Codedrock: Ansa= 11 LIKE this if you think i am correct

y u de beg for likes na? Wit ur wide mouth like angelina pant. Lol

and hw is dis gonna help you be more productive? if u give give me d poo ansa of helping u develop ur analytical mind....i'll slap u in d face. give these guys jobs jare

-1 + 1 = 0.
U borrow 1 and add 1 to place the borrowed 1 and U are left with nothing. So therefore, the Answer is Zero(0). NA SIMPLE MATHS!

1 + 1 = 3
See Proof Below

Method one
1 = 1

41 – 40 = 61 – 60

16 + 25 – 40 = 36 + 25 – 60

4² + 5² – 2 * 4 * 5 = 6² + 5² – 2 * 6 * 5

(4 – 5)² = (6 – 5)²

4 – 5 = 6 – 5

4 = 6

2 = 3

1 + 1 = 3

Method two
put a+b = 0

so 1(a+b) = 0

1 = 0/(a+b)

0 = 1

adding 2 on both sides

0+2 = 1+2

2= 3

1+1 =3
Method three
Let x = y, then

x−y+y=y

x−y/x−y+y=y/x−y

We can then simplify as:

x−y/x−y+y/x−y=y/x−y

or

1+y/x−y=y/x−y

1=y/x−y−y/x−y

1=0

Now we know that x = y or 1 = 1 is true and that 1 = 0 or 0 = 1 is true, we pose:

0 = 1
1 = 1
1 = 1

Adding these three equations we get:

0 + 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 + 1

or

1 + 1 = 3

naijaobi: in mathematics, -1+1=0
but in dis case -1+1 = >1 or <1..
Think deep and u'll undstand wot i mean

mtcheeeeee...

I think the answer would be zero as we would have to introduce brackets as follows

-1+1 = -(1-1) if we expand the bracket we have -1+1 that is - x 1 -(-1) would give us -1+1 hence from the above -(1-1) = -(0) = 0 Q. E. D

Na wa ooo people dey show some craze fr here oh,see equations and many many mata, some dey reason marriage join d equation kai oghene really create people

Y all d confusion, -1 + 1= 0, its just a test to confuse you kowai

sincerely,we all knw wot interviewers look or wot dey always insinuate........they only wants to see ur level of reasonin n ways in wic u approach tins wen it comes to real n practical life......firstly,one needs to calm down n dont start bragging as if u really knw the actual answer because questions like dis are so deadly in wic u might tot u knw wot d interviewer is really insinuatin but,all u just need is to cool down n give some meaninful(to u) responses,just try to make sometin u knw is a bit relative n if possible relate wit examples.i wish all job seekers all d best in their different interviews.

Boss Ttdiamonds: 1 + 1 = 3
See Proof Below

Method one
1 = 1

41 – 40 = 61 – 60

16 + 25 – 40 = 36 + 25 – 60

4² + 5² – 2 * 4 * 5 = 6² + 5² – 2 * 6 * 5

(4 – 5)² = (6 – 5)²

4 – 5 = 6 – 5

4 = 6

2 = 3

1 + 1 = 3

You should sue your primary school teachers for teaching you nansense!

You can write

(a-b)² = (b-a) ²

but you cannot write
(a-b) = (b-a)

Just as |a-b|=|b-a| <> (a-b) =(b-a)

Boss Ttdiamonds:
Method two
put a+b = 0

so 1(a+b) = 0

1 = 0/(a+b)

0 = 1

adding 2 on both sides

0+2 = 1+2

2= 3

1+1 =3

Again, dude, you FAILED!

if a+b = 0

then 0/(a+b) <> 0. In this case, 0/(a+b) = undefined

You should really sue your primary school headmaster and ask for your money back

Olodo mathematician!

Boss Ttdiamonds: 1 + 1 = 3
See Proof Below

Method one
1 = 1

41 – 40 = 61 – 60

16 + 25 – 40 = 36 + 25 – 60

4² + 5² – 2 * 4 * 5 = 6² + 5² – 2 * 6 * 5

(4 – 5)² = (6 – 5)²

4 – 5 = 6 – 5

4 = 6

2 = 3

1 + 1 = 3

Method two
put a+b = 0

so 1(a+b) = 0

1 = 0/(a+b)

0 = 1

adding 2 on both sides

0+2 = 1+2

2= 3

1+1 =3
Method three
Let x = y, then

x−y+y=y

x−y/x−y+y=y/x−y

We can then simplify as:

x−y/x−y+y/x−y=y/x−y

or

1+y/x−y=y/x−y

1=y/x−y−y/x−y

1=0

Now we know that x = y or 1 = 1 is true and that 1 = 0 or 0 = 1 is true, we pose:

0 = 1
1 = 1
1 = 1

Adding these three equations we get:

0 + 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 + 1

or

1 + 1 = 3

lmfao!!!!!!! seriously??,no wonder ASUU is on strike dude

Is it me or is there a serious comprehension problem here? The question is -1 + 1 not 1+1. Na why people dey fail be dat.

vedaxcool: I think the answer would be zero as we would have to introduce brackets as follows

-1+1 = -(1-1) if we expand the bracket we have -1+1 that is - x 1 -(-1) would give us -1+1 hence from the above -(1-1) = -(0) = 0 Q. E. D

I'd just write a big fat O..

