Niflheim:
@ameri9ja,

I was warned about you!!! I was warned to stay clear away from you because you are the type of person that loves to hold on to cave man error!!! So far you have not disappointed them(as in the people who warned me that you are not interested in learning anything new)!!! My last and final comment on this thread!!!

LINK 1:........................................http://bigthink.com/robby-berman/theres-no-such-thing-as-nothing-according-to-quantum-physics

LINK 2:........................................http://www.physics-astronomy.com/2017/04/theres-no-such-thing-as-nothing.html#.WXEBFraQzcs

LINK 3:........................................http://feedbox.com/2017/03/theres-no-such-thing-as-nothing-according-to-quantum-physics/

LINK 4:.......................................http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/519405-in-modern-physics-there-is-no-such-thing-as-nothing

LINK 5:......................................https://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2011/11/why-there-is-no-such-thing-as-empty-space.html


When I saw that your statement about the cavemen being right, and the Quantum Physicists being wrong, I knew that I had to flee from you forever!!! Don't be surprised when you continuously receive insults on Nairaland!!!

Like you fled from my questions. I'm waiting for specific answers from you. https://www.nairaland.com/3907602/calling-all-atheists-need-argument
Runaway atheist

DeepEyes:


Oh sorry but I doubt ud get any proper response since atheist, just like theists, hate when their beliefs are questioned beyond their mental capacity. Ironic isn't it? They're​ guilty of the exact thing they condemn all believers for- blind belief! Lol. They are very logical until they have to get illogical to support their logic. Lemme explain: standard science law of causes and affects is suddenly benched to argue that there was once a "Random" big bang out of "nowhere" that started time, space and evolution. See what I mean? Lol

To answer ur question tho, the subject of God is complexity, as only religion posits any kind of practical explanation. But we know, from history, that religions can't be trusted due to their mostly contrived ideologies. This "made up" nature of religion is what disqualifies it and it's claims, atleast for an intellectual mind. Science on the other hand tries to be as investigative as possible, until they have no more leads and resort to stalemate hypothesis disguised as theories. This is where science fails too. So both the theist and atheist end up in the same boat of knowledgeable ignorance. Wouldn't it suffice to just admit that we don't know, rather than feigning one knowledge or the other?

There's obviously an origin/source/creator but its probably not that "God" depicted by religion as an attention-seeking insecure being.

Nice writeup