California Passes ‘Yes Means Yes’ Law



Here’s some uplifting news to read before you leave for your long weekend: California just became the first state to pass a ‘Yes Means Yes’ bill that would require all state-funded colleges and universities to adopt “affirmative consent” language in their definitions of consensual sex, Yahoo! News reports.
The California senate unanimously passed the bill in May, and it’s now set to be signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown. The law defines sexual consent between people as “affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity.” In other words, silence or a lack of resistance do not count as consent, and drugs and alcohol will not (not that they ever should) excuse unwanted sexual activity or touching.
Governor Brown must sign the bill into law by September 30th, and if he does, it would be the first time a state would require such strong language to be a part of a school’s sexual assault policies, Claire Conlon, a spokesperson for Senator Kevin de Leon—who championed the bill—told Yahoo!.
We love this idea, not only because it seems to do away with the old “No means no” mentality, but because it champions enthusiastic consent between students. Hopefully, it’ll encourage all parties involved to stand up for themselves and talk about what they’re comfortable with. There’s nothing sexier or healthier than two people who really know what they want and aren’t afraid to say it.

http://zealnote.com/yes-means-yes-new-sex-law-california/

I don't understand

Women wil not like dis law. They prefare no means yes. Watch out for feminists protest. Meanwhile if dis law was alife when men where men, many of us would have smelled the bars uncountable times!

Idrismusty97: I don't understand

Makes two of us

RubbbbbbbbbbiiiiiiiissssssSshhhhhh

McWhillion:
Makes two of us

same here

Tawis06: same here

Me too don't understand ... Hahahahahahaha rubbish

Rexnegro:

Me too don't understand ... Hahahahahahaha rubbish

Idrismusty97: I don't understand

Rexnegro:

Me too don't understand ... Hahahahahahaha rubbish

Am still clueless

It means sex will be preceded by a question and answer session.

Boy: do you know what i am getting ready to do you?

Girl: yes!

Boy: are you aware i have an ere.ction?

Girl: yes!

Boy: do you know what erect pennees do?

Girl: yes!

Boy: under California statute code 739 section X.X.X, do you consent to be fvckd by this penees?

Girl: yes!

Boy: to prove intent and consent in the AFFIRMATIVE grab the penees and insert it in your body.

Girl: ok.


I change my mind about relocating to California! Im going to Utah instead.

There are no blurred lines. #simple

If its a case of the lady making the move, does the law also stipulates the lady to pop the question and the man to consent or is it usually the other way round?

Other Intelligent Lawmakers are covering all loopholes with unambiguous laws while the ones in Nigeria are impeaching poultry farmers, sharing monies and virtually doing nothing except passing budgets without asking questions.

When are we getting our Judiciary up and running with unambiguous laws covering every issue in life for quick dispensation of justice with stiffer penalties?

Reproductive Organs must verbalise what they want or be kept in-cloths

Na wa o. This law makes f*cking a long process.

So if the girl doesn't say yes, but stays on top is that consensual?

Idrismusty97: I don't understand

consensual agreement btw both party.
Sexual cohesiveness btw the opposites.
They mean, sexual principle of reciprocity.
Infact, they mean no sexual militancy and insurgency.
They mean holo-sexual relativity.
I swear, they mean effusion of 'yeses'.
They are saying sexual desiderata . What the law preaches is romantic uniformitarianis. Infact, it encourages holo-hayalenal sexual acceptance. The law is frictional to rapemaniac, the law envices posterior and anterior compromise, they mean conspicous YES, as in, existentialistic YES is the case here. Like 'hemorhagic yes' is what they're talking about...Etc.
Hope u understand now.

Idrismusty97: I don't understand

what they are trying to say is that before a guy can have canal knowledge of a girl she must say yes if not it will be seen as rape/molestation.

Get it?

caseless: consensual agreement btw both party.
Sexual cohesiveness btw the opposites.
They mean, sexual principle of reciprocity.
Infact, they mean no sexual militancy and insurgency.
They mean holo-sexual relativity.
I swear, they mean effusion of 'yeses'.
They ar saying sexual desiderata etc.
Hope u understand now.

bros Nawa for you o!

You just compounded the matter...

Tundeiab: bros Nawa for you o!

You just compounded the matter...

learning is a life-long experience.

Sexual molestation is very high in California,and I believe this law will go a long way in curbing the menace.









When tryna hide the sausage on some CA ladies they would be like "remember I haven't said yes"

Mheeeen...Carlifornia prostitutes are about to experience a BOOM in business!!

yes























































Dedicate this plots of land to the humble owner of afronigeria just luv d guy #very humble












thank God this is a lessface forum

Make I book space first.

Idrismusty97: I don't understand

me too

YES ;d

#taaaaa if konji hold me make I hear say I get time for all Dis question and answer session.. moreover Dis people get stupid laws,come see law wey u no fit put rat trap for ur house except u get hunting permit
read here. http:///Gxzp

What happens in America stays in America..
This is highly not welcomed in my country..
Show spoiler...

So if I walk to her and say hope you need it now.she must say yes or no rather than pretending.ok Jerry brown I don understand this level wela

i don't even understand this Anyone to explain this to me plz??!