The loving God.

KingEbukasBlog:


Read herring

interpretation: I'd rather run for cover than open the Pandora's box which may cure me of my delusion of grandeur

DoctorAlien:


Then go and sit down. Most of you when exposed begin to appeal to ignorance. That was how the other was stating emphatically that every human is as a result of reproduction. When asked about the first human, he began to appeal to ignorance.

Prove that man was not created by GOD as the Bible says or you hold your peace.

Exposed?? The claims of the bible are neither evidence or proof. The idea that man was created by god is as credible as the idea of the earth bring created by oduduwa... I don't need to prove the non- existence of a fact by bringing positive arguments or evidence. I only need to show that the claims of the bible have not been confirmed and are not sufficient proof of creation...
That's how it works in a court of law BTW

KingEbukasBlog:



I'm downloading python videos once I exhaust the mb , to bed straight

That's better
Where are you downloading them from?

Eastactivist:

If Noah can be directed to build such large ship...
For sure he can be directed on how to acquire the tools he needed for his assignments.

How the species in the ship where sustained is through God intervention.

On the final note!! God is involved more reason to respect Him
But don't derail the thread... Mention me in your own thread anytime and I will comply

lol, you've been running round in circles, saying "it is God" without any proof.. Don't worry I have an upcoming thread and I'll make sure I mention you and your clueless gang

hopefulLandlord:


interpretation: I'd rather run for cover than open the Pandora's box which may cure me of my delusion of grandeur

You deceptively tried to extricate yourself from that right ?

randomperson:

Exposed?? The claims of the bible are neither evidence or proof. The idea that man was created by god is as credible as the idea of the earth bring created by oduduwa... I don't need to prove the non- existence of a fact by bringing positive arguments or evidence. I only need to show that the claims of the bible have not been confirmed and are not sufficient proof of creation...
That's how it works in a court of law BTW

Okay.

Bye.

EyeHateGod:
Are you this desperate?

desperate for what??

4kings:

That's better
Where are you downloading them from?

One stop programming

KingEbukasBlog:


Go and argue with archaeologists who made the discovery and show them why they are wrong

Really?? That's a market women style of argument. U brought the evidence of the research and I want you to show me how those research prove that the story in the bible happened as it was recorded

...

randomperson:

Exposed?? The claims of the bible are neither evidence or proof. The idea that man was created by god is as credible as the idea of the earth bring created by oduduwa... I don't need to prove the non- existence of a fact by bringing positive arguments or evidence. I only need to show that the claims of the bible have not been confirmed and are not sufficient proof of creation...
That's how it works in a court of law BTW

same thing kingebuka is pretending not to understand

hahn:


I don't know if you have noticed but I am not a scientist. I am a business man and evolution o jawo

4everGod, what did you do? All these atheists are denying Science all of sudden.

randomperson:

Really?? That's a market women style of argument. U brought the evidence of the research and I want you to show me how those research prove that the story in the bible happened as it was recorded

you dey mind those people? They've dodged questions a lot in this thread alone, it's their normal behavior, dodging questions

Anas09:

And Seun?

you know the answer naaah

4kings:

That's better
Where are you downloading them from?

Which AI videos did you download from Udacity ? AI for robotics or just AI ?

KingEbukasBlog:


One stop programming

Never heard of that.
Good luck and Good night.

randomperson:

So when a boy asks you, who created god... What would you say?

Mind you, you have shielded my question but I will answer you.
God is not man.
Man can reproduce.
God can't, why?? because reproduction is a man's feature which God added to man to automate the process of creation.
God is the creator and not reproducer, that will be my response to him.

4kings:

So Anas09 is a lady.

No, she's a Spirit.

Anas09:

O yeah. He is an atheist sir. No matter how dumb someone is, immidiately he declares for atheism, his IQ jupms to the highest level. Didnt we see one who testified of this fact here?

Atheism upgrades the intellects, so, yes Smart.

lol

KingEbukasBlog:


Which AI videos did you download from Udacity ? AI for robotics or just AI ?

Just AI. I just finished unit4.
So uve started to Robotics

EyeHateGod:

I though i made myself clear earlier on this thread?

Oh Sorry, you are too lazy to read.

benzics:
...

Stop derailing this thread . You have been embarrassed , humiliated by the very best . Stop attempting a pathetic come back . The good sire who has bedeviled you with recondite knowledge has gone

KingEbukasBlog:


You deceptively tried to extricate yourself from that right ?

who is suffering from delusion of grandeur between the both of us?

me? how?

Or

you that claim to have a special relationship with the holy spirit which claims that he'll reveal things to you?

4everGod:


Another way to look at it is this;

Imagine I take a jug to fill a glass with orange juice, and somebody enters the room just as the last few drops fall into the glass. I then ask the person how long it took me to fill the glass. That person then commences counting the seconds between the drops falling into the glass, quantifying the volume of the glass, and makes the ASSUMPTION that the rate at which the last few drops fall into the glass is the constant rate at which I have been filling the glass all along. He then tells me according to ’scientific calculations’ it took me so many months to fill the glass. Sounds absurd? Well it’s the same with the age of the earth. We arrive on the scene late, measure certain rates of deposition/erosion of sediments and ASSUME that the rate is constant, then proceed to calculate millions of years for the age of the earth according to ‘geological evidence’

2 THINGS MUST WORK TO GIVE ACCURACY...EYE WITNESS ACCOUNT AND WRITTEN RECORD.

4kings how do you know your age?

Your logical fallacy is: Ridiculous comparism.

every soul in the world knows that liquid flow is variable. This is why fluid mechanics is one of the most difficult areas of physics and mathematics today because it is almost impossible to predict. The age of the earth on the other hand is based on methods that have been repeatedly proven to be constant. So don't come here to say another thing.

benzics:

Lol, and you've just bust yourself, so you'd rather tell children lies than telling them the truth?

I simply don't know and I don't care, I happen to end up in the universe as a human being, and I've been enjoying my life ever since!

How did I bust myself?? You really are delusional.
That you don't know is because you are pompously ignorant.
Don't blame anyone else but yourself.

hopefulLandlord:


I do, do you?

Am not sure you do. I spelled 'Chirp', but spelled 'chrip' why is that.

Anas09:

No, she's a Spirit.

Yes, in a container called the body.

4kings:

Just AI. I just finished unit4.
So uve started to Robotics

I wanted to go through AI first before AI for robotics .

4kings:

Yes, in a container called the body.

For your mind you don set rejoinder ba

KingEbukasBlog:


Stop derailing this thread . You have been embarrassed , humiliated by the very best . Stop attempting a pathetic come back . The good sire who has bedeviled you with recondite knowledge has gone

lmao

*searching for where I was humiliated in the thread, found none *

Lol, humiliated by your pathetic arguments or your unending question dodging as if you are commando ?

Eastactivist:

Mind you, you have shielded my question but I will answer you.
God is not man.
Man can reproduce.
God can't, why?? because reproduction is a man's feature which God added to man to automate the process of creation.
God is the creator and not reproducer, that will be my response to him.

Wtf!! How does this answer my question?? I asked who created god and u answer is god cannot reproduce?? Am not talking about god's reproductive powers, am asking who or what produced god??
I think u should read my question and your comment again. They are not related at all