If person no die for this matter dem no go rest

Fayose is PDP if u no like am .....suicide awaits u

If this thug of a governor can survive all this random missiles coming his way, ... lips sealed.

PDP Vs APC = renowned thieves Vs reformed thieves.

Abeg who is deceiving who... NEXT

Story 4 d gods

MrIncrediible:

You're just a common PDP TANoid, you have no say in this matter.

And u have a say in the matter, I see!

MrIncrediible:

You're just a common PDP TANoid, you have no say in this matter.

and u are mr slowpoke and not mr incredible.

Let's see how it goes on thursday. If APC really wants to burn nigeria down we would know

Ehya! They should jst leave him 4 now.

FAYOSE

ozoigbondu:
So many legal technicalities but fayose is going nowhere

Yeah

dridowu:
Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the Federal High Court, Abuja Thursday rejected an oral application by lawyer to Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State for an order stopping the on-going move to impeach the governor.
Fayose’s lawyer, Ahmed Raji (SAN) had shortly before the end of proceedings in the case seeking to stop the on-going impeachment move, applied orally for an order directing parties to maintain status quo ante bellum “to stop things from degenerating further.”
Justice Mohammed, in a ruling, rejected Raji’s prayer and upheld the argument by Terence Vembe, lawyer to Ekiti State Speaker, Adewale Omirin, to the effect that granting such prayer will amount to the court amending its earlier ruling that the defendants were still within time show cause, as earlier ordered by the court.
The judge had, last Wednesday, refused Fayose’s ex-parte prayers for interim injunctions restraining Omirin and other defendants in the case from proceeding with the impeachment move.
Instead, Justice Mohammed ordered the defendants to show cause why the orders of interim injunction sought by the plaintiffs should not be granted.
Plaintiffs in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/302/2015 include Olugbemi Joseph Dele (who claimed to be Speaker of the State Assembly), Ekiti State House of Assembly, Fayose and his deputy, Olusola Kolapo.
Listed as defendants are Omirin, the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Chief Judge, Ekiti State.
At the commencement of proceedings Thursday, Raji urged the court to grant the order of interim injunction on the ground that none of the defendants complied with the court’s order of April 8 directing them to show cause.
“None of the defendants has filed any paper and already a life has been lost on the account of trying to carry out the illegal act (impeachment). To save more life, I urge my Lord to grant the reliefs 5, 6, 7 and 8 on our motion paper.”
Vembe objected and told the court that his client were contesting the mode of service of the court processes on him, which he said, was done through a newspaper publication on April 11 which was a public holiday.
He further faulted the service effected by the plaintiffs via a publication in the Nigerian Tribune newspaper on April 11 on the ground that movements were restricted on that day owing to the governorship and House of Assembly elections held nationwide.
In a brief ruling, Justice Mohammed upheld Raji’s argument that Vembe‎ could not canvass any argument on the issue of service orally without putting it in writing as required under the court’s rules.
Vembe proceeded to argue that his client was still within time to obey the court’s order directing him and other defendants to show cause.
Although Raji objected to Vembe’s further argument that his client was still within time, Justice Mohammed, in yet another brief ruling, upheld Vembe’s argument.
The judge noted that the publication ought not to have been done on a public holiday. He held that the three days within which the defendants were required to comply with the court’s order began to run on Tuesday, April 14 and will end on Friday‎, April 17.
“As of today, the 1st defendant is still within time as provided by Order 36 Rule 13 of the Federal High Court Rules,” the judge said.
Further hearing in the case has been fixed for April 29.
The plaintiffs are, in the substantive suit, seeking nine prayers among which is “an order setting aside the purported notice of impeachment and all steps taken by the 1st defendant (Omirin) with other errant members of the 2nd plaintiff (Ekiti State House of Assembly) in relation to the purported issuance and service of the said notice of impeachment for the purpose of commencing and concluding the impeachment proceedings against Peter Ayodele Fayose and Dr. Olusola Kolapo, except and until there is absolute compliance with provisions of section 36(1) and section 188(1), (2), (3) and (4) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).”


http://thenationonlineng.net/new/again-court-re%E2%80%8Efuses-to-stop-impeachment-move-against-fayose/

He ain't seen nothing yet.

Can't those lawmakers be recalled by their constituents?

GREAT

[font=Lucida Sans Unicode][/font] This Political thug,gregarious pig must be impeached

ITS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME...........

THE CHICK WILL COME HOME TO ROOST................

HE CAN RUN BUT HE CANT HIDE FROM THE HAND OF JUSTICE.........

