Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,158,215 members, 7,836,050 topics. Date: Tuesday, 21 May 2024 at 07:50 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? (39147 Views)
Can Christians Really Be Friends And Connect With Those Of Other Faiths? / Born Gay? It's Not Your Fault / Is It Really Compulsory To Go To Church On Sundays?? (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) (36) ... (39) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sauron1: 7:41pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
michelin89: Shut up, Michelin. What are you talking about here? How can you say Naturality can't be quantified. There's a reason God gave you vagina. Your butt-hole is meant to eject not to inject. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by bawomolo(m): 7:42pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
Sagamite: naturality based on what conditions? yours? I'm really trying hard to see the open mindedness here. You do know these same arguments were used in the cases against interracial marriage right? the similarities are amazing. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 7:42pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
bawomolo: Bonobos would rub their genitals against anything. Even a tree, a elephant or a hedgehog just to get pleasure. They would do it morning til night. That is not a bisexual animal per se, it just has an over-the-top sexual urge it will satisfy by any means. bawomolo: They would not stop at freedom, the would demand equality and acceptance BY FORCE. They would want to infest society with their perversion so my stance is not to give them an INCH to even start with. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 7:45pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
haha u guys still dey argue this nonsense. @bawomolo. If he doesn't believe it he won't no matter what argument you make. If he can honestly say he thinks that all the evidence is tainted, then thats just how he feels. You are not going to change his mind. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 7:49pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
michelin89: bawomolo: State one thing humans do naturally or occurs naturally to them that does not exist in animal world. You can't? I am will be waiting until you can. Well, that is just a useful test of naturality for you. chic2pimp: Money and security is a bitch, but you still have to chase them anyway. But people like us would never raise a child here. We need to raise them is a place with the right orientation. Here, child manners and mentality is at the bottom. bawomolo: Please stop equating blacks to gays, it is rude! |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Nobody: 7:50pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
@ Sauron Nothing between my legs has been used to contribute to this topic. I think your sexuality plays a big role in the way you perceive Homosexuality. Could you see it as a threat to your own sexuality? |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 7:52pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
Krayola: Next time scrutinise your evidence before presenting it to me so I don't cut it into shreds. The next thing you would be doing is providing me with a write-up by Mohammed Abacha as proof that Sani Abacha was not a kleptomaniac. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by chic2pimp(m): 7:58pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
Sagamite:How can be you be 'with me' when on one hand you say you are against all forms of discrimination and on the other hand you refuse see the non- acceptance of homosexuality as discrimination? . Sagamite:Liberal ma foot. From what i've seen read from your posts, I am in no doubt that you are indeed very close minded. Sagamite:Here you again. What utter rubbish!!!. How can you put homosexuality & bestiality in the same bracket? And you do know there used to be other things in the society not seen as the 'Accepted Norm', right? |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 8:02pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
haha sauron sounds like Adolf Hitler on steroids!! |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 8:03pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
Sagamite: haha. . . u still don't get it. do u? |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 8:06pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
chic2pimp: Because it is not. Just like a necrophilic, a nudist, a peadophile or bestial can not use the word discrimination. chic2pimp: You want to define what open-minded is? Is your definition (like the Brirish people): Anyone that approves of homosexuality and support gays? chic2pimp: They both have pervert, unnatural sexual urges. Far better than you placing blacks and gays in the same bracket. One faces non-acceptance on a perception of superiority. The other on a percpetion of immorality. How can you intelltgently place them in the same bracket? Both bestiality and homosexuality are rejected based on morality. So please, the logic beats yours by far. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by chic2pimp(m): 8:07pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
Krayola:I'll rather live with Adolf Hitler on steriods that's for sure. As the saying goes,the devil you know is better. . . . . . . . |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 8:08pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
Krayola: No, I got it. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sauron1: 8:09pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
michelin89: Threat to ma sexuality? Nothing threatens this dude, so save it!!! Krayola: Adolf Hitler abi Idi Amin. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by chic2pimp(m): 8:40pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
Sagamite:Oh c'mon now. You are just being strongheaded here. Sagamite:My definition of open mindedness is 'Someone Who Is Inclined To Respect Views And Beliefs That Differs From Your Own'. You definitely don't come under ths category. Sagamite:You might see it as an unnatural sexual urge, I certainly don't. I certainly did not place blacks & gays in the same bracket. I was only using it as an example to show to you that all forms of discrimination is not acceptable. You really do think the world of yourself, don't you? . What is so morally wrong about two men having sex? Or do you believe that you are far superior to them? |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 8:57pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
