CoolUsername:


Don't think I'm not seeing your poor attempt to dodge the fact that you've been caught in a lie.


But wait, did you just say that you understand the feeling of wanting Hunter Biden's dick portrait on your wall?

That's sus.

Thank God you ain't smart, coz if you were, you would know I just destroyed your conspiracies.

Obrigardo:


Thank God you ain't smart, coz if you were, you would know I just destroyed your conspiracies.

Not really 'conspiracy theories' when they have been proven to be true. Even your fellow leftists admit that much.

CoolUsername:


Don't think I'm not seeing your poor attempt to dodge the fact that you've been caught in a lie.


But wait, did you just say that you understand the feeling of wanting Hunter Biden's dick portrait on your wall?

That's sus.

Lmao nigga said what?

Sup bitches! This wedding hasn’t even started and I think I’m already tipsy. Bear with me if I rant uncontrollably on this thread at any point today. Better yet, don’t quote me with any rubbish if you don’t want to even get me started.

Say a prayer for me ya’ll

Cheerio.

Trump was right exhibit # 24,987

CoolUsername:


Not really 'conspiracy theories' when they have been proven to be true. Even your fellow leftists admit that much.

Yeah, right, tell me another thing.

All this fake rage you maga cultists are on is just pure trash. Need an example?
Just check out this ignorant tweet below (the fool rushed to delete it after he learned who was president when this happened), doesn't it make you laugh?

Obrigardo:


Yeah, right, tell me another thing.

All this fake rage you maga cultists are on is just pure trash. Need an example?
Just check out this ignorant tweet below (the fool rushed to delete it after he learned who was president when this happened), doesn't it make you laugh?

LMAO

There are more.

Obrigardo:
I may have misread your post, sorry about that.

I have very short fuse towards racist, xenophobic, and bigoted people. And I know you are not one. My apologies.

How's it going?

I'm just seeing this your post Obrigado, which was intended for me. You forgot to mention my NL
moniker when you originally posted this, otherwise I would have seen it much earlier.

I thought as much that you misread my post... This is the reason why it is good to read an online post again (so as to get the true context) before replying online and offline.

Communicating online via text can lead to miscommunications because of the absence of facial expressions, body cues, and voice tones. This is where emoticons come in to minimize online miscommunications.

You and I are on the same page with reference to having zero-tolerance for the bolded in your post above.

I accept your full apologies. You are wise and a great sport.

Have a great weekend!


All the best.

Obrigardo:
This is exactly what the massive reveal was just about.

basilico, let me save you from traficking in conspiracies. We are bigger than that here.

Both parties and one held the Presidency.

Tim Young below in a seperate tweet also forgot that it was a Trump presidency.

Like I mentioned earlier, nothing has been released that we weren't aware of already.

Obrigardo:
Ahh but Elno Wusk is a massive disgrace shaaa.
Methinks gym jordan, pedogaetz, kkkmcarthy, mtg space lasers will be so dissapointed with the reveal.

Team Biden did nothing wrong at all, na da.

But kanye is still an anti-semite, Criminal trump is still a loser and elno wusk, the apartheid baby, does not understand the American constitution.

More.

saxywale2:

LMAO

There are more.

Damn this is funny

wirinet:


They want to avoid a repeat of 2015 elections where FBI came out to announce investigation against Hillary and a few days later said it was nothing. Hillary and the democratic party that that announcement tipped the election in favour of Trump.

This was the greatest travesty of the decade. A conspiracist would claim the FBI was working for Hillary's downfall.

wirinet:


Elon Musk big reveal is another Kraken. It did not reveal anything malicious on the part of twitter staffs nor reveal collusion with the democratic party. It only revealed intelligence agencies along with major social media organisations like Facebook and twitter were being cautious so close to election day. They want to avoid a repeat of 2015 elections where FBI came out to announce investigation against Hillary and a few days later said it was nothing. Hillary and the democratic party that that announcement tipped the election in favour of Trump.

Also Trump and the democratic party were desperately trying to repeat the scenario by looking for any announcement that would damage Joe Bidens image very close to elections, they had earlier tried to quid quote pro Zelensky into announcing an investigation against Hunter and Joe Biden which failed and led to Trump's impeachment. So it's reasonable to be cautious of a laptop suddenly appearing just weeks to the elections.

