Jeezuzpick:


And that's enough to kill her, abi?

So based on your stroke of genius, they should let him go, abi?

you chop crazy?from my deduction did i include my verdict on the issue??it left for who in charge of law to carry their verdict according to the law

CelestineNelson:
I don't even know what to type...

type " May God forgive all our sin...

Mhizzard:
The guy didn't raped the girl,because she followed him into the hotel without forcing her into the room.perhaps the girl was a virgin that had not experience to much sex to which the guy had with her

Statutory rape.. not yet 18

Emyzoloye5:
How can a 19year old boy rape a girl to death, with little prick?

Maybe he stabbed her

At 19 my d. Ck don fully develop and thick

Mhizzard:
The guy didn't raped the girl,because she followed him into the hotel without forcing her into the room.perhaps the girl was a virgin that had not experience to much sex to which the guy had with her

According Nigeria Child Rights Acts, the age of consent is 18 years, so he actually raped her.

sirpharrell:


The difference between 17 and 19 is that in a jurisdiction where the legal age of consent is 18 years, 17 is a minor while 19 is an adult.

noted

linearity:


According Nigeria Child Rights Acts, the age of consent is 18 years, so he actually raped her.

but they didn't include that she was forced or drag into the hotel

Emyzoloye5:
How can a 19year old boy rape a girl to death, with little prick?

omoh.......no talk am ooh,sum 19yr prick big pass sum 45yr old man prick.


cum imbiama cum see small boys prick,u go shout.

Mhizzard:
The guy didn't raped the girl,because she followed him into the hotel without forcing her into the room.perhaps the girl was a virgin that had not experience to much sex to which the guy had with her

Statutory rape

In common law jurisdictions, statutory rape is nonforcible sexual activity in which one of the individuals is below the age of consent (the age required to legally consent to the behaviour).[1][2] Although it usually refers to adults engaging in sexual contact with minors under the age of consent, it is a generic term, and very few jurisdictions use the actual term statutory rape in the language of statutes.[3] In statutory rape, overt force or threat is usually not present. Statutory rape laws presume coercion because a minor or mentally disabled adult is legally incapable of giving consent to the act. It is also considered as statutory rape even if the victim is above age of consent, and if the perpetrator is in an authority position such as a teacher, a doctor or a parent

Did the so-called law enforcement release this statement so obviously skewed? From what I just read, I don't think the teenage girl - God rest her soul - was "lured to a hotel" and raped to death. Even so, I wasn't there, so... We all know what 13 - 14-year-old girls are up to these days. You could end up with someone with underlying health problems and you are screwed, literally. The guy even volunteered that he's an internet fraudster. Wow. Kudos, Naija Police, although this is probably just a thoughtless, tactless, junk from a stupid blogger.

IjebuWarrior:
He should also be raped to death, simple!

No be sharia law be dat? Eye for an eye na...

alaye come and rape me pls

How can u rape someone to death
She was bleeding from where

Mhizzard:

but they didn't include that she was forced or drag into the hotel

That does not matter in the eyes of the law, even if she was the one that instigated it, forced herself on the guy, removed the guys clothes and hers and hold his thing and put it in hers, it is statutory rape.

I doubt if there is any defense against statutory e.g. in a hypothetical situation what if the minor put a gun to one’s head and under the threat of violence forced them into a statutory rape.

My reading of the Child Rights clearly states that, there is no defense, all the prosecution need to prove are two things.

1. The person was below the age of 18.
2. There was sexual intercourse.

Are other circumstantial arguments or explanations from the defendant are mere waste of time. Though, those arguments may help in the sentencing phase of the trial eg the argument about threat that I laid out above.

Mhizzard:
The guy didn't raped the girl,because she followed him into the hotel without forcing her into the room.perhaps the girl was a virgin that had not experience to much sex to which the guy had with her

who booked a minor into a hotel room ? the hotel management must be sued for not confirming an ID that the 17 year old is a minor

teepain:


Admittedly so! Even at that a girl that wants to get down with a boy has the right to change her mind at any point in time before the deed. It does not mean that she should be raped. Any man who rapes is a worthless idiot without self-esteem. Any guy who is worth his salt will let a non-willing girl go her way knowing that his worth can always get himself a better lay. What is the fuss about!

Prevention is better than cure

Now she is dead! Too bad!!

