iconize:


You're not trembling yet you find seriousness in my jokes, like my joke about Kenyans

Your reason for saying C.A.R is not a novel is because it's not lengthy, according to you.

Your said the length of a narrative is the only factor that makes it a novel.

Please kindly tell us where you were taught that the length of a narrative is the only determinant of a novel.

I was only mocking you. SMP that I put in front of the reply was for that effect.

hifaif:


OK, tell us what you know about a novel beyond the surface definition given by Wikipedia. I mean what you feel a novel is.

And you should (for your own good) ask Wiki to define a NOVELLA, SHORT STORY and SHORT FICTION and post your findings here (if you have the time)

I asked you a question and you're replying with a question!

iconize:


I asked you a question and you're replying with a question!

You seem to know a lot (even though your only reference is an editable page on Wiki) about the word NOVEL

black people cab be silly.

hifaif:


I was only mocking you. SMP that I put in front of the reply was for that effect.

Mocking me by telling us narrative length is the only determinant of a novel?

I've turned you into a lying bush rat.

Talk about insecurity!

How come you never said that until now?

He said he was mocking me by being dumb.

iconize:


Mocking me by telling us narrative length is the only determinant of a novel?

I've turned you into a lying bush rat.

Talk about insecurity!

How come you never said that until now?

He said he was mocking me by being dumb.

Insults can't give you points over me, bro, if not I would have stopped being civil with you.

The only difference between a NOVEL and a SHORT FICTION is size. Technically, they have the same elements such as themes, plot, scenes, characterization, suspence, conflict, denouement, etc.

hifaif:


You seem to know a lot (even though your only reference is an editable page on Wiki) about the word NOVEL

Everybody knows that a novel is a "usually" long narrative story, in which the characters and events are imaginary.

I never said that novels are not lengthy.

But what we don't know is that; the length of the narrative is the only determinant of a novel.

hifaif:


Insults can't give you points over me, bro, if not I would have stopped being civil with you.

The only difference between a NOVEL and a SHORT FICTION is size. Technically, they have the same elements such as themes, plot, scenes, characterization, suspence, conflict, denouement, etc.

Okay!

Can you now tell us where you were taught that narrative length is the only determinant of a novel.

Failure!

iconize:


Everybody knows that a novel is a "usually" long narrative story, in which the characters and events are imaginary.

I never said that novels are not lengthy.

But what we don't know is that; the length of the narrative is the only determinant of a novel.

Yes. That is what distinguishes the novel from other SHORT FICTION. You can't just pick up a story book and say you are reading a novel.

For someone to say that narrative length is the only determinant of a novel, and after hours he's now saying he said that in a bid to scoff me.

What a baseless and moronic excuse.

iconize:


Okay!

Can you now tell us where you were taught that narrative length is the only determinant of a novel.

Failure!

Why do you want to know? I have given you an explanation. It is your turn to say what you know on the subject.

So?

hifaif:


Yes. That is what distinguishes the novel from other SHORT FICTION. You can't just pick up a story book and say you are reading a novel.

Whoo!

So the other determinants like;

1) Imaginary characters

2) Imaginary events, don't count?




This minute you're defending the statement, the next minute, "I said it to mock you".

Such an addled being!

iconize:
For someone to say that narrative length is the only determinant of a novel, and after hours he's now saying he said that in a bid to scoff me.

What a baseless and moronic excuse.

I used it against your supposed sarcasm.

iconize:


Whoo!

So the other determinants like;

1) Imaginary characters

2) Imaginary events, don't count?

Guy, are you reading my post at all? Now, I know why you have continued posting.

I said all fiction have imaginary stuffs (that is why they are called FICTION) but there are different forms in which we write fiction. Now, it is size that distinguishes one form of fiction from the other.

A novel and a novella have imaginary characters and other similar elements but only size can differentiate them.

hifaif:


Why do you want to know? I have given you an explanation. It is your turn to say what you know on the subject.

So?

What else is there to explain? I've simply explained to you what I understand from the word novel.

Unlike you who has been deviating and talking like an addled being.

This minute its sarcasm, the next minute you're seriously defending the statement.

Talk about confusion and insecurity!

iconize:


What else is there to explain? I've simply explained to you what I understand from the word novel.

Unlike you who has been deviating and talking like an addled being.

This minute its sarcasm, the next minute you're seriously defending the statement.

Talk about confusion and insecurity!

You are the one who is confused. And I understand why. You can't come to an argument with just a definition from Wiki. Literature is wider than that.

hifaif:


You are the one who is confused. And I understand why. You can't come to an argument with just a definition from Wiki. Literature is wider than that.

I think a mad person will even marvel at your confusion.

You've been pummeled from every corner, hence the confusion.

You authoritatively said; narrative length is the only determinant of a novel, only to tell us after hours that you were being sarcastic. Who does that?

iconize:


I think a mad person will even marvel at your confusion.

You've been pummeled from every corner, hence the confusion.

You authoritatively said; narrative length is the only determinant of a novel, only to tell us after hours that you were being sarcastic. Who does that?

I was replying to your supposed sarcasm about Kenya.

