Dongorgon5:
Hmmmn
But can we fight for the title next season or at least top 4 with traore as the 2nd striker with costa injury problem(hamstring)
I believe if there is also competition, costa will drop his bad attitude knowing fully well their is a quality back up.

To be honest I done tire for Costa sef. I need a striker with more pace that will allow us vary our game.

Ibime:


To be honest I done tire for Costa sef. I need a striker with more pace that will allow us vary our game.

That's what I'm saying bro!!!
But emenalo is a stupiid man, we have costa, remy,falcao and Traore.
You still go ahead and sign another dead 'Pato'

Ibime:
Looks like we're signing Moussa Dembele from Fulham. Good move.

Dembele, Traore and Costa (or a faster no9) suits me fine as our 3 strikers for next season.

the guy is just 19 years. how good is he

raumdeuter:


Over 2hrs later neither of bigkesh nor GBR1 could give us the stats. the points won in Mourinho 16 games vs Points won in Hiddink 16 games

Thats how to expose half baked fake analyst. Put them to a fact and stats test and they run away

Just to put Hiddink's supposed impact at Chelsea into
perspective: Mourinho 10 points from 1st 8 home games,
Hiddink 9 pts from next 8



Oga go sleep

bigkesh:

Just to put Hiddink's supposed impact at Chelsea into
perspective: Mourinho 10 points from 1st 8 home games,
Hiddink 9 pts from next 8



Oga go sleep

Oh Chelsea was only playing home games? or do home games have more points than away games?

Like I told you and GBR1, when it comes to football I would wallop you with facts and stats

Both Mourinho and Guus played 16 games each tell us how many points both gathered in their 16 games played this season

Mourinho 16 games 15 points
Hiddink 16 games 26 points

Even a blind deaf and dumb would see that one as astronomically better than the other

If Mourinho had performed just like Hiddink and got 26 points from his 16 games, Chelsea would now be within reach of top 4 and UCL spots

lordfalcao:
the guy is just 19 years. how good is he

He's a good number 3, maybe no 2.

He's scored about 18 goals in a team in the relegation zone in the Championship.

Fast, tall, dribbler type of striker.

raumdeuter:


Oh Chelsea was only playing home games? or do home games have more points than away games?

Like I told you and GBR1, when it comes to football I would wallop you with facts and stats

Both Mourinho and Guus played 16 games each tell us how many points both gathered in their 16 games played this season

Mourinho 16 games 15 points
Hiddink 16 games 26 points

Even a blind deaf and dumb would see that one as astronomically better than the other

If Mourinho had performed just like Hiddink and got 26 points from his 16 games, Chelsea would now be within reach of top 4 and UCL spots

Have we been playing just the league??
Mou left us in UCL and FA cup......

I no get time to argue but tell us how a win rate of 1.1 is astronomically better than 0.9..........
Are you sure you studied engineering??

bigkesh:


Have we been playing just the league??
Mou left us in UCL and FA cup......

I no get time to argue but tell us how a win rate of 1.1 is astronomically better than 0.9..........
Are you sure you studied engineering??

Last season did Mou win FA cup and UCL? The Carling he won last season he was the one who crashed out of it

The league where they accumulate points Mou point/game is 0.9 Hiddink is 1.6

Ask anyone who knows numbers which one is better 1.6 or 0.9

You are just showing yourself to be an illiterate everyday, How can any team have a win rate over 1?
With what you wrote, 1.1 win rate means out of 10 games Chelsea wins 11, Does that make any sense?

You are one of the evidence of the failed Nigerian education system. Tell anyone that you have a anything rate of 1.1 and watch their reaction

One dumbino Chelsea or EPL fan would rush to like your post soon, You still wonder why they say Chelsea fans are mostly illiterates? You are a perfect example

raumdeuter:


Last season did Mou win FA cup and UCL? The Carling he won last season he was the one who crashed out of it

The league where they accumulate points Mou point/game is 0.9 Hiddink is 1.6

Ask anyone who knows numbers which one is better 1.6 or 0.9

You are just showing yourself to be an illiterate everyday, How can any team have a win rate over 1?
With what you wrote, 1.1 win rate means out of 10 games Chelsea wins 11, Does that make any sense?

You are one of the evidence of the failed Nigerian education system. Tell anyone that you have a anything rate of 1.1 and watch their reaction

One dumbino Chelsea or EPL fan would rush to like your post soon, You still wonder why they say Chelsea fans are mostly illiterates? You are a perfect example

M not going to lecture on how to decode an error......
What's our biz last season,you start shifting posts up and down........
Fact is Hiddink crashed out of 2 competitions....

bigkesh:

M not going to lecture on how to decode an error......
What's our biz last season,you start shifting posts up and down........
Fact is Hiddink crashed out of 2 competitions....

Tell us how any team in the history of football can have a win rate of 1.1

Tell us how you came about the 1.1 you are spitting everywhere. Show your intellect and give us how you came about 1.1

Shebi you told us you are a university student

Chelsea win UEFA Youth League again...

