LordReed:


Are you still in denial that the Russians interfered in the elections?

It's been 20 months since you started sniffing the ground for evidence, where is the evidence of collusion?

OLAADEGBU:


It's been 20 months since you started sniffing the ground for evidence, where is the evidence of collusion?

No evidence of collusion but a Republican appointed a special counsel to investigate because you think they have time to waste pursuing a Democrat led conspiracy.

LordReed:


No evidence of collusion but a Republican appointed a special counsel to investigate because you think they have time to waste pursuing a Democrat led conspiracy.

Now, that's the problems with liberals. If the Republicans had choose not to act, you would have said, they are partisan, putting their interests first before America. And now that they have acted and still could not find a single shred of evidence of coalition, you have concluded they acted because they are sure there is "evidence" of coalition. What now that they have found nothing?

LordReed:


Benghazi investigations of 5 years yielded not even 1 indictment but Mueller's investigation has indicted several people but no its a witch hunt. Ask Roy Moore if Trump helped him win a seat that was firmly in Republican hands, ask Rick Saccone if Trump helped him win a seat in a district that Trump won by 20pts. If you think Trump is or has some kind of magic wand for winning you are living in lalaland.

What is indictment per say? Does it define guilt? Think about that. Does the fact that Russia was indicteed for interfering in the US election mean she was guilty as charged or that Trump was guilty as well? How in hell did Russia interfere in the election and helped Trump to win when actually he overwhelmingly lost the popular vote by over 2million votes but got elected by the EC? Why can't America stop blaming Russia for everything?

So, it was Russia that also influenced the 2002 prophecy of the Simpsons about Trump being the US President? I see that Russia has been wired into the national psyche of America to blame Russia for everything.

Mueller's investigation could have indicted anybody, even,the whole world, cause they were fishing on a wide sea without boundaries. That's the sole reason the investigation is going back and forth. It's simple. Like Benghazi, they lack evidence.

That's the fact.

As for Trump, he has no magic wand for winning, and he is not even my ideal president. But any man who is elected by a predeterminate council that's beyond our intelligence is worth his place in history, and is only a novice with warp delusion that will choose to fight what you can't see.

Trump's ascension to the White House was foretold far before the election took place. Instead of looking for blame, consider the circumstances and the system that ushered him into the White House. There you will find your blame.

OLAADEGBU:


Russia is to be blamed. They did it.

Yeah.. Russia helped Trump to win yet he lost the popular vote by 2million plus. American liberal democrazy and the Russian mantra will pass well-for a circus.

LordReed:


I now know where this is coming from, Q-Anon right? LoL! You guys never cease to amaze. Do all Trump supporters believe in insane conspiracy theories? It's beginning to look that way.

Lol.Time will tell, won't it?

Appleyard:


Yeah.. Russia helped Trump to win yet he lost the popular vote by 2million plus. American liberal democrazy and the Russian mantra will pass well-for a circus.

What's it about you guys that loves the worthless despotic wannabe president. I guess being ruled by semi despotic leaders over the years is the cause. FYI, Trampy loathes people that looks like you and the Republikkan Party think of your ilk as subhuman. I doubt if you know what liberalism is all about. Talking about Democrazy, getting a little bag of rice and cooking oil from your Thieflicians in Nigeria is a perfect example. Meanwhile, you keep licking the behind of your despotic Pootin and a wannabe despotic Trampy.

Appleyard:

Now, that's the problems with liberals. If the Republicans had choose not to act, you would have said, they are partisan, putting their interests first before America. And now that they have acted and still could not find a single shred of evidence of coalition, you have concluded they acted because they are sure there is "evidence" of coalition. What now that they have found nothing?

Where was the Democrats power to stop the Benghazi Investigations or the email server investigations (of which there were no indictments)? But all of a sudden they have the power to push through an investigation of a sitting Republican President's presidential campaign without proof? Man this logic is really corkscrewed.

Q says there's a video on Hillary to be released soon. Meanwhile, National Guard to be deployed soon to border and probably blue states.

