VanjoshIII:
2000/01 you finished 6th, 01/02 6th, 02/03 4th, 03/04 2nd, big club indeed, Mourinho was even bigger than Chelsea before he came to Chelsea.

but man u has finished 7th,4th,5th,6th, and 2nd for the past 5seasons now

Reference:


He was sacked because the expectations of a trophy every season were not realised. Which coach in the world can deliver that. Even the great Sir Alex had barren years and painful losses during his time. Chelsea as a club is foolishly overambitious and paying the price for it with constant rebooting of their footballing structure almost every season. Result is a trophy cabinet does not reflect the investment they have made over the last decade and a half. If things were done properly it is they not Manchester City that should have been the heirs to the aging Manchester United in premiership successes.

Mourinho simply went to United because he felt they were a more mature and stable club willing to give their manager's time to build proper sustainable structures once they found the right man.

if you can read very well, you will noticed that I said every fan was angry when he was sacked even though he didn't achieve result that season, so whats all this your epistle for by the way?

Mentorkaryhm:

substitution mins is part of the time, that's the reason for normal 3 mins added time..

there is nothing like normal 3minutes. it could be 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 according to the assistant ref calculation of the amount of time wasted. is this the first time we are having a 6min added time?

Angel196:
Seriously? Chelsea gave him? Before Mourinho who were Chelsea? What was Chelsea? He was the one who helped give Chelsea a name and reputation in the football world so he is indeed special.

Before Mourinho came Chelsea had played in the semi final of the Uefa Champions league, won the Uefa super cup defeating Real Madrid. And won an European trophy before Arsenal

Mentorkaryhm:

substitution mins is part of the time, that's the reason for normal 3 mins added time..

i doubt you see the match, the added time was not for substitution but for the time wasted when rashford was down injured.
And besides the added mins was for the both teams, you should rather blame your team for not holding on to their lead till the the final whistle.

Mklanceee:

but man u has finished 7th,4th,5th,6th, and 2nd for the past 5seasons now

that tells you mourinho is not as bad as they painted him, man utd don get problem before he came, any manager will need time in utd

This guy Don forget say this nah SARRI BALL ⚽ no shit for our side

Angel196:


Again you missed the part where I pointed out Man city already had a strong team before Pep not like the one Mourinho met.

Some of his signings (I won't say all) didn't deliver in Man united as they were in their previous clubs e.g Sanchez. Martial and Shaw are okay though.

What Pep met at City is three times or more better than what Mourinho met at United that's the honest truth.

That been said, Mourinho too has his faults that's the truth.
Have a good day.

pep is playing with all his signing, never shaming them in the media when they make mistake. now look at it is this way, if you meet a very bad squad in a club and you were given the chance to sign your full starting 11 , will the squad be bad again?. I will understand if you tell me the left back is man u weak point because that is the only position he has not signed a player

VanjoshIII:
that tells you mourinho is not as bad as they painted him, man utd don get problem before he came, any manager will need time in utd

since he is Chelsea saviour not Abramovic according to you, he should easily turn man u situation around.
Conte won Chelsea the league with a squad that mou left at 15th position which was the second highest leap in two season . behind only Leicester title winning season

Mklanceee:

since he is Chelsea saviour not Abramovic according to you, he should easily turn man u situation around.
Conte won Chelsea the league with a squad that mou left at 15th position which was the second highest leap in two season . behind only Leicester title winning season

so first season he finished 6th and gave em 2silverwares, 2nd season he finished 2nd and runnerup ni FA cup, so what were you saying? Let's wait till end of this season nah

VanjoshIII:
so first season he finished 6th and gave em 2silverwares, 2nd season he finished 2nd and runnerup ni FA cup, so what were you saying? Let's wait till end of this season nah

and where is his epl the most important title in English football? at Chelsea he would be sack one hour after losing that fa cup final

Mklanceee:

and where is his epl the most important title in English football? at Chelsea he would be sack one hour after losing that fa cup final

season don end?

Mourinho mumu still dey start.

We conceded the first goal cus we were under pressure caused by Mou parking the bus style of play.
In the 2nd half he told them to come out n play....only for him to park it again after going 1-2 up.

Animal!!

kechywillz:
Man u were robbed by the referee by adding 6mins extra time,thats all

Abeg Park well
Was it referee that scored the goal.
Haters spotted

Mou should go to hell. Thank my Ancestors, im no more a Man U fan. And i wont support any big clubside ever!

kechywillz:
Man u were robbed by the referee by adding 6mins extra time,thats all

Karma no send age. Na so referees de do am for ManU when Alex Ferguson was in charge.

Shezkid:
Mourinho still getting it wrong, Chelsea gave him 3 EPL and not the other way round... If he thinks he's that special to have given Chelsea 3 EPL,let him give us (Man Utd) same...

Meet his demands na, and see if he won't


I wondered, why he was clamouring for an experienced defender, with all he's got

With d number of goals shipped so far...........

