ABSOLUTELY SHOCKING NEWS! ALL MUST
KNOW!


If you own a New International Version (NIV)
Did you know that it was written by Zondervan
and they are OWNED by Harper Collins, who also
publish the The Satanic Bible, and The Joy of
Gay Sex.
NIV has removed 64,575 words from the Bible
including Jehovah, Calvary, Holy Ghost and
omnipotent to name but a few...
NIV has also removed 45 complete verses. Most
of us have the Bible on our phones.
Try and find these
scriptures under NIV on your phone right now if
you don't believe me:


Matthew 17:21
- Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer
and fasting.


Matthew 18:11 -
For the Son of man is come to save that which
was lost.


Matthew 23:14
- Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence
make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the
greater damnation.


Mark 7:16 -
If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.


Mark 9:44 -
Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not
quenched.


Mark 9:46
- Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not
quenched.


Luke 17:36
- Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be
taken, and the other left.


Luke 23:17 -
(For of necessity he must release one unto them
at the feast.)


John 5:4 -
For an angel went down at a certain season into

the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then
first after the troubling of the water stepped in
was made whole of whatsoever disease he had.


Acts 8:37 -
And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine
heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I
believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God
You will not believe your eyes.

These verses are
not in NIV bible!!!
Let's not forget what the Word says in John
10:10 #KingJamesVersion

Someone send it to me so I wish to share & read comments.


cc: Ishilove, PastorOluT, Mprex

Go on..

This is so true oo, just checked my bible now and couldn't find the verses you mentioned.

So all NIV should find their way to the dustbin.

psucc:
So all NIV should find their way to the dustbin.

it was mumsy that borrowed my sister's niv one time and screamed throw this work of the devil away!

https://www.nairaland.com/2430755/disregard-all-messages-social-media

Help your ignorance OP

Gombs:
https://www.nairaland.com/2430755/disregard-all-messages-social-media

Help your ignorance OP

Maybe you've not come across the recent publications. RCCG uses more of KJV. I worship there. If really you are spiritually dogged, you will feel the difference in your spiritman when studying KJV & others. Studying KJV has helped to developed my spiritman more than the ten different versions of Bibles in my library.

I knw devil or smth... Won't allow our brother & sister to visit dis kind tred. If naa porn pic u pot nw u will see one million view. And 500 thousand comments! Chai!!! Ojo idajo gongo aso!!!!!

wasuka14:
I knw devil or smth... Won't allow our brother & sister to visit dis kind tred. If naa porn pic u pot nw u will see one million view. And 500 thousand comments! Chai!!! Ojo idajo gongo aso!!!!!

not again!

The comment below came from a teacher & a bishop.


THE NIV WAHALA!

I have had to address privately questions bordering on the NIV and the name of Jesus. Some of the inquiries are through my inbox while others are direct.

I didn't consider it worth troubling myself about but since the faith of many is being rattled I'm obligated to talk. FIRST, let me say that I've used NIV all my life and find it very good. I also find it worrisome that those calling it names demand that it be torn or burnt. NEXT, let me say that the Bible does not warn only against removals from but also additions to the Bible. Having said that, the critics have not proven to us that the KJV with which they judge the other versions is not an addition to the word of God.

THIRD, the criticisms assume the KJV is the original bible. That is not so. The KJV like the NIV and other versions, is a translation from the original manuscripts which are in Hebrew, Greek and aramaic. To verify the accuracy of any version therefore will require comparison with the original manuscripts and not other versions. To do this one has to not only be versatile with the original languages but also the science of translation known as TEXTUAL CRITICISM.

I happen to be introduced to elementary knowledge of textual criticism while doing a masters degree in theology at the evangel theological seminary Jos. I can tell you that I've not yet found any reason to rate the NIV anything less than the best scholarly work on translation of the bible.

I know that ZONDERVAN is nothing but a printing press. It is not responsible for the translation of the Bible. It also has published many other sound Christian literature as well as many ungodly ones. NIV was a work done in 1964/65. From the claims of the critics Zondervan was bought over in 1998, 34yrs later. How can that nullify the accuracy of the NIV. AGAIN, I observed that all the "missing" texts are footnoted by the translators.