Don't hve time to waste puttin bracket removing it wtf..
I'd soo fail this test thingy what exactly do they want

Question don finish? Ŋά̲̣̣̣ confusion ǻn̶̲̥̅̊ԃ brain disturbance be dis.....1+1 equal to 2 period!!!!! Nxt question plsss

Boss Ttdiamonds: 1 + 1 = 3
See Proof Below

Method one
1 = 1

41 – 40 = 61 – 60

16 + 25 – 40 = 36 + 25 – 60

4² + 5² – 2 * 4 * 5 = 6² + 5² – 2 * 6 * 5

(4 – 5)² = (6 – 5)²

4 – 5 = 6 – 5

4 = 6

2 = 3

1 + 1 = 3

Method two
put a+b = 0

so 1(a+b) = 0

1 = 0/(a+b)

0 = 1

adding 2 on both sides

0+2 = 1+2

2= 3

1+1 =3
Method three
Let x = y, then

x−y+y=y

x−y/x−y+y=y/x−y

We can then simplify as:

x−y/x−y+y/x−y=y/x−y

or

1+y/x−y=y/x−y

1=y/x−y−y/x−y

1=0

Now we know that x = y or 1 = 1 is true and that 1 = 0 or 0 = 1 is true, we pose:

0 = 1
1 = 1
1 = 1

Adding these three equations we get:

0 + 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 + 1

or

1 + 1 = 3

i dey laugh ooo.

lol they want to test your foolishness....the answer is simply 0.

Boss Ttdiamonds: 1 + 1 = 3
See Proof Below

Method one
1 = 1

41 – 40 = 61 – 60

16 + 25 – 40 = 36 + 25 – 60

4² + 5² – 2 * 4 * 5 = 6² + 5² – 2 * 6 * 5

(4 – 5)² = (6 – 5)²

4 – 5 = 6 – 5

4 = 6

2 = 3

1 + 1 = 3

Method two
put a+b = 0

so 1(a+b) = 0

1 = 0/(a+b)

0 = 1

adding 2 on both sides

0+2 = 1+2

2= 3

1+1 =3
Method three
Let x = y, then

x−y+y=y

x−y/x−y+y=y/x−y

We can then simplify as:

x−y/x−y+y/x−y=y/x−y

or

1+y/x−y=y/x−y

1=y/x−y−y/x−y

1=0

Now we know that x = y or 1 = 1 is true and that 1 = 0 or 0 = 1 is true, we pose:

0 = 1
1 = 1
1 = 1

Adding these three equations we get:

0 + 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 + 1

or

1 + 1 = 3

dis guy don smoke real igboooooo

-1+1= Constant or Unchanged or Non-permanent changed value. Reason for my assertion. If what left(outflow) is equivalent to what entered(inflow), it means that system is still in its original state. Besides dont forget that zero as a value means no significant/permanent change occured.

bookface:

You should sue your primary school teachers for teaching you nansense!

You can write

(a-b)² = (b-a) ²

but you cannot write
(a-b) = (b-a)

Just as |a-b|=|b-a| <> (a-b) =(b-a)

I think I should break it down a bit....
(4 – 5)² = (6 – 5)²
takin' the square root of both sides

(4-5) ^(2*1/2) = (6-5) ^(2*1/2)

(4-5)¹ = (6-5)¹

Removing the brackets we get
4 – 5 = 6 – 5
Now adding (+5) to both sides, we get
4-5+5=6-5+5
4-0=6-0
therefore we have
4 = 6
Dividing both sides by 2 we have
4/2=6/2
Then we have
2 = 3

Now from our normal math rule
1+1 = 2
substitutin' 1+1 for 2 in the equation
We have
1 + 1 = 3

Boss Ttdiamonds: 1 + 1 = 3
See Proof Below

Method one
1 = 1

41 – 40 = 61 – 60

16 + 25 – 40 = 36 + 25 – 60

4² + 5² – 2 * 4 * 5 = 6² + 5² – 2 * 6 * 5

(4 – 5)² = (6 – 5)²

4 – 5 = 6 – 5

4 = 6

2 = 3

1 + 1 = 3

Method two
put a+b = 0

so 1(a+b) = 0

1 = 0/(a+b)

0 = 1

adding 2 on both sides

0+2 = 1+2

2= 3

1+1 =3
Method three
Let x = y, then

x−y+y=y

x−y/x−y+y=y/x−y

We can then simplify as:

x−y/x−y+y/x−y=y/x−y

or

1+y/x−y=y/x−y

1=y/x−y−y/x−y

1=0

Now we know that x = y or 1 = 1 is true and that 1 = 0 or 0 = 1 is true, we pose:

0 = 1
1 = 1
1 = 1

Adding these three equations we get:

0 + 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 + 1

or

1 + 1 = 3

gosh where is my baby powder when i need it the most.....u need some serious bytch slapping!

