adeolakemi:
I'm Yoruba but what I don't get is the continuous poke nosing of biafran affairs by the Yoruba ....its topics like this that makes Igbo's insult the Yoruba .....pls Dr try to write on state of the Yoruba affairs and leave biafrans alone

degamemaster:
I have said it time without number that I like our yoruba people but something is really wrong with them, I must say. And that is poking their noses into igbo's affairs. How can a sane mind be jubilating that a national army, well equipped invaded an innocent and unarmed defenceless civilians enclave, killed, maimed and tortured them for no crimes or other offences committed other asking for referendum ? And you claim to be a "Dr" and a lover of humanity, shame on you. People like this idiot is why the great yoruba nation keep receiving insults and humiliation from every quarter.

misterawo:
Same old sh#it of "hope for the black race" is getting boring. Frankly. . .

adeolakemi:
I'm Yoruba but what I don't get is the continuous poke nosing of biafran affairs by the Yoruba ....its topics like this that makes Igbo's insult the Yoruba .....pls Dr try to write on state of the Yoruba affairs and leave biafrans alone

PointB:


Coward Ojukwu indeed.

If people remind you of how your demi-god Awolowo, the bigger coward cum Afonja, took poison (committed suicide) in order to escape arrest, you'll burst into anger fits. You throw stones while living thin glass house.

Between Ojukwu who live to fight another day, and Awolowo who consumed gallon of rat poison to escape arrest, who do you think is the real coward?

http://247ureports.com/how-awolowo-committed-suicide-by-abdulmumini-adeku/



The Internet never forgets



Cowardice and Yoruba are twin malaise sired same day. Between Cowardice and Yoruba, Yoruba is more fearful, and more like to turn tail and run, or twist their tongues to save their skin. Freaking cowards seeking to deflect attention to the valiants.

IfeanyiYagazie:
And some wil say Igbos are quick to insult yurobas.

seeing this kind of biased writeup insujts are highly inevitable.
For God's sake yuroba has urgent issues to attend to than dis.

cc NDelta
what do u have to say ?

Am yet to see an article where an Igbo man poke nose in Yuroba affair but i can flood dis thread wit thousands of yuroba articles poke nosing in Igbo affair jhux to bring disrepute to d Igbos.

#Maturity is when you mind your business.
#ps

ivolt:

Intelligent discussion involves sticking with a topic, unfortunately, you
and your lots can never hold a discussion wothout deflection.
What the hell does shekau had to do with a cowardly boastful leader
who took to his heel?
Are you in any way suggesting that boko haram and ipob are in the same league?

Nowhere in the article was a happy mood expressed, you can throw empty words
around whichever way you like but that doesn' t invalidate the fact the mad coward
kanu took to his heels.

Being unarmed doesn't make an individual a saint, kanu is in the league of
Jim Jones, the psychotic cult leader who caused the deaths of hundreds
of people without firing a single shot.

It is imperative that madmen who are agents of destabilization be reigned in
before they cause disaster.

Though I would prefer that kanu be locked up in a psychiatric
asylum where he can get the necessary help he needs.

NnamdiKanu:
I actually decided not to insult Yoruba's on this forum .
but their constant pock nosing into biafran matters will make me retract that decision...imagine the rubbish an acclaimed doctor wrote. May Death befall on this bastard and his people

gidgiddy:


There wazms no deflection here. The writter started by saying a boastful Kanu ran away from the Nigerian Army. My question is, was the Nigerian created to go after unarmed and boastful people like Kanu or where they created to go after people who are destroying lives and property like Shekau? So the Army left their consstitional role of defending Nigeria to go after boastful people and the writter is trying to make a point from that illegal act?

It is quite a shame and cowardly of the Nigerian Army to be still invading someones house as if we are still in military rule. The Army is going to fight an unarmed man and you people are praising them? What is there to praise? The only cowards here are the Nigerian Army who embarked on an illegal exercise to to attack an unarmed man in his house. But sheka has been in his house fir seven years and nobody can get him. So the Nigerian Army is only good at attacking people with no guns? So what was all that training for?

If you suppport the reigning in of people using unconstitutional methods in a democracy then you dont mean well for anyone.

