So who said on some post some time ago that a musician's/actor's website must have flash and have music playing in the background? I blv I said it wasn't compulsory. Anyways, via proof of contradiction, I present to you:

http://www.50cent.com/-/Main.aspx - the dude is worth $400million. I am sure he could afford such a site.

Later,

Never knew the dude was worth that much.

The site looks total crap anyway, I am sure he could at least spare about £20,000 for a design company to do it up, may be there is no need anyway, has his solo career would end come september 11 when Kanye out sells him, cant wait.lol

juintade:

Never knew the dude was worth that much.

The site looks total crap anyway, I am sure he could at least spare about £20,000 for a design company to do it up, may be there is no need anyway, has his solo career would end come september 11 when Kanye out sells him, can't wait.lol

Crap? Why? What is wrong with the site abi you want make elephant come dey welcome visitors for the homepage before the site go dey cool?

LOL Afam,

Unfortunately, at least based on what I have been able to glean from this forum, we hv been indoctrinated (by who or what, I dont know) to blv that if a site doesn't have some kind of movement (ala flash or marquee) then such a site is "simple". Am I saying a site shdnt "move"? Nope. I am just saying, it isn't mandatory.

To me, the site is perfect as is - it delivers on functionality. The only problem I may (emphasis on "may" have with the site is the background color. The site does look gloomy. Then again, his first album was titled, "Get rich or die trying"