PS, How was voting this past Wednesday,

Did you vote ANC?

if Yes, Why?


If not Why and who did you vote for and Why?

jln115:

The nature of Africa is violent, Africans have been killing each other and taking land through conquest for thousands of years.... This peaceful nature of an African you are talking about in your post does not exist, the Boer people took some land through conquest(and some they bought) and had to defend it just like any other African tribe.
The reason nobody chased the Afrikaner wasn't due to this false nature you were talking about but due to the fact that there was no tribe physically capable to do so.

I don't know what Reading you're talking about since I'm 100% certain that I'm more verse in the history of the Afrikaner and better placed in speaking for the majority of Afrikaners since I'm actually one and not a Nigerian that thinks he has spoken to a couple of whites and know has this whole understanding of how they think.

Now you personal opinion if you view Afrikaners as African is just that, an opinion and you have that right to express it.

However your opinion on, that Afrikaners don't see themselves as African(thus you speak in behalf of us Afrikaners) but rather a European extension is Factually incorrect and I know this since I myself am an Afrikaner and know the political, religious, and personal view of the majority of Afrikaners.

They can never own up to their issues, it's always the White people or the Arabs, and now the Asians . Africans are always the victims of everyone, no sense of accountability or responsibility whatsoever. There is no one who hates Africans more than Africans lol.

morpheus24:
PS, How was voting this past Wednesday,

Did you vote ANC?

if Yes, Why?


If not Why and who did you vote for and Why?

Unfortunately we have a big for nothing population that wants freebies and other people's properties without having worked a day in their lives , that is why you see the criminal organisation still leading us and fraudsters like the EFF growing in numbers . One would have thought the so called black middle class would throw their numbers behind a saner party that promotes peace , quality of life , jobs and prosperity , but No! They would rather promote racism , division and hatred and blame the whitties for their problems. It's hard to see this country ever getting back it's former glory with so many people voting against progress and unity .

To answer your question , the beggers voted for the ANC but patriots voted for progressive parties , unfortunately There are less of us and more of them . They clearly want another African poohole. Viva Africa !.

kemptonpost:


Unfortunately we have a big for nothing population that wants freebies and other people's properties without having worked a day in their lives , that is why you see the criminal organisation still leading us and fraudsters like the EFF growing in numbers . One would have thought the so called black middle class would throw their numbers behind a saner party that promotes peace , quality of life , jobs and prosperity , but No! They would rather promote racism , division and hatred and blame the whitties for their problems. It's hard to see this country ever getting back it's former glory with so many people voting against progress and unity
To answer your question , the beggers voted for the ANC but patriots voted for progressive parties , unfortunately There are less of us and more of them . They clearly want another African poohole. Viva Africa !.

My question regarding any voting activity was directed specifically at my debate opponent for a specific reason, again if you wish to vent, or discuss the ills of socialist thinking there's another topic regarding SA elections. This comment would be more appropriate there so do yourself a favor and repost.

kemptonpost:

They can never own up to their issues, it's always the White people or the Arabs, and now the Asians . Africans are always the victims of everyone, no sense of accountability or responsibility whatsoever. There is no one who hates Africans more than Africans lol.

This statement is out of complete context regarding this topic but I understand you are looking for a platform to vent.

You have to be specific with what you mean by the above statement relative to this topic and we can take it point by point, otherwise start a new thread and wait for people to respond to your comment.

Jkay187:


3/10 Nigerians in South Africa are hardworking the rest are the parasites who give the rest of Nigerians a bad name. We South Africans don't hate Nigerians we only hate those of you who are involved in crime and mind you there's plenty of those in SA. South African and Nigerians mostly live in harmony and this is never reported in the media.

If you think whites love you then you are truly naïve bordering on madness. The blacks in SA constitutes the largest middle class in SA and they do live in good areas, the only issue is that there's 20% of blacks live in informal settlements.

You talk a lot of bullshitt.

