Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,153,529 members, 7,819,904 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 06:06 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? (2607 Views)
Hard Questions From The Bible / Put Your Hard Questions For Trinitarian Theologians Enigma , Goshen & Company / Is It Wisdom For Christians To Lie In Some Situations? (2) (3) (4)
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Bastage: 1:30am On Mar 04, 2009 |
why then did the high priests arrest Jesus and bring Him to Pilate? why didnt they just take Him and kill Him themselves? You tell me. It's one of those little contradictions in the Bible that you so often like to overlook. That is simply NOT true. Peter was also crucified for blasphemy Hmmm. Where in the Bible is this? Very misleading. According to Tertullian, Peter was crucified in Rome when Nero was persecuting Christians and blaming and executing them for the fire that had swept through Rome three months prior. Even if he were executed for blasphemy it wouldn't have been for blasphemy against the Jewish god but against the Roman deities. A totally different scenario from the one you are trying to claim. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by huxley(m): 1:33am On Mar 04, 2009 |
davidylan: Yet again, you are taking the gospels literally and uncritically. Modern historian of this period and subject are almost in unanimous agreement that this could not have happen as presented in the gospel. There are just too many inconsistencies in the account and how it relates to the culture, customs, laws and tradition to have been true. See the following list of inconsistencies below: Laws of the Sanhedrin Regarding Trials: 1. There was to be no arrest by religious authorities that was effected by a bribe Ex. 23:8 2. There were to be no steps of criminal proceedings after sunset. 3. Judges or Sanhedrin members were not allowed to participate in the arrest. 4. There were to be no trials before the morning sacrifice. 5. There were to be no secret trials, only public. 6. Sanhedrin trials could only be conducted in the Hall of Judgment of the Temple Compound. 7. The procedure was to be first the defense and then the accusation. 8. All may agree in favor of acquittal, but all may not argue in favor of conviction. 9. There were to be two or three witness and their testimony had to agree in every detail. Deu. 19:15. 10. There was to be no allowance for the accused to testify against himself. 11. The High Priest was forbidden to rent his garments. Leviticus 21:10 12. Charges could not originate with the judges; they could only investigate charges brought to them. 13. The accusation of blasphemy was only valid if the name, of G-d, itself was pronounced (and heard by 2 witnesses). 14. A person could not be condemned on the basis of his own words alone. 15. The verdict could not be announced at night, only in the daytime. 16. In cases of capital punishment, the trial and guilty verdict could not occur at the same time but must be separated by at least 24 hours. 17. Voting for he death penalty had to be done by individual count beginning with the youngest so the young would not be influenced by the elders. 18. A unanimous decision for guilt shows innocence since it is impossible for 23-71 men to agree without plotting. 19. The sentence could only be pronounced three days after the guilty verdict. 20. Judges were to be humane and kind. 21. A person condemned to death was not to be scourged or beaten beforehand. 22. No trials are allowed on the eve of the Sabbath or on a feast day. davidylan:Yet again you accept christian tradition uncritically. I thought Christian tradition says Peter died in Rome, at the hands of the Romans. If Peter was crucified for blasphemywhile in Rome, then he could not have been blaspheming againgst the Jewish religion, could he? |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Nobody: 1:37am On Mar 04, 2009 |
Bastage: Simple. Because the Jews did not have the power to carry out punishments on offenders. Barabas the robber was a prisoner of Rome. Bastage: When you people get backed into a corner, out come flying the irrelevancies . . . Huxley claimed stoning was the punishment for blasphemy ONLY, i pointed out to the crucifiction of Peter as proof that could not be right and suddenly out come flying Nero and Rome? What next, Origen? |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Nobody: 1:38am On Mar 04, 2009 |
huxley: Good point. Of course not . . . |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Bastage: 1:59am On Mar 04, 2009 |
If Peter was crucified for blasphemywhile in Rome, then he could not have been blaspheming againgst the Jewish religion, could he? Good point. Of course not . . . Hey you plagiarists!!! That's what I said!!! |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Nobody: 2:02am On Mar 04, 2009 |
