tintingz: another ignorantee, Jesus never spoke Aramaic?

It is generally agreed that Jesus and his disciples
primarily spoke Aramaic , the common language
of Judea in the first century AD, most likely a
Galilean dialect distinguishable from that of
Jerusalem . [1] The towns of Nazareth and
Capernaum in Galilee , where Jesus spent most
of his time, were Aramaic-speaking communities.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Language_of_Jesus

Jesus said " Eloi , Eloi , lama sabachthani" what language is that?

again...

"Jesus was a native Aramaic speaker," he said about the largely defunct Semitic language closely related to Hebrew. "But he would have also known Hebrew because there were extant religious writings in Hebrew."
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2014/05/26/Hebrew-or-Aramaic-Pope-Netanyahu-spar-over-Jesus-native-language.html

You guys should stop posting what you don't have knowledge of.

Rilwayne001:
According to the bible
Jesus turned water to wine, can you do that? even your pastor..can he do it? or ever did it?

Jesus fed more than 5000men with a loaf of bread, can you do that? even your pastor..can he do it? or ever did it?

Jesus walked on sea according to the bible, can you do it? even your pastor..can he do it? or ever did it?

Jesus said if you believe in him and tell a mountain to throw itself into a river,it will surely happen, can you do that? even your pastor..can he do it? or ever did it?

Please answer all my kwestions dont skip them abeg....



mtsheew..
how does this relate to what we are sayin...
the miracle of islam is everywherr for you to see aside all that you state up there.



so are you saying that the bomb despite missing there major target never killed anybody most especially people comin out of the tafsir programme?

Macelliot:
Revelation is Reliable.. The Revelation to Apostle John in 100 A.D in the isle of Cyprus..
The content in the book are reliable and some have came to past.....

FrancisTony:


Tintingz, the father all liers and ignoramus had to quote me with his over-edited wiki lies? I don't believe in those wiki lies that have been edited by Muslim extremist.

I hate liers!

It's not generally agreed that Jesus spoke Aramiac. Keep deluding yourself with Anti-christian websites.

ELi Eli, lama sabachtani is a Mishniac Hebrew word which were widely spoken in olden days and not Aramiac.

So, try again later!

tintingz: I'm a liar huh?

even when I gave another link of a pope saying Jesus native language is Aramaic.

Now this where you guys are mixing it up.

"Eli" is Hebrew while "Eloi" is Aramaic.

In the bible Mark used "Eloi" which is Aramaic (Mark 15:34) but Matthew used "Eli" which is Hebrew(Matthew 27:46).

Mark and Matthew used different language because they speak both, but Aramaic is the native language Jesus spoke.

You Christians are just reading the bible without knowing the original text, Muslims on the other hand have studied the original text of the Quran which is Arabic.

So Mister do your research first before calling others liars.

FrancisTony:

http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Articles/Jesus_Hebrew/jesus_hebrew.html



he said Eli not Eloi 'cos jews were like "Was he invoking Elijah".

tintingz: Yai...! see big lie

Please do some research before posting.

Jesus native language is Aramaic, the romans were the rulers then so many scriptures were translated into Greek language, that's why there are Roman catholic they adopted the roman culture and language.

tintingz:
Jesus call God "Eloi" is Eloi Aramaic or Greek?

tintingz:
It is generally agreed that Jesus and his disciples primarily spoke Aramaic , the common language of Judea in the first century AD, most likely a Galilean dialect distinguishable from that of Jerusalem . [1] The towns of Nazareth and Capernaum in Galilee , where Jesus spent most of his time, were Aramaic-speaking communities.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_of_Jesus

tintingz:
And secondly the disciples of Jesus never had any agreement nor accept paul teachings.

malvisguy212: with God all things are possible, unless you don't believe in miracle. Do you? I may not feed 50people or change water to wine, but one thin for sure, I can do miracle through the name of jesus.

malvisguy212: Funny guy,if you want to set trap , is it not were you will kill many meat you will set the trap? If you say boko haram are people in the politics, I may reason with you, but for you to say they are christian, that a very very big lie, I remember when they have not started killing muslims, all the hausa guys are very happy with them, there kid are even calling them self boko haram, but just when the boko boys start killing muslims, they start causing them and sayin they are christian.