How do you rape a girl to death ?
It’s not possible unless there are related trauma .

Thonyboy:


https://.ng/2023/12/04/court-remands-yahoo-boy-for-raping-17-year-old-girl-to-death/

These two people are underage. Forget the calculation, what is the difference between 17 & 19 years old. They are both children

All of you shouting that it is consensual, if u like no train ur sons well. Except u have video to show that a girl that is less than 18 tied you, drugged you and mounted you for sex, it is considered rape. Even if na 30 seconds before her 18th birthday.

Na weytin some of una dey do abroad wey dey land una for jail and back home be dat.

Mhizzard:
The guy didn't raped the girl,because she followed him into the hotel without forcing her into the room.perhaps the girl was a virgin that had not experience to much sex to which the guy had with her

Exactly cus e didn't force d gal to d hotel.And what is a gal of her age doing in a hotel? Rubbish

which area in ilorin,was once a student there

philo04:
It happened in my area
It wasn’t only him
They are three in number that took turn on her

Werey ni gbogbo yin!
He lured her into to hotel room abi?
If there was no sign of murder, this was clearly an accident or a drug overdose that should be investigated properly.
They may have had sex, but this looks mutual. Everyone knows what a male inviting a female to hotel room mutually wants to do.
Train your female children well. If they don’t intend to be sexually active, they should focus on their books and God until they are ready.

Hussein035:


These two people are underage. Forget the calculation, what is the difference between 17 & 19 years old. They are both children

See ehn we know but the law is the law, the law will draw a line at some point. 17 and 19 are not the same. On issues that can arise at the intersection of sex and age, infact 17.9999999999999 and 18 are not the same. Self-control is not hard. A man that cannot should go and self-service

Tzar:
Werey ni gbogbo yin!
He lured her into to hotel room abi?
If there was no sign of murder, this was clearly an accident or a drug overdose that should be investigated properly.
They may have had sex, but this looks mutual. Everyone knows what a male inviting a female to hotel room mutually wants to do.
Train your female children well. If they don’t intend to be sexually active, they should focus on their books and God until they are ready.

You are right, but we should also train our male children to understand that they should protect themselves from these kind of stories. Train all kids what consent age means, train male kids the consequences of not getting consent.

Who goes to an hotel and get a room without paying lodging fee first before making use of the room? The story isn’t adding up

He must have sacrificed the girl... These young girls won't listen to counsel and that is why the boys are wasting them away

Many of these ladies have not eaten good food sef

ogbonti:



who booked a minor into a hotel room ? the hotel management must be sued for not confirming an ID that the 17 year old is a minor

how would they get sales if they try that.

Smilez04:


Statutory rape

In common law jurisdictions, statutory rape is nonforcible sexual activity in which one of the individuals is below the age of consent (the age required to legally consent to the behaviour).[1][2] Although it usually refers to adults engaging in sexual contact with minors under the age of consent, it is a generic term, and very few jurisdictions use the actual term statutory rape in the language of statutes.[3] In statutory rape, overt force or threat is usually not present. Statutory rape laws presume coercion because a minor or mentally disabled adult is legally incapable of giving consent to the act. It is also considered as statutory rape even if the victim is above age of consent, and if the perpetrator is in an authority position such as a teacher, a doctor or a parent

noted

linearity:


That does not matter in the eyes of the law, even if she was the one that instigated it, forced herself on the guy, removed the guys clothes and hers and hold his thing and put it in hers, it is statutory rape.

I doubt if there is any defense against statutory e.g. in a hypothetical situation what if the minor put a gun to one’s head and under the threat of violence forced them into a statutory rape.

My reading of the Child Rights clearly states that, there is no defense, all the prosecution need to prove are two things.

1. The person was below the age of 18.
2. There was sexual intercourse.

Are other circumstantial arguments or explanations from the defendant are mere waste of time. Though, those arguments may help in the sentencing phase of the trial eg the argument about threat that I laid out above.

noted

Mhizzard:
The guy didn't raped the girl,because she followed him into the hotel without forcing her into the room.perhaps the girl was a virgin that had not experience to much sex to which the guy had with her

The guy actually RAPED her.

There is what we call "Statutory Rape" in Law. Having sex with a lady below 18years is an automatic rape, whether the said lady consents to the act or not.