Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,153,133 members, 7,818,401 topics. Date: Sunday, 05 May 2024 at 02:30 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness (67199 Views)
New Changes For Jehovah's Witness: Women Can Wear Trousers, Men Must Not Wear.. / Commercial Driver Prays As A Muslim, Christian And Traditionalist Before A Trip / Is It Right To Be A Christian And Join Secret Society?; Pastor Shares Photos (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) ... (77) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Janosky: 2:06pm On May 23, 2019 |
Barristter07: I will expose his deceitful posts on Zechariah 12:10 for ALL to see. |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Janosky: 2:54pm On May 23, 2019 |
shadeyinka5: Shadeyinka 's baseless rants and LIES EXPOSED... Let's check out each Hebrew word for each English word meaning in Zech12:10. * Since Hebrew is the source language of Zech12:10, it's the Hebrew meaning that is Paramount. **https://biblehub.com/zechariah/12-10.htm Scroll down to "Lexicon" * * LEXICON " Then I will pour out (Strong's Hebrew8210 meaning- to spill forth, to expend) on ( Strong's Hebrew5921 meaning- above, over, upon, against) the house (Strong's Hebrew1004 meaning- a house) of David (Strong's Hebrew1732 meaning- perhaps beloved one, a son of Jesse) and on ( Strong's Hebrew5921meaning- above ,over, upon, against) the residents ( Strong's Hebrew3427 meaning- to sit down, to dwell, to settle , to marry) of Jerusalem ( Strong's Hebrew meaning- probably foundation of peace, capital city of Israel) a spirit ( Strong's Hebrew7307 meaning- wind, breath,exhalation, life, anger, unsubstantiality, a region of the sky,spirit) of grace (Strong's Hebrew2580 meaning- graciousness....) and prayer (Strong's Hebrew8469 meaning- supplication for favor) and they will look (Strong's Hebrew5027 meaning- to scan , look intently at, to regard) -ON ME, (Strong's Hebrew413 meaning- near, with, among, to ) -THE ONE (Strong's Hebrew meaning- who ,which, what, that, when, where, how ,because, in order that) -they have pierced. (Strong's Hebrew1856 meaning- to stab , to starve , to revile). They will mourn (Strong's Hebrew 5594 meaning- to tear the hair and beat the breast, to lament, to wail) for Him (Strong's Hebrew 5921 meaning- above over upon against) as one mourns (Strong's Hebrew 5594 meaning- to lament, to wail..) an only child (Strong's Hebrew3173 meaning- united, sole ,beloved, lonely, the life) and weep bitterly (Strong's Hebrew4843 meaning- to be, bitter) for him (Strong's Hebrew 5921 meaning- .. as one grieves (Strong's Hebrew 4843 meaning- to be, bitter) a firstborn (Strong's Hebrew1060- meaning- firstborn, chief). * Hebrew's "On Me" meaning Near, With, Among, TO. Therefore "look at the one", see the one" ( CEV, GNT, NWT & RSV ) are even more AUTHENTIC than the deceptive fraud of KJV. |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 3:21pm On May 23, 2019 |
Barristter07:I hope you know that most old testament Prophecies are POETIC. Zechariah was delivering his message in poetic form. Hence, you needn't change the original text from what it is saying to something else. Changing "on me" to "on him" is robbery! The "Me" is the "Him"! If it was meant to be "on Him" why didn't the Hebrew writer put it in exactly the form you desire? |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Emusan(m): 3:29pm On May 23, 2019 |
Barristter07: So to you adding the word OTHER in those verses didn't change the narration and the intended point of the original writer.... Wasn't the word OTHER added to place Jesus as second created being If other translations do it, it's to support their false doctrine but if JWs does it, it's justified and right! Hypocrisy and JWs are 5&6 |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Emusan(m): 3:35pm On May 23, 2019 |
Barristter07: Are you saying Zec 12:10 isn't talking about Jesus Christ or what is your point exactly? |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Janosky: 3:42pm On May 23, 2019 |
shadeyinka: Go and learn , rather than grasp straws, making baseless rants built on falsehood. " ON ME" in Hebrew, what is the meaning? https://biblehub.com/zechariah/12-10.htm *Lexicon " On me" - Strong's Hebrew413, meaning- "Near, With, Among, To" Look TO the one (Strong's Hebrew 843 " the one " meaning who, which, what, that, when, where, how, because)" they have pierced. |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Janosky: 4:30pm On May 23, 2019 |
shadeyinka5: https://biblehub.com/text/acts/ 12-22.htm "And the people were crying out, Of (theou) a god (this is the) voice, and not of a man" Mr man, explain to us why your KJV was never consistent in it's rendition of Greek 'theou' everywhere in your KJV Bible? How did indefinite article ('a') find it's way into the KJV when it does not even exist in any koine Greek or Bible manuscript ? Does not "a" change the narrative at Acts 12:22 whereas "a" was not placed before 'theou' elsewhere? Isn't it sinister? cc: Emusan |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Janosky: 4:42pm On May 23, 2019 |
Emusan: Janosky:Oga Emusan , So, what's the intended point of adding the word "a" before 'theou' @ Acts12;22? |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Emusan(m): 5:42pm On May 23, 2019 |
Janosky: Do you now agree that NWT did the same thing you people are always accused other translations for? That's the point.... But you will castigate others translations but trying to justify the reason why NWT did it and never the reason why other did it.... Hypocrite! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 5:49pm On May 23, 2019 |