Appleyard:


What is indictment per say? Does it define guilt? Think about that. Does the fact that Russia was indicteed for interfering in the US election mean she was guilty as charged or that Trump was guilty as well? How in hell did Russia interfere in the election and helped Trump to win when actually he overwhelmingly lost the popular vote by over 2million votes but got elected by the EC? Why can't America stop blaming Russia for everything?

So, it was Russia that also influenced the 2002 prophecy of the Simpsons about Trump being the US President? I see that Russia has been wired into the national psyche of America to blame Russia for everything.

Mueller's investigation could have indicted anybody, even,the whole world, cause they were fishing on a wide sea without boundaries. That's the sole reason the investigation is going back and forth. It's simple. Like Benghazi, they lack evidence.

That's the fact.

As for Trump, he has no magic wand for winning, and he is not even my ideal president. But any man who is elected by a predeterminate council that's beyond our intelligence is worth his place in history, and is only a novice with warp delusion that will choose to fight what you can't see.

Trump's ascension to the White House was foretold far before the election took place. Instead of looking for blame, consider the circumstances and the system that ushered him into the White House. There you will find your blame.

Do well to take note of this:

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States states in part: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia when in actual service in time of War or public danger". The requirement of an indictment has not been incorporated against the states; therefore, although the federal government uses grand juries and indictments, not all U.S. states do.[10]

In many, but not all, United States jurisdictions that use grand juries, prosecutors often have a choice between seeking an indictment from a grand jury and filing a charging document directly with the court. Such a document is usually called an information, accusation, or complaint, to distinguish it from a grand-jury indictment. To protect the suspect's due-process rights in felony cases (where the suspect's interest in liberty is at stake), there is usually a preliminary hearing, at which a judge determines whether there was probable cause to arrest the suspect who is in custody. If the judge finds such probable cause, he or she binds, or holds over, the suspect for trial.

The substance of an indictment or other charging instrument is usually the same, regardless of the jurisdiction: it consists of a short and plain statement of where, when, and how the defendant allegedly committed the offense. Each offense usually is set out in a separate count. Indictments for complex crimes, particularly those involving conspiracy or numerous counts, may run to hundreds of pages. However, in other cases an indictment for a crime as serious as murder, may consist of a single sheet of paper.

If some how you think indictments are child's play this should dispel your doubts.

Mueller's investigations have a well defined scope so that idea that they can indict anybody is pure fallacy.

So The Simpsons is now a prophetic show? LMAO! Kai you guys go through the most absurd mental gymnastics known to modern history.

This denial of Russian interference in the elections is even more absurd because a Republican dominated Congress passed a bill to enact sanctions and you are here saying its a figment of imagination? SMH.

EDIT: Just saw that the Simpsons so called prediction was even a conspiracy theory that was thoroughly debunked. LMAO!

Timbuktuo:


Lol.Time will tell, won't it?

It always does, like it did for Jade Helm.

Timbuktuo:
Q says there's a video on Hillary to be released soon.

They said that in March, this is April. Tick tock says the clock, is time telling yet?

Timbuktuo:


Lucas, the doofus, how are you today? How does it feel to know that construction on the southern wall has been paid for and that work on it will commence tomorrow? It must grate your nerves that Trump is delivering on his promises.

LoL the omnibus budget did not approve any spend for the border wall. BTW Trump has not even selected out of the prototypes so how can he start with no prototype or money?

LordReed:


Where was the Democrats power to stop the Benghazi Investigations or the email server investigations (of which there were no indictments)? But all of a sudden they have the power to push through an investigation of a sitting Republican President's presidential campaign without proof? Man this logic is really corkscrewed.

Then where is the proof? For Christ's sake, people need proof.

LordReed:


No evidence of collusion but a Republican appointed a special counsel to investigate because you think they have time to waste pursuing a Democrat led conspiracy.

Yeah right, it's the conservatives that are accusing Russia of collusion.

LordReed:


No evidence of collusion but a Republican appointed a special counsel to investigate because you think they have time to waste pursuing a Democrat led conspiracy.

Yeah right, it's the Republicans that are accusing Russia of collusion.

LordReed:


Are you still in denial that the Russians interfered in the elections?