HungerBAD:
By Bisi Olawunmi

The secessionist insurrection of the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB) took a dramatic turn in the week ended Saturday, September 23, 2017, during which the secessionist group was proscribed and its erstwhile boastful leader, Nnamdi Kanu, took to his heels when confronted with fired up soldiers. Reminds you of another boastful secessionist in Biafra 1 – Emeka Odimegwu Ojukwu – who also went on the lam when federal troops closed in on him back in January 1970? At least, Ojukwu walked the talk of war, but this wet pants peed on only hearing the sound of guns! So much for the empty braggadocio! Also during the same week, there was an international angle to the secessionist agitation as the Federal Government decided to name two countries – Britain and France – as collaborators in IPOB’s partitioning agenda.

Minister of Information, Culture and Tourism, Lai Mohammed, told the nation on Wednesday, September 20, 2017 how Britain and France have been tacitly complicit with IPOB in its destabilisation of Nigeria. Britain, stated the minister, continues to tolerate Radio Biafra’s hate and incendiary broadcasts from London while France is said to be the financial clearing house of IPOB from where funds flow to the secessionist group. The minister had asserted: “Let me tell you, the financial headquarters (of IPOB) is in France, we know” and also posed a rhetorical question: “Who does not know that IPOB internal radio is located in London?” Mohammed explained how Britain had been frustrating Nigeria’s diplomatic efforts with the British authorities to shut down the pirate radio station only to be given the nebulous excuse of freedom of expression.

He had wondered: “If we have a person in Nigeria openly soliciting arms to come and fight in the UK, what would you think of it. Would you consider that freedom of expression?” The minister implied that the two countries have been engaged in semantics or what I would call diplomatic jousting. Minister Mohammed spoke of “knotty diplomatic issues which you need to skip” only to add in a double talk “I don’t want any diplomatic row.” Of course, the minister knew the charges against the two countries would spark diplomatic skirmishes, perhaps low level, for now.

Well, these are trying times in Nigeria and nationalist fervor demands that the country must be ready to ruffle some diplomatic nests in defense of the sanctity of her territorial integrity and sovereignty. There is reciprocity in diplomatic relations. We need to remember that Britain and France have played ignoble roles in the international arena in recent times under the self-serving subterfuge called ‘International Community.’ Britain followed the United States to declare war on Iraq on the lie that Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein, had ‘weapons of mass destruction’ which must be neutralised.

They ended up destroying that country and got its president hanged, as a rub in. Yet, Tony Blair, the then British Prime Minister, who stridently orchestrated Gulf War II could still face the world and declare that he had no apology for the destruction of Iraq, a country that has not known peace since. Such brazenness! Such denial of criminal culpability by a British Prime Minister who had made a past time of pillorying President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe whose main offence was winning re-elections in his country.

Apparently, Blair, with imperialist hang-over, wanted a regime change in Zimbabwe but met more than his match in President Mugabe, who once derisively called him Tony b-Liar. The old Zimbabwean war horse was right, Tony Blair lied on Iraq. So, if Britain condoned the Iraqi war, why is the Nigerian government peeved by the British High Commission’s statement condoning Radio Biafra’s hate and inciting broadcasts on the puerile doctrine of freedom of expression? The same Britain that shut down the Internet when youths went on rampage in London on the excuse that they were using it to network and mobilize others for the riot.

Talk of diplomatic duplicity or double standard. The immediate past British Prime Minister, chubby boy, David Cameron, in an expansive mood, once described Nigeria as a fantastically corrupt country, another brazenness from a country that is fantastically a receiver of stolen funds, being the financial capital of the world, both legitimate and illicit. Well, it was good riddance, as the political gambler fantastically lost the Brexit vote that saw to his exit from 10, Downing Street, the Prime Minister’s official residence.

As for France, it supported Biafra I and facilitated Emeka Ojukwu’s exile in Ivory Coast, her satellite nation, so, it should be no surprise that it is the financial clearing house for IPOB, the leading agent for Biafra II. France was indicted in the Rwanda Genocide of 1994, in which an estimated 800,000 Tutsis lost their lives, for being complicit with the then Hutu-led government. France also led the Western onslaught on Libya that saw the killing of Libyan leader, Muamar Gaddafi. In 2011, France, brazenly thwarted the will of the Ivorian people, when under the cover of ‘International Community’ mandate, it provided military support for a candidate, Alassane Quattara, in Cote D’Ivoire’s disputed presidential election conflict to capture a sitting African President, Laurent Gbagbo! Gbagbo had won the majority vote in the main election and was pronounced winner of the re-run election by the country’s Constitutional Court only for the UN Representative in Cote D’Ivoire to assume the role of electoral commission to declare Quattara as the winner!!