I see the incoming Republican led house wasting lots of time on the laptop as they are still pained from loosing to Biden. It will still amount to to huge kraken.

Exactly, but there in lies the problem. Trump and co. work so hard at gaslighting, his supporters don't even know that the FBI (who he said hated him so much), hid the fact he was under investigation while publicly acknowledging Clinton was under investigation. I believe that swung the election. It's an amazing level of cognitive dissonance.

CoolUsername:


So you new that social media companies were conspiring to influence the elections, huh?

Now the conspiracy theories have turned out to be true, the new response is to say that all of it was already known.

How were the social media companies conspiring to influence the elections? Which ones? I'm new to all this.

Obrigardo:


Turns out it exposed criminal trumps admin violation of the 1st amendment. Biden was a private citizen when his team made those requests. Trust me, that's standard procedure, all political strategists knows this. Why is elon so dumb? I'm kinda flabbergasted even with all the money he has. Twitter just revealed the hypocrite he is.

It's funny because the "big reveal" showed Trump cabinet was doing the same thing as Biden's campaign team, and Trump was POTUS at the time so that could be seen as the government violating 1st amendment rights. The complaint, as Taibbi frames it, is that Biden's campaign team had more big tech friends.

It's unbelievable that some People are angry because twitter posts with dick pics were deleted, and the accounts posting such were banned accordingly. e.g. Jared87983561

And Elon Musk accidentally revealed that the Trump White House was using Twitter to censor his critics in violation of the First Amendment. You can't make this stuff up.

James Wood said he is going to sue because the porn he posted was deleted

https://www.foxnews.com/media/james-woods-fires-back-twitter-vows-sue-censorship-tucker-carlson-tonight

1stGenAmerican:


Alpha is a really great guy and so are you. Two of my favorites. Happy that the dust settled even before it could be kicked up. We move.

But can either of them eat pvssy like I do? You should try me. I’d take you to heaven and back with my tongue game.

IjeBos:


How were the social media companies conspiring to influence the elections? Which ones? I'm new to all this.

During the 2016 election race, WikiLeaks published some dirt on Hillary Clinton shortly before election day and caused a huge scandal without giving enough time for the Clinton campaign to get things under control. As you know, Trump won that election. Stats later showed that a significant number of voters decided to vote for Trump over Clinton because of the leaks.

Shortly after the election, a leaked video showed Google execs in meeting talking about what they can do to prevent something like Trump winning from every happening again. Furthermore, a lot of social companies changed their policies on what was deemed to be 'misinformation' and 'hacked materials'.

Fast forward to 2020, the Trump v Biden election race. The New York Post published an article detailing some of the activities of Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden. This included things like drugs abuse, prostitution, and some potential evidence of corruption by Joe Biden.

This is where things got weird, Twitter asked the New York Post to delete the post, then banned them after they refused. Twitter banned Trump's campaign account for posting a video taking about it. Twitter deleted all posts and DMs mentioning the article. There are more details of Twitter's activities in my previous comments. Former Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey even came out later (after the election, of course) to apologize for the censorship.

Facebook also deleted posts and DMs about the news. Mark Zuckerberg would later cone out to say that he did that on instruction of the FBI to be on the look out for disinformation from foreign actors. Mind you, this news was broken by the New York Post and was actually true.

I guess they successfully prevented it from happening again.

Obrigardo:


Yeah, right, tell me another thing.

All this fake rage you maga cultists are on is just pure trash. Need an example?
Just check out this ignorant tweet below (the fool rushed to delete it after he learned who was president when this happened), doesn't it make you laugh?

I'm against censorship from both parties and it's absolute nonsense that the Trump White House was also engaging in it.

I know you're also angry about censorship from both sides and are not a shameless hypocrite, right?

saxywale2:
It's unbelievable that some People are angry because twitter posts with dick pics were deleted, and the accounts posting such were banned accordingly. e.g. Jared87983561

Did New York Post publish dick pics? What about Kayleigh McEnany?

CoolUsername:


Did New York Post publish dick pics? What about Kayleigh McEnany?

Twitter policies at that time prohibited “directly distribut(ing) content obtained through hacking that contains private information”. Twitter’s policy against posting hacked material was established in 2018, 2 years before the leak. Many posters account were locked as a result. Alot of SM companies weren't also sure if it was also Russian disinformation given the time the leaks were released. They erred on the side of caution. Plus she was given an opportunity to delete to restore access to her account but refused.