RikoduoSennin:

Yet the disciples did not write the original text in Roman language but they did so in Greek. Why did they Favor Greek, When they could have used their well established Native "Aramiac" language to write it? Why didn't Jesus and his disciples Names not in Aramaic but in Hebrew if it wasn't his Native language? Roman and Greek are two different cultures!

You mean a variation of Eloihim is Aramaic? Two language can call spoon the same way, that doesn't mean they are the same language; the surrounding verse and other parts of the New testament were written around the same time period and the Recognised original text of not just one but all of these books (27) of them are written in Greek. Anything else is fallacy.

Not everything you read in the internet is reliable information, you should know that. Throughtout all the ages and cultures; Names given to children is a reflection of the commonly spoken language. That is a FACT.

Oh really? Well, the book of Acts is written by the Luke himself. Read through the Acts of the apostles and you will see things differently.

tintingz: The Roman empire two languages are Latin and Greek so the bible was translated into Greek because the Jews at that time understand Greek generally, some part of the original bible text were written in Aramaic, Hebrew and were all translated into Greek by the early authors, the scholars wrote in Greek then.

The Jews old language is Hebrew so people name their children in Hebrew language(there are Aramaic names too) but Jesus and his disciples speak in Aramaic often, it was the language widely spoken during Jesus era.

tintingz:
Aramaic even became the common language spoken in Israel in Jesus' time, and it was likely the language He spoke day by day.[B] Some Aramaic words were even used by the Gospel writers in the New Testament.[/b]
http://www.biblica.com/en-us/bible/bible-faqs/in-what-language-was-the-bible-first-written/

tintingz:
Eloi is Aramaic, Eli is Hebrew, go and find out yourself.


Mark and Matthew used different language in some part of the bible.

tintingz:



Do you want me to quote where Jesus disciples and paul disagreed with their gospel teachings?

RikoduoSennin:

According to you- the Jews commonly spoken language change from Hebrew to Aramaic. So What is the commonly spoken language now? Please tell me When in particular in History did the Jewish forsake their original language and commonly use another language-eg Aramaic as their National language.

Note- Some not all, how does that prove the common language was Aramaic. Some latin words were also used to, can we draw the same conclusion?.

Well you are right. I did some research and found out Mark used SOME aramaic expressions (3:17; 5:41;7:11,34;14:36;15:22,34).

The language they used the most in their write up is till GREEK, the most common language then. After all, Mark's gospel was written with the Gentiles in mind- hence the added explanation giving to Hebrew terms used.

Please do!

We are just avoiding the main reason for this thread: which is the alleged book of Barnabas.

If according to the OP the book is authentic, the implication is; (1) Paul's 13 books was not inspired. (2) The gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) are not inspired, since in all of them Jesus is called the Son of God, he was impaled and was resurrected before going to Heaven. He even mentioned the coming of the holy spirit not some other prophet.

The book of Barnabas is not canon, it was written after compilation of all 66 inspired books. It contradict the other books, which are all harmonious in their teaching. No conclusive evidence to prove it was written by Barnabas himself due to error in time period.

RikoduoSennin: .
This report most likely is false. Even if it isn't, it goes to show the OP's limited knowledge of Christianity.

1) During Jesus era, there was nothing called the bible. They just have various scrolls and parchments of Hebrew and Aramaic writers.

RikoduoSennin: .
2) Jesus native language was not Aramaic or Syriac. Look closely at his name "Yehosuah", His ancestry, the time period was around the rise of the Roman Empire which was presided by the Greek Empire. Now you understand why the New testaments were writting in Greek (consistent with history).

RikoduoSennin: .3) The Holy Scriptures/Bible as a whole does not contradict itself, it is harmonious. How then can Barnabas call Paul and imposter yet both books written by Paul and barnabas was most likely found in your Supposely found bible.

RikoduoSennin: 4)Not all books written are inspired of God, Some books are called Apocrypha books which are not included in the Holy Scriptures. Only 66 books were inspired. These books were written after the death