Sadly, Nigeria’s naïve President Goodluck Jonathan, as ECOWAS leader, had endorsed the UN envoy’s verdict, and consequent UN mandate, which accorded French military partisan involvement a dubious legitimacy. Cote D’Ivoire is France’s milking cow, a situation President Gbagbo had ended, so the empire struck back. With Quattara, who is married to a French woman, in charge, France has returned to gravy train in Cote D’Ivoire while President Gbagbo languishes in detention at The Hague facing criminal charges at the International Court of Justice.

The West sent Gbagbo to jail for a domestic conflict arising from an election dispute, but Tony Blair still struts around, a free man. Talk of the hypocrisy of the ‘International Community.

Nigeria’s political leadership should be under no illusion about any affectionate love from Britain or France, and, by extension, western countries. Britain and France are yesterday’s countries, over whose empires the sun has set, now playing a fickle third fiddle in international power relations and struggling for residual relevance in Africa. Nigeria, on the other hand, is a country of the future with great potentials which some vested interests may not want manifested being a threat to their hegemonic hold. You see, no country in Europe has Nigeria’s landmass, natural resources or population.

According to worldometers.info (2017) the combined population of Britain (66.2 million) and France (64.9 million) is 131.1 million compared to Nigeria’s 192.06 million while the combined landmass of Britain and France is 789,487sq km as against Nigeria’s 910,770sq km. Given these endowments plus high caliber human capital, the prospects of Nigeria as the great Black Hope is bright. We can now begin to understand why many countries would have dubious designs on Nigeria and would not be averse to its disintegration.

• Dr. Olawunmi, senior lecturer, Department of Mass Communication, Bowen University and former Washington Correspondent, News Agency of Nigeria (NAN).

http://guardian.ng/opinion/britain-france-and-ipob-duplicity-of-failed-empires/

This can only come from a lecturer in a Nigerian university, evident in his loss of touch with Global realities.
myopic adjudications like this is a proof that the quality of lecturers is the reason graduates leave our higher institutions worse than undergraduates their entry status.

The crux of this man's opinion is that since IPOB has a foreign account domiciled in France, Paris has become complicit in IPOB affairs, on the other hand, Since Britain still allows radio Biafra to thrive then, london is complicit in IPOB affairs, this s!lly conclusion can only be drawn by an academic misfit, unfortunately, he feeds our undergraduates with this kinda jargon, rendering them impotent in the larger world.

In 2016, the Turkish government through its Ambassador to Nigeria handed us a list of 17 schools and several hospitals fingered to be owned by the Gulen movement accused of masterminding a failed coup in Turkey, hoping to use diplomatic influence to cripple their source of external funding by extension their investments abroad, we replied Ankra that whatever they did in Turkey isn't our problem, to us, they are much desired foreign investors assisting the growth of our economy. Never mind that the US had asked the Turkish government to provide proof of the Gulen involvement before its leader can be extradited, Turkey is yet to comply with that directive. Till date those schools are up and running, thanks to diplomacy of protectionism and national interest.

Never do wells like Lai Mohammed who ordinarily is best fit for a propaganda machinery should stop disgracing Nigeria on the global stage, why do you need to beg Britain to shut down radio Biafra? is it in the British interest to do so? how many transponders of economic importance will have to go down just to satisfy the brutish curiosity of the Nigerian government? don't think there are stand alone stations on a communication satellite.
Lai mohammed should give us one good reason why the UK should shut down radio Biafra, since we all agree that the whole freedom of speech excuse is nonsense, I could remember vividly in recent past when there was a diplomatic row between the Iranian government and the UK, anti Israeli and anti semitic rhetorics saturated the airwaves, the british government banned the Iranian owned Press Tv till further notice, isn't that a breach of speech freedom?
Lai mohammed must understand that the world does not care of his existence, he may be a minister in nigeria today, over there, he is just another bloody African that usually begs for visa at the Embassy, the british governmnet doesnt owe him sh!t neither do they care about his existence, going there to make demands is the most stup!d diplomatic move i've heard so far.

The infamous Dr omawumi is completely out of touch with reality when he assumed that Britain owes us something when we allow looters to export our common wealth to foreign treasuries, it is no right but a privilege if they choose to assist in its repatriation after all, the British government did not ask us to elect petty thieves with leaking institutions, it is a shame when Dr Omawumi has misplaced simple magnanimity for entitlement. what happened to frequency jammers if we are so desperate to shut down radio Biafra? does Britain look like a houseboy at our beck and call? The Nigerian authorities must use this incident as a learning point to up our ante, not only in diplomacy but in technological self reliance.

