4Him1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › 4Him1's Profile › 4Him1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 59 pages)
~Lady~:Pls keep this in mind as it will form the basis of questioning the rest of ur post. ~Lady~:Where pls? Honest . . . i am actually in search of someone to prove me wrong this time. ~Lady~:Confession to whom? Again pls show me in the bible pls. ~Lady~:Again pls show me in the bible pls. I'm begging at this point. ~Lady~:its "GODLINESS" ma'am . . . not mere religion. ~Lady~:u're deliberately getting things muddled up . . . the crusades (with the ORIGINAL goal being to re-capture jerusalem from muuslim invaders) is what i supported. The persecution of the protestant church (erroneously and dubiously also couched as part of the "crusades" is what i do not support. I hope that is crystal clear as it is distressing to see you actively trying to push a lie into my posts.~Lady~:Again let me not bother to argue here . . . kindly show me where this is EXPLICITLY spoken of in the bible. There was an ark of the covenant in the old testament . . . Mary certainly wasnt born then . . . but maybe you know something i dont. I'm waiting. ~Lady~:Pls open the bible and show me where the early apostles took her as the mother of the church . . . pls i desperately want to learn now. ~Lady~:Pls show us where this is written in the bible. ~Lady~:We cant find Moses' tomb, we cant find the tomb of elisha, we cant find the tomb of Timothy . . . surely they werent all taken to heaven body and soul. Or since i'm clueless . . pls show me in your bible. ~Lady~:The early apostles, the jewish prophets of God, faithful disciples penned those words under the inspiration of God. The catholic church merely compiled it into a book and NOW wish to take false credit for it. But hey . . . i'm just like olabowale isnt it? Ok here we go. Bible verses and explanations for all the heresy above. Thanks. |
ariblaze . . . quite typical of the bushman. Jump into what never involved you in the first place and cry harder than the bereaved. You'd do well to concetrate on the thread rather than trying to prove you can shout too. 1. Its females not female - when you consider ayinba1 and maedan also chose to play knight in shinning armour. 2. Its skirts buddy. . . don't be too fast to prove you have more than cottonwool between your ears only to end up playing the fool. Punk, bitch . . . bla bla bla . . . is that all you people have in ur limited vocabulary? At least i give it to sisikill of everyone else, she still showed good mastery of comprehension even when shooting blanks. |
Esss:My agreement with your post ends here. Some pretty girls are equally good if not better on the inside. To have a girl with a combination of both is a blessing you will forever thank God for if you can find one. It's not easy o. |
o boy blabs . . . take am easy o. this thing is too long for me to start responding to. Small small abeg. But wait o . . . u call urself a slave and then use the term "brethren"? Do you know what it means or are u just borrowing another biblical term as usual? |
Beautiful women always get away with stuff ugly girls wouldnt. UNTIL the guy firmly has her in his grip then all tolerance for rubbish vanishes. |
ariblaze:dude, wake up from your drunken stupor. My critic was simply a general one sentence comment . . . i dont think ANY of you here bar sisikill even read it, or read stephenP's response OR read my own response . . . OR read sisikill's first shot OR read were i conceded her point and assumed the issue to be dead and buried until she started bleating. I dont normally trade words with foolish people who think they can just butt in without thinking and start threatening others. Pardon me again? It would be you and who? Controversy is my thing . . . unfortunately controversy with blind bats isnt. Read first and come to ur own conclusions rather than hiding behind the skirts of the females. maedan:too good to post a drabble? No ma'am . . . i've posted quite a few here before . . . in the days when adults rather than self-deluded kids used to be prominent members. I dare say i recieved both positive and negative comments . . . it simply made me a better writer. I dont remember ever telling them to go write a 20 page novel first before critiquing my work. Thanks for further cementing the fact that there are more idiots on this thread than i thot. Keep it coming trolls. |
studentetc:when its morning nko? you will switch off the sun? ![]() |
