Besides, it wasn't his fault. Now the stupidity of the depositor is causing the man problems.

LadyGoddiva:
Lady justice is very curvy though

We dey discuss ten milla, see where ya eye dey focus..

But just look at those hips

thewritingtodo:


We dey discuss ten milla, see where ya eye dey focus..

seanswitch:
They will drag the case together. After everything, they will give him a payment plan that is convenient for him. Shikena. But it's unwise to use that money to settle debts. He should have just used it to do business. After all, he'll still have to pay back. It's just a 10 million Naira loan with no interest that you can pay back with no hassle.

You are funny this case is about theft. It has nothing to do with repayments or payment plan.The purpose of this case is to imprison him period.
The court can also fine him and there is no limit to that

Repayment is another matter, another case go and ask Jim Iyke whether they gave him a convenient repayment plan.

Once you get judgment 5th at he should pay next step is to get bailiffs and start selling his property .Apart from repayment he can be made to pay damages.
Your ideas are quite childish

LadyGoddiva:
Lady justice is very curvy though

Like you

seanswitch:
. But it's unwise to use that money to settle debts. He should have just used it to do business. After all, he'll still have to pay back. It's just a 10 million Naira loan with no interest that you can pay back with no hassle.

Have you ever had a debt nestling on your conscience before?
If you have, you will know that paying off that debt is certainly not unwise.
One thing for sure, this matter go drag for a long time and nothing will come out of it.

LadyGoddiva:
But just look at those hips

On a second thought...they can cause an 'eye-gasm'

10M, bail 1m + 2 surites of like sum =3M 10 - 3 =7M ladies and gentlemen we hav a winner

tollyboy5:
lolz na eim luck na eim no thief na

And sharp sharp, court don dey request for 1million naira bail

Telcorev , just forget that money, it's not coming back... Go back go jack your bankers trousers...

LadyGoddiva:
Lady justice is very curvy though

And busty

aribisala0:

You are funny this case is about theft. It has nothing to do with repayments or payment plan.The purpose of this case is to imprison him period.
The court can also fine him and there is no limit to that

Repayment is another matter, another case go and ask Jim Iyke whether they gave him a convenient repayment plan.

Once you get judgment 5th at he should pay next step is to get bailiffs and start selling his property .Apart from repayment he can be made to pay damages.
Your ideas are quite childish

Mr Arugbo... Come back when the case is settled. You think the man's defence will not sell? You don't know nothing.

MrBrownJay1:


your state of mind is the reason why so many people fail in life. you take a loan, thus you have debts, and when you have enough money to repay the lender, you'd rather take ANOTHER gamble in trying to make MORE money....what a greedy state of mind, kai?! no wonder people in Nigeria dont want to give out loans...

So how is he going to pay back now. He is still in debt. He will pay them and still have his profit and biz if he had used the money for business.

seanswitch:

So how is he going to pay back now. He is still in debt. He will pay them and still have his profit and biz if he had used the money for business.

if he's repaid the loan with the money, then he certainly has assets that hopefully has gained in value...sell these assets and take the money to start a new biz, or use the fully owned old assets as collateral to get a newloan. its called doing whats RIGHT! people like you who dont want to repay lenders when you have money to do so, are the problem in this issue. so someone was caring enough to TRUST and borrow you money, and when you have money to repay them, you would rather gamble it away?!?!?!?!? does it even makes any sense to you IF YOU WERE THE LENDER?!?!

Macgreat:
LoL

10M enter my account . . . na to use the money generate funds. Safe investment . . fixed deposit - keep the money safe.

if na me ehn, na to use 9million invest for Bitcoin sharp sharp, then use the remaining 1million process things, tear race enter ghana straight..

henrygentle:


if na me ehn, na to use 9million invest for Bitcoin sharp sharp, then use the remaining 1million process things, tear race enter ghana straight..

Na crime be that na

Macgreat:


Na crime be that na

Ok...i change my mind.

The corrupt court wants a piece of that money 1m to bail himself hmm

the transaction was done March 31st, he waited till April 4th for the confirmation. That's enough time for the bank and the sender of the money to have done the needful. Since the bank and the other party did nothing about it,the man is quite justified to carry out whatever activities he saw fit with his accounts and the money in it. With a good lawyer I'm certain he should be able to fight the case hard. Worse case, he pays a fraction of the amount and the bank suffers the loss for their lack of diligence and slow response time.

the so called company and the bank should be held for money laundering. Don't forget the man said he stopped using the account since last year. I support the man's defence, period!

This is my message to some of those stupid banks. If u mistakenly deposit money in my account and that money is not withdrawn within the next 72hrs of the error, I wud pull the money out and use it. If it's War u want then it's war u get. You idiot's wud just b setting up innocent people with of your stupid carelessness, incompetence and frail banking system. Rubbish! As far as am concerned they should let the man go. It's not his fault they made a mistake or whatever it is they were doing. Incompetent fools. Mtsew

that's how they do when they want to launder money.
once your account name and number doesn't match, the cashier tells you: your bank app shows you the name.
so, how did they erroneously pay him?
bankers and fraud.

i pray zenith bank test me too, i will walk in and collect it with teller.