Bastage: And i agreed with it . . . good point. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by huxley(m): 2:06am On Mar 04, 2009 |
Bastage: Interesting!! Where is the plagiarism? |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by toneyb: 5:37am On Mar 04, 2009 |
davidylan: This is false. one of the Yeshu talked about in the talmud that was hanged on the eve of passover was prosecuted by the jewish courts not the romans. Go and read it up. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by naijacutee(f): 10:53am On Mar 04, 2009 |
huxley: I agree with you, huxley - That seeing that the Romans were involved, a charge of blasphemy couldn't have been the isolated reason for Jesus' crucifixion. However, there is enough evidence to suggest that blasphemy on Jesus' part was the brewing point of all the problems he had with the law, which eventually led to his arrest and crucifixion. His crucifixion which was one of the major reasons why he came in the first place. Re: The prophets. Again, I am not an expert, but around Jesus time it seemed to me that not many prophets were in the business of fulfilling prophesies. Israel was notorious for its tradition of killing prophets, and the last of the "prophesying prophets" had been exterminated 400 years before the birth of Jesus. I think the figures of authority were now Rabbis, Pharisees and Saducees. Post/during the time of Jesus, two "prophetic" characters that stood out in my opinion were John the Baptist and Barrabas (who was after Jesus' time). John the Baptist had his own prophecies to fulfill, and they did not include being the "lamb of God who came to take away the sins of the world". He was just a " voice in the wilderness". The second Barrabas, was the socerer who practiced magic during the time of Paul. He performed signs and wonders, and had a large congregation. However, he wasn't claiming to fulfill any prophesies. He was, if you like, a Derren Brown of his day, who was making a living out of doing cool tricks. So this is what differentiated Jesus from any other who may have claimed to be "him". He has a message, fulfilled prophesy, and performed miracles to demonstrate his supernatural qualities. If I was one of Jesus' disciples at the time. . . . Hopefully, faithfulness and loyalty would have been as much of an expected human quality as it is today. I would hope that I would stand him, and wish for his exoneration. However, his crucifixion was a big part of Jesus' mission here on earth - and he made this clear to his disciples at the last supper. They all knew that he had anticipated, and even accepted his fate. Therefore, doing anything other than nothing would have only been a wrench in his plans. Also, forgive me if I'm wrong but back there, you mentioned something about Jews having no history/evidence of prisoner exchange. But we don't have to look very far to see that prisoner exchange is something that has been prevalent in the Middle East, even in recent times. Did you hear just last year, of the exchange between Hezbollah and Israel, where 2 dead Israeli soldiers were exchanged for the release of 5 Hezbollah soldiers (One of whom was a murderer). See : http://www.rightsidenews.com/200807211497/global-terrorism/the-eldad-regev-and-ehud-goldwasser-exchange.html |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Bastage: 12:18pm On Mar 04, 2009 |
However, there is enough evidence to suggest that blasphemy on Jesus' part was the brewing point of all the problems he had with the law. What evidence and what problems? Remember, as he was tried by a Roman Court, the problems have to be with Roman law and not Judaic. The contradiction here is that Jesus himself states that one should adhere to Roman law - "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's". There is no evidence that he broke Roman law. Only evidence that he advocated abiding by it. Did you hear just last year, of the exchange between Hezbollah and Israel, where 2 dead Israeli soldiers were exchanged for the release of 5 Hezbollah soldiers This is a relatively recent phenomenom and back in history, the Jewish attitude was that there would be no swap - they would simply go to war to release the captive. But the above is not what we are talking about in this instance. Although DD and Huxley have used the words "exchange" the incident in question here was not a prisoner exchange. It was supposedly giving the people the option of freeing one captive or another. A "custom" for which no evidence can be found outside of scripture as Huxley has stated. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by huxley(m): 1:47pm On Mar 04, 2009 |