IPOB may decide to use proxies to control the accounts having members globally, what diplomatic reason does France have to shut the said accounts? if it must be done and perhaps monies remitted to us because we are Nigeria the giant of Africa? Does Lai mohammed really think the French authorities are stup!d?

I agree completely corruption must be tackled, i agree IPOB is a clandestine group that deserve no attention in Nigeria however, bothering other countries with our petty issues is a joke taken too far.

ivolt:

Nigeria can go after any suspected trouble maker. There is no law in our
constitution mandating the government to only go after armed suspect.
In fact, most of the arrest carried out by law enforcement agencies does
not involve armed suspects.



Again unarmed does not equate saint or blameless.

Cowards cower under their beds or flee instead of confronting
their problems so you can't have "coward" and "invade" in the same character.
We can clearly see who is the real coward here.

Army exercises are perfectly legal, if it isn't please point to the part of the Nigerian
constitution which barred Nigerian army from carrying out excercise in any part of
the Nigerian territory. I hate pseudo-authoritative arguments, just because you said
so does not make the Army Excercise illegal

By bringing in shekau into an unrelated issue, you are just like a pickpocket who
berates police for arresting him instead of going after armed robbers and murderers.
You can see the fallacy in such argument.


Again, cite the part of the Nigerian constitution which bans the Army from carrying
out excercises in any Nigerian territory. Don't bother restating your point if you do not
have evidence to back yourself up.

Dangerous elements in a society must be reign in. Again this has nothing to
do with being armed.

gidgiddy:


I suggest you read section 217 of the constitution. It gives only 4 situations where the military can be deployed:

1) Protecting the territory of Nigeria from external aggression

2) When there is insurrection

3)To "aid" civil authority

4) By an act of the national assembly


And none of them applied to Abia state

bigfish3k:
am not a tribalist, but yorubas are just very funny, they make u believe u are worthless and that they can do without u even though in their inner mind they know that u are helping their existence, if not why are they so pained about a people they described as worthless wanting to leave them. they will be quick to tell u beautiful reasons why u should remain. just listen to them on television TVC and hear biase analysis

u will still see some of them with statements like 'who is holding u not to go' but will be quick to send in soldiers to the war front. hypocrisy.
as far am concerned its the yorubas that are holding us back because they have never supported our quest but opposing us both intellectually and with use of force, we are suppose to be partners but they always leave us in the cold and laugh at our pains just like the Aba massacre

the fact is that Igbos are just too invaluable to all the tribes in Nigeria for them to be spilling blood just to keep them

Alwaystruth:
That is the very problem with Nigeria ...Every Dick and Harry is a Dr and purely nothing tangible and physical to show for it. Borrowed and unmerited titles everywhere. How could this trash-writer be a Dr. of philosophy and yet has no single philosophical thoughts and senses in his empty ,bigoted tribal and corrupted Igbophobia head?. I weep for Nigeria. I have a message for you Mr. borrowed Dr, no unity is sustained with the barrel of guns as history has shown that. Let me put it to you, no amount of fabrication of words, employment of weapons, armaments and military invasion will give Nigeria unity and as long as day and night remains,Biafrans will continue to seek for freedom until freedom is gotten. If people like respected Prof. Wole Soyinka can assert that no amount of usage of weapons and military invasion can stop agitation for Biafra and if after killing over 10 million Biafrans just 50 years ago and the agitation for Biafra can hit the zoo this hard, I don't see how your useless and carelessly arranged article here can be more lethal than weapons against the quest for independent of Biafra. So, get that into your rotten and quota Dr brain that millions of you can not stop Biafra and that our leader Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is greater than you and your entire generation and the struggle for Biafra is greater and beyond Kanu.

HungerBAD:
By Bisi Olawunmi

The secessionist insurrection of the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB) took a dramatic turn in the week ended Saturday, September 23, 2017, during which the secessionist group was proscribed and its erstwhile boastful leader, Nnamdi Kanu, took to his heels when confronted with fired up soldiers. Reminds you of another boastful secessionist in Biafra 1 – Emeka Odimegwu Ojukwu – who also went on the lam when federal troops closed in on him back in January 1970? At least, Ojukwu walked the talk of war, but this wet pants peed on only hearing the sound of guns! So much for the empty braggadocio! Also during the same week, there was an international angle to the secessionist agitation as the Federal Government decided to name two countries – Britain and France – as collaborators in IPOB’s partitioning agenda.