You will still be looking for evidence of collusion until President Trump completes his 8-year term and you will not find any.

used

LordReed:



Do well to take note of this:


If some how you think indictments are child's play this should dispel your doubts.

Mueller's investigations have a well defined scope so that idea that they can indict anybody is pure fallacy.

So The Simpsons is now a prophetic show? LMAO! Kai you guys go through the most absurd mental gymnastics known to modern history.

This denial of Russian interference in the elections is even more absurd because a Republican dominated Congress passed a bill to enact sanctions and you are here saying its a figment of imagination? SMH.

EDIT: Just saw that the Simpsons so called prediction was even a conspiracy theory that was thoroughly debunked. LMAO!

First and foremost, indictment has a meaning, and when applied to a criminal proceedings, it has to carry the weight of "evidence, " which puts the suspect in the light of direct connivance with the said case. But unfortunately, most of Mueller's indictments so far has produced nothing pertaining to the determination of the fact in issue (coalition), for lack of evidence. The whole thing is becoming obvious with each passing day. People wants to see the evidence of coalition, in line with the alleged, coalition, not with the private business dealing of people.
How many people have been indicted? Where is the evidence of coalition againat these people? None. Is almost two years now and not even a single shred of evidence has emerged.

Therefore, since the Mueller's indictments so far has produced nothing, it shows there is a lack of concrete evidence, and against this backdrop, the investigation lacked a clear scope. Period.

On the Russian interference, I see you tacitly evaded the logical fact put forward to you. Now, the story is that the Russian interference in the election helped Trump to win the election, isn't it? I am now asking you: how did Russia aided Trump to win the election when he actually lost the popular vote overwhelmingly? Please tell me, I will like to learn.

Oh, the Simpson is now a conspiracy theory? Anything that blows you liberals ideal out of the water is a conspiracy theory. A prophecy that was given years before the election is a conspiracy theory because it doesn't fit in with your own liberal narrative. So Kim Clements 2007 prophecy concerning the emergence of Donald Trump as president is also a conspiracy theory. The American professor who has used his prediction key system to predict correctly the outcome of the five previous elections is an apostle of conspiracy theory, lol. You should also have said that the 500 years old Nostridamus prediction of "two birds" hitting the "twin towers" is also a conspiracy theory, lol.

Until you liberals learn to believe that there is a higher intelligence that determine major events before they happen, you guys will continue walking that part of delusion, fighting what you can't see. Brother, don't walk that path. You can dissect it and critique it constructively, but never you dismiss it. Doing otherwise is sequel to imprisoning yourself in the delusional dream world of zombification.

The Republicans vote of sanctions against Russia could have been on the ground of anything. You forget to mention that Ukraine was also cited as a reason, not entirely on the ground of meddling in the election, and never on coalition.

Meanwhile, we are still waiting for proof of coalition. It seems like the investigation has hit a brickwall, because if close to two years they can't turn up a single proof of coalition, I wonder how this would end up when reelection times come calling. Because it would simply come back to haunt them. That's politics for you.

Appleyard:


Then where is the proof? For Christ's sake, people need proof.

With the way Mueller has played things close to his chest can we say patience till the investigation is over?

Appleyard:
used

First and foremost, indictment has a meaning, and when applied to a criminal proceedings, it has to carry the weight of "evidence, " which puts the suspect in the light of direct connivance with the said case. But unfortunately, most of Mueller's indictments so far has produced nothing pertaining to the determination of the fact in issue (coalition), for lack of evidence. The whole thing is becoming obvious with each passing day. People wants to see the evidence of coalition, in line with the alleged, coalition, not with the private business dealing of people.
How many people have been indicted? Where is the evidence of coalition againat these people? None. Is almost two years now and not even a single shred of evidence has emerged.

Therefore, since the Mueller's indictments so far has produced nothing, it shows there is a lack of concrete evidence, and against this backdrop, the investigation lacked a clear scope. Period.

On the Russian interference, I see you tacitly evaded the logical fact put forward to you. Now, the story is that the Russian interference in the election helped Trump to win the election, isn't it? I am now asking you: how did Russia aided Trump to win the election when he actually lost the popular vote overwhelmingly? Please tell me, I will like to learn.