naijacutee: Hello. Very nice and constructive post, but a few caveates. Although by the time of Jesus, it was universally acdepted that the tradition of the great prophets was over, it was believed that some people still had the powers of the prophets of old. These prophets play a minor role in the religions - in facts there were marginal to mainstream judaism. Such was John the Baptist. This is discussed extensive by the historian Josephus in Prophetic Figures In Late Second Temple Jewish Palestine, Evidence From Josephus . On the prisoner exchange, which is better described as prisoner clemency, there is no evidence that this was a custom or routine practice in antiquity. The gospel writers made this up to promote and agenda, namely, that the dead of Jesus was specifically called for by the Jews, thus demonising the entire Jewish people for hundreds of years. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by naijacutee(f): 5:06am On Mar 05, 2009 |
Bastage: Luke 5 20When Jesus saw their faith, he said, "Friend, your sins are forgiven."21The Pharisees and the teachers of the law began thinking to themselves, "Who is this fellow who speaks blasphemy? Who can forgive sins but God alone?"[/b]22Jesus knew what they were thinking and asked, "Why are you thinking these things in your hearts? 23Which is easier: to say, 'Your sins are forgiven,' or to say, 'Get up and walk'? 24[b]But that you may know that I have the authority on earth to forgive sins, " He said to the paralyzed man, "I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home." 25Immediately he stood up in front of them, took what he had been lying on and went home praising God.(Paraphrase. Son of Man = I) John 5 18For this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God. John 9 35Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and when he found him, he said, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?"36"Who is he, sir?" the man asked. "Tell me so that I may believe in him." 37Jesus said, "You have now seen him; in fact, he is the one speaking with you."38Then the man said, "Lord, I believe," and he worshiped him. John 48The Jews answered him, "Aren't we right in saying that you are a Samaritan and demon-possessed?"49"I am not possessed by a demon," said Jesus,, I tell you the truth, if anyone keeps my word, he will never see death."52At this the Jews exclaimed, "Now we know that you are demon-possessed! Abraham died and so did the prophets,, Are you greater than our father Abraham? He died, and so did the prophets. Who do you think you are?" Jesus replied, Your father Abraham rejoiced at the thought of seeing my day; he saw it and was glad, "I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!" 59At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds." Bastage: On this, we are on the same page - He advocated abiding by Roman laws (Or any laws put in place by anyone of authority for that matter) . Hence, I do not know of any reason why he would be tried in Roman courts as for Jewish offences. Hence, Pilate was hesitant to go ahead with the crucifixion, as he openly demonstrated by washing his hands off the case after the following statement: 23"Why? What crime has he committed?" asked Pilate. But they shouted all the louder, "Crucify him!" 24When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. "I am innocent of this man's blood," he said. "It is your responsibility!" (Matthew 27) In the end, it all did facilitate the fulfillment of prophesy concerning the method of his crucifixion. huxley: Hello :-) I think I see where you're going with the prisoner exchange issue. However, purported exchange, or lack of it is not enough reason to demonise Jews for "hundreds of years"? I mean, let's assume there was no exchange (since it was all allegedly made up), does that change the facts that :- 1. Jesus himself was raised as a Jew (and hence knew the Jewish laws - even remarkably by Jewish standards) 2. Yet stood by his "blasphemous" claims, much to the aggravation of many Jewish priests, and to the admiration of Jews and non-Jews alike. 3. Which led to events which led to events which led to events which eventually led to his crucifixion. 4. Which was attended by many he had "offended" through his teachings (Jews and non-Jews alike). 5. And was (by the way) occured in a Jewish town/province/country. Hence Jews played a large role in the life and crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and hence it would be difficult to refer to any of these events without having one extreme opinion or the other o the roles they played. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by toneyb: 9:41am On Mar 05, 2009 |
