Eruditor:


[s]You are just forming activity. The person I am posting at understands the estimations.

United picked only 3pts from Burnley and City picked 4. Same for Leicester where City picked 6. They will make up the same 16pts that it is today without Stoke or Westbrom.

I did not need to write them out he already knew. I just brought out the most glaring source of 12pts for City that LFC and United will not have.

Which still puts City at winning the league latest 29games in.[/s]

Eruditor:


Pep won more within the same time frame abi?

airmark:


If you remove west brom and stoke, you stated that city would be leading with at least 15points by game 29. Did your brain inform you that you need to check who would be the biggest loser of this removal, by checking how many points gained and lost by city and united from these two, before jumping into that horrible conclusion?

Greatihex:
try to be understanding people's post before you quote them. I don't want to have headache this night.

Eruditor:


LOL. Still forming activity.

We are past that type of argument because time of losing will make points diff to flunctuate.

For e.g United losing today made it go back to 16 whereas it was 13 just before and 16 before they played themselves (City vs United).

That is why even if the points lost from both teams is 2more for City. It does not matter.

airmark:


Chai, instead of you to check and make neccessary deductions like an intelligent person, you base your conclusion on if, if, if like Davido.

I'm done.

FBS:
Quite sure even Sam Allardyce would win the league with all that money and players.

Eruditor:


You are just regurgitating Ibime’s misappropriated words.

How can someone ask me to cut out Stoke and Westbrom and then when I do and show him the implications of that condition. Turns around to say I am making conditional statements.

Is it not an “if” argument to say in 34 games City would have won the league in 31 games? Is that not what Ibime claimed? LOL.

airmark:


We are at wk33, If you remove points gained from the 4 matches ( wba and stc) from city and united's total points, you get the points at week 29 I.e four weeks matches deducted.

At week 29:

city = 87 - 12 = 75points

United = 71- 4 = 67points

Where did that your mysterious 15 points lead, come from? Even if you remove today's match, the gap is still 11points.

Only God can save you from getting disgraced subsequently.

Eruditor:


LOL.

United played Stoke twice and WestBrom twice.

They took 4 from stoke and 3 from Westbrom before today. So remove 7 before today. Which means City are ahead with 14pts with 29games played.

airmark:


If we even dance to your tune, you should look for your maths teacher, and do the needful.

United's 71 points - 7 points = 64 points

City = 75 points

United = 64 points

Where is your mysterious 15 or 14 points lead you were shouting about? We can now see the stupid person between me and you now.

Ibime please ask Raumdeuter to come and carry this shameless eLLLLLruditor. He is terrible.

Neymar1095:

Lol.. Pep is your champion and will remain your
champion for the next one year. And there
is absolutely nothing you can do about it. Enjoy Europa next season.

Eruditor:


[s]This is a 34 game season recall and I told you that being exacting will make the points fluctuate because of timing.[/s]

For e.g removing City’s game 25 (Westbrom) will mean City would have played 1game less than United whilst being 11pts ahead. Agree?

[s]Edit: don’t be in a hurry to gloat I am watching basketball here. LOL[/s]

airmark:


When you finish your Bball, come back and erase the stupid line i highlighted. It would have been better not to reply at all.

You are so forgetful or maybe trying to start another senseless argument, where there is none. They have all played 33matches, remove 4, you get 29.

You have problems handling numbers. We have resolved everything involving stoke city and west brom, the highest is 11 points not 14. I even conceded west brom's match today as you suggested.

Oga, just face your basketball and stop disturbing me with your shameless attempts.

Eruditor:


We are past that type of argument because time of losing will make points diff to flunctuate.

eph12:

It's not easy to replace Xavi and Iniesta. Pep was lucky

Greatihex:
*Two fishes were swimming when they saw a piece of meat dangling before them*.��

The younger fish darted toward it with an open mouth. The older fish cried out, “Stop"! ✋�
"You can’t see it, but there is a hook inside that meat. It is connected by an invisible line to a pole outside the water. There is a man holding the pole"

"THE *TRUTH* is, if you eat the meat, the hook will catch in your jaw and the man will pull you out of the water. He will cut you open with a knife, roast you on a fire and eat you. Then he will throw your remains to his cat.”

The young fish stopped. The two swam away. But when the young fish was alone, he thought to himself,
“Let me investigate the *truth* myself how accurate these lousy claims are"

He went back to the meat, swam around it, above and below it. He swam as far as he could in widening circles around the meat.

After a long search, he said to himself, “I’ve looked far and wide, and *I haven’t found any sign of a man, a pole, a knife, a fire or a cat.* In fact, I’ve found nothing outside this water we live in" I have come to realise my *truth*

"These must just be stories made up to limit our freedoms"

He went back to the meat and ate it.

The hook caught in his jaw, he felt himself being yanked out of the water.
For sure *He saw a pole, a man and a knife, and a little further, he saw the man's cat sleeping in a shade,* but at that point his knowledge of *the TRUTH* was useless.

*MORAL OF THE STORY*

*It is exactly the story of the Great Gospel and Mysteries of the Bible.*
Some of them are beyond our comprehension.
We now don't see Satan, Angels, Jesus or His judgement seat, no, we don't see the eternal fire of hell at all, but of course we will realize all along that it was *THE TRUTH* vs our truth, and that will be only when death eventually strikes. But Alas! *Too late forever*

May God let us heed to the *TRUTH* while it is useful to us. Amen. JESUS said, *"I AM the way, the TRUTH and the life* Nobody goes to the Father without me.

*Behold, I come quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book*

Revelation 22:7 Do same n share with others. God bless U

eph12:

So Pep needs to go back to Barca to the treble not to talk of sextuple? Issokay

FBS:
Quite sure even Sam Allardyce would win the league with all that money and players.

FBS:

Even Ranieri thinks its not a big deal.
Conte with less resources become EPL Champion long before Pep. So what is you saying?

popizaino:
straw man.

It's means pep made barca and messi and not the other way round as you've always thought.

eph12:

Is there any chance of Pep making another barca and messi?

TalabiAudu:
Are these people alright sha?

League that Pellegrini won at his first season without spending 500M

League that Raineri won with a relegation team.

League that Italian Tony Pulis won in his first season without buying 11 new players


After spending bastard cash, buying the best ever team to grace the EPL , all you have to show for it is a local league win and a calabash cup, like seriously?

Pellegrini took Navas, Mangala, Sagna and Kolarov to the UCL semis, beating a good PSG side to it and lost narrowly to the best team in the world Real Madrid..

Fraudiola got disgraced by Bakayoko, got pummeled 5-1 by Liverpool's Milner, Chamberlain and Lovren..

And suddenly he wins the league and he is the next best thing after slice bread.

Seriously, you guys should be ashamed.

Cashiola is a bald fraud, and there are some bald statistics to prove it.

bigkesh:
Pep won the league before Barcelona that are unbeaten sef.

Competitive my ass.


PS: Can we all now agree that Pep is 10x the manager Jose is.