Oh, the Simpson is now a conspiracy theory? Anything that blows you liberals ideal out of the water is a conspiracy theory. A prophecy that was given years before the election is a conspiracy theory because it doesn't fit in with your own liberal narrative. So Kim Clements 2007 prophecy concerning the emergence of Donald Trump as president is also a conspiracy theory. The American professor who has used his prediction key system to predict correctly the outcome of the five previous elections is an apostle of conspiracy theory, lol. You should also have said that the 500 years old Nostridamus prediction of "two birds" hitting the "twin towers" is also a conspiracy theory, lol.

Until you liberals learn to believe that there is a higher intelligence that determine major events before they happen, you guys will continue walking that part of delusion, fighting what you can't see. Brother, don't walk that path. You can dissect it and critique it constructively, but never you dismiss it. Doing otherwise is sequel to imprisoning yourself in the delusional dream world of zombification.

The Republicans vote of sanctions against Russia could have been on the ground of anything. You forget to mention that Ukraine was also cited as a reason, not entirely on the ground of meddling in the election, and never on coalition.

Meanwhile, we are still waiting for proof of coalition. It seems like the investigation has hit a brickwall, because if close to two years they can't turn up a single proof of coalition, I wonder how this would end up when reelection times come calling. Because it would simply come back to haunt them. That's politics for you.

The Simpsons so called prophecy was BS because it turns out the episode in question was not aired in 2000 but in fact was aired in 2015 after Trump's declaration and actually recreated the "famous" elevator ride scene. So my dear fellow there was no prophecy.

Yes Nostradamus' so called prophecies are BS, a set of poetry that has to be interpreted in hindsight so as to make it seem like a prophecy is hogwash. Please mention one thing that has not happened yet that Nostradamus foresaw so that we can begin to keep it in view.

Believing in a higher power controlling everything does not mean I have to accept what you call prophecies as that. Simpsons and Nostradamus' poetry are not prophetic devices by any objective measurement.

What logical fact did I evade?

As I have said Mueller is playing things close to his chest when he concludes his investigation we'll see if there is proof or not.

9inches:

1. CNN reported that the Michael Cohen in the report is not Trump's lawyer but a man with the same name from a different country.
2. Michael Cohen, who was said to have visited Prague in August and September, did not leave or enter the United States during this time.
3. Mr Cohen said he has never been to Prague in his life.

Just a heads up:
Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier

LordReed:


With the way Mueller has played things close to his chest can we say patience till the investigation is over?

You will have to wait until after Trump has exhausted his 8-year term in office.

OLAADEGBU:


You will have to wait until after Trump has exhausted his 8-year term in office.

Yeah right. LoLz!

9inches:

1. CNN reported that the Michael Cohen in the report is not Trump's lawyer but a man with the same name from a different country.
2. Michael Cohen, who was said to have visited Prague in August and September, did not leave or enter the United States during this time.
3. Mr Cohen said he has never been to Prague in his life.

FYI:

Cohen drops libel suits against BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS

LordReed:


FYI:

Cohen drops libel suits against BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS

Stormy Daniels' attorney released a sketch of the man she says threatened her in 2011 to keep quiet about her one-time sexual encounter with Donald Trump. The only problem is that the so-called "suspect" is a carbon copy of the porn queen's ex-husband. The liberals have been conned again!

OLAADEGBU:


Stormy Daniels' attorney released a sketch of the man she says threatened her in 2011 to keep quiet about her one-time sexual encounter with Donald Trump. The only problem is that the so-called "suspect" is a carbon copy of the porn queen's ex-husband. The liberals have been conned again!

LoLz, how does the drawing resembling her husband make any difference to the fact that Trump slept with her when his wife had just given birth to his child and attempted to pay her to be silent? LMAO!

LordReed:


LoLz, how does the drawing resembling her husband make any difference to the fact that Trump slept with her when his wife had just given birth to his child and attempted to pay her to be silent? LMAO!

Trump lapdogs have no conscience and they lack moral values. Anyone with decency won't support a thrice married man who cheated on all his wives.