naijacutee: Which prophesy if i may ask? there is no such prophecy it does NOT exist any where. although alleged prophecies were quoted or referred to by new testament writers, bible scholars have been unable to find the original statement any where. An example is found in John 7:38 where Jesus said, "He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water." If Jesus was right in saying that scripture said this, just where was it said? no such statement in the old testament scriptures has EVER been located, yet "the scripture" to Jesus would certainly have been the Old Testament(by old testament i mean the hebrew bible). How could there be a fulfilment of a prophecy that was never even made? Jesus claimed another fulfilment of prophecy in Luke 24:46. Speaking to his disciples on the night of his alleged resurrection, he said, "Thus it is written and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day." That the resurrection of Christ on the third day was prophesied in the scriptures was claimed also by the Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:3-4: "For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the scriptures." Here we have it being written in two different places, the new testament writers claimed that the resurrection of the Messiah on the third day had been predicted in the scriptures. But the problem is that no matter how much they try christians cannot produce a single old testament passage that made this alleged third-day prediction. There is NO written jewish text(even the christian old testament does not say any such thing) that makes this prediction of jesus dying and raising from the dead on the third day. All the scriptures paul, jesus and the new testament writters were refering to is the old testament but the problem is that there is NO such thing any where in the old testament. It simply doesn't exist. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by KunleOshob(m): 10:16am On Mar 05, 2009 |
toneyb: The truth is that there were a lot of books considered as scripture in those days and used by the early christians that did not find there way into the canon of scripture(bible) compiled by the early catholic church for reasons best known to them. Although some of these books touted around at that time were not considered authentic eveidence abound that a lot of authentic books that did not fit into the idea of christianity the catholic church was trying to project were deliberately left out. In summary not all that was considered scripture at that time found it's way into the bible, hence the original prophecy might be in one of those omitted books. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by naijacutee(f): 10:50am On Mar 05, 2009 |
toneyb: Hi :-) It would be useful if your arguments are brought forward after reading the Bible, [s]and not after visiting dodgy, unverifiable websites.[/s] As Kunle Oshob rightly stated, not every prophetic text that was written BC made its way in what we call the Bible today. However, most did, and I'm sure the Bible contains sufficient material from which Jesus quoted. Isaiah 53:3 He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not. OT Prophesy Micah 5:1 Marshal your troops, O city of troops, for a siege is laid against us. They will strike Israel's ruler on the cheek with a rod. NT Fulillment Mark 15:19 Again and again they struck him on the head with a staff and spit on him. Falling on their knees, they paid homage to him. OT Prophesy Psalm 22:16 Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, they have pierced my hands and my feet. NT Fulfillment John 20:25 So the other disciples told him, "We have seen the Lord!" But he said to them, "Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe it." OT Prophesy Psalm 22:17 I can count all my bones; people stare and gloat over me. Psalm 34:20 he protects all his bones, not one of them will be broken. NT Fulfillment John 19:33; 36a [33] But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. [36a] These things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled: "Not one of his bones will be broken," OT Prophesy Psalm 22:18 They divide my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing. NT Fulfillment Matthew 27:35 When they had crucified him, they divided up his clothes by casting lots. OT Prophesy Isaiah 53:9 He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death , NT Fulfillment matthew 27:57,59-60 [57] As evening approached, there came a rich man from Arimathea, named Joseph, who had himself become a disciple of Jesus. [59] Joseph took the body, wrapped it in a clean linen cloth, [60] and placed it in his own new tomb that he had cut out of the rock. He rolled a big stone in front of the entrance to the tomb and went away. OT Phophesy Isaiah 53:8, 11 [8] By oppression and judgment he was taken away. And who can speak of his descendants? For he was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my people he was stricken. [11] After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities. 700 B.C. NT Fulfillment Matthew 28:2, 5-7, 9 [2] There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. [5] The angel said to the women, "Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. [6] He is not here; he has risen, just as he said. Come and see the place where he lay. [7] Then go quickly and tell his disciples: `He has risen from the dead and is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him.' Now I have told you." [9] Suddenly Jesus met them. "Greetings," he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Bastage: 11:10am On Mar 05, 2009 |