Actually we would rather have the immigrants around . Immigrants don't demand anything , they work hard for everything and longer hours without toy -toy. Immigrants are respectful of authority unlike some entitled people groups here .

morpheus24:


My question regarding any voting activity was directed specifically at my debate opponent for a specific reason, again if you wish to vent, or discuss the ills of socialist thinking there's another topic regarding SA elections. This comment would be more appropriate there so do yourself a favor and repost.


This statement is out of complete context regarding this topic but I understand you are looking for a platform to vent.

You have to be specific with what you mean by the above statement relative to this topic and we can take it point by point, otherwise start a new thread and wait for people to respond to your comment.

This is an open forum buddy, and next time qoute your opponent .

kemptonpost:


This is an open forum buddy, and next time qoute your opponent .

This is the reason "PS" was written to indicate an addendum to the original write up, Buddy!

morpheus24:


Reading and comprehension is necessary here. So "I have debated many Afrikaners" cannot be in contrast to the statement " the ones I debate with tend to be more of British or of other European ancestry versus your Afrikaaner kind". They compliment each other.

Case in point.

If hypothetically speaking I have debated 1000 Afrikaners and I have also debated 3000 SA of British ancestry, both assertions would qualify the two earlier statements previous made. further clarity was given on the greater number of debates had between the two groups because one tended to be more open minded than the other. Something you are obviously proving in here.


Of course you could be more comfortable in other "White" citadels around the world. That's the whole point isn't it. You are able to trans-morph yourself into other groups of people in established empire states around the world with ease. Meanwhile a british black person with several generations in Europe would never be taken seriously if he proclaimed jis "European-ness" now would he.




That's the common narrative/excuse I get every time I speak of this. The Zulu invasions are not the same contextually. Zulu expansionism did not operate in the same way as that of the "Afrikaners". The success of the Zulu expansions was underpinned on the ability to ABSORB conquered clans, tribes and territory.

The Afrikaner or Boer to be more specific, on the other hand were expansionists in the classic European sense again guided by Calvanist religious ideals of a "special" peoples ordained by God to take territory and establish their [b]HEGEMONY[b] over the land and territory, reducing the "no believers" or "non baptized into serfs or slaves. This was not dissimilar to their Quaker counterparts established in the US.



The answer to your question is right there in front of you but you are trying to bait me into specifics. I said it contrasts other historical narratives I have read in the way it was blunt and unapologetic which indicates that other accounts written by contemporary authors I have read tend to be more on the conservative or subtle side when describing say the Mfecane,the battle at blood river, The origins of the Broederbond, the nationalist party, Apartheid e.t.c. A book in contrast would be God's, spies and Lies by John Matison.

-They certainly don't compliment each other mate.... What you said is you mostly debate with non Afrikaans white South Africans. That certainly doest compliment your statement that you debate with “many" Afrikaners.

- Not Hypothetically I can guarantee that you have not debated with "many"..... Just on nairaland alone there are less than a handful of Afrikaners... In fact I'm only aware of one on this forum and that's me!! There are however quite a lot of Non Afrikaner white SAn on this forum... Secondly besides nairaland there are very few other platforms in Nigeria and on the Internet where you could have debated with Afrikaners. There was a reason I asked you to name the Afrikaners you have debated with.... Since judging by you assertions on Afrikaners I as an Afrikaner myself can see you have not debated with "many"

- I can't speak for Black Europeans.... I'm only speaking for Afrikaners, and I'm also not debating whether you think we are Africans or not.... What I am debating is your assertion that Afrikaners don't see themselves as African but rather a European extention.

- Absorb?? Maybe the few they didn't kill were taken in as slaves yes...... But under king Shaka the Zulus killed millions of fellow Black Africans of opposition tribes....

- Again the expansion of the Boere in general terms was no different to any other expansion by African tribes.

