a day ago edited

Vaccine administrators should inform the public of PEG, ingredient in Covid vaccines that up to 72% have antibodies present, & 7% of the populations have PEG levels so high, exposure may induce an anaphylactic reaction. The worst part of this is most do not know about potential sensitivities until after reaction:
https://www.sciencemag.org/...
This provides a very serious issue for vaccine administrators, as it makes risk assessment for very serious allergic reactions implausible. Already playing out in India, after family members of a person who died after receiving Covid vaccines and experienced a medical reaction are charging medical negligence. Vaccine administrators could face potential liability, nurses and doctors should take note.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-...
The same issue could present with administering mass testing with PCR testing that are not suitable for diagnosis of Sars CoV2 and as lawsuit continue to out these issues, nurse and doctors faced with implementing mass testing could face liability due to individual and public health harms:
In the event of a false positive result, risks to
patients could include the following: a recommendation for isolation of the
patient, monitoring of household or other close contacts for symptoms, patient
isolation that might limit contact with family or friends and may increase
contact with other potentially COVID-19 patients, limits in the ability to
work, delayed diagnosis and treatment for the true infection causing the
symptoms, unnecessary prescription of a treatment or therapy, or other
unintended adverse effects
Given that tests generate false positives by default by the simple expedient of setting Cycle Threshold levels so high that they detect nothing more than dead non-infectious material 85/90% of time, and their lack of specificity makes the other 10/15% of 'true positives' equally unreliable. This is no small issues. This is a HUGE and MEGA issue, and it is surprising the health care leadership has not picked up on it, if for nothing but their own liability protection. Top officials will willingly pass off responsibility to the scientific and medical & nursing community they relied on for implementing these directives even if they were the ones paying for and guiding the directives:
https://cormandrostenreview...
https://principia-scientifi...
https://www.cdc.gov/coronav...
The WHO recent update is now guiding labs to include the CT number with the test report (although they STILL have not lowered the recommendations for high CT rates which would stop the over amplification issue entirely. This may be seen as a step to avoid liability and direct it onto labs who are running tests at rates as high as 45 CT in some states. The labs should be outing this, if just for their own protection:
https://web.archive.org/web...
Employers should seriously consider their own legal liability when directing employees to administer protocols that demonstrate potential for serious and individual health harms.

I doubt you have done any research on this, don't just talk down on what others are saying and if you have proofs, please present it

SangoOlukosoOba:
You feed on too much beer parlour news

Hearsay that hold no fact