Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,158,540 members, 7,837,078 topics. Date: Wednesday, 22 May 2024 at 04:29 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (994707 Views)
President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (472) (473) (474) (475) (476) (477) (478) ... (668) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:10am On Oct 06, 2018 |
Upgraded insas
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:15am On Oct 06, 2018 |
Warheads Blue watermelon shaped one is the NGARM warhead
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:20am On Oct 06, 2018 |
nemesis8u: Generally we dont. But the past 6 months a company of their's was assigned to the same sector as one of our platoons. The idea was they'd advance into any settlement about to be attacked, either protecting civilians or, allowing our offensive platoon attached to them to either defend them or the settlement/village/town. Most of the time they tactically advanced to the rear. Which is why very quickly, even the most inexperienced section leader from RSABATT would groan when told they were in same sector as elements from PA_BATT. That said, their staff officers I encountered are top-class. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:33am On Oct 06, 2018 |
ALH at Siachen glacier
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:40am On Oct 06, 2018 |
nemesis8u: Smaller yes, but for some politicians making stupid decisions we could have had similar line-up of A400m by now. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:41am On Oct 06, 2018 |
Prithvi series SRBM interesting info on the support systems It had a warhead carrier with 4 types of warheads which could be interchanged in the field on the missile just before launch 2nd pic the 2nd vehicle from the top
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:41am On Oct 06, 2018 |
frumentius: Budget constraints ? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:43am On Oct 06, 2018 |
frumentius: I deleted the question becz I thought later it was a inappropriate question to ask |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:52am On Oct 06, 2018 |
Info on the Prithvi warheads
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 2:58am On Oct 06, 2018 |
One of the prithvi warheads BCES (blast cum earth shock) in action during testing It contains 32 explosive penetrators that penetrate the ground , structures etc and then explode for damage . Its effect is that of a area saturation warhead. Targets r airfields , staging areas , C2 posts , depos etc
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:03am On Oct 06, 2018 |
nemesis8u: Not really. We were one of the founder partners of the damn thing, which is why Denel Aeronotics still manufactures part of the plane. We were scheduled to get 10-12, paid a substantial amount, with the balance supposedly off-set by loans, our R & D and manufacturing contribution. The delays at Airbus's side, coupled with exchange fluctuations and some fool not having hedged for currency volatility, caused some other fool advising the DefMin to mis-state how much we were supposed to pay. As a result the politicians said "Nyet", we were refunded our original buy-in. When the auditors discovered the mistake of the extra zero, nobody politically wanted to re-surrect the deal as they' all made a meal of how much savings when pulling out etc. The irony of course, is that Denel continues churning out struts and fuselages as one of the original founder manufacturers. Fucking politicians! We would've received all 10-12 of our planes by now. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:12am On Oct 06, 2018 |
frumentius: That sucks a extra zero killed the deal Strategic lift capability is a must Anyways do know LCA contribution to A400 Airbus bought the rights to a integrated automated software for designing and analysing 3-D laminated composite elements developed for LCA and it was used in A400. The Russians and Boeing also bought it. Interestingly, it was also largely bought by racing car manufacturers for its ability to reduce weight of the cars with accurate design. |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:43pm On Oct 07, 2018 |
CFD analysis for using su30mki as a buddy refuler for LCA So that's a given su30mki will act as a mini tanker for LCA in the future |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:45pm On Oct 07, 2018 |
And looks like the first definite image of LCA MK2 has come out ( unofficially atleast till more info comes out ) I am totally surprised since it now sports a close coupled fully active canards like typhoon and rafale Previously naval LCA MK1 has LEVCONS attached to the wings , now it seems the designers had opted for one of the many design configuration which was explored at the beginning of the LCA programme. The canards now r totally separate from the wing and are positioned below and aft of the cockpit and the front fuselage has been increased by 1 m and the tail also has been redesigned. Pic 1 LCA MK2 with fully active close coupled canards separate from the wing Pic 2 LEVCONS attached to the wing on naval LCA MK1 Pic 3 one of the initial wind tunnel models of LCA with fully active close coupled canards separate from the wing Pic 4 typhoon fully active close coupled canards separate from the wing , now to be implemented in LCA MK2 hopefully
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 11:21pm On Oct 07, 2018 |
Vishakhapatnam class destroyers 4 nos being built Each costs more than 1 billion dollars 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by barineh(m): 3:11am On Oct 08, 2018 |
nemesis8u:Why are you guys buying Frigates from Russia and what type? |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:22am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Ind... is basically interested in 77N6-N and the 77N6-NI LR-SAMs, having top speeds of 7km/second and also the first LR-SAMs of Russian origin to possess INERT warheads. They r part of S500. Later these will shipped as part of the S400 deal.
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:26am On Oct 08, 2018 |
barineh: Partly as a favour to the Russians, 2 of the frigates r already build but without the turbines which the Ukranians refused to supply to them. Ind.. with buy the turbines from Ukraine and supply them to Russia for fitting to the half complete ships. Another 2 ships will be built in Ind... with TOT as a quid pro quo. Type name I don't remember maybe admiral go..... something |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:28am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Initially, the S-400 will come equipped with only the 380km-range 40N6E LR-SAMs
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:30am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Pic of the S400 brigade HQ
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:46am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Deal is for 5 regiments of S400 1 regiment has 2 battalions so 10 battalions ordered 1 battalion has 8 launchers , 112 missiles and associated command , radar and support vehicles. So total 80 launchers and 1120 missiles. However total missiles ordered is 6000. Personally I think S400 effectiveness lies in its psychological effect. In real world I doubt it's effectiveness which will be dictated by its geographical location ( like atop mountains, hills etc ) to overcome the limitations placed by the natural curvature of Earth which will otherwise impede the effective radar range. LRSAMs r only effective against high altitude targets and can operate to its full potential only in a layered air defence coverage provided by MRSAMs , SRSAMs , VSHORADs , AAA etc with a centralised networked C2. Otherwise it's a white elephant. One interesting reason why s400 was bought becz of the falling squadron nos of fighters. Primary air defence task is with fighters however since the shiit storm associated with fighter procurement has played spoiler sport the s400 buy was required. However there is a silver lining IAF has confirmed procurement of 300+ LCA when the various versions become available. 1 Like |
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:05am On Oct 08, 2018 |
I hope LCA MK1A LCA MK2 gets operationalized soon The IAF has been put in charge of the LCA programme a month ago , which should have done years ago. Also LCA MK2 has been renamed to MCA as it is being built as a medium combat aircraft
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:22am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Flaring
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:23am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Mig 21 Bisons with Mig 29 Fulcrums
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:24am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Helicopters tango
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:25am On Oct 08, 2018 |
That's a Dakota
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:26am On Oct 08, 2018 |
WW1 and WW2 reloading
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:26am On Oct 08, 2018 |
I am coming plz stay put
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:27am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Bazingaaaaaa 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 5:29am On Oct 08, 2018 |
IAF raising day 1 Like
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:04am On Oct 08, 2018 |
IN Harriers
|
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:05am On Oct 08, 2018 |
Mi 35 IAF
|
(1) (2) (3) ... (472) (473) (474) (475) (476) (477) (478) ... (668) (Reply)
American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 39 |