Barristter07:First who are these people: A great multitude who came out of the great tribulation (tribulation on earth) but where are they? (Where did John see them?) Rev 7:14-15,17: "And I said to him, Sir, you know. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve him day and night in his temple: and he that sits on the throne shall dwell among them. … For the Lamb which is in the middle of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them to living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes." Where is the throne of God? |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 6:20pm On May 23, 2019 |
Barristter07: Let me first address 1Pt @bolded! I will copy an extended version as you never seem to read the bible in context. 1Pet 3:18-20: "For Christ also has once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: By which also he went and preached to the spirits in prison; Which sometime were disobedient, when once the long-suffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water." 1Pet 4:5-6: Who shall give account to him that is ready to judge the quick and the dead. For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead , that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit." Is your conclusion still that ? Jesus was put to death in the body and rose as a body 1. If Jesus rose as a Spirit why did he say "do not touch me.." John 20:17: "Jesus said to her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brothers, and say to them, I ascend to my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God." 2. If Jesus rose as a spirit, how could he be touched? John 20:27: "Then said he to Thomas, Reach here your finger, and behold my hands; and reach here your hand, and thrust it into my side: [/b]and be not faithless, but believing." 3. If Jesus rose as a Spirit, how could he eat? [b]Luk 24:40-43: "And when he had thus spoken, he showed them his hands and his feet. And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said to them, Have you here any meat? And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. And he took it, and did eat before them." Can you see your false theology? The rest of your post isn't worth a response! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 6:23pm On May 23, 2019 |
Maximus69:All these is just stories that has been used to brainwash you. It holds nothing of value. I presented facts and evidences in form of links and screen shots and the best you have is a history of your organisation! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 6:32pm On May 23, 2019 |
Maximus69:I didn't just call it "misinformation" I called it a "Deliberate misinformation". One is forgivable, the other is not! 2Tim 3:16: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:" But since your organisation doubt the inspiration, the assumed upon themselves the power to CHANGE the word into what the want it to say. In the Jehovah's Witness "Hebrew" and "Greek" bibles, do you also insert WORDs to make it say what you want? If a Jew or an Italian were to read your own NW Hebrew/Greek Bible, what would they read? The bolded is food for thought! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 6:34pm On May 23, 2019 |
Barristter07:What does the Hebrew text say? What does the Greek text say? Would you also insert WORDs so that the Jew would be decieved? |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 6:37pm On May 23, 2019 |
Janosky:Please do! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 6:45pm On May 23, 2019 |
Janosky:Honestly, I don't know what your noise is about. The way to use Strongs Hebrew-Greek to English Word concordance is to pick the Hebrew or Greek word of interest, then Look at the various shades of meanings it could have (without looking at the context) Your troubles is ON ME that you translated as ON HIM It's easy, go back to the Strongs and verify which is the closest meaning. |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 6:53pm On May 23, 2019 |
Janosky: Have you used Strongs before? Check the attached! Do you think you are referring to the same word? "Constitute" and "Constitution" look similar but are they not Different?
|
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Nobody: 6:55pm On May 23, 2019 |
shadeyinka:There are lots and lots of our JW brothers and Sisters who are Jews and Italians by birth, all of us are UNITEDLY using the NWT of the holy scriptures and what's more? They're zealously preaching and teaching in their lands and using their languages! So i don't know what caused this headache for you a black African and Nigerian for that matter furiously arguing when the owners of both languages did not stand up to refute the NW translation of JWs! Abeg get to WORK! Jews and Italians can SEE the WORKS of FAITH, they BOW to the WISDOM from above so your agitation is FUTILE! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Nobody: 7:07pm On May 23, 2019 |
shadeyinka:GET TO WORK Sir! There is no sense in arguing over this. You claim to be a professional baker but your produce is nothing to write home about, even within your locality you can't confidently vouch for your products yet you're agitating,criticizing and antagonizing another baker over the use of flour and other igredients, baking pan, oven and the workers while his products is the fastest and best selling globally! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 7:10pm On May 23, 2019 |
Janosky: Very simple: Have you checked the NWT of the same passage. Why didn't they use "Jehovah" for "a god"? Act12:22 (NWT) 22 Then the people who were assembled began shouting: “A god’s voice, and not a man’s!” How did indefinite article ('a') find it's way into the NWT when it does not even exist in any koine Greek or Bible manuscript ? In the Greek culture, even though theou was used, it wasn't refering to Jehovah. Was it? Is there a Doctrine that is being protected? No ulterior motive! Unlike yours, we know why you do what you do! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 7:20pm On May 23, 2019 |