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/10248901/paris-saint-german-1-2-chelsea-blues-retain-uefa-youth-league-crown

Raumdeuter it seems you failed to notice i was done with that debate. Stop the mentions and i advise you go through the nonsense you have been posting recently, because you would get exposed again the next time i quote you. I won't warn you again.

GBR1:
Raumdeuter it seems you failed to notice i was done with that debate. Stop the mentions and i advise you go through the nonsense you have been posting recently, because you would get exposed again the next time i quote you. I won't warn you again.

How many times have I shown you to be limited in football knowledge. And when you are trounced with facts you either edit or run away

1. Show us your formular for getting the "1.1 rate" you posted earlier

2. Mourinho played 16 league games, Hiddink played 16 league games how many points have both gathered from their equal number of games

Below is your post before you edit it as usual,

GBR1:
Now Hiddink's rate is now 1.1
0.9 vs 1.1... where is the ''huge improvement''?

Do you know what Hiddink's rate would be by the end of the season?

bandely:
Chelsea win UEFA Youth League again...

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/10248901/paris-saint-german-1-2-chelsea-blues-retain-uefa-youth-league-crown

gosh, this youths sef...win all d whole trophies yet na loan go end deir hustle

raumdeuter:


How many times have I shown you to be limited in football knowledge. And when you are trounced with facts you either edit or run away

1. Show us your formular for getting the "1.1 rate" you posted earlier

2. Mourinho played 16 league games, Hiddink played 16 league games how many points have both gathered from their equal number of games

Below is your post before you edit it as usual,

what he meant by 1.1 was average points per game. u know this but u just feel like degrading d guy

lekkie073:
what he meant by 1.1 was average points per game. u know this but u just feel like degrading d guy

Then let him say with his own mouth what he meant and also go a step further to show how he arrived at the 1.1 calculation

How many points Hiddink got / How many games he played

Thats how intelligent people debate not just throw unverifiable numbers into the fray but Like I said he would run away. When you argue on the internet without the right facts you get embarrassed

Emaprince:
No, second yellow.

I think the ref wanted leicester to lose that match. The penalty he gave to westham was undeserved.

Ok

Ibime:


He got benched because:

(a.) Willian was signed at the end of August for £32m (not Mourinhos signing but he was expected to make the Willian signing work)

(b.) Mata who had returned late from Confederations cup got up to full fitness - the 2 time club player of the year.

(c.) Schurrle the £18m signing who had had an illness in July reurned to full fitness.


So DeBruyne wasn't dropped. He returned to his rightful place in the pecking order which was always the squad plan for the 'small boy' by Emenalo. These multimillion signings were always planned ahead of him in the pecking order as well as MaZaCar who were already first choice. He had played very well in his first 3 games.

we both know the type of person mourinho is. There is no way Kevin will play very well and mou will go back to bench him, no matter the amount of money that was used to sign his competitor.

.... Watched this match just once(the day it was played). Since then, I haven't peeped into the replay nor highlight.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNFfmeHY7Nk

Oh my goodness, this team had so much depth. A team that had ..

Makalele, essien, mikel, lampard and ballck in the midfield.. Wow!!! And they were still in their prime.

Upfront, you have robben, joecoal(in his prime) kalou, drogba, shevchenko(weakest link),

Chelsea was supposed to dorminate europe with this squad.. Though liverpool no ever gree make we smell the final that time, but then, it was no surprise that premier league teams dorminated Europe sha.

Anthony Knockaert would be a good signing for any Premier League club.

Nigel Pearson sidelined him last season over a contract dispute but he was the original Riyadh Mahrez in their promotion year.

Just saw in BBC sport that Gareth Barry has more EPL assists than Scholes.

#ProductiveNiggaAlert

Nihilist:
Just saw in BBC sport that Gareth Barry has more EPL assists than Scholes.

#ProductiveNiggaAlert

Ibime ....! Nihilist dey find you o....!

Meanwhile @ Nihilist why you wan compare both players in terms of productivity when dem obviously no dey play same position?

Just asking bruv

diggz:


Ibime ....! Nihilist dey find you o....!

Meanwhile @ Nihilist why you wan compare both players in terms of productivity when dem obviously no dey play same position?

Just asking bruv

Barry and Scholes are both central midfielders

I no mention anybody name, I just dey report wetin I see for BBC sport

Nihilist:


Barry and Scholes are both central midfielders

I no mention anybody name, I just dey report wetin I see for BBC sport

Sorry jare I think say na bale I see bf....

I see say u dey do Fela things..

U no mention name indeed (lol). I don help u call am sha(lol).

diggz:


Ibime ....! Nihilist dey find you o....!

Meanwhile @ Nihilist why you wan compare both players in terms of productivity when dem obviously no dey play same position?

Just asking bruv

Nihilist dey always find me.