I don't think anyone, be they religious or atheist, who has studied scripture and it's surroundings can argue that Jesus wasn't fulfilling prophesy as he saw it. It doesn't even matter if those prophesies are in the Bible or not - Jesus obviously thought he was fulfilling them. From the wealth of religious texts that are out there, it's no suprise that they may have been omitted from the Bible. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by toneyb: 1:02pm On Mar 05, 2009 |
KunleOshob: If such books existed it will definitely be included in the bible but the fact is that non exist. No christian scholar has ever made reference to any of such books, there are books that we not included in the bible that are still around till this day and non of them has any of such prophecies. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Bastage: 1:47pm On Mar 05, 2009 |
If such books existed it will definitely be included in the bible but the fact is that non exist. Not true at all. There is tons of stuff that has been omitted either purposefully or because it may have been lost. And what about oral tradition? Not everything was written down. Also, another avenue: what about ideas that may have been "borrowed" from other religions? |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by toneyb: 2:03pm On Mar 05, 2009 |
naijacutee: Your arguments would have made sense if you read what was written in the old testament in context instead of copying and pasting non prophecies that your fellow christian apologist throw around. Most of the drivel you copy and pasted have nothing to do with jesus, they are either mistranslations or where deliberately made up bu christian apologist. naijacutee: What has these got to do with jesus? was jesus israel's ruler? where did you get this nonsense from? OT Prophesy The problem is that this a delibrate mistranslation of the original hebrew text. Here is what the hebrew text say. JPS(it is considered to be the most accurate english translation of the hebrew bible) כִּי סְבָבוּנִי, כְּלָבִים: עֲדַת מְרֵעִים, הִקִּיפוּנִי; כָּאֲרִי, יָדַי וְרַגְלָי.17 Psalm 17For dogs have encompassed me; a company of evil-doers have inclosed me; like a lion, they are at my hands and my feet. (JPS) KJV Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, they have pierced my hands and my feet. So as you can see its a wrong translation of what the original hebrew bible says. Bear in mind, this stunning mistranslation in the 22nd Psalm did not occur because Christian translators were unaware of the correct meaning of this Hebrew word. Clearly, this was not the case. The word kaari can be found in a number of other places in the Jewish scriptures. Yet predictably, the same Christian translators who rendered kaari as "pierced" in Psalm 22 correctly translated it "like a lion" in all other places in the Hebrew Bible where this word appears. OT Prophesy If you read the passage in context you will realize that it wasn't a prophecy but a poem by the writer.( where do you guys get this things from? ) here it is But thou [art] he that took me out of the womb: thou didst make me hope [when I was] upon my mother's breasts. NT Fulfillment John 19:33; 36a [33] But when they came to Jesus and found that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. [36a] These things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled: "Not one of his bones will be broken," OT Prophesy הט וַיִּתֵּן אֶת-רְשָׁעִים קִבְרוֹ, וְאֶת-עָשִׁיר בְּמֹתָיו; עַל לֹא-חָמָס עָשָׂוְלֹא מִרְמָה בְּפִיוThere is more than enough differences between the christian translation and the jewish translation of the old testament. i would rather believe the jewish translation because the book belongs to them, the new testament writters did not know what they were doing when talking about the prophecies that jesus fulfilled in the old testament. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by toneyb: 2:19pm On Mar 05, 2009 |
Bastage: The problem is that the new testament writter's did not say any thing about oral translation. In two different places, then, New Testament writers claimed that the resurrection of the Messiah on the third day had been predicted in the scriptures. the problem is which scriptures, there is no such scripture. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Bastage: 6:29pm On Mar 05, 2009 |