I don't know why Chelsea fans are just gallivanting up and down. those big guns u have been meeting, you guys are at home, don't come and start to brag that u are good,u guys should fear premier league fixtures. the time u will meet the big guns consecutively at away, you will know that it won't be easy. u met Liverpool and man utd at Stamford bridge, u guys Drew and u started shouting. man utd really tried, I wasnt expecting this result

VanjoshIII:
season don end?

he has spent 2 season already. even this third season,he has a better chance of finishing below ten than top four

Mklanceee:

he has spent 2 season already. even this third season,he has a better chance of finishing below ten than top four

Okay

VanjoshIII:
so Nah money dey make man city now not pep guardiola? If its abramovic money that made Chelsea, then its Qatar's money that's making city not pep.

I don't understand you guys. Would Pep go anywhere near City if not for the money the club owners have? Hasn't city been winning premiership titles before Pep.. Courtesy of the same Arab money?

It's wise for you to stop giving too much credit to these managers. I can respect someone like Ranieri more than Pep and Mourinho combined. Ranieri won the Premier League with a miserable and poor club like Leicester, who had only just returned from relegation. Let Mourinho go to Everton at their current financial level and win the league with them. Let Pep go to Real Betis or Deportivo and win the La Liga with them. That's when you will convince me that the manager is extraordinary and "special". Not when you're always running to billionaire clubs with an unlimited budget to sign any player you want.

It's all about the club owner's money and the willingness to spend it. Full stop.

Johnrake69:


Before Mourinho came Chelsea had played in the semi final of the Uefa Champions league, won the Uefa super cup defeating Real Madrid. And won an European trophy before Arsenal

Don't mind these people.

The very season the Roman Emperor landed at Chelsea, with Ranieri as the manager he inherited, Chelsea finished second in the EPL... Behind the unbeaten Arsenal! Read again, BEHIND THE UNBEATEN ARSENAL!. In other words the only reason Ranieri didn't win the EPL was because it was that same season, unfortunately, that Arsenal went unbeaten. Are you telling me that Mourinho would have won the league that year over the unbeaten Arsenal? In addition to finishing second behind the unbeaten Arsenal, Ranieri took Chelsea to the Semi Final of the Champions League.. Which is an achievement that Mourinho NEVER surpassed at Chelsea.

Unfortunately, Roman sacked Ranieri because he felt he didn't have the 'clout' and the pizzazz. Trust me, if he had left Ranieri or even hired any other coach (even Onigbinde or Eguavoen), Chelsea would have still won the league the next season. The momentum was there. The cash was heavy. The players were there. Mourinho just came to take the glory for something that he didn't build. He's a vulture.

The entire glory (101%) of Chelsea's rise to prominence should be given to none other than the Emperor.. Roman Abramovich. He and he alone and no one but him.

VanjoshIII:
why Chelsea no give themselves before mourinho came in as manager?

They gave themselves in 2010 and 2017

Shezkid:
Mourinho still getting it wrong, Chelsea gave him 3 EPL and not the other way round... If he thinks he's that special to have given Chelsea 3 EPL,let him give us (Man Utd) same...

he did not say I gave them 3 EPL he only tried to demonstrate that we one 3 EPL together and the fans need to respect that...he never celebrated any of man utd goals that is respect to the club

Shezkid:


Greatest manager should be Di Matteo... Won UCL with the blues, mourinho never came close to it

lol...so semi final is not close?

I laugh in 3D when I read Man United fans comment. Stats don't lie. Who is the better side on the day? See image

Brains1990:
. U are one among the delusional blues I have ever come across. Did Abramovich stood in d dugout as Chelsea Boss? He came with the money, but without Mou, the money wouldn't have been judiciously spent. MOU bought the legendary players. All players Abramovich bought himself were flops. U remember Shevchenko? That was Abramovich signing. Chelsea should learn to idolize d special one. He gave Chelsea life, period.

And you think there was no other coaches in the market that would have done that with the money the man invested

Shezkid:


Please how much has mourinho spent since he became manager of Man Utd

He has no excuse to be sincere..
Pep proved he didn't waste money.. He now has a very strong team.. Mourinho is Still complaining and remember they both came to EPL same season....

man city and man utd who had better squad as at when they both arrived? Man city and man united who had spent more money since they both arrived? The problem with plastic fans is they are just noise makers

Shezkid:


Chelsea was below an average team before Abramovic took over and spent money...mourinho came in when money was been spent

mourinho won champions league Europa league with porto... please remind me of the amount of money Porto spent again?

Mklanceee:

you expect Chelsea to respect a grown man who behave like a baby? he started the fight with Chelsea fans by saying stupid things about Chelsea when he became man u manager, now he is getting paid back and man u fans are crying.

remind us of the stupid thing he said

loswhite:
remind us of the stupid thing he said

you have Google with you

Mklanceee:

with players already signed for every position except Left back since he became man u manager, I don't see any reason for him to complain about his squad. if pep has a better team by spending almost same amount of money then it means mou failed in his transfers

lol they did not spend almost the same amount of money and also go and learn about football heritage