Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,151,089 members, 7,811,054 topics. Date: Saturday, 27 April 2024 at 09:44 PM

Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. - Culture - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Culture / Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. (3945 Views)

Ownership Crisis: Igodomigodo Asks Oba Of Benin To Return To Ile-ife / Bini Are Original Owners Of Lagos, Not Yoruba – Layi Ajayi-Bembe / Meet The 51 Kings Of Lagos (contacts) (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (Reply) (Go Down)

Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Putinofrussia: 11:29am On Dec 02, 2017
Rasheed Ojikutu.

The recent interviews granted by two prominent indigenes of Lagos, namely, Alhaji Olufemi Okunnu and Chief Layi Ajayi Bembe, to one of the main newspapers in Nigeria on the question of “Who owns Lagos?” should have been restricted to the plethora of injustices and unfairness done to the indigenous people of Lagos rather than on landlord-ship.

For avoidance of doubt, Alhaji Okunnu, an Isale Eko indigene, was the former Nigerian Commissioner for Works and the husband of Alhaja Lateefa Okunnu (Née Oyekan), a former Deputy Governor of Lagos State. He is Awori. Chief Bembe on the other hand is of the Obanikoro family whose ancestral root is undoubtedly Benin with its tinge of Awori lineage.. Readers would then understand the reason for the position of each of these men on one of the most vexed issues of our time.



Ordinarily, in such a tricky situation, one should have allowed each person to hold on to the advantages secured from the argument knowing that those who require more information and knowledge can have unhindered access to history books that would place the facts in perspective. Unfortunately, such a compendium is a luxury in our environment and therefore, people stand history on its head for personal convenience and ego boosting. Every human being is a sculptor of history and people who have advantage are those who could place their documents within the arm’s reach of the world and humanity. However, prosperity will frown upon us if we look on while facts are slaughtered or remodelled into a shape that may mislead the generations of Nigerians yet unborn.

“Who owns Lagos?.” The question is “Which Lagos?” because the ownership of Eko has never been in contention. It is very clear that none of these men was talking about Lagos State but it is also abundantly clear that there is some muddling in their presentations with respect to the clear distinction between Eko, Lagos and Lagos State. An indigene of Lagos should not be found in this shaky ground anytime the issue of our state is placed on the podium for discourse. Therefore, the starting point is to resort to spatial delineation of these territories on the map of Lagos State for the clear comprehension of the reader.



In nomenclature, non-indigenes are usually unable to know the difference between Eko, Lagos and Lagos State. For comprehension, Eko, the domain in which Oba Rilwan Aremu Akiolu is the traditional head belongs to Aromire. It is the space from Obalende to Idumota (that is Lagos Island). This is different from Lagos which starts from Victoria Island, Lagos Island (Eko), Lagos Mainland up to Jibowu, Apapa, Surulere up to Akangba. This was the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria. Lagos State, on the other hand, consists of the entire Lagos and its colonies of Badagry, Epe, Ikeja and Ikorodu. From the interviews, it seems the concentration of Alhaji Okunnu and Chief Bembe are on Lagos Island, that is, Eko, to the exclusion of other parts of Lagos State.


There is hardly anyone who is conversant with the history of Lagos Island that would feign ignorance on the fact that Lagos Island belongs to Aromire, who is one of the children of Olofin Ogunfunminire, the progenitor of the Awori nation. The Yoruba say, “Bi omode k oba Itan, yiobaaroba. Aroba de ni baba Itan”, therefore, anyone trying to reconstruct history must also bear in mind that beyond the textbooks are the oral history handed over to us by our forefathers. In the regard, one may want to listen to the musical records of Salami Balogun of Gbara Village, that is, Lefty. He says,

“Aromire loniile Eko o -2ce

A be’jaro mi re 2ce

Awonni baba awa o

Aromire lo niile Eko o.