FINALLY, I have been around for sometime in this race. This is not the first time it's coming. it wont be the last. I think that this is an attack on the Bible. The devil does not want the Bible in the people's language. He fought it at the beginning killing Tyndale and co for translating the bible from the vulgate (the Latin version by Jerome) to English. NIV employed the principle of dynamic equivalent in translation which simplifies the language without losing the force of the truth as in the paraphrases. The KJV is the product of literal translation and is limited to the Masoretic texts of the Bible.

My take is own as versions as you can afford and use the one that best guarantees the understanding of the truths therein.

This is not exhaustive but I hope it can give you peace in these perilous times. God bless you all and keep you blameless until his coming day.

Bishop cnc

That is a clear sign that the REAL Bible that was revealed by God through Jesus Christ Is no more in existence. It has been changed and corrupted over time by different ppl to meet their own selfish interests. Only the Qur'an has been protected from this harm as promised by God from these selfish ppl no matter how hard they try.

christaddicted:
The comment below came from a teacher & a bishop.


THE NIV WAHALA!

I have had to address privately questions bordering on the NIV and the name of Jesus. Some of the inquiries are through my inbox while others are direct.

I didn't consider it worth troubling myself about but since the faith of many is being rattled I'm obligated to talk. FIRST, let me say that I've used NIV all my life and find it very good. I also find it worrisome that those calling it names demand that it be torn or burnt. NEXT, let me say that the Bible does not warn only against removals from but also additions to the Bible. Having said that, the critics have not proven to us that the KJV with which they judge the other versions is not an addition to the word of God.

THIRD, the criticisms assume the KJV is the original bible. That is not so. The KJV like the NIV and other versions, is a translation from the original manuscripts which are in Hebrew, Greek and aramaic. To verify the accuracy of any version therefore will require comparison with the original manuscripts and not other versions. To do this one has to not only be versatile with the original languages but also the science of translation known as TEXTUAL CRITICISM.

I happen to be introduced to elementary knowledge of textual criticism while doing a masters degree in theology at the evangel theological seminary Jos. I can tell you that I've not yet found any reason to rate the NIV anything less than the best scholarly work on translation of the bible.

I know that ZONDERVAN is nothing but a printing press. It is not responsible for the translation of the Bible. It also has published many other sound Christian literature as well as many ungodly ones. NIV was a work done in 1964/65. From the claims of the critics Zondervan was bought over in 1998, 34yrs later. How can that nullify the accuracy of the NIV. AGAIN, I observed that all the "missing" texts are footnoted by the translators.

FINALLY, I have been around for sometime in this race. This is not the first time it's coming. it wont be the last. I think that this is an attack on the Bible. The devil does not want the Bible in the people's language. He fought it at the beginning killing Tyndale and co for translating the bible from the vulgate (the Latin version by Jerome) to English. NIV employed the principle of dynamic equivalent in translation which simplifies the language without losing the force of the truth as in the paraphrases. The KJV is the product of literal translation and is limited to the Masoretic texts of the Bible.

My take is own as versions as you can afford and use the one that best guarantees the understanding of the truths therein.

This is not exhaustive but I hope it can give you peace in these perilous times. God bless you all and keep you blameless until his coming day.

Bishop cnc

Beautiful!!!

@Christaddicted, in the light of this, don't you think you should amend your original post?

i still think KJV is the most consistent translation

Ya, I came across it too via facebook and I shared it... and I read NIV a lot...Couldn't stop thinking

My sister and I had our confirmation a few years ago in the uk.

Along with our certificates we were given the NIV as gifts. Although the above passages are missing in the version of bibles given to us, are we now supposed to dump the bible (NIV) altogether??

I must say though, the bible was tucked away nicely in a corner in my room but after this bombshell. . .I don't know. I'm taken aback.

solodox:


it was mumsy that borrowed my sister's niv one time and screamed throw this work of the devil away!

This argument will not end, obviously. But I have serious issue with a publishing house that handles works that directly contravenes "the Word of God" as they also agree their NIV version is. Those other titles are complete no, no for me.

The second issue I have is why this NIV version should remove those key verses of Scripture? That affects the core of the Bible theme!

As far as I've studied, the KJV is the only version closest to the original translation of the original texts. Perhaps that explains why it appears hard to understand as the translators tried to get close to the real work as they possibly could.

You guys need to educate yourselves and not simply believe things hook line and sinker. Read the following to understand.

http://www.missingverses.com/