New Testament writers claimed that the resurrection of the Messiah on the third day had been predicted in the scriptures. the problem is which scriptures, there is no such scripture. Maybe not in scriptures of Christianity per se. But the idea of a Messiah being crucified and resurrected long preceeded Christianity. Just a few examples: Tammuz of Mesopotamia 1160 BC. Iao of Nepal 622 BC. Hesus of the Celtic Druids 834 BC. Quezalcoatl of Mexico 587 BC. Quirinius of Rome 506 BC. Prometheus 547 B.C. Thulis of Egypt 1700 BC. Indra of Tibet 725 BC. Alcestos of Euripides 600 BC. Attis of Phrygia 1170 BC. Crite of Chaldaea 1200 BC. Bali of Orissa 725 BC. Mithras of Persia 600 BC. And of course, lets not forget the Hindu, Krishna. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Nobody: 7:45pm On Mar 05, 2009 |
May Kelly I Hold A Deep Grudge Against Yourself(huxley) Typical of Christians. Why do you always get so angry at those who don't follow your dumb footsteps? |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by toneyb: 8:24pm On Mar 05, 2009 |
Bastage: Thats not what i am interested in. christians and the bible writers have all said that jesus' death and resurrection were already written in the scriptures but the problem is that there is no such scripture any where in the world. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Okijajuju1(m): 11:59pm On Mar 05, 2009 |
1) What were the crimes for which Jesus was arrested, tried, convicted and executed? I will start with question 1. ANSWER 1. He was arrested for treson. Matt 27:11 1. Breaking the law of Sabbath. Matt 12:10-13 1. Blasphemy Matt 26:63-65 1. Terrorism Matt 26:61-62 ANSWER 2 2. Yes. Matt 26:66 ANSWER 3. Faced with the evidence of the prosecution?? He was guilty as charged. Although I would have sentenced him to life behind bars or a psychiatric ward. MY OPINION OKIJA_JUJUTM |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by huxley(m): 12:08am On Mar 06, 2009 |
Okija_juju: If you were one of his followers, say Peter, would it have seemed to have been a fair trial? Why was Pilate so reluctant to convict him if the charges were clearcut and fair? If you were Peter, would you have convicted him? |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by Okijajuju1(m): 1:03am On Mar 06, 2009 |
@ Huxley If I were one of his followers, ofcourse it would be a biased trial. Jesus would be innocent of all vharges irrespective of evidence. Thats why I am his Speaking of pilate, what gives you the opinion that he was reluctant to convict him?? that was just a public show to please his wife. Remember that he was the governor/chief judge, he could pardon or conderm whosoever he pleases, but he didnt. Why?! Its for you and I to draw our conclusions. Heres the story according to the bible; Matt 27:15-26 Note the word scourged. scourge [skurj] Why would he whip someone he dosent want to have a hand in his death?? And if I were Peter, why would I convict my mentor?? |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by naijacutee(f): 8:33pm On Mar 09, 2009 |
toneyb: Ahhhhhhh, I have seen the light, toneyb! Why didn't I see this before? Anyways. . . toneyb: 19Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross. It read:|sc JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS. 20Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Aramaic, Latin and Greek. 21The chief priests of the Jews protested to Pilate, "Do not write 'The King of the Jews,' but that this man claimed to be king of the Jews." 22Pilate answered, "What I have written, I have written." (John 19) Re: Alleged Hebrew text mis-translation. You know, I have learnt a long time ago that christian skeptics will always abound in skepticism regardless of what facts are placed before them, hence I do not wish to take on the task of changing anyones' views - It is not in my place to do so. These arguments are far from constructive and nearly always disintegrate into insults, abuses and disrespect of people's faith (In other words, blasphemy - Just search the Religion section of NL for similar topics). I do not wish to go down this route with you, toneyb. However, my reluctance to engage you in the issue of prophesy doesn't stem from incompetence on my part. Far from it, I do look outside the world of Google and into the world of books and lectures for my references . The fact that many of us christians do not engage in apologetic research and matters relating to defending the faith does not mean that we are blind or stupid as you may have presumed. I have seen that matters of faith cannot usually be resolved by reason of human intellect and scientific experiments (even in the abundance of evidence to back related claims), and I will henceforth not engage you in your weak "Hebrew translation concerns" on over 400 separate prophesies, spanning over hundreds of years which were fulfilled in the life of one unique person. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by toneyb: 9:55pm On Mar 09, 2009 |