chic2pimp:No. I am I drawing valid parallels which is further boosted by the arguments by pro-gays for advocating acceptance of homosexuality. chic2pimp: Well I am very inclined to respect views and beliefs that differ from my own in a vast majority of cases but not all. One of the exception is homosexuality and for some reason, despite my acceptance for a vast majority, you want to use one objection to label me as close-minded. Typical of gay-propagandists and western media brainwashing. I guess if you do not respect the view and beliefs of Al-qaeda and Taliban OR Bestiality but respect a vast majority of others, then I am entitled to label you close-minded too? Quality open-mindedness needs a FILTER. chic2pimp: If it was natural, you would see it in Nature rampantly. There are more than 10 million species of animals on earth, yet gay advocates are struggling to catch homosexuality comprehensively in one specie on camera. Yet, IN THIS DAY AND AGE, we are filming some giving birth in odd places, or going miles underwater to see creatures never seen before. But yet can not capture homosexual sex, only write that it exists. That tells me it is not natural. Sonthin wrong! chic2pimp: Thank you. We are getting somewhere. You can place sexism, semitism, ageism, fatism, ethnicism in the same bracket as they are all discrimination based on SUPERIORITY. But GAYS? HELL NO! Cheap credibility tactics used by gay-propagandists. chic2pimp: You can say that again. My swagga is serious. I am the star up in the skies. [flash=400,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch/v/LyaNlZaVOpc&feature/related[/flash] chic2pimp: Oh please! Disgust!!!! That is like me asking you what is morally wrong with a horse shagging a woman. It is unnatural, disturbing and an AWFUL sight. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by chic2pimp(m): 9:06pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
I'll get back to you. Lemme watch the champs lge footie first |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 11:06pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
its not just a personal thing, its a societal thing to the extent that if we were all gay, humanity would go extinct. Any act that holds such a potential once adopted universally is a macro social danger and should accordingly be discouraged under law[/quite] How could homosexuality possibly lead to human extinction? How could we all go gay? Are u comfortable and secure with your sexuality? |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by bawomolo(m): 11:51pm On Nov 03, 2009 |
Krayola: that's what homophobia does to the mind. why would someone think such a thing is possible in a genetically diverse human population. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Chrisbenogor(m): 2:34am On Nov 04, 2009 |
Just some years ago an argument like this raged on, only that time it was if black people should be accepted as human beings. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 6:53am On Nov 04, 2009 |
Chrisbenogor: Yeah. Peadophiles would soon be referencing this too as back in the day, as well as the similarity of their discrimination with that of the Palestinians in the present day. Moronic analogy. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by DeepSight(m): 9:29am On Nov 04, 2009 |
Krayola: bawomolo: Krayola/ Bawomolo - please endeavour to read my post more carefully: I NEVER suggested that it was possible or likely that homosexuality would lead to human extinction. I stated that: ANY action which would lead to such if universally adopted, was a macro social reverse, or danger. What i simply mean is that a great parametre for judging the acceptability of an act would be an imaginary postulation of macro effects if universally applicable. We know that no act will ever be universally applicable but we use this postulation as a test for judging the acceptability or natruralness of any act. For example, in assessing the acceptability of being a vegetarian, we can try this test. If the whole world decided to become vegetarian (note: this cannot happen), no significant reverse would result to humanity. Indeed there would be great benefits such as excess cattle for wool, leather, clothing and many other cattle based commodities, thus leading to an economic boom. Also many meat-based dieseases would evaporate. The general well-being of humanity would soar, heart dieseases and cancer would be reduced, and people will live longer. It can thus be deduced that being vegetarian is not only acceptable, but to be actively encouraged. However apply the test to something like cannibalism. You will find that if the whole world choses to adopt cannibalism (note again: this cannot happen) then humanity is finished. Some persons can make a case that cannibalism is ok if limited to already dead persons who may have given consent for their bodies to be eaten. However we note that once human meat becomes general fare, the ripple effects will lead to a commercialization of human meat, and the sources of such meat will include murder. Humanity will be on a slippery slope to perdition. Consequently we can deduce that cannibalism is naturally wrong. Thus it is simply an imaginary way of testing that which is right, and in tandem with nature and that which is wrong, unnatural, and deductively reverse. Now, under no circumstances can you deny the efficacy of this test: it simply reveals things that are good and things that are bad in a very simple fashion. I challenge you both to apply the test to any other act or human tendency in existence (not homosexuality, since that is the present issue) and you will see the inviolable efficacy of this test. Now if you cannot produce ONE SINGLE human act or tendency that debunks the efficacy of this test, then you both must unconditionally and rationally accept that the test is also right as per its deductive result on homosexuality: to wit: that it is unnatural and an unnacceptable reverse. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 1:16pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
To summarise: Homosexuality is immoral because it is unnatural! How is it unnatural? Point A: There is nothing we do naturally or occurs to us naturally that does not exist in the same fashion in the Animal Kingdom. Homosexuality cannot be natural if it does not exist in the same fashion in animal kingdom, hence homosexuals are not born gay (lest we forget, the major premisal question of the thread). It is either a choice or a malfunction in the human reproduction process that needs to be corrected, not accepted. Examples of natural occurences in humans that occurs in animal kingdom are birth defects, dwarfism, albinoism, race etc which one can easily get the evidence for through the web (Thank God, this is not the 80s when information is hard to get and facts can not be backed up except one is in the field). For gay-propagandists, there are 2 options left to you: 1) Prove my Point A is invalid. E.g. state ONE thing that occurs naturally to us that is not in existence in the Animal Kingdom. By doing this, you have proved it is not a valid test for naturality in humans. 