Maynman:
The "late" is just below 10th century, they said it, it's missing in Greek manuscript.

That is the argument of the modern translations that rejected 1 John 5:7

How is this hard to understand?

What does umlaunt mean, why was it put there?

Can you imagine! So you don't know yet jump in to Strat saying rubbish.

Codex vaticanus is 4th century 😂😂

And the Umluat is a DOT found in between 1 John 5:7-8 on the same Codex Vatican's.

Which that text must have been removed.

Oma se oooo

Emusan:


That is the argument of the modern translations that rejected 1 John 5:7

How is this hard to understand?



Can you imagine! So you don't know yet jump in to Strat saying rubbish.



And the Umluat is a DOT found in between 1 John 5:7-8 on the same Codex Vatican's.

Which that text must have been removed.

Oma se oooo

No illiterate, it's modern standards that are calling it "late", the oldest place where it was seen was in 4th century.

Codex is not a manuscript, it's a collection of manuscripts, codex vaticanus is 4th century, that's the oldest you can see it, it didn't exist before 4th century
Umlaut is not a DOT, illiterate.

Indoctrination is ugly

Maynman:

No illiterate, it's modern scholars that are calling it "late",

Then who says they are not the one?

the latest place where it was seen was in 4th century.

You're too dull.

Codex is not a manuscript, it's a collection of books, codex vaticanus is 4th century, that's the oldest you can see it, it didn't exist before 4th century
Umlaujt is not a DOT, illiterate.

Your illiteracy sha...

Indoctrination is ugly

Illiteracy is bad.

Emusan:


Then who says they are not the one?



You're too dull.



Your illiteracy sha...



Illiteracy is bad.

They are not late, they are "late" according to modern standards, they also told you that the late manuscript does not contain the comma.

You are the Dullard.

Trinity was birted in Rome, with the aid of constantine it became universal!

Indoctrination is worse

Maynman:
They are not late, they are "late" according to modern scholars, they also told you that the late manuscript does not contain the comma.

Do you even understand yourself here?

You are the Dullard.

Says the person who says Codex Vaticanus isn't a manuscript

Trinity was birted in Rome, with the aid of constantine it became universal!

That's your cup of tea

Indoctrination is worse

Illiteracy is bad.

Emusan:


Do you even understand yourself here?



Says the person who says Codex Vaticanus isn't a manuscript



That's your cup of tea



Illiteracy is bad.

Illiterate, we have manuscripts/papyrus, then they complied this many manuscripts into one book called a codex.


It's only "late" according to modern standard, they went ahead to tell you only 12 was below 10 century.

Says the illiterate that says umlaut is a "DOT"

Maydman please educate omusan well. Especially on how trinity dogma came to be

Funny thing is how an illiterate person will be priding in his ignorance.

Maynman:

Illiterate, we have manuscripts/papyrus, then they complied this many manuscripts into one book called a codex.

Codex Vaticanus is a manuscript, stop disgracing yourself on a public forum.

Papyrus is the materials used for the manuscripts just like our modern day paper.

Can you see your life outside?

It's only "late" according to modern standard, they went ahead to tell you only 12 was below 10 century.

And your point is?

Says the illiterate that says umlaut is a "DOT"

When I said you should stop disgracing yourself on a public forum, I have my reason.

The same link you failed to read said the below screenshot.

You see the reason why you shouldn't be taken serious.

O ma se oooo

Emusan:
Funny thing is how an illiterate person will be priding in his ignorance.



Codex Vaticanus is a manuscript, stop disgracing yourself on a public forum.

Papyrus is the materials used for the manuscripts just like our modern day paper.

Can you see your life outside?



And your point is?



When I said you should stop disgracing yourself on a public forum, I have my reason.

The same link you failed to read said the below screenshot.

You see the reason why you shouldn't be taken serious.

O ma se oooo

Illiterate, a CODEX is not a manuscript.
The dot is a symbol for umlaunt, umlaunt is not a DOT. READ NA

Maynman:

Illiterate, a CODEX is not a manuscript.

A codex is a book put together and you read it that, manuscripts comprises a book put together.

Olodo oshi

Read and stop disgracing yourself.

Ndi papyrus is a manuscript and Umluat is not a dot

Too dull yet be forming all-knowing

Emusan:


A codex is book put together and you read it that, manuscripts comprises a book put together.

Olodo oshi

Read and stop disgracing yourself.

Ndi papyrus is a manuscript and Umluat is not a dot

Too dull yet be forming all-knowing

A manuscript is not a book. A CODEX IS A BOOK.

Umlaunt is not a DOT, READ WHAT YOU POSTED.

Maynman:

A manuscript is not a book. A CODEX IS A BOOK.

