I have a theory to propose and it's based on information gathered from over two hundred couples in both relationships and marriages.

The concept is simply focused on what class of women would cross the line and boundaries of relationships/marriages just to meet up with trends, even if it means cheating on their men.

The outcome shows that ladies from poor backgrounds/homes tend to be more materialistically demanding and impatient when their needs are not flowing accordingly.

Further more, ladies from rich/average homes: Would and can bare with hardship from their men and stick to whatever is available for them. They're mostly not the click types of women. They're mostly not the overly activity going type of women as well as can be comfortable when their needs are not 100% flowing.

While those from Poor Backgrounds: Would hardly bare with hardship and can over step boundaries just to meet up with friends. They're click oriented types of women and are mostly the SHOW type that would go any level to impress their environs.

The point is that ladies from average or rich homes tend to strive better during hard times in relationships/marriages better than those from poor backgrounds/homes.

One could could argue that the reason is because when you have suffered from the poverty syndrome long enough, you automatically becomes allergic to it and it's components and would do anything within reach to avoid it while if you have enjoyed wealth and comfort, it's absence no longer threatens you.

As this may not be true for EVERY woman but to a larger extent it has proven to be true for most.

Feel free to share your Views

www.flaubertajiero.com

I don't even know why i am mad at the OP