NJPot:


Useless man. Face your state. Leave Imo State alone. Ihedioha is our governor.

ihedioha didn't even win that election... he failed to meet the statutory 2/3rd requirements... the best decision for me would have been a new Election... while for bayelsa the deputy governor should be substituted

yarimo:
They should focus on bayelsa state judgement and live imo state alone. Wallahi it shall never be well with justice ODILI

Shut up...

Must you be partizan even in ur grave

Shame on you

yarimo:
They should focus on bayelsa state judgement and live imo state alone. Wallahi it shall never be well with justice ODILI

It's leave and not live friend! Justice odili is a made woman. The question is are you a made man?

yarimo:
They should focus on bayelsa state judgement and live imo state alone. Wallahi it shall never be well with justice ODILI

are you God?......let's see how your end will be.....f.ool

I bet one tyre of my only surviving car that local citizens know not how joy is rumbling ups n downs within the walls of my members reading this hopeful epistle.Most worthy of note is that the eagle eye of international electoral observers have zoomed so closely on Buhari,Native doctor Cjn Tanko,APC,Hopeless Uzo,father mbaka et all.
My reason of confidence is not cos of the fellow Nigerian likes Soyinka, pat utomi,falana,abdusalami et all as independent observers,nope,cos we have records of their fraudulent Integrity antedences cos of spoon of Jacob's red porridge,its possible then will,like Oliiver Twist ask for more red porridge .
Back to my interest.
Having international observers present to monitor the review of the IMO electoral judgment,I am under coconut tree,sipping kunu as my lord lugard radio is tuned to catch the news report from IMO state.
I must comment the leadership of PDP for their never use the gun strategy to pursure this pained matter,we all shall be happy in the end.
BTW
Learn how to drive very well so you can be relevant any where any time in terms of life and job opportunities see our contact below.

Buhari has infected the judiciary with his incompetence...anything he touches he messes up...puah!

janefblog:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailypost.ng/2020/02/17/uzodimma-vs-ihedioha-wole-soyinka-gen-abdulsalami-abubakar-others-to-monitor-supreme-court-imo-judgement-review/amp/

All of you are selfishly talking about these two states and nobody is talking about Zamfara State where the most landmark judgement will be recorded today?

Marafa is everywhere around CBD and I fear if Zamfara will be returned to him by the Supreme Court.

vikithor:
I bet one tyre of my only surviving car that local citizens know not how joy is rumbling ups n downs within the walls of my members reading this hopeful epistle.Most worthy of note is that the eagle eye of international electoral observers have zoomed so closely on Buhari,Native doctor Cjn Tanko,APC,Hopeless Uzo,father mbaka et all.
My reason of confidence is not cos of the fellow Nigerian likes Soyinka, pat utomi,falana,abdusalami et all as independent observers,nope,cos we have records of their fraudulent Integrity antedences cos of spoon of Jacob's red porridge,its possible then will,like Oliiver Twist ask for more red porridge .
Back to my interest.
Having international observers present to monitor the review of the IMO electoral judgment,I am under coconut tree,sipping kunu as my lord lugard radio is tuned to catch the news report from IMO state.
I must comment the leadership of PDP for their never use the gun strategy to pursure this pained matter,we all shall be happy in the end.
BTW
Learn how to drive very well so you can be relevant any where any time in terms of life and job opportunities see our contact below.

The best that can happen to PDP is a rerun that they will stand no chance of winning.

yarimo:
They should focus on bayelsa state judgement and live imo state alone. Wallahi it shall never be well with justice ODILI

Why won't it be well with her?

[s]

SangoOlukosoOba:


Have you had breakfast.

[/s]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRcDvCj_JPs

Bigflamie:
And who cares about that good for nothing Abdulsalami.

Supreme court judges and all their accomplices are under immense pressure to reverse that fraudulent ruling or they risk severe international sanctions. They are in panic hence the review of the judgement.

International sanctions...lol

[s]

SangoOlukosoOba:
Ihedioha just wasting his new loots.

He can never be reinstated.

Dude should just use his loots to invest in Agriculture.

Fish farming or Pigery.

His lawyers will ruin him just like they finished Atiku that he could even no longer pay workers again.

[/s]

Caseless:
can that change anything?
ATIKU monitored his own case at the supreme court, did that make him the winner?

I wonder o! Or they are going there to scare those justices! PDP and their detractor are in funny mode!

I see election conducted in Imo . At the end, PDP will emerged. For Bayelsa State, APC should go and strategize ahead of 2023

contigiency:
There will be a rerun in IMO and bayelsa States.

How can there be a rerun in Bayelaa when the deputy was indicted for multiple names/forged/false certificate?