Attempts in contemporary times to reconstruct the history of the Yoruba and the Benin Empires have led to a series of distortions most of which contradict empirical evidences that lay bare in front of our generation. The only point of agreement in the hot debates over the years is that the two nations have the same root but whether the fruit was planted in Benin or Ife has been contentious. Irrespective of the position taken, there are some facts that are sacrosanct and should be linearly preserved. It is obvious and clear that one major reason for conquering people is to take their land and properties. If truly the Bini conquered Eko, how come there is no land in the entire Eko that belongs to the Bini? This issue was settled in 1920 when Chief Amodu Tijani, the Oluwa of Lagos, took the British colonialists to the Privy Council in London. Hence, today, there is no contest on who the landlord is on the land in Lagos (not Lagos State). The legitimate ownership of Lagos Land is vested in the Idejo who are the offspring of Olofin Ogunfunminire and not the Bini. Anyone who cares, can read the landmark judgement delivered at the Privy Council in London in 1921.

History revealed that Olofin Ogunfunminire, the progenitor of the Awori and the father of the Idejo, came from Ile Ife to settle in Isheri Olofin (a small town along the Lagos Ibadan Expressway) with his two wives, Akesan and Ajayi. While Akesan was procreating, Ajayi was barren. On consultation, Ifa advised Olofin to move with Ajayi to the edge of a river. The couple consequently settled in Oto (at the back of the Ido Railway Terminus)

One day, the Bini invaded Oto and took Olofin to Benin. On arrival in the palace in Bini, it was discovered that Olofin was a Prince of Ife and was consequently released to come back to Lagos with a retinue of Bini Chiefs which included Obanikoro (Chief Ajayi Bembe’s Lineage); Bajulaiye, Ashogbon and others as clearly outlined in Alhaji Okunnu’s interview.

History had it that the guests of Olofinwere, on arrival, settled on the pepper farm of the Aromire . Hence, the name “Idungaran”

While one may not want to get too entrenched in the controversy of the explosive discourse, it won’t be out of place to also mention that the word “Idu” may not necessarily be of Benin origin because apart from shared vocabulary between the Yoruba and the Bini, the settlement or any place in which a Yoruba community settles is called “Iduro, Idu or Ido” depending on the tongue.

To conclude that Awori are of Bini origin is far too incorrect to be ignored because the Awori are in umbilicus and plasma of the Yoruba lineage and therefore migrated from Ile Ife. I have addressed some of this issues in the book titled, “The Ojikutu family of Lagos”. The painstaking and comprehensive research traced the movement of the first Prince Obayomi from Isheri Olofin in 1790 to Lagos Island and how the great grandchild of Obayomi, namely, Amodu Rufai Ibikunle, acquired the appellate Ojikutu

Because of his entrepreneurial acumen, wealth and influence.

There is of course no variation in our positions on the annihilation and suppression of the right of the indigenous people of Lagos State. The sad part of it is that governments upon governments in Lagos State with the connivance of some indigenes and pseudo indigenes have employed the style of cracking the walls of the homes of the indigenes rather than fence-mending the obvious disaffection that is created every day. In this regard, I do not see the difference in the style of the governors towards the rights of the indigenes in the state, irrespective of whether the administrator is the “Son of the soil’ or not. The attitude is the same. The most disappointing of all of them was Babatunde Raji Fashola, a young man who by virtue of his intellectual endowment should have done better but whose love for his people was beclouded by pecuniary considerations. I still hold him in high regard in view of his contributions to the development of Lagos but I do not think many of us will forgive him for failing us in view of our high aspiration.

Prof Ojikutu wrote in from University of Lagos, Akoka.


http://punchng.com/ownership-of-lagos-between-distortion-and-obvious-facts/

5 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by MasterKim: 11:32am On Dec 02, 2017
grin grin grin
Laughing in advance
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by MrDude: 11:34am On Dec 02, 2017
Why all this noise? After carrying out extensive private research of my own, I've come to the conclusion that the Yorubas should just accept reality as it is - Yorubas are the land grabbers here! angry

4 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by MasterKim: 11:35am On Dec 02, 2017
Make I hear d correct history from my eastern brodas. This one is fake grin
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Ritchiee: 11:36am On Dec 02, 2017
Putinofrussia:
Rasheed Ojikutu.

