Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,157,911 members, 7,835,048 topics. Date: Tuesday, 21 May 2024 at 02:23 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . (3046817 Views)
“If Mugabe Dies, We Will Field His Corpse As A Candidate For Election” - Wife / Photos: What Some Countries Gives Their Soldiers To Eat On The Battle Field. / Video Of Frightened Black Man Forced Into A Coffin By White Man Sparks Outrage (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026) (2027) (2028) (2029) ... (2202) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by youghs: 12:30pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Whyem15: You'll know this is incorrect if you judge from the numbers of fighters that attack when they are desperate for victory. Most of these figures are mere assumptions. 1 Like |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Sizzorkay: 12:41pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Or that fight for scarce resources will spill over to the rest of the country and you have chaos on your hands and then they have the numbers. Allowing a tumor to grow won't do anyone any good. Issues there need to be fixed or it engulfs the whole country. These aren't foreign citizens. we still occupy same country. things get too hard and they will move to other areas. Whyem15: 3 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Hisvoice(m): 1:19pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Nigeria terrorism is deeper than what we think. Ask yourself, why is Ghana, Togo or even Benin republic not residents for terrorism? Read this investigative article with unbiased mind please. https://westafricaweekly.substack.com/p/cornflakes-for-jihad-the-boko-haram May God help Nigeria. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Fynline(m): 1:28pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by EricBraven: 3:13pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Hisvoice:It has been posted here before |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by EricBraven: 3:18pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Whyem15:Whenever the police becomes actively involve in internal security, the judiciary will be the chain dragging it back |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Dammysmart: 3:58pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
SamuelAnyawu:. 10 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Nobody: 4:06pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Terrorist organisation incorporated as Miyetti Allah whose dumbed headship authorises maiming, raping, slaughtering of citizens across the country with on-your-face impunity must be celebrating in its quiet recesses that it has visited Afghanistan on Nigeria at 61! Those who say President Muhammadu Buhari is the precursor of Miyetti Allah’s banality, banditary, barbarity have a point, after all. Apart from being a cow’s President, no mentally sane leader watches tendenciuosly while citizens are been murdered and uprooted from their ancestral homes and farm lands while romanticising with the murderous terror group. The last statistical account revealed that more than six hundred thousand Nigerians from President Muhammadu Buhari’s ancestral home state have relocated to Niger Republic. Those were the words (not exactly) of Mrs. Aisha Buhari, the Nation’s First Lady! David J. Singer, a South African and one of the world’s best war strategists in his book titled: Correlate of War (COW) states that if a thousand people are killed in state conflicts and five thousand people are displaced within a period of one year, such conflicts have metamorphosed into war! Only a few weeks ago Governor Zulum of Borno State told journalists that over twenty thousand Borno State citizens have been slaughtered. Even though this figure is conservatively way out of the known numbers of victims of Fulani’s terrorism, banditary killings, Boko Haram’s attacks and ISWAP’s nihilists the picture is clearer than ever before that President Buhari is perfectly suited as the COW President! It’s even more worrisome now that Miyetti Allah has gone beyond issuing statements on behalf of the Federal Government of Nigeria. In many cases, the Federal Government has been caught issuing clear and unambiguous statements on behalf of Miyetti Allah. The terrorist organisation has been playing Federal Government’s roles by placing a hundred million ransom on Nnamdi Kalu’s head if caught dead or alife before he was eventually arrested in Kenya. The facts about who pays or gets what on Kalu’s eventual arrest is still shrouded in secrecy. Many a time Presidency spokesmen, Mr. Garba Shehu and Femi Adesina have directly responded to Governor Samuel Ortom of Benue State over his reservations on the banal and terrorist activities of Fulani herdsmen’s killing of farmers in Benue State. Nigerians are at a cross road as to which to be known and called government between Miyetti Allah and the Nigerian Government. Mr. Femi Adesina in a national television programme some two years ago told Nigerians that it’s better for them to let go of their ancestral lands instead of allowing themselves to be slaughtered on the same piece of land by Fulani terrorists. That was the worst statement that could come out from a renegade presidential spokesman who choose to lobotomise the evil of a terrorist group for an ethnic bloodlust monsters. President Buhari has himself been intentionally pursuing Miyetti Allah’s agenda which has been advocating for seization