Rockstar has been one of the most creative AAA video game companies right now. Maintaining the spot with their new installment, sequel to Red Dead Redemption.
However, with every game they release, they tend to up the bars of creativity and uniqueness. At least until after GTA: San Andreas, which was arguably the[b] last[/b] GTA with more variety than every other GTA created. GTA IV was arguably a game that would have been better before GTA: SA. GTA V was a heavy upgrade to the franchise in terms of details and graphics but, still behind SA in variety of play and fun.
I haven't played RDR 2 but, I've seen game plays and it looks like a fair upgrade, at least to its predecessor. And also looks like a seriously thought card from what might not be an impressive deck left.

The question now is, what can we expect from Rockstar in GTA VI? Is there anything new that could be added to make the game less of a reboot? Should they produce a GTA VI at all?

Note: all these are not facts, they are my opinions on the company. You are free to disagree and discuss what you think.

See my nigga on the air. Why am I not seeing trevor there

Lemme finish this pepper soup. Will update later

I'm sure this same question was asked by someone when GTA V was released and Rockstar answered with Red Dead Redemption 2.

Only Rockstar can beat Rockstar.

Qlick:
I'm sure this same question was asked by someone when GTA V was released and Rockstar answered with Red Dead Redemption 2.

Only Rockstar can beat Rockstar.

What's the difference between RDR and RDR 2?