Umlaunt is not a DOT, READ WHAT YOU POSTED.

It's evident you don't know what you're saying.

Emusan:


It's evident you don't know what you're saying.

Please look up the definition of "umlaunt", the symbol representing a umlaunt is a dot, umlaunt is not a dot.

And a manuscript is not a book, CODEX is a book. They called it CODEX vaticanus.

Maynman:

Please look up the definition of "umlaunt", the symbol representing a u]umlaunt is a dot,[/u] umlaunt is not a dot.

You said it yourself

And a manuscript is not a book, CODEX is a book. They called it CODEX vaticanus.

Here you have it again.

You are desperate, you went to a Wikipedia page specifically dedicated to BIBLICAL manuscripts, look at the definition they gave you.
Instead of you to look at the definition of manuscript and codex Ina dictionary and compare it.

Emusan:


You said it yourself



Here you have it again.

It's called codex vaticanus LITERALLY. We hsve thousands of manuscripts, we only havd few codexes.
Look up CODEX.

Umlaut is not a Dot, don't go and disgrace yourself outside.

Emusan:
Funny ia
Papyrus is the materialsused for the manuscripts just like our modern day paper.
oo

I don't blame you, you just learning this.
Which material is papyrus 137

Maynman:
You are desperate, you went to a Wikipedia page specifically dedicated to BIBLICAL manuscripts, look at the definition they gave you.
Instead of you to look at the definition of manuscript and codex Ina dictionary and compare it.

See this one

So codex Vaticanus is a science book

It's called codex vaticanus LITERALLY. We hsve thousands of manuscripts, we only havd few codexes.
Look up CODEX.

You have your answer there

Umlaut is not a Dot, don't go and disgrace yourself outside.

Look at your point above

Maynman:

I don't blame you, you just learning this.
Which material is papyrus 137

I ma se oooo
Very pathetic

Emusan:


See this one

So codex Vaticanus is a science book



You have your answer there



Look at your point above

Do you even know what "biblical' means lol.

Emusan:


I ma se oooo
Very pathetic

Which material is papyrus 137?

Maynman:

Do you even know what "biblical' means lol.

I said you should stop disgracing yourself. For the last time.

This is another dictionary meaning of manuscripts.

Stop disgracing yourself.

Maynman:

Which material is papyrus 137?

Yet you'll open your dirty mouth to say nonsense.

Emusan:


I said you should stop disgracing yourself. For the last time.

This is another dictionary meaning of manuscripts.

Stop disgracing yourself.

It's called Codex vaticanus.

You are the one disgracing yourself.

Emusan:


Yet you'll open your dirty mouth to say nonsense.

What material is papyrus 137?

Maynman:

What material is papyrus 137?

You're too dull.

Papyrus is the materials used just like our modern day paper.

So if you find a sheet of paper on ground and you give it a name SHEET 100

Manuscripts is the writing done with HAND on papyrus.

Maynman:

It's called Codex vaticanus.

You are the one disgracing yourself.

So is Manuscripts not A BOOK according to Dictionary?

Dull.

Emusan:


So is Manuscripts not A BOOK according to Dictionary?

Dull.

Illiterate, Codex is a collection of manuscript.

Dummy

Emusan:


You're too dull.

Papyrus is the materials used just like our modern day paper.

So if you find a sheet of paper on ground and you give it a name SHEET 100

Manuscripts is the writing done with HAND on papyrus.

Illiterate, it depends on the context you are using it.
When you are reading history and they say papyrus they don't mean materials.
And if I'm carrying a brief case with papers in it, won't your sense tell you those papers contain something

Maynman:

Illiterate, Codex is a collection of manuscript.

Dummy

So what will you called it?

Dullyy

Maynman:

Illiterate, it depends on the context you are using it.
When you are reading history and they say papyrus they don't mean materials.
And if I'm carrying a brief case with papers in it, won't your sense tell you those papers contain something

Olodo we're talking about BIBLE here.

I've provided every fact here you're the one jumping up and down like kangaroo.

You first claimed I used Wikipedia, after I have provided you with Dictionary meaning, yet your dull brain is still ranting.

Emusan:


So what will you called it?

Dullyy

It's called a CODEX.
we have few Codex but thousands of manuscript.

Dullard

Emusan:


Olodo we're talking about BIBLE here.

I've provided every fact here you're the one jumping up and down like kangaroo.

You first claimed I used Wikipedia, after I have provided you with Dictionary meaning, yet your dull brain is still ranting.

Bible means books/collection of books. You mean Christian Bible lol
Codex vaticanus is a Codex not a manuscript.
It's called CODEX VATICANUS, I didn't name it