of Nigerians ancestral land for cattle colony; to the bill of forest control, to open grazing, to ancient grazing routes in the private businesses of cattle herding. Any further doubt that President Buhari and his APC and Northernised government have failed to heed good counsels to allow cattle business owners to build ranches for their cattle and allow peace to reign? Now that Nigeria is at the verge of imminent collapse, those who ensure the pending decoupling will have their dates in the hall of shame! Nigerians also wait with bathed breath for the President to declare the herdsmen bandits as terrorist. The Senate having foot dragged for so long recently made a resolution to call the killer herdsmen terrorist and not bandits. So the ball is now clearly in the court of Mr. President. President Buhari has been signposted or positioned himself as the grand patron of the terrorising Miyetti Allah militia group. The global community would like to see him take positive action to prove that the latter assertion is wrong. https://independent.ng/federal-republic-of-miyetti-allah-at-61/ 1 Like |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Lurker4Long: 4:40pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Guys, unlike some here, I can appreciate how the religious/regional/ethnic/tribal (tribes in 2021?)/farmer v herder (again, in 2021?) issues affect the security situation of Nigeria. That is a discussion for another thread, not this one designated "Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .)" I'm willing to donate data that people so occupied with the above primitive issues can pursue that rubbish on their own thread. 11 Likes 3 Shares |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by youghs: 6:21pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Dammysmart: Nigeria is still battling with alot of ills caused by the military regime decades after and you're still thinking Military regime will bring a solution 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Whyem15: 6:35pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Between MRAPs and IFVs, which should be the NA's priority and why? I know both are very important but faced with limited funds, which would you rather the NA prioritize? 7 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 6:37pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Whyem15: Bingo!! |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by JohnEagle96(m): 6:48pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
I would want army, navy and airforce to go for a definite IFV ,for offensive operations, IFV can accommodate varieties of weapons platforms such as machine guns, anti -tank , grenade launchers, etc. It will be a force multiplier in offensive operations coupled with the troop transport capabilities. The BMP Terminator comes in this aspect, especially NA should get this in large numbers for the next offensive operations. The amphibious version of the IFV should be considered as also for the NAVY SBS in lake Chad 9 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Whyem15: 7:00pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
JohnEagle96: The Terminator isn't an IFV per se, it was designed to support and plug the weaknesses of tanks. It will serve the function of an IFV comfortable but it seems like an overkill when you factor in limited finances. The airforce has purchased a fit for purpose aircraft in the firm of the Tucano, we shouldn't get too comfortable with the airforce and navy assisting the army to the extent they start purchasing their land systems while they still have their own capability gaps to fill. 4 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by jpphilips(m): 7:05pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Dammysmart: Military Coup has no reward in this era, you will hand over the country in less than 6 months, intl pressure sounds familiar right? Except a coup sanctioned by the same international powers. 4 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by JohnEagle96(m): 7:24pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Whyhem15 The airforce has deployed special forces too in moguno and zamfara, it serves as force protection measure especially in high risk areas such as moguno air detachment. In this insurgency we're currently fighting every hands must be on the desk, the NAVY fighting arm in lake Chad should be robust and sharpened not just policing over the lake. Airforce need to acquire more electronic warfare aircrafts, SIGNIT and electronic listening UAV especially for anti banditry operations and operations in South East. 2 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by JohnEagle96(m): 7:26pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
If the BMP Terminator will be an overkill and it will rid off the guntrucks of iswap and bokoharam easily within comfortable kilometers for our troops, then it is okay. As a matter of concern NA needs a dedicated IFV urgently. 10 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Roan77: 8:20pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Nigeria Super Tucano firing hydra 70 rockets at a target. 13 Likes
|
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by youghs: 9:42pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
