Imagine this situation:
1. You are happily married with kids, but the family average income is just OK but not sufficient to cater for the whole family. You always have to plan before the next pay check.

2. You are happily married still waiting on the Lord for kids, but can afford all the good things of life. Good House, Cars, frequent vacations etc.

Sincerely, if you have a choice, which would you prefer?

Which would you prefer, your eyes or you mouth??

i will take the wealth and addopt.

my own biological children
If so, also wealth to take care of my children

Wealth can dissapear, but your loving children would always be yours.

Both.

Tough one

i will take children wealth we surely come.

i have been working to make sure my children have good future

see question

children,because children are wealth.

BOTH.i cannot choose bcus d person who gives dem,does not make dem as substitutes to each oda.

definitely children, like the someone already said, wealth could disappear but your children are yours forever, and they become your wealth, your retirement plan.

definetly kids, whats all the wealth if u've got no1 to leave it for when ure gone?definetly kids men(doe money must dey sha)

very though question
but I'll go for children coz that can bring fortune later.
Not to come to this world and go like a snake that passed on a rock without traces

" ego ka nwa" meaning "money is better than child"
or
"nwa ka ego" meaning "child is is better than money"
which is sweeter?

i choose my name "okenwa" meaning " wealthy child"
so funny

Both

Health.you cannot enjoy neither withour health.

Children ofcourse. Remember "Child is wealth" there is a saying in yoruba that says "Omo bori owo" meaning "Pikin pass money"


@ SeanT21
If you should adopt what would be the end of the story?

i want both

when i first saw this, i thought to myself: ''I think ill make do with wealth and adopt - change another child's life forever.' But asides that, everyone desire both.

Children without a doubt.

Wealth is material things how many people out there would give all just to have a child

Children for me thanks and lots of them!!!

LadyT:

Children without a doubt.

Wealth is material things how many people out there would give all just to have a child

Children for me thanks and lots of them!!!

i 2nd 2 dat ladyT.

I can have both!!. . .
I dont settle for less. . .

this is definetely a no brainer, i will go for the children
what the point if you have all the money in the world with no one to share it with?

What makes you think you can't have both?!

Children

Children definitely! Can't trade them for anything in the world even with all their wahala. . . of which they are so many!

children definitely or both

Both! I refuse for my children to live in poverty. That is not their portion.

My Babies, ofcourse. . .