That alone has disqualified the governor and deputy from rerun because during rerun yoi cannot change your running mate.
And when your running mate has been indicted like that
You have disqualified yourself.

I took my time to explain it so it will sink into your head

janefblog:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailypost.ng/2020/02/17/uzodimma-vs-ihedioha-wole-soyinka-gen-abdulsalami-abubakar-others-to-monitor-supreme-court-imo-judgement-review/amp/

A NATION Supreme Court NEED Monitoring

kutashi:


I wonder o! Or they are going there to scare those justices! PDP and their detractor are in funny mode!

don't mind them.

yarimo:
They should focus on bayelsa state judgement and live imo state alone. Wallahi it shall never be well with justice ODILI

they should focus on the clear one to up turn it then leave the unclear one the way it is ...... You see why it will never be well with lovers of backwardness

OGHENAOGIE:
ihedioha didn't even win that election... he failed to meet the statutory 2/3rd requirements... the best decision for me would have been a new Election... while for bayelsa the deputy governor should be substituted

Even with the so called total valid votes which the Apex Court based its ruling which however exceeded the total accredited voters by INEC, Senator Hope Uzodinma did not also fulfill the constitutional requirements for a validly elected governor of the state, having failed to score at least one-quarter of the votes cast in each of the at least two-thirds of all the local government areas in the state.

Secondly, the same Supreme court said Uche Nwosu was the real APC candidate and his petition was withdrawn on the basis that he has both AA and APC as the governorship candidates. This means that Hope Uzodimma is the governorship candidate of no party. How can he be governor without party.
Therefore, Uche Nwosu and Hope Uzodimma never contested election in the face of the law. The case is now between Ihedioha and Ararume. The statutory 2/3rd requirements would be met by Ihedioha since Uche Nwosu and Hope Uzodimma is out of the way.

Even if the Imo election is cancelled, the rerun would be between Ihedioha and Ararume. Even Ararume's method of emergence as the APGA candidate is also wrong in the face of the Nigerian constitution. So, if the supreme court wants to redeem their image, all they need to do is to declare Ihedioha winner and sentence Hope to life imprisonment for forgery and deceiving the elites.

EagleNest:
Supreme Court is in a very tight corner caused by itself.

KIDS FORGET ABOUT IT

SHIT IS ALREADY DONE

APC GETS IMO STATE

DexterousOne:


How can there be a rerun in Bayelaa when the deputy was indicted for multiple names/forged/false certificate?

That alone has disqualified the governor and deputy from rerun because during rerun yoi cannot change your running mate.
And when your running mate has been indicted like that
You have disqualified yourself.

I took my time to explain it so it will sink into your head

senior man you wasted your time.... Zombies only choose to understand things in opposite form that's why they are called zombies.... They want a review for a very clear judgement ...

yarimo:
They should focus on bayelsa state judgement and live imo state alone. Wallahi it shall never be well with justice ODILI

And your father too idiot....Is it Justice Odili that told your stupid and myopic deputy governor elect to present forged certificates

The Bible tells us that "the affliction shall not rise up the second time."
This review is all about waking up this man's affliction for the second time.
They should've leave this man's wound that is gradually healing to heal completely.
Now, they want to bruise the wound again to make it fresh.

Supreme Court will never review this case. They will throw away this case. If they eventually agree to review this case, know it they have messed themselves up. It will then encourage ppl (mostly politicians) to seek for review of a case that the Supreme Court has already decided.

They will refuse to review it not that they don't know that the decision was a total mess, but because they want to discourage people easily seeking for a Supreme Court case review. That will make the Supreme Court to lose her Supremacy.

jaxxy:
I have never seen pdp reverse it's judgement when in power tho

this kind of judgement with all manners of illogical loopholes.??...

Mires:
I see election conducted in Imo . At the end, PDP will emerged. For Bayelsa State, APC should go and strategize ahead of 2023

Thank you so much for your relevant comment.This is the bitter truth that much be told.

Perfect. Let them be there. God bless those that stand by the truth.

Thus that matter! Or is Soyinka and Abdulsalam,who are PDP sympathisers, African chief judges?

yarimo:
They should focus on bayelsa state judgement and live imo state alone. Wallahi it shall never be well with justice ODILI

Abeg stop this nonsense else thunder will strike you real hard. What has she done wrong? or for calling black, black. People like you are those killing this country future,.enemies of divine progress.

yarimo:
They should focus on bayelsa state judgement and live imo state alone. Wallahi it shall never be well with justice ODILI

you will die a painful death in the hands of the in justice you are supporting today

Biafrarep:
Last Las, they will return Imo to PDP and give back Bayelsa to APC

But the cases are not comparable. Disqualifications, as in Bayelsa, are common in politics. Imo, on the other hand, is not like any other SC judgment in recent memory. In Imo the Supreme Court, in broad daylight, unabashedly aided clear fraud and rigging that even an elementary school kid can see is rigging.
——————————————————

This is from YESTERDAY’S paper.
Note the bolded

That Supreme Court Magic Judgment
This Day (Lagos) 17 FEBRUARY 2020

... According to summary of trial materials, no ward collation agent was called to show that at the collation center results were brought from the 388 polling units where the alleged exclusion took place...