JohnEagle96: You did not get his point. There are lots of IFVs that will perform the role of BMP terminator with respect to shelling of guntrucks at a lower cost, you don't need to buy terminator that's meant for tank support at a higher cost. That's waste of resources. 6 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by youghs: 9:43pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Valkrie: 9:54pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Lurker4Long: When the fulani man dagger land on your neck then you would understand that the issue is not and never primitive but issue capable of shattering the whole country...!! You never jam so you no go know...tell it to those who have lost loved ones to the fulani marauders and see what their response would be....!!! |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 10:22pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Whyem15:IFVs How they have no proper IFVs and engage in wishful thinking of helicopters baffles me. An iFV is in between the big guns (105mm, 90mm) and the small guns. MRAPs are just battle taxis 9 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 10:23pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Valkrie:Your garage boy nature must just come out. What is this excrement 7 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Odunayaw(m): 10:24pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
JohnEagle96:The terminator is meant to move as "bodyguard" for tanks. 6 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Roan77: 11:39pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
youghs: Yes. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Roan77: 11:42pm On Oct 05, 2021 |
Valkrie: And you think your wailing in Battle field discussion in Nairaland will solve the Fulani menace? 4 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Valkrie: 8:01am On Oct 06, 2021 |
Roan77: It's part of the problem hitting us hard in this country either we like it or not and worthy of discussion too bro....!! 4 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Valkrie: 8:02am On Oct 06, 2021 |
Odunayaw: It's takes one to know one...seems you are also a garage boy..!! 1 Like |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by WoeBetide666: 8:54am On Oct 06, 2021 |
Ise-Ewu For Neo-Fascism Washington Times - Politics, Breaking News, US and World News logo U.S. ignores small African terrorist group IPOB at its peril State Department needs to designate Indigenous People of Biafra as a foreign terrorist organization Illustration on IPOB's status as a Foreign Terrorist Group by Alexander Hunter/The Washington Times Illustration on IPOB’s status as a Foreign Terrorist Group by Alexander Hunter/The Washington Times By Ivan Sascha Sheehan - - Monday, October 4, 2021 ANALYSIS/OPINION: An African terrorist organization is suing U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in U.S. federal court. It beggars belief. So how did it happen? The answer is frustratingly simple. The violent secessionist group in question – the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) – is yet to be designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) by the US Department of State. This is despite repeated pleas to do so by longstanding U.S. ally Nigeria, where IPOB is based and carries out its murderous activities. It is difficult to explain how U.S. interests are served by inaction and complacency on IPOB. The listing costs nothing. But the designation would have significant implications for the group’s continuance. Let’s start with the obvious: Tagging the group with a terror label would hit IPOB’s wallet hard. As soon as the designation is applied, no organization that utilizes U.S. currency would be able to legally conduct transactions with the organization. By cutting off IPOB’s funding, the U.S. would weaken the 50,000 strong paramilitary outfit and provide Nigeria’s security forces room to train their sights squarely on ISIS-affiliated Boko Haram in the Northeast of the country. Counterterrorism operations against Boko Haram have long been assisted by U.S. agencies working in close coordination with the West African government. Though IPOB may appear to be Abuja’s problem alone, the militants have served as a distraction and bled precious resources. Over the past eighteen months, Boko Haram has regrettably been able to regroup and rejuvenate. The same is true of Al Qaeda-affiliated groups across the volatile Sahel region. That the African continent is rapidly becoming a staging ground for global terror operations should concern U.S. officials. But Nnamdi Kanu, IPOB’s leader, is clearly unconcerned. That he feels no need to even disguise his support of terrorism is worrisome. Though IPOB’s principal aim is to restore a breakaway state of Biafra in the Southeastern parts of Nigeria, Mr. Kanu’s rhetoric has become increasingly strident. “I don’t want peaceful actualization (of Biafra),” Mr. Kanu has said through his Radio Biafra channel, used to project threats, instructions, and propaganda into Nigeria from the safety of London. “If they don’t (give us Biafra), they will die.” Neither does Mr. Kanu make idle threats. The December revelation of IPOB’s 50,000 strong-armed paramilitary wing, the Eastern Security Network (ESN), complete with a Swastika-style flag, marked the end to all pretenses of being a peaceful movement. What had been largely unspoken was publicly declared. Since then, violent IPOB attacks on both security personnel and civilians have surged by a terrifying 59%; deaths by 344%. More than 20 attacks were carried out in the first three months of this year alone, including the retribution-style bombing of a local state governor’s home where four were