2) Prove that homosexuality exists in the Animal Kingdon in the same fashion as it exists in the human kingdom i.e. meeting my criteria. Point B: https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria?topic=279591.msg3990475#msg3990475 Please don't show me pix where some moooron gay is saying some animals "appear to be kissing" and tell me the author has a PhD so I must believe whatever they spew as their reputation is on the line. Show me solid facts (a few scenarios) of an animals opting for the same s3x despite the availability of opposite gender and engaging in sexual intercourse that involves expulsion (which s3x inevitably leads to). And don't tell me you can't show it but still maintain homosexuality is natural and exists in the animal kingdom when all other natural things can be shown EXCEPT the "natural" homosexuality in this ADVANCED DAY AND AGE! That would just be a dumb debater I should not waste my time on. Or you can prove that any (or all) of the criteria in Point B is not valid assessment of homosexuality in animals. Otherwise, stop wasting my time with lame arguments. Arguments of "just accept it because homosexuals exist and it was practised in Greek and Roman times". Tight arguments! |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 2:00pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
Deep Sight: Universal B12 deficiency is a potential hazard of everybody being a vegetarian. If everybody became a vegetarian we could all suffer as a result. Therefore laws should ban vegetarianism. Vitamin B12 Deficiency Deep Sight: If the whole world decided to only have protected sex (could never happen but that is irrelevant, right?) we would all go extinct. Therefore protected sex should be banned. Deep Sight: very little, if anything, is homogeneous in nature in terms of animal behaviour. Different species adapt to their environments differenly, and do what works in the system they have to live in. Also, some animals eat their young, and kill their sex partners. Should humans do that? The argument that what occurs in nature should be the model on which humans base their lives, IMO, makes our rationality irrelevant. We should just look at the wild and emulate? reproduction is not the only function sex serves. . . it can relieve stress, strengthen relationships, and contribute to happiness and overall quality of one's life. We do not intend to have children every time we have sex. If you feel that whatever value u get from those intimate moments with your lover should not be universally accessible to all human beings, because of their sexual orientation, then you are guilty of violating your own premise that what is good should be encouraged, and must be applicable and accessible universally. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 2:26pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
Sagamite: Humans have critical awareness. We can manipulate complex concepts and use very sophisticated language, We also have the capacity to plan, reflect, deliberate as a group, make rational choices, and for the most part we accept responsibility for acting. Since most of these characteristics do not occur in the animal kingdom as they do in humans, going by your premise humans are, by definition - UNNATURAL!! If, based on your premise, humans are unnatural, why should we act "naturally"? |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 2:36pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
Krayola: Everything you stated exist in the animal world. We are just better at doing it. Animals have awareness, communicate, plan, reflect, delibrate as a group, make rational choices and I bet accept responsibility for acting. Most of what you have stated is not natural per se, it is choice but it does exist in animals. My premise can never say humans are unnatural. Read it again. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 2:59pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
Sagamite: Sagamite: 1) Human beings are autonomous and self-directing rational moral agents 2)We can make long-range and long-term plans, anticipate their consequences, choose among alternative courses of action, take responsibility, make and follow rules, engage in rational moral discussion and behaviour that affect both ourselves and others and are subject to moral appraisal. 3)We constitute a community of interacting autonomous beings, that have the characteristics above ^^, where moral concepts can develop, evolve, and be understood. I rest my case. [size=16pt]. . . . . NEXT??!![/size] |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sagamite(m): 3:54pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
Krayola: You struggle to differentiate between human choice and human naturality/biology. To you, going to school is as natural an occurrence as sweating. I am not surprised you will struggle to see homosexuality as a choice if it is. I don't debate at that level. My intellect is imperious to that, move. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 11:04pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
hahaha. this guy is very confused. Sagamite: Do we choose to be capable of being rational creatures, capable of doing all those things I listed, or are we born with that potential? Think hard this time. . .U're starting to look desperate. Sagamite: I never used "naturalness" as a criterion for how humans should behave. You did. That is your baggage not mine. But just for the hell of it, I'll respond to that straw-man The capacity to learn concepts taught in school occurs naturally in most humans and not in the rest of the animal kingdom. here is your video. . . [flash=400,400] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE0e0hCb7ME&hl=en&fs=1&[/flash] I'm done with you. U're an empty barrel. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Sauron1: 11:10pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
Krayola: You are talking trash. Termites have more organisation and are more responsible than Nigerians. Animals can do the basic things humans can do. |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by Krayola(m): 11:19pm On Nov 04, 2009 |
haha *whistles the melody of of 'champion', pops collar, and steps out* Holla back when you start making sense |
Re: Could It Really Be That A Person Can Be Born Gay? by bawomolo(m): 1:59am On Nov 05, 2009 |
~Sauron~: humans are considered higher animals for a reason. Krayola is really going in. Let me just sit back and watch |
(1) (2) (3) ... (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) (36) ... (39) (Reply)
Lagos Pastor: "I Only Had Sex With 6 Out Of The 30 Underaged Girls" / Franklin Graham's Tweet About Stephen Hawkins And The Reply He Got / Woman Slumps And Dies While Singing On Altar In Delta Church
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 122 |