Paul Scholes has scored double the no of goals of Gareth Barry, while Gareth Barry has played a hundred games more than Scholes so Scholes is way more productive than Barry.

Productivity = goals + assists. . . . .except your name is Hiddeniesta.

Ibime:


Nihilist dey always find me.

Paul Scholes has scored double the no of goals of Gareth Barry, while Gareth Barry has played a hundred games more than Scholes so Scholes is way more productive than Barry.

Productivity = goals + assists. . . . .except your name is Hiddeniesta.

Or Xavi. Or Zidane. Both of whom Barry played several hundred games more than.

Barry played for most of his career at rubbish teams like Villa and Everton providing assists to ediots like Agbonlahor and Steven Naismith.

Scholes played his entire career for the biggest and most successful team in the EPL era. Yet he has less assists than a bottom feeder than Gareth Barry.

Logic of Production states that if you have more assists supplying John Carew, Juan Angel and Gabby Agbonlahor, than the guy supplying Tevez, Ronaldo, Rooney, Van Nistelrooy and co....then you are more productive

Nihilist:


Or Xavi. Or Zidane. Both of whom Barry played several hundred games more than.

Barry played for most of his career at rubbish teams like Villa and Everton providing assists to ediots like Agbonlahor and Steven Naismith.

Scholes played his entire career for the biggest and most successful team in the EPL era. Yet he has less assists than a bottom feeder than Gareth Barry.

Logic of Production states that if you have more assists supplying John Carew, Juan Angel and Gabby Agbonlahor, than the guy supplying Tevez, Ronaldo, Rooney, Van Nistelrooy and co....then you are more productive

Productivity is goals + assists nigga.

If you are having trouble with Maths, kindly supply us those Barry stats you claim you saw.

We will do the metric

Scholes - (goals + assists)/ games

vs

Barry - (goals + assists)/ games


You can bet £100 that Scholes is 50% more productive than Barry. Put your money where your mouth is nigga.

Ibime:


Productivity is goals + assists nigga.

If you are having trouble with Maths, kindly supply us those Barry stats you claim you saw.

We will do the metric

Scholes - (goals + assists)/ games

vs

Barry - (goals + assists)/ games


You can bet £100 that Scholes is 50% more productive than Barry. Put your money where your mouth is nigga.

I hope you are aware of the fact that scholes started out as a second striker ( he scored majority of his goals from that position) while Barry has played as an anchor man in a pivot almost throughout his career.

If you limit the numbers to the appearances of both players from the CMF position, I don't see Scholes coming out tops.

Ibime - you really gotta calm down on the goals + assists thingy.

Nihilist:



Logic of Production states that if you have more assists supplying John Carew, Juan Angel and Gabby Agbonlahor, than the guy supplying Tevez, Ronaldo, Rooney, Van Nistelrooy and co....then you are more productive

logic of production?
where did u get that from

ok here's mine
logic of qualitative association states that a player dat scores a goal for a team like manutd is greater than a player dat scores 10 goals for a team like aston villa..

reason why scholes will always be better than barry

Dadehmola:


I hope you are aware of the fact that scholes started out as a second striker ( he scored majority of his goals from that position) while Barry has played as an anchor man in a pivot almost throughout his career.

Scoles started as the 2nd midfielder in a 4-4-2 with Roy Keane.

He wasn't no 2nd striker, not where Sheringham, Solskjaer, Dwight Yorke, Andy Cole and Cantona dey. He can only have played a couple of games as a 2nd striker.

He and Barry have played the same position for the bulk of their career.

Let us set our terms for comparability.

Xavi = deep lying midfielder. Compare his productivity with Scholes and Barry. Productivity is decreasingly important in that position.

Zidane is an attacking midfielder of the 1990s. Compare his productivity with all attacking midfielders of his time: Rui Costa etc

Iniesta is the attacking midfielder in a 4-3-3. Compare with Lampard, Gerrard etc.

Ibime:


Productivity is goals + assists nigga.

If you are having trouble with Maths, kindly supply us those Barry stats you claim you saw.

We will do the metric

Scholes - (goals + assists)/ games

vs

Barry - (goals + assists)/ games


You can bet £100 that Scholes is 50% more productive than Barry. Put your money where your mouth is nigga.

Yes lets do the Maths.

Agbonlahor 73 league goals in 10 seasons (7.3 goals per season or 0.2 goals per game)

Emile Hesky 9 league goals in 4 seasons (0.4 goals per season or 0.09 goals per game)

These are examples of the Wastemen than Barry was assisting. Try and factor these profligate wastemen into your calculations abeg.

And then compare to Scholes playing with Rooney(177 league goals), RVN(95 league goals)

And tell me why Scholes has only 34 premier league assists


Btw using your equation...


Iniesta = (34 goals + 81 assists)/386 league games = 0.30 ga per game
Scholes = (107 goals + 34 assists)/499 league games = 0.28 ga per game


I hope this does not mean what I think it means...