Maximus69:When a man is Hypnotized, he can be made to see black as white. It's not surprising. But, did you insert WORDs or change the Hebrew and Greek where it's appropriate for your Doctrine too? |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 7:21pm On May 23, 2019 |
Maximus69:The thrashing of a drowning man! |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Janosky: 7:38pm On May 23, 2019 |
Emusan: Greek 'theou', 'theos', 'theon' meaning "Gods", "God", "god", "gods , lower case or upper case is not significant. I already know that Acts12:22 NWT, reads 'a god', I'm a Bible student, all JWs are. The reasons the Greek grammar construct justified "a" before 'theou' @ Acts12:22 is the same reasons John 1:1 MUST have "a" because Greek John 1:1b- 'the Word was with the God', shows that the Word is not the God, they are different beings. More so, Jesus says He is God's son and God's sons are gods. The son of God is a god. John 10:34-36. " The scriptures can not be broken" Lying Pharisee and hypocrites like Emusan and shadeyinka are too blind to see it. |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Nobody: 7:38pm On May 23, 2019 |
shadeyinka:DROWNING MAN that is WORKING out the fine QUALITIES of God's holy spirit! Well it is just simple, the so called drowning man is saying 'get to work so that observers can SEE your swimming skills that qualifies you to help those DROWNING!' |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Nobody: 7:45pm On May 23, 2019 |
shadeyinka:So if the GB of Jehovah's Witnesses are so skilled to the extent of HYPNOTIZING the Jews and Greeks whose languages were used to write the Bible, making them lovers of other HYPNOTIZED races as their own blood brothers and sisters, yet you and your folks who aren't under their SPELLS couldn't even unite in thoughts! What do you think you can say to prove that their HYPNOTISM is not BENEFITING the HYPNOTIZED? John 13:34-35 |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Nobody: 8:09pm On May 23, 2019 |
Janosky:Oh Janosky! You're just given them what is holy! Matthew 7:6 Instead of tormenting them with their own weapons [ denial of facts and realities] They will never learn the truth as long as it could be found ONLY with the JWs, so let them GET TO WORK and make use of the TRUTH they think they're having! After all TRUTH has the powers to unite people in thoughts after reproving, correcting with worthy doctrines! 2Timothy 3:16 But if they're not united in thoughts then what is their problem with JWs who simply hold a different thought? Are they also not having different thoughts? So why focusing only on the JWs, if not that they're all hypocrites? Please tell them to GET TO WORK so that honesthearted observers could SEE their fine qualities as they're able to MAKE PEACE within different races just as JWs have succeeded in doing! Isaiah 2:2-4 , Micah 4:1-3 |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 8:35pm On May 23, 2019 |
Maximus69:If you know just a little about Hypnosis, you'll know that it's not a race thing. |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by shadeyinka(m): 8:36pm On May 23, 2019 |
Maximus69:Tata tat tat Ra!?? |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Emusan(m): 8:43pm On May 23, 2019 |
Janosky: You're just attacking a straw man. My post to your brother is about Col 1:16-17 which he agreed the word OTHER was added for emphasis. But look how foolish you change the whole point of discussion and begin to beat about the bush. Notice what you're doing here, you're telling us reason why a word can be inserted. I have asked you before, so do you think other translations can justify the reason they also added some words into their own translations? It is so stupid to think JWs are the only one who have right to defend insertion into their translation and also hypocrisy to accuse someone of what you yourself is doing. The other day, you said to promote Trinity the translator of KJV fraudulently inserted the word GOD in 1 Tim 3:16 Your reason: The word GOD doesn't appear in the original manuscript. But when I pointed you to Acts 20:28 where your own organization inserted the word SON which doesn't appear in the original manuscript to promote their own devilish doctrine, your tune changed! What did you do? You didn't see it as a fraudulent act and way of promoting watchtower doctrine but you were roaming about trying to justify why watchtower did so...which you couldn't do with the same KJV.....Hypocrite! Lastly, it's evident that NWT translator intentionally and fraudulently inserted words into their own translation to promote their own devilish doctrines. The reasons the Greek grammar construct justified "a" before 'theou' @ Acts12:22 is the same reasons John 1:1 MUST have "a" because Greek John 1:1b- 'the Word was with the God', shows that the Word is not the God, they are different beings. Since you agree with Greek grammar construct here If you're such an honest being, kindly shows us how the Greek grammar construct justified OTHER in between ALL THINGS in Colossians 1 I know you'll begin to sing another song now. |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Jozzy4: 2:12am On May 24, 2019 |
malvisguy212: Lol, so let me get you clearly ... Are you saying Jesus =Angel ? |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Jozzy4: 2:14am On May 24, 2019 |
alBHAGDADI: Angel is Angel o Are you saying Jesus = Angel ? I must bookmark this thread |
Re: Discussion on Doctrine between a Christian and a Jehovah's Witness by Jozzy4: 2:16am On May 24, 2019 |
Maximus69: |
(1) (2) (3) ... (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) ... (77) (Reply)
Apostle Suleman Reacts To Snapchat Photos With Stephanie Oboto / Osole Owo Aye (money Ritual To See Money To Live Life) / T.B Joshua: Pastor Adeboye's Condolence Letter To Evelyn Joshua
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 150 |