Guy, calm down and read well.

I am still maintaining my stand

Hiafai, for the fact the you're even defending your supposed sarcasm to be true crowns your confusion and dumbness.

This minute "it was a sarcasm", the minute "it was a serious statement".

I pummel m_orons for fun!

hifaif:


I was replying to your supposed sarcasm about Kenya.

Guy, calm down and read well.

I am still maintaining my stand

You replied my sarcasm about Kenya after how many hours of maintaining seriousness about your supposed sarcasm?

I even asked you more than 7times, where you were taught such and you never said it was sarcasm until pictures of your dumbness became more vivid.

iconize:
Hiafai, for the fact the you're even defending your supposed sarcasm to be true crowns your confusion and dumbness.

This minute "it was a sarcasm", the minute "it was a serious statement".

I pummel m_orons for fun!

I maintain my stand. You refused to read properly which is why you are making unnecessary mistakes.

iconize:


You replied my sarcasm about Kenya after how many hours of maintaining seriousness about your supposed sarcasm?

I even asked you more than 7times, where you were taught such and you never said it was sarcasm until pictures of your dumbness became more vivid.

Since you are so forgetful, I will patiently remind you.

I replied you when you said I took your sarcasm seriously.

Go and read that particular post again. It has nothing to do with this argument.

hifaif:


I maintain my stand. You refused to read properly which is why you are making unnecessary mistakes.

This was my sarcasm;

iconize:
The world sees Kenyans as East Africans but hifaif is tryna tell us they're not.

Your reply

hifaif:


SMP. Where did I say they were not East Africans?

My immediate reply. It didn't take me hours to reply after your question, unlike you who realized you were being sarcastic after hours

hifaif:


SMP. Where did I say they were not East Africans?

Why are you always trembling? I've told you the whites are not coming.

I was just being sarcastic.

iconize:


This was my sarcasm;

Your reply



My immediate reply. It didn't take me hours to reply after your question, unlike you who realized you were being sarcastic after hours





Why are you always trembling? I've told you the whites are not coming.

I was just being sarcastic.

Sorry to say, you are FOOL. I replied you once you insisted I took your sarcasm serious.

hifaif:


Since you are so forgetful, I will patiently remind you.

I replied you when you said I took your sarcasm seriously.

Go and read that particular post again. It has nothing to do with this argument.

Did it take up to 2 minutes you asked the question and I replied?

Besides, the issue about Kenyans have nothing to do with this discourse. But your statement about narrative length being the only determinant of a novel has everything to do with our discourse.

Can you slap yourself in the cheek, boy!

You've been pummeled by the great Iconize.

iconize:


Did it take up to 2 minutes you asked the question and I replied?

Besides, the issue about Kenyans have nothing to do with this discourse. But your statement about narrative length being the only determinant of a novel has everything to do with our discourse.

Can you slap yourself in the cheek, boy!

You've been pummeled by the great Iconize.

I repeat, you are fool who doesn't know it. You have done nothing but throw insults. Is that how to argue?

hifaif:


Sorry to say, you are FOOL. I replied you once you insisted I took your sarcasm serious.

You don't need to be sorry. How long did it take you to reply and also get replied? I'm not sure if it was up to 3minutes.

By the way, that's out of the topic. Kenyans are totally out of the topic.

It took this addled m_oron hours to realize he was being sarcastic after being questioned several times.

What a slap-happy dunce!

hifaif:


I repeat, you are fool who doesn't know it. You have done nothing but throw insults. Is that how to argue?

Argue?

Boy, I'm not arguing with you! Rather I'm pummeling you severely.


It took you hours to realize you were being sarcastic!

iconize:


You don't need to be sorry. How long did to take for you to reply and also get replied? I'm not sure if it was up to 3minutes.

By the way, that's out of the topic. Kenyans are totally out of the topic.

It took this addled m_oron hours to realize he was being sarcastic after being questioned several times.

What a slap-happy dunce!

It is taking a dunce like you hours to understand that SMP means Shitting My Pant and doesn't signify a show of taking anything personal.

iconize:


Argue?

Boy, I'm not arguing with you! Rather I'm pummeling you severely.


It took you hours to realize you were being sarcastic!

SMP. I have been throwing the punches while you have been throwing insults.

hifaif:


It is taking a dunce like you hours to understand that SMP means Shitting My Pant and doesn't signify a show of taking anything personal.

He's trying to be smart.

How does shitting on your pant translate to sarcasm?

Boy, you're a pure m_oron and you know it.

You were shitting on your pant as a cholera patient that you're.

You've been flogged and pummeled thoroughly.

You also got blinded and outshined by Iconize.

iconize:


He's trying to be smart.

How does shitting on your pant translate to sarcasm?

Boy, you're a pure m_oron and you know it.

You were shitting on your pant as a cholera patient that you're.

You've been flogged and pummeled thoroughly.

You also got blinded and outshined by Iconize.

Go and unborn yourself. You are less than nothing to me, your slowpoke.

I used SMP to tell you I didn't take your words seriously. Show me the post where I said it was sarcasm, you big fool.