This my GOD has uncountable names that we all{ought to}call him but the one I love calling him the most is the
'ANCIENT OF DAYS'. what about you/

When I start, I doubt i'll stop!
I call Him 'the one who is, who was and is to come'

hmmmmm his names r jst 2much

The rock of ages

The I am, that I am!

if we start , we go tire ooooooooooo

god has names

sauer:

god has names 

wat do u mean??

@Effiko; « on: Yesterday at 07:21:19 PM »
[Quote]This my GOD has uncountable names that we all{ought to}call him but the one I love calling him the most is the
'ANCIENT OF DAYS'. what about you/ Smiley Smiley Smiley[/Quote]

What is 'ancient of days' and does that fit the description or the nature of God?

Please each one and marry them together before it can never be accepted as a serious opinion.



@Odunnu (f); « #1 on: Yesterday at 07:28:19 PM »

[Quote]When I start, I doubt i'll stop!
I call Him 'the one who is, who was and is to come'[/Quote]

Can who is be who is to come, because the former is present, already while the later is missing in action, now?

It seems to me that you are talking about two entities, the who is and who was is talking about what has always been present before the start to exist what exist[ed] the earliest. But what is to come can't me what has been consistently existing before existence, yet never fail for a moment to exist in the 'state that it has always existing, not allowing metamorphosis in its existence'.

Maybe you need to clarify yourself and marry the obviously two entities to one. The way you left it, above, there are obviously two separate and not equal in the way the exist. Definitely one has the continuance of existence in the same form, while other has termination at some point, at least regardless.

I call Him Jehovah Jaireh- the Great provider! Always on point.

Sweetnecta:

@Effiko; « on: Yesterday at 07:21:19 PM »
What is 'ancient of days' and does that fit the description or the nature of God?

Please each one and marry them together before it can never be accepted as a serious opinion.



@Odunnu (f); « #1 on: Yesterday at 07:28:19 PM »


Can who is be who is to come, because the former is present, already while the later is missing in action, now?

It seems to me that you are talking about two entities, the who is and who was is talking about what has always been present before the start to exist what exist[ed] the earliest.  But what is to come can't me what has been consistently existing before existence, yet never fail for a moment to exist in the 'state that it has always existing, not allowing metamorphosis in its existence'.

Maybe you need to clarify yourself and marry the obviously two entities to one. The way you left it, above, there are obviously two separate and not equal in the way the exist. Definitely one has the continuance of existence in the same form, while other has termination at some point, at least regardless.

u jst dey tok rubbish 4 mouth
u dnt evn knw wat u r tokin abt , quack

Learn to ignore some people especially people who'l want to derail your thread.
Moreover, sweetnecta is a muslim seeking a reason to 'advertise' her religion.
@OP : I call Him the God of War and God of Peace. . .wow!

I call him the Sleeping One!

Sky Daddy, Magic Man in the Sky and many many more.

Sweetnecta:

@Effiko; « on: Yesterday at 07:21:19 PM »
What is 'ancient of days' and does that fit the description or the nature of God?

Please each one and marry them together before it can never be accepted as a serious opinion.

@Odunnu (f); « #1 on: Yesterday at 07:28:19 PM
Can who is be who is to come, because the former is present, already while the later is missing in action, now?

It seems to me that you are talking about two entities, the who is and who was is talking about what has always been present before the start to exist what exist[ed] the earliest. But what is to come can't me what has been consistently existing before existence, yet never fail for a moment to exist in the 'state that it has always existing, not allowing metamorphosis in its existence'.

Maybe you need to clarify yourself and marry the obviously two entities to one. The way you left it, above, there are obviously two separate and not equal in the way the exist. Definitely one has the continuance of existence in the same form, while other has termination at some point, at least regardless.

I read it silently, I read it aloud, I read it slowly, I even rearranged some words BUT what this guy wrote still doesn't make sense.

@Martian; what is the ancient of days? definite it. then define God. bring them together as one.

how is he was, he is is equal to he is to come? how is God was, is and He is to come?


now put God in each. i wanna read how you will make he is to come stick with the Invisible God Who is always present.


you can understand this now or are you still in the daze of denial?

is sweetnecta the same old olobowale?

Sweetnecta:

@Martian; what is the ancient of days? definite it. then define God. bring them together as one.

how is he was, he is is equal to he is to come? how is God was, is and He is to come?


now put God in each. i wanna read how you will make he is to come stick with the Invisible God Who is always present.


you can understand this now or are you still in the daze of denial?

You should proof read or stuff or something, at least I understand this one.

Ok, the ancient of days is a name Christians give their god to insinuate that he has always existed.

God is a generic term used by humans to refer to the most powerful being in polytheism and the omnipotent being in monotheism.
God is what ancient man used to describe natural phenomena. If he couldn't explain something, heattached god to it, problem solved!
Like Spinoza said, " god is an asylum of ignorance". That's God.

I call Him 'the Lion of Judah'

Odunnu:

I call Him 'the Lion of Judah'

I call him "the tiger of bengal"

I call him the Docile One.

He is the faithful one

I call him Herr Hit____
Those jews shouldn't have betrayed him.

Sweetnecta:

@Martian; what is the ancient of days? definite it. then define God. bring them together as one.

how is he was, he is is equal to he is to come? how is God was, is and He is to come?


now put God in each. i wanna read how you will make he is to come stick with the Invisible God Who is always present.


you can understand this now or are you still in the daze of denial?

i no blame u sha , u be MUSLIM buh u evn sound mor lyk a buddhist

Martian:

I read it silently, I read it aloud, I read it slowly, I even rearranged some words BUT what this guy wrote still doesn't make sense.

myself i evn read it upside down it didnt stil mke an atom of sense

Odunnu:

He is the faithful one

He is the only MERCIFUL GOD

God has many names!

Alpha and Omega!

Obelomo:

God has many names!

Alpha and Omega!

abeg help me tel dem oooooooooooooooooooooo

I don't know where to start or what to say! But all i want to say is that "HE is ALL IN ALL, THE ALPHA AND THE OMEGA"!

Most Holy

Martian:

I read it silently, I read it aloud, I read it slowly, I even rearranged some words BUT what this guy wrote still doesn't make sense.

This^ with the combo of that nectar's post gave me a 'tough' laugh into the night. Arabic english?

I call Him the Awesome wonder