Often times I see projects being put on display in nairaland for comments. We comment "hit or miss" merely because of the body work. If this is a scientific, technological or engineering work, then we can't conclude whether it's a hit or miss until we are able to find out what were the hypotheses, aims, and objectives of the work. Have they been achieved? What are the recommendations made for future work? Where is the engineering design? Or was the work designed at all? On the body work or finishing: I want to say that it is due to our backward knowledge of basic technology in secondary school. Under ideal condition, a JS 3 ceritificate holder was supposed to weld, fabricate, and polish better than an uneducated welder. Deficiency of this has led to the setback of our engineers who will come to shout, "it is not the work of engineers to do practicals" - a requirement we all were expected to meet before entering senior secondary school. Whoever knows the owner of this work should tell him that Nigerian government encourages innovations. When he is done with his schooling, let him put together his design philosophy and the objective of his work and forward it to Technology Incubation Centre, Ministry of Science and Technology, and other relevant bodies that will work on developing this prototype and scaling it up if viable. I have consulted for men who built miniature systems while in their undergraduate level but are now owning big firms with wide clientele.

Na wah ooo, fire burn the motor remain? The guy come even put tyre for the back (for him mind na SUV him make).

This is a true definition of a motor car.
The guy try