lolz

Sagamite:

You are reetarded!

You said it is an uncountable noun hence un-pluralizable, and I am the one that goofed despite correcting your daft arse? 

Unbaked cretin! How can a moooron recognise intellect?

And, for the record, it is spelt begin[b]n[/b]ing, fooooooooooooooool!

Your intellect will only mean something to a stone-age daft, you archetypal mor0n.

Are you not the slimy, ordure-eating sewer-rat that said ". . . Foods beings transported"?

sinistyle:

Your intellect will only mean something to a stone-age daft, you archetypal mor0n.

Are you not the slimy, ordure-eating sewer-rat that said ". . . Foods beings transported"?

Reetard, yes, I said foods were being transported, how did your reetarded, unbaked arse decide so mooronically confidently that food is an uncountable noun?

Sagamite:

Reetard, yes, I said foods were being transported, how did your reetarded, unbaked arse decide so mooronically confidently that food is an uncountable noun?

How many times do you want me to explain this?
Yes, I said food is uncountable and cannot be pluralized but then, you had pluralized food wrongly I was only correcting you. If you hadn't made a mistake I wouldn't have said that. I should be getting a thank you, you ungrateful schmuck. Is it my fault that you were busy w@nking when English Language was being taught in your underfunded public high school?

http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/food

In those cases where you can pluralize food, it can also be left as singular.

sinistyle:

How many times do you want me to explain this?
Yes, I said food is uncountable and cannot be pluralized but then,

Since food is countable and pluralizable and you stated the qoted in an attempt to correct someone that is better educated than you and is your God in thinking, you were reetarded for saying it is uncountable and cannot be pluralized?

Sagamite:

Since food is countable and pluralizable and you stated the qoted in an attempt to correct someone that is better educated than you and is your God in thinking

You're not even ashamed to declare yourself a god in thinking when you can't even spell right.

Daft arse, it's spelt q[b]u[/b]oted, by the way.

Sagamite:

you were reetarded for saying it is uncountable and cannot be pluralized?

and you are and will forever be not-so-smart.
Airhead, you still don't know the difference between 'were' and 'are'.

sinistyle:

You're not even ashamed to declare yourself a god in thinking when you can't even spell right.

Daft arse, it's spelt q[b]u[/b]oted, by the way.

Mooron, what has spelling typo got to do with thinking?

You want me to bring the definitation for "thinking" for you, dimwit? 

sinistyle:

and you are and will forever be not-so-smart.
Airhead, you still don't know the difference between 'were' and 'are'.

Reetard!!! LWKMD 

Stop trying to correct grammar! You are too dumb.

I was referring to a historic statement and when you made the statement, hence used "were".

But if you insist that I must acknowledge you "are" still reetarded, then that is the most intelligent thing I have ever seen you contribute. 

Dumbo! 

Sagamite:



Mooron, what has spelling typo got to do with thinking?

You want me to bring the definitation for "thinking" for you, dimwit? 

Another post, another groundbreaking blunder.

Now, I don't expect you to know what it means to think. I mean you slow-apes don't think, do y'all?


You intelligence deficient thing, it's definition of and not the nonsense you posted. You could do away with your devil forsaken accent, you know.

Sagamite:







Reetard!!! LWKMD 

Stop trying to correct grammar! You are too dumb.

I was referring to a historic statement and when you made the statement, hence used "were".

But if you insist that I must acknowledge you "are" still reetarded, then that is the most intelligent thing I have ever seen you contribute. 

Dumbo! 

Inane excuses. Your dumb arse was trying to diss and you missed. Notwithstanding, I was generous enough to correct to your daft arse.

Do you think I'm all about intellectually pummelling you? I really do want to impart some knowledge into your empty head, fo - ol

sinistyle:

Another post, another groundbreaking blunder.

Now, I don't expect you to know what it means to think. I mean you slow-apes don't think, do y'all?


You intelligence deficient thing, it's definition of and not the nonsense you posted. You could do away with your devil forsaken accent, you know.




Inane excuses. Your dumb arse was trying to diss and you missed. Notwithstanding, I was generous enough to correct to your daft arse.

Do you think I'm all about intellectually pummelling you? I really do want to impart some knowledge into your empty head, fo - ol

Reetard, what kind of grammar is that?

Sagamite:

Reetard, what kind of grammar is that?

It's a sagamite-esque kind of grammar.

PS: I checked your profile and I saw your picture Shouldn't you have a license for being that ugly?

Yet! Another thread colonized by Sagamite.

sinistyle:

It's a sagamite-esque kind of grammar.

PS: I checked your profile and I saw your picture Shouldn't you have a license for being that ugly?

You are reetarded!

Never in your life try and correct your God's grammar.

sinistyle:

It's a sagamite-esque kind of grammar.

PS: I checked your profile and I saw your picture Shouldn't you have a license for being that ugly?

No, but this is wicked

sinistyle:

It's a sagamite-esque kind of grammar.

PS: I checked your profile and I saw your picture [b]Shouldn't you have a license for being that ugly?[/b]

now dats gangsta