Boss Ttdiamonds: 1 + 1 = 3
See Proof Below

Method one
1 = 1

41 – 40 = 61 – 60

16 + 25 – 40 = 36 + 25 – 60

4² + 5² – 2 * 4 * 5 = 6² + 5² – 2 * 6 * 5

(4 – 5)² = (6 – 5)²

4 – 5 = 6 – 5

4 = 6

2 = 3

1 + 1 = 3

Method two
put a+b = 0

so 1(a+b) = 0

1 = 0/(a+b)

0 = 1

adding 2 on both sides

0+2 = 1+2

2= 3

1+1 =3
Method three
Let x = y, then

x−y+y=y

x−y/x−y+y=y/x−y

We can then simplify as:

x−y/x−y+y/x−y=y/x−y

or

1+y/x−y=y/x−y

1=y/x−y−y/x−y

1=0

Now we know that x = y or 1 = 1 is true and that 1 = 0 or 0 = 1 is true, we pose:

0 = 1
1 = 1
1 = 1

Adding these three equations we get:

0 + 1 + 1 = 1 + 1 + 1

or

1 + 1 = 3

Pythagoras don suffer in his grave

engineerd:



gosh where is my baby powder when i need it the most.....u need some serious bytch slapping!

Ever Heard of "Street Fightin' Mathematics"...

I do not think this is about mathematics simpliciter, I think it is more like if you take money to invest, that is -1, when you make profit, it is +1. But +1 cannot come without -1, that is, without investment, there is no profit or gain.

Secondly, it looks also like when you remove one person from an employment and employ another person, you end up with the same expense, no economic loss. That is, -1+1=0

IMO though.

- 1 + 1 is equillibrium. Nothing changes. Zero is equilibrium point answer is Zero.

HighNesssss......

1+1=2

Personally, in answering this question, I ll leverage on the concept of team work which is neccessay in every organisation. That said, let's look at it this way, 1 is greater than two isn't it? It means that for you to get to 2, you must first get to 1 isn't it? 1 respresents a team member each. An addition of which is equal to 2 which is an elevated position to which every staff employee aspires.

The quest to get to that elevated position can be likened to a project in which you need a team member(1) and a team lead(1) to execute. Therefore each 1 needs (he other 1 to get to 2 which is the aspired position.

I could also put it this way, 2 (1+1) good heads are better than one. The aim of the interview is to discover the good heads and hopefully you ll top the list.

This might not make sense to some of you but sincerely, this is the way I would answer the question.

tobicool: -1 + 1 = 0.
U borrow 1 and add 1 to place the borrowed 1 and U are left with nothing. So therefore, the Answer is Zero(0). NA SIMPLE MATHS!

iweee!!!!!!!!. do u tink dat dey would av been so dull to av asked dis simple question?..simple questions may contain some hidden traps sometimes...dey must be looking for something else.and also consider d tym,dey must be looking for somebody dat can act and think fast..daz wat business requires..#just passing by sha

infiniteloop: 1+1= whatever you choose to define it.

Like earlier stated, it depends on the operating base of computation.

An example of what I mean is this:
1, 2, 4, ? What's the next number in the series?

This is a common math problem and on lower level of thinking, it is safe to assume this is a GP series and then conclude the next number is 8.

However looking deeper, the next number could be 17/3.

(1x5 -3)/1 =2
(2x5 -3)/2 =4
...
So third term will be (4x5 -3)/3 =17/3

Point is: when asked such a question, technically the right answer is to ask the condition.

Actually, when given a series, whatever "formula" that defines one, must define all. The calculations u just gave doesn't help us get the 1st term.
So unless you can come up with one that also helps you get the 1st term, it's safer to assume [2^(p-1)]. Where p signifies which term. Just saying.

SilaV: It depends on the perspective with which an individual wants to view the equation.For instance,if we were to look at it from mathematics angle,then the following conditions would apply:
(1) The number bases you are working with.If it were to be base ten,then the answer would be 2.However,if it were to be base two,the answer would be "10"(pronounced one-zero)
(2)The operation the cross symbol represents.That is,the concept of binary operation would be looked at.In binary operation,the cross or plus sign is not regarded as the "normal addition" operator.Any sign that comes in-between two numbers in binary operation is often expressed as "opertion".For example, 1+1 is read as "one operation one".Of course, in binary operation if the plus sign actually means addition,then one of the rule would apply;1+1= 1.
Again, if the equation is to be looked at from social perspective,then the institution of marriage would come to mind.In marriage: 1+1=1
Just my contribution.

Twale 4u. I think ur ans are very logical n intelligent. Exactly my thought. Brawo!

See wetin excess supply of labour dey cause...stcheww...nonsense qwestion.