The recent interviews granted by two prominent indigenes of Lagos, namely, Alhaji Olufemi Okunnu and Chief Layi Ajayi Bembe, to one of the main newspapers in Nigeria on the question of “Who owns Lagos?” should have been restricted to the plethora of injustices and unfairness done to the indigenous people of Lagos rather than on landlord-ship.

For avoidance of doubt, Alhaji Okunnu, an Isale Eko indigene, was the former Nigerian Commissioner for Works and the husband of Alhaja Lateefa Okunnu (Née Oyekan), a former Deputy Governor of Lagos State. He is Awori. Chief Bembe on the other hand is of the Obanikoro family whose ancestral root is undoubtedly Benin with its tinge of Awori lineage.. Readers would then understand the reason for the position of each of these men on one of the most vexed issues of our time.



Ordinarily, in such a tricky situation, one should have allowed each person to hold on to the advantages secured from the argument knowing that those who require more information and knowledge can have unhindered access to history books that would place the facts in perspective. Unfortunately, such a compendium is a luxury in our environment and therefore, people stand history on its head for personal convenience and ego boosting. Every human being is a sculptor of history and people who have advantage are those who could place their documents within the arm’s reach of the world and humanity. However, prosperity will frown upon us if we look on while facts are slaughtered or remodelled into a shape that may mislead the generations of Nigerians yet unborn.

“Who owns Lagos?.” The question is “Which Lagos?” because the ownership of Eko has never been in contention. It is very clear that none of these men was talking about Lagos State but it is also abundantly clear that there is some muddling in their presentations with respect to the clear distinction between Eko, Lagos and Lagos State. An indigene of Lagos should not be found in this shaky ground anytime the issue of our state is placed on the podium for discourse. Therefore, the starting point is to resort to spatial delineation of these territories on the map of Lagos State for the clear comprehension of the reader.



In nomenclature, non-indigenes are usually unable to know the difference between Eko, Lagos and Lagos State. For comprehension, Eko, the domain in which Oba Rilwan Aremu Akiolu is the traditional head belongs to Aromire. It is the space from Obalende to Idumota (that is Lagos Island). This is different from Lagos which starts from Victoria Island, Lagos Island (Eko), Lagos Mainland up to Jibowu, Apapa, Surulere up to Akangba. This was the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria. Lagos State, on the other hand, consists of the entire Lagos and its colonies of Badagry, Epe, Ikeja and Ikorodu. From the interviews, it seems the concentration of Alhaji Okunnu and Chief Bembe are on Lagos Island, that is, Eko, to the exclusion of other parts of Lagos State.


There is hardly anyone who is conversant with the history of Lagos Island that would feign ignorance on the fact that Lagos Island belongs to Aromire, who is one of the children of Olofin Ogunfunminire, the progenitor of the Awori nation. The Yoruba say, “Bi omode k oba Itan, yiobaaroba. Aroba de ni baba Itan”, therefore, anyone trying to reconstruct history must also bear in mind that beyond the textbooks are the oral history handed over to us by our forefathers. In the regard, one may want to listen to the musical records of Salami Balogun of Gbara Village, that is, Lefty. He says,

“Aromire loniile Eko o -2ce

A be’jaro mi re 2ce

Awonni baba awa o

Aromire lo niile Eko o.



Attempts in contemporary times to reconstruct the history of the Yoruba and the Benin Empires have led to a series of distortions most of which contradict empirical evidences that lay bare in front of our generation. The only point of agreement in the hot debates over the years is that the two nations have the same root but whether the fruit was planted in Benin or Ife has been contentious. Irrespective of the position taken, there are some facts that are sacrosanct and should be linearly preserved. It is obvious and clear that one major reason for conquering people is to take their land and properties. If truly the Bini conquered Eko, how come there is no land in the entire Eko that belongs to the Bini? This issue was settled in 1920 when Chief Amodu Tijani, the Oluwa of Lagos, took the British colonialists to the Privy Council in London. Hence, today, there is no contest on who the landlord is on the land in Lagos (not Lagos State). The legitimate ownership of Lagos Land is vested in the Idejo who are the offspring of Olofin Ogunfunminire and not the Bini. Anyone who cares, can read the landmark judgement delivered at the Privy Council in London in 1921.