- yes I'm asking you for specifics since you made the original assertion.... Thus its up to you to prove your assertion as factual. Also John Matisons book has nothing to do with our debate since its focused on Apartheid SA..... I have no doubt that Walkers books would be in contrast with other historical narrative with regards with apartheid since there were many biased SAn historians that tried to justify the actions of the apartheid government.

However getting back to our original debate...I'll make this simple, you said one of the topics that was in contrast with other historical narratives was the battle of blood river.... What in Walkers book on the Battle of blood river was in contrast with most historical narratives.

morpheus24:
PS, How was voting this past Wednesday,

Did you vote ANC?

if Yes, Why?


If not Why and who did you vote for and Why?

Took me 10 minutes to drive from my house, vote and drive back from my house.

And no I certainly didn't vote ANC.

kemptonpost:



They can never own up to their issues, it's always the White people or the Arabs, and now the Asians . Africans are always the victims of everyone, no sense of accountability or responsibility whatsoever. There is no one who hates Africans more than Africans lol.

The world is a violent place.... The Boere, Zulus, Ndebele ect ect are all responsible for killing millions.

jln115:

The world is a violent place.... The Boere, Zulus, Ndebele ect ect are all responsible for killing millions.

You should not apologise to Zulus, without them South Africa would be peaceful. Replace them with great immigrants like Nigerians and you will have a peaceful and first world country. Zulus made South Africa a third world country , before the whites left power the country was peaceful , prosperity and great. Now the Zulu savages have made even the whites poor because of their laziness and jealousy.

Johncables402:


You should not apologise to Zulus, without them South Africa would be peaceful. Replace them with great immigrants like Nigerians and you will have a peaceful and first world country. Zulus made South Africa a third world country , before the whites left power the country was peaceful , prosperity and great. Now the Zulu savages have made even the whites poor because of their laziness and jealousy.

Nigerians... Great immigrants?.. Don't make me laugh

Without the Zulus some other tribe would have taken their place, the world we live in was shaped through conquest, its the way it is.

The rest of your post is just plain tripe....

jln115:

-They certainly don't compliment each other mate.... What you said is you mostly debate with non Afrikaans white South Africans. That certainly doest compliment your statement that you debate with “many" Afrikaners.

You deliberately ignore the statements when contextualized, so I will repeat it one last time. If you don't get it after that please move on or go back to school.

I have debated 1000 Afrikaners

I have debated 3000 White S.Africans of british ancestry.

I have debated many Afrikaners.

I have debated more white S. Africans of british ancestry than I have debated Afrikaners.

If the logic above in reference to complimentary statements above allude you then I don't know what else to say, its my word against yours at this point.

jln115:

- Not Hypothetically I can guarantee that you have not debated with "many"..... Just on nairaland alone there are less than a handful of Afrikaners... In fact I'm only aware of one on this forum and that's me!! There are however quite a lot of Non Afrikaner white SAn on this forum... Secondly besides nairaland there are very few other platforms in Nigeria and on the Internet where you could have debated with Afrikaners. There was a reason I asked you to name the Afrikaners you have debated with.... Since judging by you assertions on Afrikaners I as an Afrikaner myself can see you have not debated with "many"

This is the most stupid statement you have made so far, so all my debates must be on internet platforms and I must register all the Van Nierkes, coetzee's, La platts and everyone else's last name that appears on 7 de laan for me to prove interactions with Afrikaners. Quite nonsensical.

There is no chance that I have actually lived in different cities in South Africa.

There is no chance that I actually worked for a certain period of time, in cape town,Johannesburg, travelled through several countries as a UN attache since before the 2010 World cup, sat on panel discussions with the likes of Khaya Dlanga who I have known since 2007, interacted with small coloreds, Zulus, Xhosas communities spanning the length of cape town all the way to Port Elizabeth, currently have many friends and associates who are white south african historians of the afrikaner persuasion, students from Rodenbosh and UJ.

