acidrop:

DO U SERIOUSLY NOT C ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT PICTURE




well neither should be legalized, all sin in the eyes of God

thank you hun. that's how i see it too. all or nothing.

C2H5OH:

how is it any of your business? does it hurt you in anyway?
if two men can get married, why not one man and two women?

I already answered this question.  

two men getting married is a monogamous marriage that should only be compared to one man and one woman.

one man and two women is a polygamous marriage that should only be compared to one man and two men.

do u understand logic at all? read my previous post again

C2H5OH:

thank you hun. that's how i see it too. all or nothing.

another reason why this topic is pointless.

C2H5OH:

thank you hun. that's how i see it too. all or nothing.

well wat do u c?

are u guys supporting the notion of polygamy or opposing it? and who is who

C2H5OH:

do you have a few loose screws in your head?  ffs what is the matter with you    start providing answers if you disagree with what i have written.

if you agree with me that men should be allowed to have multiple wives, sit at my right hand side and enjoy the show.

ure a lost cause---- what am i even doing here??--- people i think we should leave C2h to keep ranting, its not getting us anywhere!

acidrop:

are u guys supporting the notion of polygamy or opposing it? and who is who

alcohol is a weirdo that's all you need to know.

oyinda.:

I already answered this question.  

two men getting married is a monogamous marriage that should only be compared to one man and one woman.

one man and two women is a polygamous marriage that should only be compared to one man and two men.

do u understand logic at all? read my previous post again

your arguments are not only circular, they also lack substance.  i know the definition of a monogamous marriage and i know the definition of a polygamous marriage.
you are making empty statements.  your point is MOOT by all possible accounts.
this thread is about men having multiple wives.
is something wrong with that, if so,   WHY
if you're trying to argue that marriage should only be a monogamous arrangement and you can't convince me with reasons, i will not agree with you. . . perioD!

oyinda.:

alcohol is a weirdo that's all you need to know.

gotchya sweety u should have warned earlier----

acidrop:

are u guys supporting the notion of polygamy or opposing it? and who is who

that is what i am trying to find out myself, and so far udeycraze is barking down my neck like a german shepherd, and oyinda is afraid to say whether she is for or against it.

udeycraze?:

ure a lost cause---- what am i even doing here??--- people i think we should leave C2h to keep ranting, its not getting us anywhere!

you are a disgrace to logic, why should i even bother what a waste

put your brain to good use or go to sleep

I am against polygamy because I don't think the United States needs it. If, however, I find a convincing argument for polygamy, I can change my mind.

oyinda.:

alcohol is a weirdo that's all you need to know.

one question:

are you ignorant or do you choose to be stupid. if you are actually trying to make a point then make your point. stop beating around the bush.
you can both choose to attack the person or put your time to good use by making some valid points

oyinda.:

I am against polygamy because I don't think the United States needs it. If, however, I find a convincing argument for polygamy, I can change my mind.

"you think" "you think" "you think" will not get us anywhere. no wonder you couldn't say what's on your mind. we argue with facts here. we could care less about your thoughts.
the united states doesn't need polygamy but it needs homosexuality

for the love of the Heavens i'm done here until you guys make some sense.

oyinda.:

alcohol is a weirdo that's all you need to know.

Alcohol? wat has that got 2 do with it?

C2H5OH:

your arguments are not only circular, they also lack substance.  i know the definition of a monogamous marriage and i know the definition of a polygamous marriage.
you are making empty statements.  your point is MOOT by all possible accounts.
this thread is about men having multiple wives.
is something wrong with that, if so,   [b]WHY[/b]if you're trying to argue that marriage should only be a monogamous arrangement and you can't convince me with reasons, i will not agree with you. . . perioD!

now its coming clear, well POLYGAMY IS A BIG NO for me, reasons beign back in  d days were women were voiceless, and men reigned it was one of the strategy among with many such as rape whithin marriage, occupation restriction and vote to limite the propsect of women raisng their voice and recgnising the higher hierachy of men than women. Do ur history? am pretty sure thats d history behind it. but recently datz y its dosent occur much with women as it does with men. any way recently wen women has been recognised this concept was modernised, and even given a fancy name POLYGAMY. i believed with the concept of homosexuality and heterosexuality the whole thing has been remixed

Alcohol, i reserve my comments

acidrop:

Alcohol? wat has that got 2 do with it?

his username is the chemical formula for alcohol i.e alcohol is the simple english version of his name.

oyinda.:

Alcohol, i reserve my comments

his username is the chemical formula for alcohol i.e alcohol is the simple english version of his name.

haaaaaaaaaaaaa i c, so are u sure he's not under the influence i mean with this statemnet:

if you're trying to argue that marriage should only be a monogamous arrangement and you can't convince me with reasons, i will not agree with you. . . perioD!

y put it up if u don wanna be convinced??

if you're trying to argue that marriage should only be a monogamous arrangement and you can't convince me with reasons, i will not agree with you. . . perioD!

end of discussion.

arguing with you or davidylan is like conversing with the thin air.
remind me again where I tried to argue about monogamous marriage versus polygamous marriage?

acidrop:

haaaaaaaaaaaaa i c, so are u sure he's not under the influence i mean with this statemnet:y put it up if u don wanna be convinced??

he's trying to set me up but it's not working.
That's what people do when they run out of ideas on how to logically make arguments.

Love gone sour.

A mixture of acid and base

FL Gators:

Love gone sour.

A mixture of acid and base

iya gboin how now 
why's everyone asleep so early today.

oyinda.:

end of discussion.

arguing with you or davidylan is like conversing with the thin air.
remind me again where I tried to argue about monogamous marriage versus polygamous marriage?

i didn't say you did.  all i said was, what 1 man decides to do with 4 consenting women is none of your business.  no be so 

i would prefer to slam my head against a brick wall than to argue with you.

oyinda3:
I am against polygamy because I don't think the United States needs it. If, however, I find a convincing argument for polygamy, I can change my mind.

It's more about your Religion and believes, law and order, Christians are or should be monogamous, Muslims are polygamous, Tibet people women have multiple husbands as there is not enough women. But all religions and law are supporting a family union in all forms, not spreading diseases going to multiple relationships with no responsibility, religions are about the healthy family and good environment for to grow up kids and guide us for to keep the rules, not hurting our families.