History revealed that Olofin Ogunfunminire, the progenitor of the Awori and the father of the Idejo, came from Ile Ife to settle in Isheri Olofin (a small town along the Lagos Ibadan Expressway) with his two wives, Akesan and Ajayi. While Akesan was procreating, Ajayi was barren. On consultation, Ifa advised Olofin to move with Ajayi to the edge of a river. The couple consequently settled in Oto (at the back of the Ido Railway Terminus)

One day, the Bini invaded Oto and took Olofin to Benin. On arrival in the palace in Bini, it was discovered that Olofin was a Prince of Ife and was consequently released to come back to Lagos with a retinue of Bini Chiefs which included Obanikoro (Chief Ajayi Bembe’s Lineage); Bajulaiye, Ashogbon and others as clearly outlined in Alhaji Okunnu’s interview.

History had it that the guests of Olofinwere, on arrival, settled on the pepper farm of the Aromire . Hence, the name “Idungaran”

While one may not want to get too entrenched in the controversy of the explosive discourse, it won’t be out of place to also mention that the word “Idu” may not necessarily be of Benin origin because apart from shared vocabulary between the Yoruba and the Bini, the settlement or any place in which a Yoruba community settles is called “Iduro, Idu or Ido” depending on the tongue.

To conclude that Awori are of Bini origin is far too incorrect to be ignored because the Awori are in umbilicus and plasma of the Yoruba lineage and therefore migrated from Ile Ife. I have addressed some of this issues in the book titled, “The Ojikutu family of Lagos”. The painstaking and comprehensive research traced the movement of the first Prince Obayomi from Isheri Olofin in 1790 to Lagos Island and how the great grandchild of Obayomi, namely, Amodu Rufai Ibikunle, acquired the appellate Ojikutu

Because of his entrepreneurial acumen, wealth and influence.

There is of course no variation in our positions on the annihilation and suppression of the right of the indigenous people of Lagos State. The sad part of it is that governments upon governments in Lagos State with the connivance of some indigenes and pseudo indigenes have employed the style of cracking the walls of the homes of the indigenes rather than fence-mending the obvious disaffection that is created every day. In this regard, I do not see the difference in the style of the governors towards the rights of the indigenes in the state, irrespective of whether the administrator is the “Son of the soil’ or not. The attitude is the same. The most disappointing of all of them was Babatunde Raji Fashola, a young man who by virtue of his intellectual endowment should have done better but whose love for his people was beclouded by pecuniary considerations. I still hold him in high regard in view of his contributions to the development of Lagos but I do not think many of us will forgive him for failing us in view of our high aspiration.

Prof Ojikutu wrote in from University of Lagos, Akoka.


http://punchng.com/ownership-of-lagos-between-distortion-and-obvious-facts/

We know ourselves. cheesy

1 Like

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by bakynes(m): 11:40am On Dec 02, 2017
We have explained the same thing to Igbos who love to claim Lagos State is no man's land or Benin Land.

I guess they know the truth but they just wouldn't accept it, so Yoruba's won't feel good about themselves.

10 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Nobody: 11:47am On Dec 02, 2017
The guys from across the Niger call Lagos a no man’s land. We should just continue ignoring them till they make a mistake.

3 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by rozay12345: 11:55am On Dec 02, 2017
I keep wondering why the ownership of Lagos keeps generating unnecessary headlines. This only demonstrates our myopism if trivial issues like this disturbs us. More successful cities such as New York, London, Hong Kong and many more do not have this gory headlines. Nigerians need to look beyond ethnicity in everything they do In the religious and scientific clime, no human should lay claim of ownership to anywhere in the world, the two major religions accepted our origin as Eden, nobody can trace Eden today. In science, man originated from the rift valley and from there disperse across the world. Even red indians crossed an ice bridge from Siberia to the Americas during the ice age. What should bother us more is how we can make our society a much better place for all and sundry.