The petitioner, rather called 28 polling unit agents who came to identify some of the results tendered by the petitioner from the bar. All the electoral documents were tendered from the bar and thus dumped on the court without anybody giving evidence correlating the contents of the result forms with the tabulation done by the petitioner himself.

Each of the 18 polling unit agents under cross-examination, manifested ignorance of the contents of the documents and never convinced anybody of being present in their claimed polling units...

When confronted with the purported result sheets tendered by the petitioners, each of the witnesses admitted as follows:
i. The names and signatures of the Presiding Officers are not well found on those results.
ii. The names and signatures of other party agents did not appear on the result sheets, neither could they mention even one party agent of the other political parties in those booths.
iii. The result sheets do not contain the total number of ballot papers used and number of ballot papers unused or invalid. The scores of political parties are not clear on the face of the documents.

Based on the above, it appears the Supreme Court was desperately working to an answer in favour of the ruling party... and the only opening to do that was to accept the fictitious results of the 388 polling units willy-nilly. And instead of doing substantial justice on the matter, it ended up delivering one of judiciary's greatest infamies which even a kid learning arithmetic can see through. The judgment turned logic on its head, rewrote the basic universal laws of arithmetic and did grave and substantial injury to our democracy and the power of the people to choose who governs them. With this judicial precedent, the Supreme Court has inevitably rubber-stamped political rascality and the judgment could shape our democratic future.

The court has widened the opening which politicians exploit and manipulate to get into elective offices. All one needs to do is to stay somewhere, maybe in one's room, probably with one policeman or so, write one's own results, submit to INEC for counting and if it refuses, don't worry, bid your time till you get to the court. With supreme arrogance, the final court of appeal will recognise the results as legitimate, credible and authentic and pronto, you will be declared duly elected.

...Even more perplexing was the fact that in some of the polling units, voter turnout was more than the registered voters. How is this possible?
In Uzodinma's result sheets, there was no voided vote and only two parties, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and APC participated and were reflected in the election results of the 388 polling units. Yet, 70 political parties participated in that election and were all reflected in the INEC declared results of other polling units all over the state. ..,Does it mean that other parties such as All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), Action Alliance (AA), etc., did not participate in the election in those 388 polling units contrary to INEC's results in other areas of the state?
Why did the result sheets reflect only two parties when so many parties participated in the said election? Apparently, Senator Uzodinma concocted those results that fly in the face of the basic laws of arithmetic and common sense between the PDP and the APC after the fact that the PDP had won the election and he only scored his party a vote figure higher than the PDP vote. The corollary to that is that if it was any other party that was on the cusp of victory, Uzodinma's results would have been between just the APC and that party! Yet our almighty Supreme Court glossed over all these fundamental anomalies in Uzodinma's result sheets which had been rejected by even INEC... and accepted same as authentic.
A further assessment of the result sheets of the disputed 388 polling units showed that the said units are all in the Orlu Senatorial Zone where Uzodinma and the candidate of the Action Alliance Ugwumba Uche Nwosu come from. So even if the 388 polling units were concentrated mostly in Uzodinma's ancestral home, surely, Nwosu who emerged second in the March 9, 2019 election in Imo State and was backed by the incumbent governor at the time, Rochas Okorocha, his father in-law, must have amassed some votes from the units. But these votes were curiously missing, for the simple reason that they forged the results, and very badly at that.
Furthermore, Uzodinma of the APC scored an average of 98% of the total votes cast in the 388 units, whereas he scored an average of 13% in the remaining polling units in the state. How could this be? Why was it that it was only in these 388 units throughout the state that the voter turnout was either more than the registered voters or achieved 98 to 100 percent of the registered voters? Please note that emphasis is NOT on the number of accredited voters which is usually far less than the number of registered voters. Uzodinma's fake results validated by our Supreme Court defy reason. The pattern of the results from the disputed 388 polling units clearly shows the improbability of such an occurrence. And on the basis of the testimony of one policeman, and 28 discredited polling units' agents who gave contradictory statements at trial, the Supreme Court accepted the results.

In declaring Uzodinma governor of Imo State, the Supreme Court simply annulled a valid mandate freely given to an individual and transferred it to another person who came fourth in the election.