Kingsnairaland:


I use to believe this lies you mix up with truth

Untill I listen and read Russia side of history

You only watch history Chanel of USA side and UK side
. Go watch Russia side

After all UK's and USA don't know what happened to Hitler

It was actually Russia that told them what happened to Hitler lol

Because they came to Berlin first.

Go watch and read Russia side.

AmuDimpka:
mmong man

mightyhaze:
Cry about your own shithole first.. leave people defending their lands to worry about it.. the way una carry this war for head like mannequins sha

tete7000:


The lie that there was no lend-lease deal between the west and USSR? That USSR didn't form an alliance he wouldn't have had with the west if Hitler hadn't attack him? I really don't understand you. As far as I know USSR was Hitler ally and wouldn't have anything to do with Britain or the US until Hitler hit him. Before USSR was attacked, Britain supplied Stalin with intelligence that an attack was imminent but Stalin shrugged it off because he believed they wanted to create enmity between him and his friend Hitler. Out of desperation the same Stalin came back and signed treaty with the West to defeat Nazi and you are here talking of Russian side. Which side,? The history favours the West, not even Britain was invaded by the Nazi, the USSR was the one pushed against the wall and in need of help.
The Soviets were the one who turned around and embraced those they hitherto consider untrustworthy.

SSpeter:
You are still missing the basic point. There is a difference between an intervention and a war. Bush declared an invasion in Iraq it was a war., There was no declaration in Vietnam, Vietnam was a fraudulent military intervention and not a war. Just like the Us intervention in Korea, it is not a war, there is no outright declaration of hostility. US in Afghanistan is not a war is an intervention, just like Libya and Syria. Don't confuse intervention for a declaration. Putin declared war in Ukraine and the goal was to seize Kiev. They almost captured Kiev in the first days of the war, if not for poor planning and corruption, this war would have ended in February with a Russian victory. The Ukrainians fought hard and bombed their own airport runways so that Russians will not land troops outside of Kiev. This is war and not intervention

Johnboom:
So who is Russia to be dictating to a sovereign nation like Ukraine?. Ask yourself while most countries prefer west to Russia.

leofab:
those talks were destroyed in the first week/day of the war.. now ukraine is 10000 stronger than before and can never be bullied by Russia like before..

SuperSixSeven:


Lets not forget it took around 20 Himars to stall the Russian advance last summer. Where are the Russian tanks by the way? Now instead of armored breakthroughs they switched to desperate WW2 human wave tactics. And while having 3000 T80 in storage the Russian Army is now reactivating T62 without thermal imagers. Russia has always maintained a paper tiger army. Not to talk about about their Air Force and Navy.


Some takes on Wagner Group's 'human wave' tactics

Svlla:


Go and see the latest casualty figure leaked by the Turks from Israeli MOSSAD and come back to talk

Btw former PM of Israel is now singing like a bird

The casualty rate is 20:1
And the leak is the latest thing now in the war and I figured it's because of you would rather remain ignorant than tell yourselves the truth

tete7000:


Bros when Hitler launched operation Barbarossa, it caught Stalin by total surprise. Within a short period of time, a large swath of USSR has been overthrown. Stalingrand, Leningrand would soon be under siege, and it looked like Moscow would be overthrown. To save USSR, many of its industries within the reach of war have to be quickly dismantled, transported away from theatre of war and reassembled elsewhere. The running over was so quick and swift, it left USSR with so little time to react than retreat. Is it within that short time, they would have reacted and produced machines? The western allies whose intelligence of imminent Nazi attack they had earlier ignored came quickly to their rescue. They supply them mobility, guns and ammunitions until they could stabilise and resume production. No one tells you they didn't eventually produce some machines on their own, but without western aid, they would have capitulated before they had time to move from defensive to offensive position. And even until the end of the war, some critical elements of war equipments continued to be supplied from the west particularly mobility, that is jeeps, etc. Please do a comprehensive reading before you begin to argue what you don't know much about. Stop this narrow, inchoate, blinded argument.

olugabbie:


But why didn't they (West) save France. The same Western equipments were sent to France during World War II. UK (the West) even tried to rescue France by sending troops & equipments. But the Germans over ran the country.