naijacutee: I said that there are no such prophecies in the jewish text, you can't engaged me because you know you have no foot to stand on. the writers of the new testament just copied or claimed that jesus fulfilled some prophecies when he did not, they even lied about some of the so called prophecies because they totally go them all mixed up. let me show you some examples. The writer of Matthew said that the purchase of the potter's field with the thirty pieces of silver that Judas cast back to the chief priests and elders fulfilled a prophecy made by Jeremiah: "Then was fulfilled that which was spoken through Jeremiah the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was priced, whom certain of the children of Israel did price; and they gave them for the potter's field as the Lord appointed me" (Matt 27:9-10). The problem is that Jeremiah NEVER wrote anything like that, so how could this be a fulfillment of "that which was spoken through Jeremiah the prophet"? Some christian apologist have suggested that Matthew was quoting loosely a statement that was actually written by Zechariah (11:12-13) rather than Jeremiah. If this is true, then one can only wonder why a divinely inspired writer, being guided by the omniscient Holy Spirit, would make such a great mistake and refer to Jeremiah instead of Zechariah. Psalms 22 and 69 are not prophecies at all, they are lamentation songs, and thus the similarities between the psalms and the Gospel stories could not be called "prophesy fulfillment" under any circumstance. In addition, the phrase "they have pierced my hands and my feet" is a mistranslation as i have showed you, and is not a part of the Hebrew text, but is a later variant of a Greek translation of the text. New testament Basically the new testament writers just copied some parts of the old testament that had nothing to do with prophecies and began telling people that jesus fulfilled those "prophecies" when in fact most of them were not prohecies at all. You know, I have learnt a long time ago that christian skeptics will always abound in skepticism regardless of what facts are placed before them, hence I do not wish to take on the task of changing anyones' views - It is not in my place to do so. These arguments are far from constructive and nearly always disintegrate into insults, abuses and disrespect of people's faith (In other words, blasphemy - Just search the Religion section of NL for similar topics). Far from it, I do look outside the world of Google and into the world of books and lectures for my references . The fact that many of us christians do not engage in apologetic research and matters relating to defending the faith does not mean that we are blind or stupid as you may have presumed. I have seen that matters of faith cannot usually be resolved by reason of human intellect and scientific experiments (even in the abundance of evidence to back related claims), and I will henceforth not engage you in your weak[b] "Hebrew translation concerns" on over 400 separate prophesies, spanning over hundreds of years which were fulfilled in the life of one unique person[/b]. I showed you where the original hebrew bible differs with your own bible with regards to some translations of the hebrew text, the JPS which i copied from is one of the most accurately accepted english translation of the hebrew bible and it completely differs from what is written in the king james bible and other english translation of the christian old testament. Can you show me any hebrew text that says that jesus will come die and rise from dead after three days. the gospel writers wrote that, where are the scriptures they alluded to that says jesus will come die and be raised on the 3 day? non of such "scripture" exist. |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by bawomolo(m): 1:05am On Mar 10, 2009 |
I have seen that matters of faith cannot usually be resolved by reason of human intellect and scientific experiments (even in the abundance of evidence to back related claims), why babble when your stance can be condensed to this? |
Re: Why Are These Hard Questions For Christians To Answer? by huxley(m): 11:43pm On Mar 16, 2009 |
Any real honest takers for these questions yet? |
US Army List Evangelical Christianity, Catholicism As Religious Terrorist Groups / Make Heaven Your Final Destination/benefits Of Having Faith In God / Public Holiday On The 2nd or 5th Of Jan???
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 256 |