hopefulLandlord:


calm down, no one is chasing you

now go back and read, keep reading till you get it

Now I understand . Don't be embarrassed man . Its normal to be feel like an intellectual while you are not https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority

You should have asked me to explain the slippery slope fallacy to you , I'd have done that gladly .

KingEbukasBlog:


Now I understand . Don't be embarrassed man . Its normal to be feel like an intellectual while you are not https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority

You would have asked me to explain the slippery slope fallacy to you , I'd have done that gladly .

don't be embarrassed when your inability to comprehend is laid bare

you're suffering from "Delusion of Grandeur" http://psychcentral.com/encyclopedia/delusion-of-grandeur/

I've explained "Slippery Slope" perfectly, in a way that any sane person would understand with the "Car" example

if you still don't get it........

hopefulLandlord:


I've explained it perfectly in a way that any sane person would understand with the "Car" example

if you still don't get it........

Shut up and show me how that exact statement I made is a slippery slope fallacy . I want to see what makes it a slippery slope fallacy

foladara777:

That picture is utter crap and doesn't reflect what atheism is but even that crap still makes more sense than Christianity...

what?, it agrees with atheism 100%

According to Richard Dawkins, this atheist mythology is a staggering fact.

I really want to embarrass the guy sha

hopefulLandlord:


aha!

so its no longer by saying "There is no god"?



you change the definition of atheism based on the straw you want to pull

Shut up , just shut up

KingEbukasBlog:


Shut up and show me how that exact statement I made is a slippery slope fallacy . I want to see what makes it a slippery slope fallacy

oga, wetin?

"if babies are atheists going by your definition, then rocks are atheists"

if we say "a" is a word as used in "I have a car", then "b" should be a word too, so should "t", "f"

"if we say sex is pleasurable, then rape should be too"

"fishes and bicycle are the same, afterall they both move from one place to another"

if you still can't get it.......

this dog is a theist

Richirich713:


what?, it agrees with atheism 100%

According to Richard Dawkins, this atheist mythology is a staggering fact.

Well, the argument that human beings are amazing so they must have been created but a supposedly more amazing God didn't have to be created is not just staggering, it's stupid

Richirich713:
this dog is a theist

So you understand logic?? Why not apply it to your beliefs and see how stupid they suddenly become

KingEbukasBlog:
I really want to embarrass the guy sha

you know that your bullying tactics has never worked on me and would never work on me

foladara777:

So you understand logic?? Why not apply it to your beliefs and see how stupid they suddenly become

Are u evens an atheist?

hopefulLandlord:


oga, wetin?

"if babies are atheists going by your definition, then rocks are atheists"

if we say "a" is a word as used in "I have a car", then "b" should be a word too, so should "t", "f"

"if we say sex is pleasurable, then rape should be too"

if you still can't get it.......

That is not the slippery slope fallacy . It has to do with chains of events of effects and causes , then as it progresses it becomes less and more less probable that the next event was caused by the one that precedes it .

Its called a slope for a reason

hopefulLandlord:


you know that your bullying tactics has never worked on me and would never work on me

Oh, no... I just believe the Christian God is bullshit, since that's the one I've learned about well enough

KingEbukasBlog:


That is not the slippery slope fallacy . It has to do with chains of events of effects and causes , then as it progresses it becomes less and more less probable that the next event was caused by the one that precedes it .

Its called a slope for a reason

K

hopefulLandlord:


K

So have you accepted that I was right concerning the definition of atheism

KingEbukasBlog:


So have you accepted that I was right concerning the definition of atheism

there's a reason the words "Narrower sense" was added to pass a message you're ignoring

can you explain what the words "Narrow sense" mean?

stop feigning ignorance bro, you're too smart for that

your slippery slope definition doesn't negate my examples

as for definitions, my issue is you pulling whatever one you want to use based on the straw you want to pull

same way you define "Christianity" based on the straw you want to pull

hopefulLandlord:


there's a reason the words "Narrower sense" was added to pass a message you're ignoring

stop feigning ignorance bro, you're too smart for that

your slippery slope definition doesn't negate my examples

as for definitions, my issue is you pulling whatever one you want to use based on the straw you want to pull

same way you define "Christianity" based on the straw you want to pull

I 'pull no straws ' bro . I work with the definitions from your own sources . There is no such thing as 'implicit atheism' - that is not atheism - its deceptive . That's why babies , animals and inanimate things are not atheists .

