iceberylin: Whites being Silly since 10000AC

MayorofLagos: It means sex will be preceded by a question and answer session.

Boy: do you know what i am getting ready to do you?

Girl: yes!

Boy: are you aware i have an ere.ction?

Girl: yes!

Boy: do you know what erect pennees do?

Girl: yes!

Boy: under California statute code 739 section X.X.X, do you consent to be fvckd by this penees?

Girl: yes!

Boy: to prove intent and consent in the AFFIRMATIVE grab the penees and insert it in your body.

Girl: ok.


I change my mind about relocating to California! Im going to Utah instead.

ebolablast: #taaaaa if konji hold me make I hear say I get time for all Dis question and answer session.. moreover Dis people get stupid laws,come see law wey u no fit put rat trap for ur house except u get hunting permit
read here. http:///Gxzp

nairalife2013: Women wil not like dis law. They prefare no means yes. Watch out for feminists protest. Meanwhile if dis law was alife when men where men, many of us would have smelled the bars uncountable times!

MayorofLagos: It means sex will be preceded by a question and answer session.

Boy: do you know what i am getting ready to do you?

Girl: yes!

Boy: are you aware i have an ere.ction?

Girl: yes!

Boy: do you know what erect pennees do?

Girl: yes!

Boy: under California statute code 739 section X.X.X, do you consent to be fvckd by this penees?

Girl: yes!

Boy: to prove intent and consent in the AFFIRMATIVE grab the penees and insert it in your body.

Girl: ok.


I change my mind about relocating to California! Im going to Utah instead.

experimentist: Ujsizzle... Say yes pls

Rawani: Basically they're saying if a girl does not verbally agree to intimate activity, you cannot assume her smile/silence means she is interested, regardless of if she is high or drunk because that would count as rape_. It's all in a bid to tighten laws against sexual crime and harassment especially in schools. That's my understanding.

Rawani: Basically they're saying if a girl does not verbally agree to intimate activity, you cannot assume her smile/silence means she is interested, regardless of if she is high or drunk because that would count as rape_. It's all in a bid to tighten laws against sexual crime and harassment especially in schools. That's my understanding.

Dcaliphate: ppl that cant understand this how do expect to pass an aptitude test, go back to sleep joor

Dcaliphate: ppl that cant understand this how do expect to pass an aptitude test, go back to sleep joor

Nctrice: seems like a harsh one to me! In a world where ladies "No" means "Yes" when it has to do with intimacy. they add more salt to injury by saying "silence and or lack of resistance do not count as consent" waaaat?... A saying that is in contrast with the common saying that says "Silence means Consent!" I wonder who sponsor this kind of bill sef!

MayorofLagos: It means sex will be preceded by a question and answer session.

Boy: do you know what i am getting ready to do you?

Girl: yes!

Boy: are you aware i have an ere.ction?

Girl: yes!

Boy: do you know what erect pennees do?

Girl: yes!

Boy: under California statute code 739 section X.X.X, do you consent to be fvckd by this penees?

Girl: yes!

Boy: to prove intent and consent in the AFFIRMATIVE grab the penees and insert it in your body.

Girl: ok.


I change my mind about relocating to California! Im going to Utah instead.

MayorofLagos: It means sex will be preceded by a question and answer session.

Boy: do you know what i am getting ready to do you?

Girl: yes!

Boy: are you aware i have an ere.ction?

Girl: yes!

Boy: do you know what erect pennees do?

Girl: yes!

Boy: under California statute code 739 section X.X.X, do you consent to be fvckd by this penees?

Girl: yes!

Boy: to prove intent and consent in the AFFIRMATIVE grab the penees and insert it in your body.

Girl: ok.


I change my mind about relocating to California! Im going to Utah instead.

EnlightenedSoul: Instead of pushing outrageous and relatively unenforceable laws, they should properly enforce the laws we already have in place.

Secondly, if they want to curb ra.pe on campus, they should transfer control from the "campus police" (glorified security personnel) to the local law enforcement. I've talked to a "campus officer" I know, and he expressly stated that his job was to make sure the university never got a bad rap. He was expected to sweep such reports under the rug when studies show that few of these crimes get reported as it is.

I know more than one girl who claims to have been ra.ped. One of them claimed that she'd reported it to the campus police only to be advised against pressing charges. Perhaps this "Yes Means Yes" BC was passed with good intentions, but I don't see it changing anything. I guess we'll see how it goes...

solidman59: See this one talking as if she can answer the question if asked. All these "stop it I like it girls" in naija. They want it even more than you. In this case, I prefer Houston, Texas

UjSizzle: Next will be acceptance in writing

nairalife2013: Women wil not like dis law. They prefare no means yes. Watch out for feminists protest. Meanwhile if dis law was alife when men where men, many of us would have smelled the bars uncountable times!

all4naija: Wow! They should also extend this to young girls coerced into p o r n.

Ngwakwe: Other Intelligent Lawmakers are covering all loopholes with unambiguous laws while the ones in Nigeria are impeaching poultry farmers, sharing monies and virtually doing nothing except passing budgets without asking questions.

When are we getting our Judiciary up and running with unambiguous laws covering every issue in life for quick dispensation of justice with stiffer penalties?

Reproductive Organs must verbalise what they want or be kept in-cloths

Ngwakwe: Other Intelligent Lawmakers are covering all loopholes with unambiguous laws while the ones in Nigeria are impeaching poultry farmers, sharing monies and virtually doing nothing except passing budgets without asking questions.

When are we getting our Judiciary up and running with unambiguous laws covering every issue in life for quick dispensation of justice with stiffer penalties?

Reproductive Organs must verbalise what they want or be kept in-cloths

MayorofLagos: It means sex will be preceded by a question and answer session.

Boy: do you know what i am getting ready to do you?

Girl: yes!

Boy: are you aware i have an ere.ction?

Girl: yes!

Boy: do you know what erect pennees do?

Girl: yes!

Boy: under California statute code 739 section X.X.X, do you consent to be fvckd by this penees?

Girl: yes!

Boy: to prove intent and consent in the AFFIRMATIVE grab the penees and insert it in your body.

Girl: ok.


I change my mind about relocating to California! Im going to Utah instead.

EnlightenedSoul: Instead of pushing outrageous and relatively unenforceable laws, they should properly enforce the laws we already have in place.

Secondly, if they want to curb ra.pe on campus, they should transfer control from the "campus police" (glorified security personnel) to the local law enforcement. I've talked to a "campus officer" I know, and he expressly stated that his job was to make sure the university never got a bad rap. He was expected to sweep such reports under the rug when studies show that few of these crimes get reported as it is.

I know more than one girl who claims to have been ra.ped. One of them claimed that she'd reported it to the campus police only to be advised against pressing charges. Perhaps this "Yes Means Yes" BC was passed with good intentions, but I don't see it changing anything. I guess we'll see how it goes...