Andrewgame42:
Sane tin... Gt people almost kill me because of 60k wey I bend.. Carry police dey find me upandan
Like say I theft the money ...no be them pay it inside my balance account

lmao

Supadupaman:
It's really not his money and he should have known.. It happened to me last month from Fcmb.. #250k to be precise.. I called my account officer immediately and the bank didn't touch for four consecutive days but by the fifth day the money was gone.. The bank debited me with the exact amount and also charged #48 for sms alert! So such is life..

...chai..useless people!

Hmmmmm

You guys are funny. That money wasn't stolen and has nothing fraudulent related to it. He got an alert. That's too simple to not understand. He could equally sue the company and the bank for attempt on illegal use of his account and personal bank information. The dude didn't just have a good lawyer. Taking advantage of an opportunity is different from taking an opportunity. They're two different things. He was to quick and less wise.

Bigajeff:
There is no manner falling from heavens in this era, manner has stop falling since Israelites era. So if any manner fall on U this days just be patient, if not it may land you in trouble.

manna

iAlpha:
You guys are funny. That money wasn't stolen and has nothing fraudulent related to it. He got an alert. That's too simple to not understand. He could equally sue the company and the bank for attempt on illegal use of his account and personal bank information. The dude didn't just have a good lawyer. Taking advantage of an opportunity is different from taking an opportunity. They're two different things. He was to quick and less wise.

You are the funny one ,
This matter has been settled by case law in English law where we derive our jurisprudence
In our law stealing occurs when there is an intent to permanently deny the owner their property
http://www.nigeria-law.org/Criminal%20Code%20Act-Part%20VI%20%20to%20the%20end.htm

383. (1) A person who fraudulently takes anything capable of being stolen, or fraudulently converts to his own use or to the use of any other person anything capable of being stolen, is said to steal that thing.

(2) A person who takes or converts anything capable of being stolen is deemed to do so fraudulently if he does so with any of the following intents-

(a) an intent permanently to deprive the owner of the thing of it;

(b) an intent permanently to deprive any person who has any special property in the thing of such property;

(c) an intent to use the thing as a pledge or security;

(d) an intent to part with it on a condition as to its return which the person taking or converting it may be unable to perform;

(e) an intent to deal with it in such a manner that it cannot be returned in the condition in which it was at the time of the taking or conversion;

(f) in the case of money, an intent to use it at the will of the person who takes or converts it, although he may intend afterwards to repay the amount to the owner.

The term "special property" includes any charge or lien upon the thing in question, and any right arising from or dependent upon holding possession of the thing in question, whether by the person entitled to such right or by some other person for his benefit.

(3) The taking or conversion may he fraudulent, although it is effected without secrecy or attempt at concealment.

(4) In the case of conversion, it is immaterial whether the thing converted is taken for the purpose of conversion, or whether it is at the time of the conversion in the possession of the person who converts it. It is also immaterial that the person who converts the property is the holder of a power of attorney for the disposition of it, or is otherwise authorised to dispose of the property.

(5) When a thing converted has been lost by the owner and found by the person who converts it, the conversion is not deemed to be fraudulent if at the time of the conversion the person taking or converting the thing does not know who is the owner, and believes on reasonable grounds that the owner cannot be discovered.

(6) A person shall not be deemed to take a thing unless he moves the thing or causes it to move

Sorry sir.

aribisala0:

You are the funny one ,
This matter has been settled by case law in English law where we derive our jurisprudence
In our law stealing occurs when there is an intent to permanently deny the owner their property
http://www.nigeria-law.org/Criminal%20Code%20Act-Part%20VI%20%20to%20the%20end.htm

383. (1) A person who fraudulently takes anything capable of being stolen, or fraudulently converts to his own use or to the use of any other person anything capable of being stolen, is said to steal that thing.

(2) A person who takes or converts anything capable of being stolen is deemed to do so fraudulently if he does so with any of the following intents-

(a) an intent permanently to deprive the owner of the thing of it;

(b) an intent permanently to deprive any person who has any special property in the thing of such property;

(c) an intent to use the thing as a pledge or security;

(d) an intent to part with it on a condition as to its return which the person taking or converting it may be unable to perform;

(e) an intent to deal with it in such a manner that it cannot be returned in the condition in which it was at the time of the taking or conversion;

(f) in the case of money, an intent to use it at the will of the person who takes or converts it, although he may intend afterwards to repay the amount to the owner.

The term "special property" includes any charge or lien upon the thing in question, and any right arising from or dependent upon holding possession of the thing in question, whether by the person entitled to such right or by some other person for his benefit.

(3) The taking or conversion may he fraudulent, although it is effected without secrecy or attempt at concealment.

(4) In the case of conversion, it is immaterial whether the thing converted is taken for the purpose of conversion, or whether it is at the time of the conversion in the possession of the person who converts it. It is also immaterial that the person who converts the property is the holder of a power of attorney for the disposition of it, or is otherwise authorised to dispose of the property.

(5) When a thing converted has been lost by the owner and found by the person who converts it, the conversion is not deemed to be fraudulent if at the time of the conversion the person taking or converting the thing does not know who is the owner, and believes on reasonable grounds that the owner cannot be discovered.

(6) A person shall not be deemed to take a thing unless he moves the thing or causes it to move