You really have some audacity my friend. I have been on Nairaland since 2007 that's over a decade covering South and Southern African issues, debated your kin folk on here who have identified as Afrikaner,white S. AFricans , Coloreds, Black south Africans. etc and you come here with your Afrikaner audacity because you are bruised at the assertion I made regarding your Africaness or what you perceive this to be. You have some nerve. This is why I detest debates with your ilk, you can never stay subjective.

jln115:

- I can't speak for Black Europeans.... I'm only speaking for Afrikaners, and I'm also not debating whether you think we are Africans or not.... What I am debating is your assertion that Afrikaners don't see themselves as African but rather a European extention.

This arguement is getting stale now because you have issues with comprehension for real. So you are assert my statement is false. We have enumerated reasons why even if "some" Afrikaners were to assert this which is not far fetched, the evidence presented shows they are not or their concept of "African-ness" is not on par or concurrent with the concept as shared amongst the rest of the continent.

We go through historical evidence, Genetic evidence, linguistic evidence, Religious evidence, and all this just flies out the window.

jln115:

- Absorb?? Maybe the few they didn't kill were taken in as slaves yes...... But under king Shaka the Zulus killed millions of fellow Black Africans of opposition tribes....

You are just reaching for straws now ,point me to the evidence that estimates "millions" died. I would like to peruse over this.

jln115:

- Again the expansion of the Boere in general terms was no different to any other expansion by African tribes.

I have enumerated evidencial points, your statement above is opinion but then again you are the typical stubborn Afrikaner type. How dare this Nigerian tell you off, eh?

jln115:

- yes I'm asking you for specifics since you made the original assertion.... Thus its up to you to prove your assertion as factual. Also John Matisons book has nothing to do with our debate since its focused on Apartheid SA..... I have no doubt that Walkers books would be in contrast with other historical narrative with regards with apartheid since there were many biased SAn historians that tried to justify the actions of the apartheid government.

The whole above book comparison really has nothing to do with the argument but again is a red herring on your part. You haven't read the book so we cannot continue to debate points of contrast can we?. You simple want to rehash your knowledge of Boer history to us here.

What I will say is that Matteson book picks ups from Apartheid era in South Africa and focuses on the media perspective of the political atmosphere but he does references many a subject matters with his point of view, which is discussed much more expansively in walker's books such as the broaderbond.

jln115:

However getting back to our original debate...I'll make this simple, you said one of the topics that was in contrast with other historical narratives was the battle of blood river.... What in Walkers book on the Battle of blood river was in contrast with most historical narratives.

This is not our original debate this is a red herring. You simply want to rehash or test my knowledge of Afrikaner history as a way of discrediting my initial assertion. I will not fall for that. I have repeated that there are several contrasting view points in walkers books versus other books I have read, I have given two books to contrast between and I have given a specific account.

You are basically red herring here.

morpheus24:


You deliberately ignore the statements when contextualized, so I will repeat it one last time. If you don't get it after that please move on or go back to school.

I have debated 1000 Afrikaners

I have debated 3000 White S.Africans of british ancestry.

I have debated many Afrikaners.

I have debated more white S. Africans of british ancestry than I have debated Afrikaners.

If the logic above in reference to complimentary statements above allude you then I don't know what else to say, its my word against yours at this point.



This is the most stupid statement you have made so far, so all my debates must be on internet platforms and I must register all the Van Nierkes, coetzee's, La platts and everyone else's last name that appears on 7 de laan for me to prove interactions with Afrikaners. Quite nonsensical.

There is no chance that I have actually lived in different cities in South Africa.

There is no chance that I actually worked for a certain period of time, in cape town,Johannesburg, travelled through several countries as a UN attache since before the 2010 World cup, sat on panel discussions with the likes of Khaya Dlanga who I have known since 2007, interacted with small coloreds, Zulus, Xhosas communities spanning the length of cape town all the way to Port Elizabeth, currently have many friends and associates who are white south african historians of the afrikaner persuasion, students from Rodenbosh and UJ.

