Goahead:
太晚了慢性子

cescky:
not much was expected of bitter ssce holder anyways

kutchs:
When did he come to that realization, before the elections or after?
I can remember vividly how this man and his band of crooks went about town undermining all the efforts of the Jonqthan's administration to fix Nigeria.
I can remember how he promised to fix Nigeria within one year of his office.
I can remember the names they called Jonathan.
I can remember one of his lieutenant St Fashola telling his gullible followers that providing 24 hours electricity supply isn't rocket science.
I can remember the millions of promises he and party made.
Reasonable Nigerians know it isn't a day's job but you deceived many, so do the little you can and run away you are a waste and a big disgrace.

HirstMOG:


when you are stucked in an enclosed place with some fellows with body odour and smelling mouth, you can't help but endure whether they are your friends or not. are you not feeling the body odour of the dullard too?? you said 2019, we are both in the same boat

Doyin2:


I am challenging you on an intellectual discus!

Although I do not support military rule,but I still need to prove to you that Nigeria was even better(sadly) under military rule,than under PDP 16 year rule!

Which economic indices should we exploit?

brojoshua:

But the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.
And righteousness exalts a nation and not education. Or sorry do understand what I am saying? [color=#006600][/color]

Doyin2:



Well let me agree with a not too good start.But hey, in a marathon race,which is more important,the finish or the start?

Unless you do not accept that fixing Nigeria is not a 100 meters dash!


So do not be surprised if you see me carry placard ''APC must go'' in few years time!!!!

Keneking:
Jonathan vandalise the country

Doyin2:


It is only a stack illiterate like you, would define illiteracy as lack of certificate!

However let me come down to your illiteracy level:

By your own definition of illiteracy,PMB is definitely not an illiterate.

I am very much interested on how the cost of governance could be cut down by 80%, as a quick fix,kindly educate us further.

When your constitution says you must engage 36 ministers and you think reducing cost of governance by 80% would be a quick fix?Or you think the president has the powers to cut down their salaries?

When the constitution says you must have 109 senators and 360 house of reps members and the president does not even have any powers to reduce their fraudulent salaries,yet for you, reducing cost of governance by 80% would be a quick fix?

Or you think constitutionally reducing the number of NASS members would be an easy task and a quick fix?

80% reduction in cost of governance,with the present constitution?Or did you mean 8%,which is quite achievable by reducing frivolous appointments and expenditure?

TALK IS VERY CHEAP!