For the slippery slope fallacy , it has to do with a chain of related events not just one statement .

Atheists, Newton thought you were idiots (senseless). Just saying

KingEbukasBlog:


I 'pull no straws ' bro . I work with the definitions from your own sources . There is no such thing as 'implicit atheism' - that is not atheism - its deceptive . That's why babies , animals and inanimate things are not atheists .

For the slippery slope fallacy , it has to do with a chain of related events not just one statement .

your posts show strawman

you use whatever definition you like and base it on that

"Christianity" and "Atheism" are the two terms you do that to the most, one time atheism is "Lack of belief" then changes to "Rejection of gods" then changes to "Saying there's no god"

Atheists on this platform have made it clear times without number that they "Lack belief in any deity" let that be the definition you use or you're just pulling straws

hopefulLandlord:


there's a reason the words "Narrower sense" was added to pass a message you're ignoring

Theism says there is a God .
Theism accepts the belief in God
Theism holds the belief in God

Atheism rejects the belief in God
Atheism holds no belief in God

But its wrong to say that Atheism says there is no God ?

Where are the straws here

KingEbukasBlog:


Theism says there is a God .
Theism accepts the belief in God
Theism holds the belief in God

Atheism rejects the belief in God
Atheism holds no belief in God

But its wrong to say that Atheism says there is no God ?

Where are the straws here

strawman is simply misrepresenting someone's viewpoint and attack it

atheists reject belief in any deity

there are atheists that say "There is no god" but such atheists are simply thinking emotionally

almost all atheists on this platform simply say "They lack belief in any deity" full stop

the existence/non existence of deities is relegated to the same places Bigfoot, man with 500 hands who resides in the moon and cannot be photographed, Diamond the shape of a man in the middle of the planet called "@+£&@:£-#:£-#", The 32 billion dollars you have in your domiciliary account, the invisible pink unicorn you conversed with yesterday are

comprende?

Richirich713:
this dog is a theist

Bruv?

If man was made from dust, why is there still dust??

Your kind of stupid is amazing though

benzics:

Bruv?

If man was made from dust, why is there still dust??

Your kind of stupid is amazing though

this got nothing to do with being made of any substance, it's about Evolution (evolving), ur very stupid.

And I didn't claim anything about Evolution, it was the theist (dog) who made the claim, not me.

Richirich713:


this got nothing to do with being made of any substance, it's about Evolution (evolving), ur very stupid.

And I didn't claim anything about Evolution, it was the theist (dog) who made the claim, not me.

Do you know anything about natural selection? Hell do you even know what evolution is? Hmm

Richirich713:


this got nothing to do with being made of any substance, it's about Evolution (evolving), ur very stupid.

And I didn't claim anything about Evolution, it was the theist (dog) who made the claim, not me.

Answer me, so it's not possible for something to be gotten from nothing?

benzics:

Do you know anything about natural selection? Hell do you even know what evolution is? Hmm

Yes

benzics:

Answer me, so it's not possible for something to be gotten from nothing?

it's impossible to get something from nothing and by nothing, only mentally ill people like Richard Dawkins believe this is possible., he must be on that strong weed.

Richirich713:


it's impossible to get something from nothing and by nothing, only mentally ill people like Richard Dawkins believe this is possible., he must be on that strong weed.

lol
You obviously didn't go far in physics

hopefulLandlord:


strawman is simply misrepresenting someone's viewpoint and attack it

atheists reject belief in any deity

there are atheists that say "There is no god" but such atheists are simply thinking emotionally

almost all atheists on this platform simply say "They lack belief in any deity" full stop

Theism : There is a God or there are deities

A-Theism : There is no God or there are no deities

What you see above are the basic definitions . The rejection , lack of belief or whatever are just embellishments .

That's why Diagoras of Melos according to history is the first atheist because He declared that there were no gods

[quote author=benzics post=51733098]
Lol, anyone, even a priest can contribute to science! There are always rooms for new discoveries in science, it doesn't matter if you are religious or not, as far as you have experimented, observed and evaluated something, science welcomes it with a broad mind, unlike religion..

Now when the madness sets in is when you start making useless arguments like the one I illustrated above, that's when we'll totally ignore you!

If you believe that even priests can contribute to science, then there is no need trying to paint Religion as an inhibitor to innovation. Its a big contradiction to the purpose of your thread.

jonbellion:
lol
You obviously didn't go far in physics

Nothing means non existence not empty space