You really have some audacity my friend. I have been on Nairaland since 2007 that's over a decade covering South and Southern African issues, debated your kin folk on here who have identified as Afrikaner,white S. AFricans , Coloreds, Black south Africans. etc and you come here with your Afrikaner audacity because you are bruised at the assertion I made regarding your Africaness or what you perceive this to be. You have some nerve. This is why I detest debates with your ilk, you can never stay subjective.




This arguement is getting stale now because you have issues with comprehension for real. So you are assert my statement is false. We have enumerated reasons why even if "some" Afrikaners were to assert this which is not far fetched, the evidence presented shows they are not or their concept of "African-ness" is not on par or concurrent with the concept as shared amongst the rest of the continent.

We go through historical evidence, Genetic evidence, linguistic evidence, Religious evidence, and all this just flies out the window.



You are just reaching for straws now ,point me to the evidence that estimates "millions" died. I would like to peruse over this.



I have enumerated evidencial points, your statement above is opinion but then again you are the typical stubborn Afrikaner type. How dare this Nigerian tell you off, eh?


The whole above book comparison really has nothing to do with the argument but again is a red herring on your part. You haven't read the book so we cannot continue to debate points of contrast can we?. You simple want to rehash your knowledge of Boer history to us here.

What I will say is that Matteson book picks ups from Apartheid era in South Africa and focuses on the media perspective of the political atmosphere but he does references many a subject matters with his point of view, which is discussed much more expansively in walker's books such as the broaderbond.


This is not our original debate this is a red herring. You simply want to rehash or test my knowledge of Afrikaner history as a way of discrediting my initial assertion. I will not fall for that. I have repeated that there are several contrasting view points in walkers books versus other books I have read, I have given two books to contrast between and I have given a specific account.

You are basically red herring here.

You are an idiot. What did whites do to you . Is it not the Zulus who are our enemies here , why are you picking on people who have nothing against Nigeria and Nigerians?. You Afonjas are something else.

Johncables402:


You are an idiot. What did whites do to you . Is it not the Zulus who are our enemies here , why are you picking on people who have nothing against Nigeria and Nigerians?. You Afonjas are something else.

Judging from your responses it is safe to assume your IQ level is below 80 if it is that high at all. This is unusual for people from the eastern part of Nigeria as I know Imo state still has some of the highest cut off marks in the country.

You must have been one of those from the the adjourning eastern states that claimed local government from the east to pass common entrance.

Will you vamoose from here and allow grown people discuss serious things!

kemptonpost:


Actually we would rather have the immigrants around . Immigrants don't demand anything , they work hard for everything and longer hours without toy -toy. Immigrants are respectful of authority unlike some entitled people groups here .

You do realize in SA foreigners without proper documentation are exploited and don't even enjoy the basic rights guaranteed under labour laws in SA. My point would rather be that all immigrants who are legally in SA be treated with dignity by employers.

morpheus24:


Judging from your responses it is safe to assume your IQ level is below 80 if it is that high at all. This is unusual for people from the eastern part of Nigeria as I know Imo state still has some of the highest cut off marks in the country.

You must have been one of those from the the adjourning eastern states that claimed local government from the east to pass common entrance.

Will you vamoose from here and allow grown people discuss serious things!

Afonja you think by siding with xenophobes they will spare you when they start hating Nigeria again? . Yes Igbos have a way higher IQ than both afonjas and Abokis combined, that is why biafra will be like South Africa before the Zulus arrived and messed up everything the good whites worked for. Afonjas can remain the slaves to their Northern masters for all i care. Idiot.

Jkay187:


You do realize in SA foreigners without proper documentation are exploited and don't even enjoy the basic rights guaranteed under labour laws in SA. My point would rather be that all immigrants who are legally in SA be treated with dignity by employers.