THE LOQUACIOUS FAYOSE MUST ANSWER FOR HIS ILLS

Rawani:
Fayose does not need a soothsayer to tell him this is Karma twerking for him, he cannot continue to benefit from lawlessness.

truth be told FAYOSE WILL BE IMPEACHED AND IT WILL STAND THAT WAS WHY HE WAS MADE TO ENJOY FROM THE JUDICIARY 2 DAYS AGO SO WHEN THE COURT GOES AGAINST HIM THERE WILL BE NO EXCUSE

ShowYourCertificate:
APC cannot reap where they did not sow. Ekiti is a PDP state. Let it sink into their skull.

PDP Indeed

JustCalMeDBoss:
They are liars the will of ekiti ppl must stand

Wot WILL do u refer to, is it the WILL of ekiti ppl which has been suppressed & nw being manipulated easily? SMH

[s]

justified19:
and u are mr slowpoke and not mr incredible.

[/s]
Fool, you've been noticed.

Rotiix:

And u have a say in the matter, I see!

I never claimed I had a say in the matter, I was quoting the PDP Robot who felt he did.

abeg una make una impeach am fast fast cos time.dey go jare

I for once had not made Any comment on this Fayose case, reason being that I'm not from Ekiti and shouldn't chose their leaders for them. The speakers I think are there to represent their people, meaning; whatever decisions they are taking should reflect the will of their people but after the conduct of april 11 state NAS election, it seems the speakers are on their own.

Fayose is in a state of dilema....d era of impunity has gone.....fayose must go

ozoigbondu:
So many legal technicalities but fayose is going nowhere.The chief Judge and the clerk of ekiti state does not recongise orimini as speaker and will not act on any letter written by that postmaster

Impeachment has NOTHING to do with SPEAKER otherwise we would be saying a speaker must sanction impeachment.The constitition says 1/3 of members is required to INITIATE impeachment so the issue of speaker or speaker recognition is irrelevant

richidinho:
If person no die for this matter dem no go rest

Fayose is PDP if u no like am .....suicide awaits u

PDP indeed















E go soon clear for him Eye.

Alot of spineless jobless dumb haters here. If Fayose doesnt go,what happens? You will still put your lazy fingers on your cheap keypads and type crap! If you are not from EKITI, face front and straight to your fathers' compounds and tackle your fathers' failures that made you children of nobody slandering somebody(FAYOSE) . Mmmtwww:-P

obie3rixe:






They should leave this man alone! Apc pushing for impeachment!
Like they are the only one who deserves governmental positions in the country!


.

APC IS MADE OF BITTERNESS. I THINK ITS HIGH TIME THE MILITARY RUBBISH THIS MAD PEOPLE

Following

sCun:
Can't those lawmakers be recalled by their constituents?

I was thinking the same, can't they allow this man to be?

paulolee:
hmmmm... all I c is some sets of Peps wasting dier time n money n d other sets just playing wt oda Peps time n getting free money....
wi all kno n even d judges kno dt Fayose can NEVA b impeached coz Ekiti state that is one of d most loyal n few pdp States within d country....
some Peps ar too blind to d fact dt dese politicians ar far bigger Dan d law expecially wen deY av d total support of big men at d top(GEJ)...
d case wud b dragged n adjourned till Fayose finishes his anoda four years, if buhari can escape d court cases abT his certificate saga n become d president elect..... how much more dis smaller case....

I swear I no understand anything wey u talk

Fayose talk too much and step on toes that is too big for his size.
Imagine a small rat talking to Obasanjo and Buhari anyhow.
He must go even if PDP will still rule Ekiti, they should produce a better candidate not tout.

omonnakoda:
Impeachment has NOTHING to do with SPEAKER otherwise we would be saying a speaker must sanction impeachment.The constitition says 1/3 of members is required to INITIATE impeachment so the issue of speaker or speaker recognition is irrelevant

If the chief judge does not fall in line the impeachment will fail.The same thing happened in Nassarawa state. So far the ekiti CJ has not recognized Omirin as speaker so the impeachment process has already failed

paulolee:
hmmmm... all I c is some sets of Peps wasting dier time n money n d other sets just playing wt oda Peps time n getting free money....
wi all kno n even d judges kno dt Fayose can NEVA b impeached coz Ekiti state that is one of d most loyal n few pdp States within d country....
some Peps ar too blind to d fact dt dese politicians ar far bigger Dan d law expecially wen deY av d total support of big men at d top(GEJ)...
d case wud b dragged n adjourned till Fayose finishes his anoda four years, if buhari can escape d court cases abT his certificate saga n become d president elect..... how much more dis smaller case....

Oga Ade, ur argument lacks merit & I will urge u not to comment on dis topic anymore---just read wot intellectuals put up ok.