~Lady~:Nope and could you pls qualify "the church" by adding "catholic" to it so we dont confuse others pls. ~Lady~:how many did they burn at the stake, how many did they feed to lions, how many did they drive into catacombs? ~Lady~:Who are the "heretics"? Those who refused to follow catholic man made doctrine of purgatory and confessions? ~Lady~:Do you notice anything similar to this . . . christians attacked muuslims and all she did was defend herself. As she is still doing today. When did protestants attack the catholic church to destroy it? How did the catholic church defend herself? By killing millions and plunging the world thru the dark ages? ~Lady~:If your popes can see it and feel the need to apologise then i just shake my head. ~Lady~:Same old anti-biblical nonsense we've had to endure for centuries. Is God so weak that He needed the pope to protect His word? ~Lady~:That would never have happened because it would have rendered God's word and His very sacrifice on the cross null and void. The catholic church stood up and fought for her own doctrine . . . certainly not the doctrine of Christ. ~Lady~:Hatred, hatred. . . . expose their errors and they say u resort to hatred. Even the pharisees labelled Christ a son of belzebub. ~Lady~:That's why i dont respond to every topic. Because there are some i frankly have no idea about. ~Lady~:Not at all, that accusation is squarely yours. Continue venerating Mary and then accuse those who point out the bible to you as bashing u out of hatred. ~Lady~:get back on track all you want . . . catholicism is merely less violent than is'lam. They are both the same - idol worship. |
maedan:not really. The infantile part comes from people like you who think because we dont write drabbles here we must all be block heads who are simply being bitter. Doesnt work that way madamme . . . hey ojukwu, good shot but it needs a bit more work though. |
You wouldnt date a girl you consider ugly in the first place. |
maedan:. . . at this rate you'll hit ur head on the wall for nothing. I read StephenP's drabble, made a general comment . . . we both laughed over it and he even sent me a link to his poem to check out . . . no wahala . . . everyone's fine. Then come the selfrighteous teenage girls on PMS . . . recipe for disaster. Keep up the word play dear. ![]() If it helps you live through the cramps then who am i. |
maedan:31 word dribble. Excellent. ![]() |
~Lady~:No problem, i'll simply withdraw the compliment. I never called the crusades evil, i think you're getting it mixed up in the haste to have a leg to stand on. I would never call evil a war that was launched to rescue Jerusalem from the hands of isl'amic invaders. No way. What i criticised quite frankly were the dark ages when the catholic church ACTIVELY persecuted the protestant church. IT IS IN NO WAY TO BE MIXED UP AS PART OF THE CRUSADES. ~Lady~:when you expose evil they say you bash out of hatred. I ask for the upteenth time . . . hatred of what exactly? of the catholic church? Give me a break pls. ~Lady~:I'd suggest we mutually hold on to the compliments. thanks. |
HR.hotness:nwam pls just this moment . . . allow me to address these lasses. ![]() maedan:impressive. Hey its 4 Him who's picking the fights here isnt it? maedan:Felt left out how? Left out of what? ![]() Ma'am . . . i wrote my first published work at 16, that i didnt write any drabble here has a lot more to do with the fact that i realised quite quickly that this was not a place to express one's thots but just a collection of self serving goons who think that putting up 200 words/post is a quick way to prove they've got more than cottonwool between their ears. maedan: Jealous of what? Abegi! maedan:hahaha a . . . the usual nonsense. Its bad manners to "fight" (i'm not fighting, just setting a few overgrown kids straight) a lady but its great manners to pick on one general undirected comment? maedan:Feel free to make a fool of urself while i kick back and have a good break. ![]() |
It gets more and more obvious that this has nothing to do with my comment but more to do with disgruntled elements who have been looking for a way to latch unto just about any thing to stick a knife into 4 Him. una well done. ![]() Oh by the way, i re-read the thread and came across the very first critique on this thread by SMC . . . i don't think she wrote any drabble herself. I'm shocked sisikill didnt call her out for being "rude" . . . oh well such is the hypocrisy of those who live in glass houses yet fling stones as large as mount kilimanjaroo. |
olabowale:Here is your problem. You latch unto one tiny completely/deliberately misunderstood portion of the bible and then build an is'lamic minaret on it. The bible is full of allegory and does not contradict itself . . . David called himself a servant of Saul but we all know he was not a literal servant and eventually became the next King. Ditto with the servant/slave usage in Timothy. We are servants . . . messengers . . . that is our duty to Christ BUT our ultimate inheritance is as sons and joint heirs with Christ. That much is over emphasised in the bible. olabowale:When did we start defining the Omnipotent with human dictionaries? olabowale:All you have done is make false claims with no proof. When you conclusively bring me NON-IS'LAMIC proof that the biblical writers put down evil in the scriptures then i can listen to you. By the way is this the same "evil writings" you quote when it is convenient for you? sigh. i cant explain any further. |