It was not the Western that save Russia. It was the willingness of the Russians to fight that save them.

Russians don't surrender.

olugabbie:


But why didn't they (West) save France. The same Western equipments were sent to France during World War II. UK (the West) even tried to rescue France by sending troops & equipments. But the Germans over ran the country.

It was not the Western equipments that save Russia. It was the willingness of the Russians to fight that save them.

Russians don't surrender.

Kingsnairaland:
don't mind the guy they only watch history channel of USA they don't know Russia built over ten thousand tanks during World war two by themselves ask them if USA is the ones that gave they Russia all the lands they captured in history lol.

Svlla:


Ignorance

Go and see the latest intelligent leak from Israeli MOSSAD and casualty figures

Some of you see what you want to see

ike007:


Without the help of Russia, The British, and The United States and China...you really think Nigeria would have won that war

tete7000:


The lie that there was no lend-lease deal between the west and USSR? That USSR didn't form an alliance he wouldn't have had with the west if Hitler hadn't attack him? I really don't understand you. As far as I know USSR was Hitler ally and wouldn't have anything to do with Britain or the US until Hitler hit him. Before USSR was attacked, Britain supplied Stalin with intelligence that an attack was imminent but Stalin shrugged it off because he believed they wanted to create enmity between him and his friend Hitler. Out of desperation the same Stalin came back and signed treaty with the West to defeat Nazi and you are here talking of Russian side. Which side,? The history favours the West, not even Britain was invaded by the Nazi, the USSR was the one pushed against the wall and in need of help.
The Soviets were the one who turned around and embraced those they hitherto consider untrustworthy.

Passpands:


Lol you said Britain was invaded by nazi?
I think you need to go back to your history books

Svlla:


Go and see the latest casualty figure leaked by the Turks from Israeli MOSSAD and come back to talk

Btw former PM of Israel is now singing like a bird

The casualty rate is 20:1
And the leak is the latest thing now in the war and I figured it's because of you would rather remain ignorant than tell yourselves the truth

Tiopii:


The casualties rate is 20:1 and it took Russia over 9 months to capture most part of Bakmut, if this ratio was true, Ukraine won't be planning any counter offensive. They would have exhausted their reserve.

For over 9 months they couldn't go past Bakmut and now even with the allegedly total capture of Bakmut, their offensive has peaked and can't go further, Wagner PMC is pulling out cos of high losses and she'll hunger. But you people.
How swiftly Putin congratulated the Russian army and Wagner PMC you could tell they have been waiting for a long time, and the reason it took this long was cos Ukraine made it hard for them. Same Russia is now building defensive fortifications and are preparing to go on the defensive.while Ukraine is preparing for it's own counter offensive, this sceneeio should give you an insight on which Armed forces is exhausted.

Bakmut isn't as big as Yobe, and yet Russia with it's best weapons took 9 months to claim to capture it.

Tiopii:


The casualties rate is 20:1 and it took Russia over 9 months to capture most part of Bakmut, if this ratio was true, Ukraine won't be planning any counter offensive. They would have exhausted their reserve.

For over 9 months they couldn't go past Bakmut and now even with the allegedly total capture of Bakmut, their offensive has peaked and can't go further, Wagner PMC is pulling out cos of high losses and she'll hunger. But you people.
How swiftly Putin congratulated the Russian army and Wagner PMC you could tell they have been waiting for a long time, and the reason it took this long was cos Ukraine made it hard for them. Same Russia is now building defensive fortifications and are preparing to go on the defensive.while Ukraine is preparing for it's own counter offensive, this sceneeio should give you an insight on which Armed forces is exhausted.

Bakmut isn't as big as Yobe, and yet Russia with it's best weapons took 9 months to claim to capture it.