Minister of Information, Culture and Tourism, Lai Mohammed, told the nation on Wednesday, September 20, 2017 how Britain and France have been tacitly complicit with IPOB in its destabilisation of Nigeria. Britain, stated the minister, continues to tolerate Radio Biafra’s hate and incendiary broadcasts from London while France is said to be the financial clearing house of IPOB from where funds flow to the secessionist group. The minister had asserted: “Let me tell you, the financial headquarters (of IPOB) is in France, we know” and also posed a rhetorical question: “Who does not know that IPOB internal radio is located in London?” Mohammed explained how Britain had been frustrating Nigeria’s diplomatic efforts with the British authorities to shut down the pirate radio station only to be given the nebulous excuse of freedom of expression.

He had wondered: “If we have a person in Nigeria openly soliciting arms to come and fight in the UK, what would you think of it. Would you consider that freedom of expression?” The minister implied that the two countries have been engaged in semantics or what I would call diplomatic jousting. Minister Mohammed spoke of “knotty diplomatic issues which you need to skip” only to add in a double talk “I don’t want any diplomatic row.” Of course, the minister knew the charges against the two countries would spark diplomatic skirmishes, perhaps low level, for now.

Well, these are trying times in Nigeria and nationalist fervor demands that the country must be ready to ruffle some diplomatic nests in defense of the sanctity of her territorial integrity and sovereignty. There is reciprocity in diplomatic relations. We need to remember that Britain and France have played ignoble roles in the international arena in recent times under the self-serving subterfuge called ‘International Community.’ Britain followed the United States to declare war on Iraq on the lie that Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein, had ‘weapons of mass destruction’ which must be neutralised.

They ended up destroying that country and got its president hanged, as a rub in. Yet, Tony Blair, the then British Prime Minister, who stridently orchestrated Gulf War II could still face the world and declare that he had no apology for the destruction of Iraq, a country that has not known peace since. Such brazenness! Such denial of criminal culpability by a British Prime Minister who had made a past time of pillorying President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe whose main offence was winning re-elections in his country.

Apparently, Blair, with imperialist hang-over, wanted a regime change in Zimbabwe but met more than his match in President Mugabe, who once derisively called him Tony b-Liar. The old Zimbabwean war horse was right, Tony Blair lied on Iraq. So, if Britain condoned the Iraqi war, why is the Nigerian government peeved by the British High Commission’s statement condoning Radio Biafra’s hate and inciting broadcasts on the puerile doctrine of freedom of expression? The same Britain that shut down the Internet when youths went on rampage in London on the excuse that they were using it to network and mobilize others for the riot.

Talk of diplomatic duplicity or double standard. The immediate past British Prime Minister, chubby boy, David Cameron, in an expansive mood, once described Nigeria as a fantastically corrupt country, another brazenness from a country that is fantastically a receiver of stolen funds, being the financial capital of the world, both legitimate and illicit. Well, it was good riddance, as the political gambler fantastically lost the Brexit vote that saw to his exit from 10, Downing Street, the Prime Minister’s official residence.

As for France, it supported Biafra I and facilitated Emeka Ojukwu’s exile in Ivory Coast, her satellite nation, so, it should be no surprise that it is the financial clearing house for IPOB, the leading agent for Biafra II. France was indicted in the Rwanda Genocide of 1994, in which an estimated 800,000 Tutsis lost their lives, for being complicit with the then Hutu-led government. France also led the Western onslaught on Libya that saw the killing of Libyan leader, Muamar Gaddafi. In 2011, France, brazenly thwarted the will of the Ivorian people, when under the cover of ‘International Community’ mandate, it provided military support for a candidate, Alassane Quattara, in Cote D’Ivoire’s disputed presidential election conflict to capture a sitting African President, Laurent Gbagbo! Gbagbo had won the majority vote in the main election and was pronounced winner of the re-run election by the country’s Constitutional Court only for the UN Representative in Cote D’Ivoire to assume the role of electoral commission to declare Quattara as the winner!!