2 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Nobody: 11:57am On Dec 02, 2017
rozay12345:
I keep wondering why the ownership of Lagos keeps generating unnecessary headlines. This only demonstrates our myopism if trivial issues like this disturbs us. More successful cities such as New York, London, Hong Kong and many more do not have this gory headlines. Nigerians need to look beyond ethnicity in everything they do In the religious and scientific clime, no human should lay claim of ownership to anywhere in the world, the two major religions accepted our origin as Eden, nobody can trace Eden today. In science, man originated from the rift valley and from there disperse across the world. Even red indians crossed an ice bridge from Siberia to the Americas during the ice age. What should bother us more is how we can make our society a much better place for all and sundry.

All these noise started because of the no man’s land tag by our eastern brothers.

4 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Uglyojuku: 11:59am On Dec 02, 2017
Slummers from the east hiss will not like this. grin
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by internationalman(m): 12:08pm On Dec 02, 2017
Lagos can't b no man's land when it is bordered by Yoruba states. Some yorubas are even of Lagos origin.

I will believe Lagos is no man's land until I see any person of any other tribes whose origin is Lagos, or hails from Lagos state.

Though I'm an Edo person, even if Igbos claim Lagos is ours, with which population would fill Lagos with.........Just kidding though.

4 Likes 1 Share

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by chibuzorAbia: 12:09pm On Dec 02, 2017
MasterKim:
Make I hear d correct history from my eastern brodas. This one is fake grin

Abi o!. I dey wait for iyanmirin version, bastard yeebos

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by BUHARImyDOG: 12:21pm On Dec 02, 2017
chibuzorAbia:

Abi o!. I dey wait for iyanmirin version, bastard afonja


e pain you
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by MasterKim: 12:25pm On Dec 02, 2017
Alcatraz005:
The guys from across the Niger call Lagos a no man’s land. We should just continue ignoring them till they make a mistake.
Simple as ABC. Derez no point arguing wit dem. Let dem say watever dat suits dem..., it doesn't change any fact.
Replying dem shows fear!
Now if u want to hear anytin from a Yoruba man, just tell him Lagos is a no man's land jokingly and he flares up quoting the whole history in dz world.

Just ignore dem and let dem say wateva..., fact still remain dat it's ours!
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Nobody: 12:27pm On Dec 02, 2017
MasterKim:

Simple as ABC. Derez no point arguing wit dem. Let dem say watever dat suits dem..., it doesn't change any fact.
Replying dem shows fear!
Now if u want to hear anytin from a Yoruba man, just tell him Lagos is a no man's land jokingly and he flares up quoting the whole history in dz world.

Just ignore dem and let dem say wateva..., fact still remain dat it's ours!

Nice one.
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by AxxeMan: 12:33pm On Dec 02, 2017
internationalman:
Lagos can't b no man's land when it is bordered by Yoruba states. Some yorubas are even of Lagos origin.

I will believe Lagos is no man's land until I see any person of any other tribes whose origin is Lagos, or hails from Lagos state.

Though I'm an Edo person, even if Igbos claim Lagos is ours, with which population would fill Lagos with.........Just kidding though.

Shut up there you imposter , you are not Edo

2 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by AxxeMan: 12:34pm On Dec 02, 2017
internationalman:
Lagos can't b no man's land when it is bordered by Yoruba states. Some yorubas are even of Lagos origin.

I will believe Lagos is no man's land until I see any person of any other tribes whose origin is Lagos, or hails from Lagos state.

Though I'm an Edo person, even if Igbos claim Lagos is ours, with which population would fill Lagos with.........Just kidding though.


Shut up there you imposter , you are not Edo you are Yoruba be proud of your Ewedu

1 Like

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by internationalman(m): 12:34pm On Dec 02, 2017
AxxeMan:


Shut up there you imposter , you are not Edo
You want proof?

