HopeAtHand:
Wike don win..confirmed by me Hopeathand.

Jessewizy:

Oga stop saying nonsense! Wike is not responsible For the unrest in Ahoada right now. Soon it'll end

PhockPhockMan:
I dey wait

akinsbaba2015:
Lost at the elections petition tribunal, lost at the court of appeal and yet some folks think there will be a miracle for Nyesom Wine at the Supreme court. They can't even wait for a pronouncement by the 7judges who are sitting on the matter they are already broadcasting falsehood. NA WA O

kenonze:
U called this thread live update yet not even 30min per update from u.

Keeping tabs on my Sahara reporters jare!

phantom:
Wike has won.....can anyone confirm??
Some peeps for my area,rumodomaya jus dey rejoice.
If this is true,then I pity Rivers State.
Expect the rubbish happening at ahoada to spread like harmattan fire...lol

that is currently the fake news making the rounds among the delusional PDP supporters in PH as I type. the impressionable supporters are been spoon fed with lies that out of the seven justices four have already endorsed Wike meanwhile hearing is still ongoing

masterchi:
Wike versus Dakuku Peterside : For now the
court has gone on a 30-minute recess to
resume for INEC appeal
So far:
Supreme Court has heard two appeals
against the judgment that nullified Governor Wike’s election. The Supreme Court heard
the Appeals by Governor Wike and PDP.
The Supreme Court judges posed two
questions to Dakuku Peterside lawyers
which they failed to answer
1. Is INEC guideline more than the Electoral Act
2. Can the lower tribunals give wholesale
judgment after striking out 100 paragraphs
Earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled that
accreditation is both by card reader and
manual process using the voter register. It held this position in suit filed against the
election of Governor Umahi of Ebonyi State.
Scannews

kcmichael:





Another Wailer spotted,the justces are just hearing suits by both parties,never was that question posed.u are fake.

Aminat508:
Lmao @ hungry

masterchi:
Wike versus Dakuku Peterside : For now the
court has gone on a 30-minute recess to
resume for INEC appeal
So far:
Supreme Court has heard two appeals
against the judgment that nullified Governor Wike’s election. The Supreme Court heard
the Appeals by Governor Wike and PDP.
The Supreme Court judges posed two
questions to Dakuku Peterside lawyers
which they failed to answer
1. Is INEC guideline more than the Electoral Act
2. Can the lower tribunals give wholesale
judgment after striking out 100 paragraphs
Earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled that
accreditation is both by card reader and
manual process using the voter register. It held this position in suit filed against the
election of Governor Umahi of Ebonyi State.
Scannews

ugoani:
Update please?

kcmichael:





Another Wailer spotted,the justces are just hearing suits by both parties,never was that question posed.u are fake

U need some SENSE,Electoral guildlines is contained in the Electoral act,its like saying there is no SPEEcH without WORDS when u know words make up speech..scannews is fake

masterchi:
lol. before u make a big fooool out of ur self. not every one depend on financial leftovers from politicians to survive. attack the source not me.

kenonze:
The Supreme Court has thrown out an appeal filed by the Governor of Rivers State, Nyesome Wike, challenging the constitution of the Rivers State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal Panel.

kenonze:
The Court also upheld the decision of the two lower courts which dismissed Mr Wike’s appeal challenging the relocation of the Tribunal from Rivers State capital to Abuja.

According to the apex court the invocation of the Doctrine of Necessity by the President of the appellate court at the material time was in order, since there was no Chief Judge or President of the Customary Court of Appeal in the State.

kenonze:
The Court also upheld the decision of the two lower courts which dismissed Mr Wike’s appeal challenging the relocation of the Tribunal from Rivers State capital to Abuja.

According to the apex court the invocation of the Doctrine of Necessity by the President of the appellate court at the material time was in order, since there was no Chief Judge or President of the Customary Court of Appeal in the State.