Who is treating foreigners badly , is not Zulus?. If South Africa had only white people, black foreigners would live in peace like kings and queens but the jealous Zulus discriminate against them. Idiots.

jln115:
Nigerians... Great immigrants?.. Don't make me laugh

Without the Zulus some other tribe would have taken their place, the world we live in was shaped through conquest, its the way it is.

The rest of your post is just plain tripe....

Some Nigerians give us bad image out there , but most of the news from South Africa is lies told by lazy Zulus trying to lie about hardworking Nigerians. You must be one of the whites with low self esteem not to see that Zulus have destroyed the country. Be honest , if you had to replace the dirty Zulus with Nigerian Igbos wouldn't South Africa be the country the whites wanted it to be before Mandela destroyed it ?

Johncables402:


Afonja you think by siding with xenophobes they will spare you when they start hating Nigeria again? .

You see how stupid you sound, I don't live in SA so how will they spare me. Like I said, keep exposing your stupidity on here for all to see.

Johncables402:


Yes Igbos have a way higher IQ than both afonjas and Abokis combined, that is why biafra will be like South Africa before the Zulus arrived and messed up everything the good whites worked for. Afonjas can remain the slaves to their Northern masters for all i care. Idiot.

Again exposing your village mentality here.

When did the Zulu's arrive.?

Was South Africa even a country when they arrived?

After they arrived what changed in South Africa?

You do know that Xenophobia is practiced all across major cities in South Africa of the which the Zulu are a minority right?

Go back to Aba and continue selling your fake Gucci bags, that's the best you can do for yourself.


PS there are over 150 tribes in Nigeria from Nupe, berom, to igala, idoma, efik, ibibio, kalabari, itshekiri, Benin, Ishan, Tiv, Ijaw, Kanuri etc and this Idiot thinks that I am Afonja.

YOU ARE AN IDIOT!

Johncables402:


Some Nigerians give us bad image out there , but most of the news from South Africa is lies told by lazy Zulus trying to lie about hardworking Nigerians. You must be one of the whites with low self esteem not to see that Zulus have destroyed the country. Be honest , if you had to replace the dirty Zulus with Nigerian Igbos wouldn't South Africa be the country the whites wanted it to be before Mandela destroyed it ?

Yes its only the Zulu tribe that live in South Africa. You must get your news from Radio Biafra. So RUSTENBERG, PRETORIA, MPUMALANGA is in Zulu territory abi?

You are an IDIOT!

Go back to Aba and please continue selling your fake Gucci

Johncables402:


Some Nigerians give us bad image out there , but most of the news from South Africa is lies told by lazy Zulus trying to lie about hardworking Nigerians. You must be one of the whites with low self esteem not to see that Zulus have destroyed the country. Be honest , if you had to replace the dirty Zulus with Nigerian Igbos wouldn't South Africa be the country the whites wanted it to be before Mandela destroyed it ?

ahh! Some people still reason like this?

Johncables402:


Who is treating foreigners badly , is not Zulus?. If South Africa had only white people, black foreigners would live in peace like kings and queens but the jealous Zulus discriminate against them. Idiots.

do you know who's Zulu, Swati, Tswana etc? Do you even know there are different tribes in South Africa? Are you aware that all these tribes view Nigerians the same way?

IronGalaxy:
do you know who's Zulu, Swati, Tswana etc? Do you even know there are different tribes in South Africa? Are you aware that all these tribes view Nigerians the same way?

All the black charcoals are Zulus to me , who cares what else they call themselves . All I know they are uncivilized to live in a country like south Africa with whites.

IronGalaxy:
ahh! Some people still reason like this?

Truth hurts fool.

morpheus24:


Yes its only the Zulu tribe that live in South Africa. You must get your news from Radio Biafra. So RUSTENBERG, PRETORIA, MPUMALANGA is in Zulu territory abi?

You are an IDIOT!