This is also information NOT NEW to us.

saxywale2:

Twitter policies at that time prohibited “directly distribut(ing) content obtained through hacking that contains private information”. Twitter’s policy against posting hacked material was established in 2018, 2 years before the leak. Many posters account were locked as a result. Alot of SM companies weren't also sure if it was also Russian disinformation given the time the leaks were released. They erred on the side of caution.

She was given an opportunity to delete to restore access to her account but refused.

Twitter knew it was not hacked material. Twitter with other big tech killed the story

basilico:


Twitter knew it was not hacked material. Twitter with other big tech killed the story

Maybe if the so called story had been leaked earlier, it would have been trashed out right before the election.

I also think the nude photos and drug use that came with the leaks caused a lot of damage to how the story was shared/distributed.

saxywale2:

Twitter policies at that time prohibited “directly distribut(ing) content obtained through hacking that contains private information”. Twitter’s policy against posting hacked material was established in 2018, 2 years before the leak. Many posters account were locked as a result. Alot of SM companies weren't also sure if it was also Russian disinformation given the time the leaks were released. They erred on the side of caution. Plus she was given an opportunity to delete to restore access to her account but refused.

This is also information NOT NEW to us.

They had no evidence that it was hacked material. Yet the biggest social media companies all decided to commit err in the same direction that happened to favour the political party where majority of their donations go to.

CoolUsername:

Shortly after the election, a leaked video showed Google execs in meeting talking about what they can do to prevent something like Trump winning from every happening again. Furthermore, a lot of social companies changed their policies on what was deemed to be 'misinformation' and 'hacked materials.

Where is this leaked video?

CoolUsername:

This is where things got weird, Twitter asked the New York Post to delete the post, then banned them after they refused. Twitter banned Trump's campaign account for posting a video taking about it. Twitter deleted all posts and DMs mentioning the article. There are more details of Twitter's activities in my previous comments. Former Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey even came out later (after the election, of course) to apologize for the censorship.

Facebook also deleted posts and DMs about the news. Mark Zuckerberg would later cone out to say that he did that on instruction of the FBI to be on the look out for disinformation from foreign actors. Mind you, this news was broken by the New York Post and was actually true.

I guess they successfully prevented it from happening again.

What information that was deleted do you think would have helped Trump and why? Not sure I follow here.

No one cares about smear politics

Far-right keep flogging a dead horse that won't benefit them at the polls

The public see through "digging dirt" election strategies by now. 5 years of Trump have made this shyt of little impact. Campaign on your policies, not whose son sniffed crack and fúcked prostitutes.

Someone needs to nuke this pointless thread full of brain dead liberals making ridiculous arguments. They just caught you pants down colluding with big tech to steal an election but watch them bend over backwards to defend the indefensible. You can rest assured that if this was Trump, there would have been several congressional investigations and a special counsel appointed by now.

Enugurangers:

It's funny because the "big reveal" showed Trump cabinet was doing the same thing as Biden's campaign team, and Trump was POTUS at the time so that could be seen as the government violating 1st amendment rights. The complaint, as Taibbi frames it, is that Biden's campaign team had more big tech friends.

I initially thought the suppression was when Biden was already President. But he was just a private citizen then.
I feel so ashamed for elon.

Ibime:
No one cares about smear politics

Far-right keep flogging a dead horse that won't benefit them at the polls

The public see through "digging dirt" election strategies by now. 5 years of Trump have made this shyt of little impact. Campaign on your policies, not whose son sniffed crack and fúcked prostitutes.

The maga maggots are making a grand fool of themselves, it's so delicious to watch. Even ridiculous Seb gorka thinks elon is full of shit.

Basilico is oddly silent. Conspiracy theory market don dry up.

CoolUsername:


I'm against censorship from both parties and it's absolute nonsense that the Trump White House was also engaging in it.

I know you're also angry about censorship from both sides and are not a shameless hypocrite, right?

You are missing the point entirely, like a man drunk on his piss, falling head down into the gutter. And also you don't seem to recognize what the bone of contention is here.

It's not about censorship, it's about violation of the first amendment. But the stupid thing here is none of you arguing about this issue really know what the First Amendment means. Can you Google it up please? Lol

You don't really have any argument. You are just been baited by the raging maga lunatics.