killed, and an attack on a prison that freed some 2,000 dangerous criminals. Even neighboring states were forced to impose curfews to protect their citizens from marauders. There is also a nasty racial element to the IPOB attacks. In addition to attacks on the state, much of their violence is directed towards the Fulani people, a nomadic tribe of herders that roam across West Africa. Through Biafra Radio, IPOB regularly calls on its supporters to not only kill the Fulani, but to kill “any landlord that gives accommodation or rents his house or her house to a Fulani person.” In one recent attack on a Fulani community, six young children were butchered with machetes – one, a baby, was burned alive. Their bodies were discarded in mass graves. Whether with threats made on Biafra Radio or repeated acts of violence, IPOB coerces politicians and civilians to acquiesce to its radical political demands. One example saw all the governors of Southeast Nigeria bow to a 14-day ultimatum to ban open grazing in their districts – a move targeting the livelihoods of the Fulani – rather than face the wrath of the ESN. Similarly, it enforces a sit-at-home day every Monday, intended to economically cripple the region, through acts like the torching of passenger buses. The U.S. has correctly prescribed terror labels to other secessionist groups that employ these tactics – the ETA in Spain, the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, and the PKK in Turkey. Now the people IPOB claims to represent, the Igbo, are even seeking to distance themselves from the group. So why hasn’t the U.S.? One reason may be the group’s million-dollar contracts with prominent American lobbying firms paid to whitewash the group’s reputation and lobby on Capitol Hill. It is impossible to believe that IPOB and Kanu’s deep pockets are not being lined by external organizations. A terror designation would put a stop to this influence peddling. It would also mean the group could not use the US or its Western allies, like London-based Radio Biafra, to further their cause. The group’s outsized influence – a function of its radio station, paid hands, and US lawyers – would be severely curtailed. Law enforcement in the US, the U.K., and elsewhere would be obligated to act by shutting down these activities. That a small terrorist organization can bully senior U.S. officials in American courts and leverage the influence of foreign agents to challenge an ally’s security would be laughable were it not so alarming. Washington must not ignore Nigeria’s terrorists any longer. • Ivan Sascha Sheehan is the executive director of the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Baltimore. Opinions expressed are his own. 1 Like |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by ecomog1990: 10:05am On Oct 06, 2021 |
All of you dey correct o, IFV is best equipment for Nigerian Army to end insecurity bloodshed nationwide, because NA cannot defeat gun truck enemies with own gun trucks, this war will never end with equal power on both sides. Modern 6x6WD IFV also have some landmine protection like MRAP to fit both roles, becomes MRAP-IFV combination 2 in 1 platform, 30mm autocannon + 7.62mm GPMG + ATGM + hull body resist 14.5mm + underbelly resist 8 kg TNT + some variants amphibious to swim. Notice NA bought Chinese VT-4 heavy tank but added ST-1 8x8 light tank instead of its VN-1 8x8 IFV like Thailand did (VN-1C 8x8 IFV photos shown here). Norinco VN-1C IFV is only around $1.3 m each. Lack of IFV is the main weakness of Nigerian Army. Nigerian Army may not likely buy IFV because its not yet included in our ORBAT & doctrine, NA still used 1940s WW II doctrine inherited pre-independence British war doctrine of tanks lead attack with foot infantry walking behind light tank or heavy tank as cover, thats how we fought before, during, and after ECOMOG, same old outdated doctrine that no army general is serious enough to update, NA generals just dey enjoy their =N= 12 million per year salary that most Nigerians don't know they get paid so much. 14 Likes
|
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by GeneralFarouq: 10:22am On Oct 06, 2021 |
ecomog1990:How's is 12 million per year much of a salary. When u consider the risk, the time spent and mental and physical stress all coupled with the deteriorating economy of Nigeria, , u will discover soldiers are being paid peanut.... Good thing that are not in the job for money... 2 Likes |
Re: Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . by Tobiloba24072: 10:46am On Oct 06, 2021 |
ecomog1990: I have said this before...we have btr3 and btr4, with remote weapon system....they have 30mm guns, army refused to use it and wielded 12.7mm gun that they will be gambling with boko haram and offers no technical advantage. The only good thing about the st1 against boko haram, is if it has fragmentation rounds. I think the cost of 30mm round is the issue with the army and most ifv, come with 30mm round. Truthfully we have lots of equipments that would give us clear advantage against boko haram, and they have never fired a shot against boko haram, o always ask myself why. 9 Likes |
(1) (2) (3) ... (2023) (2024) (2025) (2026) (2027) (2028) (2029) ... (2202) (Reply)
Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? / African Militaries/ Security Services Strictly Photos Only And Videos Thread / Kenya Is Ahead of Nigeria In All Aspect (Facts Don't Lie)
Viewing this topic: 2 guest(s)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 86 |