hopefulLandlord:
This is well thought post and I hope it invites good discussions regardless of subsequent poster's leanings

I however have to disagree with point 2; let me start by saying I do get the message that point is trying to drive home but I feel it ignored several important bits about human psychology and physiology
If women (I'll talk from the perspective of men) usually leave everywhere but their feet uncovered, only a few men would be aroused by naked female feet, I think I speak for most men when I say that unless uncovering one's feet signal sexual interest to whom she's showing the feet to we wouldn't be aroused, another way it could trigger arousal is if the vagyna and/or boobs are located in the female legs

hopefulLandlord:
This is well thought post and I hope it invites good discussions regardless of subsequent poster's leanings

I however have to disagree with point 2; let me start by saying I do get the message that point is trying to drive home but I feel it ignored several important bits about human psychology and physiology
If women (I'll talk from the perspective of men) usually leave everywhere but their feet uncovered, only a few men would be aroused by naked female feet, I think I speak for most men when I say that unless uncovering one's feet signal sexual interest to whom she's showing the feet to we wouldn't be aroused, another way it could trigger arousal is if the vagyna and/or boobs are located in the female legs

MuttleyLaff:
So it's only vagyna and/or boobs that are the only parts of the female body that arouses

Emmanystone:
Why won't the menfolk get na.ked too? Why only the femalefolk? Is there nothing in a man to arouse a woman?

Emmanystone:
Why won't the menfolk get na.ked too? Why only the femalefolk? Is there nothing in a man to arouse a woman?

Gggg102:


womenfolk are more affected by nudity and decency principles.

picture the reaction to a topless male vs that of a topless female

hopefulLandlord:

it goes both ways, I think OP talked more from the male perspective as he's male and the fact that female sexuality is more frowned upon and scrutinised compared to male one

MuttleyLaff:
So it's only vagyna and/or boobs that are the only parts of the female body that arouses

hopefulLandlord:
Not necessarily but they tend to arouse more men in terms of numbers more than any part of the body does;
of course there are those that are aroused by intelligence, pretty face, height, smell, skin colour, voice, general figure or several other combinations but I believe those men are fewer than those aroused by naked boobs and vagyna; I stand to be corrected though

MuttleyLaff:

I dont know which planet you are on How dare you leave ukwu out in your generous list

MuttleyLaff:


I dont know which planet you are on
How dare you leave ukwu out in your generous list

hopefulLandlord:

lmao! forgive me sir, even I couldn't believe it missed it

Emmanystone:

Lolzzzzz. I think God put Ukwu there just for you guys, becos, what is it's purpose anyways?

hopefulLandlord:


I've met several women who say they find male ukwu sexually attractive and arousing, I've even discussed at length with one who actually claims men with big ukwu have better "thrusting power" than men with smaller ukwu

Daeylar:
Nothing is wrong with nudity.


1st point: pre colonial Africa; many tribes lived with minimal coverings and no one felt any shame nor were they aroused. even today there are some isolated tribes in some part of Africa where the females don't cover their breasts. the males there don't feel ashamed or aroused. the breasts are seen as ordinary body parts like the arms. they react the same way we react when we are looking at someone's head or hand. no perverted thoughts. this is because their society does not teach them to be ashamed of boobs.
also, take a look at poor neighborhood you see little children playing together. many of them would be unclad or be wearing minimal clothing and no one cares. that's because they've not been taught by society to be ashamed of their unclothedness. if nobody tells them anything about decency, they would grow up seeing "private parts" and it would be completely normal.

Op point one is perfection.

Daeylar:
Nothing is wrong with nudity.


1st point: pre colonial Africa; many tribes lived with minimal coverings and no one felt any shame nor were they aroused. even today there are some isolated tribes in some part of Africa where the females don't cover their breasts. the males there don't feel ashamed or aroused. the breasts are seen as ordinary body parts like the arms. they react the same way we react when we are looking at someone's head or hand. no perverted thoughts. this is because their society does not teach them to be ashamed of boobs.
also, take a look at poor neighborhood you see little children playing together. many of them would be unclad or be wearing minimal clothing and no one cares. that's because they've not been taught by society to be ashamed of their unclothedness. if nobody tells them anything about decency, they would grow up seeing "private parts" and it would be completely normal.

Op point one is perfection.

danvon:
@ Op How do you know they were not aroused? Sex is ingrained in their culture E.g sexual dances like twerking, rocking, one corner, usually have African origin so there's a high probability they would have sex with as many girls as possible

In places like America, where girls dressing provocatively is a way of life, men still get aroused even though it shouldn't be so


By the way what's the point of arguing let girls start dressing nude we'll see if your point is right

Gggg102:




-they get aroused but to a lesser extent than those who are used to more covered up dressing.
a person who sees girls wear miniskirt everyday, he gets used to it and it becomes normal and a person who is used to seeing girls in ankle length skirts, feels seeing the legs are arousing. if both are shown a girl in a short skirt, their reactions would be different.

danvon:
Is there an instrument by which you measure arousal? America still remains the highest country in rape which by your logic shouldn't be so, the men should ave gotten used to the mini skirts

inkaboutit4u:


USA has NO sexual freedom. Nudity and Sexual freedom is outlawed. That is the problem.

If everyone walked around nude all the time there would be less rape.
If Church promote masturbation there would be less rape.
The church is anti-nudity and anti-sex they cause most of the problem.
They should promote women to have lot more sex.
They outlaw prostitution . So where can a person legally go to get sexual enjoyment.

When ever Israel ruled over the people they alway had prostitution.

In Bible day they had lot of nude sports.

Church Baptist people in the nude.

http://inkaboutit4u.com/?p=Porn_Not_for_Rapists

http://inkaboutit4u.com/?p=_Family_Nudism_and_Our_Nudist_Lifestyle_purenudism_com

http://inkaboutit4u.com/?p=Naturism_Christianity_Supports_Naturism

http://inkaboutit4u.com/?p=Nudity_Is_Natural_Wholesome_LibChrist

Why won't the menfolk get na.ked too? Why only the femalefolk? Is there nothing in a man to arouse a woman?