1 Like

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by AxxeMan: 12:35pm On Dec 02, 2017
Lagos is Edo territory and will always be part and parcel of the Edo commonwealth

2 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Ballmer: 12:53pm On Dec 02, 2017
rozay12345:
I keep wondering why the ownership of Lagos keeps generating unnecessary headlines. This only demonstrates our myopism if trivial issues like this disturbs us. More successful cities such as New York, London, Hong Kong and many more do not have this gory headlines. Nigerians need to look beyond ethnicity in everything they do In the religious and scientific clime, no human should lay claim of ownership to anywhere in the world, the two major religions accepted our origin as Eden, nobody can trace Eden today. In science, man originated from the rift valley and from there disperse across the world. Even red indians crossed an ice bridge from Siberia to the Americas during the ice age. What should bother us more is how we can make our society a much better place for all and sundry.

It is trivial that was what they tot in Rwanda until shii hit the fence n we know the rest. We are just patiently waiting for shii to hit the fence.
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by internationalman(m): 1:07pm On Dec 02, 2017
AxxeMan:

You are an Imposter .... Fvvck your proof
Then you are a fool for deciding my tribe for me

3 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by CrtlAltDel: 1:47pm On Dec 02, 2017
MasterKim:
Make I hear d correct history from my eastern brodas. This one is fake grin
Gbam…. Spread mat, waiting for our SE historians grin grin
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by CrtlAltDel: 1:49pm On Dec 02, 2017
AxxeMan:


You are an Imposter .... Fvvck your proof
They will even decide your sex, age, nationality and tribe…. They are gods grin grin

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by SHAKABOOM: 2:18pm On Dec 02, 2017
Why is it yorubas enjoy twisting history to dia advantage.
We all know lagos is divided into 2..We have the mainland ad the iland angry and both of them are under the control of Obi of lagos sorry oba of lagos..Oba akiolu a descendant of the binis the ruler of no mans land angry

3 Likes

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Nobody: 2:23pm On Dec 02, 2017
Lagos thread again grin grin grin

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Guestlander: 2:27pm On Dec 02, 2017
imhotep:
Lagos thread again grin grin grin

The apple in the eyes of ipob lunatics.
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by unohbethel(m): 2:34pm On Dec 02, 2017
Ritchiee:


We know ourselves. cheesy
must u quote the all long article just to make this lil comment?? ok i now understand...u escaped from yaba left.
Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Nobody: 2:40pm On Dec 02, 2017
I can see clearly that the tag of no man's land on Lagos is a sentimental subject for my Yoruba brothers. But I don't know why one should struggle over what is one's own. If Nigerians can't bide at independent ease at Lagos, where then is the basis for one Nigeria. Why make a jest of IPOB over the Biafra campaign.

1 Like

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by ZorGBUooeh: 2:41pm On Dec 02, 2017
Hahahahaha! Sheybi na jazz man olofin ad ogunmire abi na aromire get lagos baa?Ngwa make dem descendant go sit down for oba throne na make im flog dem better OGUME cheesy

Eko na bini war camp from were binis launch attacks on dem yoruba slaves.

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by Nobody: 2:44pm On Dec 02, 2017
Guestlander:


The apple in the eyes of ipob lunatics.
IPOB is innocent.
Respect Oba Akiolu

Re: Ownership Of Lagos: Between Distortion And Obvious Facts. by MayorofLagos(m): 3:15pm On Dec 02, 2017
The more the contention over Lagos, its identity, its origin, its ownership, tha more it awakens consciousness in the indigenes and promote a conservative stance to exclude non-entities and competitors in the affairs of their state.

The reference to Fashola has to do with his appointment of Ibos into his cabinet and the lackadisical attitude that led to Ibos winning legislative spots in Lagos under his watch. We see Ambode has reversed the practice and exluded non-Yorubas from the cabinet. 2019, all legislative positions are going to be returned to the House of Oduduwa.

2 Likes 1 Share

(1) (2) (3) (Reply)

The Vanishing ‘owambe’ Culture / Sounds And Songs I Have Enjoyed All Over The Sahel Of West Africa / Seun Osewa Did You See This?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 68
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.