Never refer to any
male person as a MAN until he
gets married,let him get married
first,lets see how he is going to
demeanour. If he makes the right
decision whenever it requires and
never derails from being the same
person he was,if he could manage
his home DIPLOMATICALLY then
call him a MAN. For whosoever
that cannot manage his home
should not be called a man but a
MARRIED BOY.
OR AM I WRONG

NONSENSE OF THE HIGHEST ORDER!!!!!!
A) being a MAN has nothing to do with marriage....... many men are single and highly respected individual who handle their biz right and take care of their own selves.

B) a person's demeanor has ALSO nothing to do with being a MAN...... so long as you are honest with who you are and stand by that, then however you look or behave is irrelevant. if that person is childish, then he will be a childish MAN, duh!

C) the decisions you take in life has ALSO nothing to do with being a MAN....... a MAN takes whatever decision he decides are best for HIM (at the time), and live with the consequences, maturely.

D) managing your home diplomatically also has nothing to do with being a MAN...... many men dont even have a home, lol. diplomacy has absolutely NOTHING to do with anything. many men are ruling their household with an iron fist and they still are MEN, duh!

a person that can take care of his own self (or his family if he is married) is considered a man........basta!

Typical naija mentality. James Buchanan was US president in the 19th century as a lifelong bachelor. Edward Heath was British prime minister in the early 1970s as a lifelong bachelor. So many other examples abound.