O dear, another unecessary rant. maedan:Talk to sisikill not me. maedan:hehe you bunch of self-righteous folks make me laugh. - I didnt condemn anyone . . . pls see my response to stephenP. - I gave a critique . . . its alright if you think its "dishonest". - REAL writers are out there putting their stuff out not colonizing a tiny niche on nairaland and shutting everyone else down. REAL writers? hehe God dey.maedan:No problem, that was my own comment which i least expected anyone to take seriously let alone use as a spring board to start whinning. Again read stephenP's comment and my own response. maedan:Ma'am . . . if everyone put up or shut up there'd be nothing like critiquing literary works. What do i have to playa-hate? A 100 word drabble? Puhlease! your disappointment to me is water off a duck's back, i havent picked a fight and that is obvious . . . i have only responded to a belligerent child. maedan:huh? Sex sells but talent sells sex or not. Ask Achebe or Soyinka. maedan:perfect? nah. |
You basically ended the thread urself. you've left us with no comments to make. |
Maybe, maybe not. |
depends on: - how long. - how deeply he was into her. - how much of his life she became a part of. Men feel it too, they prefer to keep it bottled up. The unfortunate recipient of the hurt ends up being his next victim errr sorry girlfriend. |
HR.hotness:there's no bickering in my arms. ![]() Seriously, this wasnt meant to get this long since i'd already conceded the point to her a long time ago except it's obvious sisikill just wanted her chance to stick it to me. She got it now she wants to milk it for all its worth. Well too bad . . . |
Lady, thanks for your brilliant expose, as usual olabowale prefers to be in denial. |
I had the intention of posting a drabble or two before but quickly realised this was more of a show-offy thread. It was obvious from page 2 but i deliberately kept quiet and prefered to read from the sidelines. My hunch has finally been confirmed. Go on crying about drabbles . . . Scroll down the literature thread and read PROPER NOVELS by way more talented authors with way tougher critics than this. What made it more interesting was the desire to improve and not to show that "i can write too". The essence of a thread such as this is defeated if the criteria to criticise is limited to "you have to contribute too". But what do you expect from a bunch of overgrown kids who think they have hit the big time because they write 100 lines of prose? |
Sisikill:Desire to be relevant? That's somehow odd . . . if i wanted to be "relevant" i'd post a drabble. That is completely beside the issue and is merely a cheap shot. I said nothing to you, why do you feel the need to cry? I merely made a comment about the sexual theme of some of the drabbles . . . NONE of which was urs since i didnt bother to read yours. Sisikill:I reproduce the "whine" here for the benefit of others . . . when will i read a REAL "drabble" that isnt sexually oriented? Pray . . . why is that a problem to you and YOU ONLY? Sisikill:Ma'am . . . everyone is free to choose to write explicit X-rated stuff . . . i can only comment and move on. That is the essence of a forum. That is not equivalent to "calling people to task" as i mentioned no names. Sisikill:I read several other drabbles and made favourable comments . . . perhaps you missed those . . . The "we" is purely self serving . . . you're not the only one with a drabble here so please remove your head from the clouds. There have been way more excellent writers here less than a yr or 2 ago. Sisikill:na, save it for your breakfast tomorrow . . . take a good gulp of humble pie too. Sisikill:I dismissed no one's "work" . . . i made a critic. My dear . . . there are tons of shakespeare critics out there . . . how many monumental works have they written? Isnt it rude for them to criticise his work? Wole Soyinka has critics of his work . . . doesnt that smack as rudeness? Adults don't fly off the handle because of a comment that did not refer to them. Only spoilt kids do. Grow up. |
stop using a razor. get an electric shaver. |
Sisikill:Cant remember nagging at all . . . u whine about "freedom of expression", apparently its lost on you because i suppose everyone has a RIGHT to make a general comment. Its not UR thread u know. Sisikill:drop the self-serving hypocritical use of "we". This is not about YOU . . . Never complained that i was bored . . . i've been coming here to read the drabbles since page 2 and i have thoroughly enjoyed it. I was a bit uncomfortable that everyone seemed to be writing more on a sexual theme. Why does that get u in a bother? I dont remember referencing your drabble. Sisikill:Again drop the use of the silly "we" . . . there's plenty of people here, only you feel the need to whine endlessly over a simple comment. Sisikill:If i were bored i wont be here in the first place. Seems you believe ur own hype a little too much. |
Sisikill:You're really not as relevant as you want to make urself. I dont remember refering to ur drabble. Why do you feel the need to act the thread captain? Is it your private business? No one else complained . . . why do you feel the need to? Get off ur high horse pls. |
Sisikill:yeah maybe. What else do you want to nag about? |
stillwater:- i didnt grow up soon enough. - FROG - Fully Reliant On God. |
HR.hotness:You have my blessings. ![]() |
Sisikill:you have a point. Point of correction - i didnt dismiss anyone's work, i appreciate the talent . . . maybe not what they chose to write on. but hey who am i? |
is what i do not support. I hope that is crystal clear as it is distressing to see you actively trying to push a lie into my posts.

at this rate you'll hit ur head on the wall for nothing. 