Sadly, Nigeria’s naïve President Goodluck Jonathan, as ECOWAS leader, had endorsed the UN envoy’s verdict, and consequent UN mandate, which accorded French military partisan involvement a dubious legitimacy. Cote D’Ivoire is France’s milking cow, a situation President Gbagbo had ended, so the empire struck back. With Quattara, who is married to a French woman, in charge, France has returned to gravy train in Cote D’Ivoire while President Gbagbo languishes in detention at The Hague facing criminal charges at the International Court of Justice.

The West sent Gbagbo to jail for a domestic conflict arising from an election dispute, but Tony Blair still struts around, a free man. Talk of the hypocrisy of the ‘International Community.

Nigeria’s political leadership should be under no illusion about any affectionate love from Britain or France, and, by extension, western countries. Britain and France are yesterday’s countries, over whose empires the sun has set, now playing a fickle third fiddle in international power relations and struggling for residual relevance in Africa. Nigeria, on the other hand, is a country of the future with great potentials which some vested interests may not want manifested being a threat to their hegemonic hold. You see, no country in Europe has Nigeria’s landmass, natural resources or population.

According to worldometers.info (2017) the combined population of Britain (66.2 million) and France (64.9 million) is 131.1 million compared to Nigeria’s 192.06 million while the combined landmass of Britain and France is 789,487sq km as against Nigeria’s 910,770sq km. Given these endowments plus high caliber human capital, the prospects of Nigeria as the great Black Hope is bright. We can now begin to understand why many countries would have dubious designs on Nigeria and would not be averse to its disintegration.

• Dr. Olawunmi, senior lecturer, Department of Mass Communication, Bowen University and former Washington Correspondent, News Agency of Nigeria (NAN).

http://guardian.ng/opinion/britain-france-and-ipob-duplicity-of-failed-empires/

knowledgeable:


Yorubas do not understand the Nigerian reality like the Igbos do........and is very very unfortunate.

My simple/common sense question to Yorubas and their elites is this: which group have a better/clearer and understanding of an environment? (a) A group whom in their numbers engaging that environment through both vertical and horizontal migratory pattern, indept intermingling through trade, commerce, inter-marriages, buying into real estate and extensive travel experiences of the said environment or (b) A group whom their engagement with the said environment is limited to about half of the first group??.

There is no greatness to Nigeria future, as the country is structured today....and any medium European power can bring complete destruction to Nigeria if she really choose to. If certain kind of weapons/finances through a proxy is made available to any one or more of the agitating groups, there goes Nigeria, your lagos and your Eko Atlantic. Britain, France and Europe understand it. If fact, in there own belief, you haven't enter into history.

DieBuhari:
What is wrong with Yorubas?

NnamdiKanu:
I actually decided not to insult Yoruba's on this forum .
but their constant pock nosing into biafran matters will make me retract that decision...imagine the rubbish an acclaimed doctor wrote. May Death befall on this bastard and his people

EternalTruths:



The fear Yorubas have for Biafra, proves that most of them don't have faith in their God to feed them even if Nigeria cease to exist today.

Ngokafor:



True that...One minute,they are making noise on how their IGR is more than the entire world put together,how they are 'sohisticated' are 'feeding' and are life-lines to Igbos,how Igbos are criminals who should leave their 'land'...But the minute you mention 'dis-integration' with the attendant opportunity for them to be on their own and be free from Igbos,they go into epileptic fits of rage,protests and dis-agreements..

A handful of them only claim to want their own country on faceless forums like nairaland of shame and embarassment when their desperate love for 'one Nigeria is pointed out..but in reality,they are all the dame..They sure do have a morbid fear of being left alone in Nigeria for real.

adeolakemi:
I'm Yoruba but what I don't get is the continuous poke nosing of biafran affairs by the Yoruba ....its topics like this that makes Igbo's insult the Yoruba .....pls Dr try to write on state of the Yoruba affairs and leave biafrans alone

Ngokafor:



True that...One minute,they are making noise on how their IGR is more than the entire world put together,how they are 'sohisticated' are 'feeding' and are life-lines to Igbos,how Igbos are criminals who should leave their 'land'..But the minute you mention 'dis-integration' with the attendant opportunity for them to be on their own and be free from Igbos,they go into epileptic fits of rage,protests and dis-agreements,cries and feverish conditions.

A handful of them only claim to want their own country on faceless forums like nairaland out of shame and embarassment when their desperate love for 'one Nigeria is pointed out..but in reality,they are all the same..They sure do have a morbid fear of being left alone in Nigeria for real.