Go back to Aba and please continue selling your fake Gucci

Insult me all you want Afonja, Igbos will still remain your worst nightmare like the boeres are to the charcoals in south Africa. We remain the backbone of Nigeria's industries, entertainment, sports , international recognition and business. You are nothing but a Hausa slave . Idiot .

morpheus24:


You see how stupid you sound, I don't live in SA so how will they spare me. Like I said, keep exposing your stupidity on here for all to see.



Again exposing your village mentality here.

When did the Zulu's arrive.?

Was South Africa even a country when they arrived?

After they arrived what changed in South Africa?

You do know that Xenophobia is practiced all across major cities in South Africa of the which the Zulu are a minority right?

Go back to Aba and continue selling your fake Gucci bags, that's the best you can do for yourself.


PS there are over 150 tribes in Nigeria from Nupe, berom, to igala, idoma, efik, ibibio, kalabari, itshekiri, Benin, Ishan, Tiv, Ijaw, Kanuri etc and this Idiot thinks that I am Afonja.

YOU ARE AN IDIOT!

Afonja they will not spare you , to them there is no Igbo just Nigerians .

Zulus are as lazy and ugly and you Hausas and afonjas always wanting to reap where they did not sow. Those charcoals Zulus arrived after the whites had built the Capes to look like heaven only to arrive murder the poor whites driving them to flee to other parts of the country again they settled there and build better cities and the charcoals again started following to cause trouble and steal, that is when the whites decided they had no choice but to start apartheid to kill the dirty dark skin niggas .

Why practice xenophobia if they are not hateful of our success ? . Like they did with whites , they do it with innocent Igbos too. Zulus hate progress, Soweto is the only place that looks ok where Zulus live , and it is because it was built by whites and maintained by them , the other places are like Zulus themselves . Rubbish.

Johncables402:


Afonja they will not spare you , to them there is no Igbo just Nigerians .

Zulus are as lazy and ugly and you Hausas and afonjas always wanting to reap where they did not sow. Those charcoals Zulus arrived after the whites had built the Capes to look like heaven only to arrive murder the poor whites driving them to flee to other parts of the country again they settled there and build better cities and the charcoals again started following to cause trouble and steal, that is when the whites decided they had no choice but to start apartheid to kill the dirty dark skin niggas .

Why practice xenophobia if they are not hateful of our success ? . Like they did with whites , they do it with innocent Igbos too. Zulus hate progress, Soweto is the only place that looks ok where Zulus live , and it is because it was built by whites and maintained by them , the other places are like Zulus themselves . Rubbish.

Poverty at its best...

panafrican:
Send all the Dutch back to Europe.

. Behave yourself they are Africans they are known today as Afrikaans

Send the Dutch to South Pole , end of the story.

Johncables402:


Some Nigerians give us bad image out there , but most of the news from South Africa is lies told by lazy Zulus trying to lie about hardworking Nigerians. You must be one of the whites with low self esteem not to see that Zulus have destroyed the country. Be honest , if you had to replace the dirty Zulus with Nigerian Igbos wouldn't South Africa be the country the whites wanted it to be before Mandela destroyed it ?

Are you saying the whites in South Africa would prefer your primitive apes in the video?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG2z32mpQgA

Johncables402:


Afonja they will not spare you , to them there is no Igbo just Nigerians .

Zulus are as lazy and ugly and you Hausas and afonjas always wanting to reap where they did not sow. Those charcoals Zulus arrived after the whites had built the Capes to look like heaven only to arrive murder the poor whites driving them to flee to other parts of the country again they settled there and build better cities and the charcoals again started following to cause trouble and steal, that is when the whites decided they had no choice but to start apartheid to kill the dirty dark skin niggas .

Why practice xenophobia if they are not hateful of our success ? . Like they did with whites , they do it with innocent Igbos too. Zulus hate progress, Soweto is the only place that looks ok where Zulus live , and it is because it was built by whites and maintained by them , the other places are like Zulus themselves . Rubbish.

you haven't taken your daily shot of Haloperidol today have you. NURSE!