My neighbours 8 year old daughter happens to be their neighbours daughter after catering for her school fees in a private school in lagos, Travelling to different countries.

"At that moment, a child that is already grow and you don't know that..you mean if I later know that.. I mean, if I notices that I am not the one that born.. I mean if I notice that my wife born but born later notices that you are not my father.. I mean that I am not my father?

It'll be hard for me to handle the situation."

Hmmmmm as for my wife, i'll tell her to leave before i get to d house but d resultant effect if she dares me will be disastrous that people will ask her 'did he ask you to leave'? As for d child, if she's so dear to me, i will father her.

dunno

DNA test is compulsory for me

I don't trust women again

NOTHING

To the child, nothing changes ever.

I'll do a thorough investigation to find out what really happened at childbirth if she insists she knows nothing about it like most of them do these days.
Sometimes, women are not to be blamed because some idiotic nurses intentionally or carelessly make this costly mistake at hospitals after delivery.

After my investigation, if my wife is not guilty of the situation, again nothing changes but if she is, divorce.

8years is too long to be this foolish.

Every man is supposed to do DNA tests within the first two years, and if he don't match...then he ought to tell his whorë of a wife to take the child to the father or better still, move in with the man responsible.

There's no sensible reason for any woman to remain married to a man whom she gave the product of her infidelity to raise as his own, none at all.

It's an abomination.

crackkhaus:
8years is too long to be this foolish.

Every man is supposed to do DNA tests within the first two years, and if he don't match...then he ought to tell his whorë of a wife to take the child to the father or better still, move in with the man responsible.

There's no sensible reason for any woman to remain married to a man whom she gave the product of her infidelity to raise as his own, none at all.

It's an abomination.

The 'Every man is supposed to do DNA' test is where there is trust issue. If there's no reason to suspect the spouse, there's no reason to doubt the paternity of the child.

But I get what you're saying. No one deserves to be lied to and used like that. Even if it was done to save face and hide the man's impotency, still, he has to know immediately the child is born.


The type of marriage issues we have today makes it worrisome for the singles. God help us ooh.

Sixfeetbelle:

The 'Every man is supposed to do DNA' test is where there is trust issue. If there's no reason to suspect the spouse, there's no reason to doubt the paternity of the child.

But I get what you're saying. No one deserves to be lied to and used like that. Even if it was done to save face and hide the man's impotency, still, he has to know immediately the child is born.


The type of marriage issues we have today makes it worrisome for the singles. God help us ooh.

Trust issues and suspicions of infidelity aside, every woman should also insist on having DNA tests on their children for their own sake as well..

Switching babies is also common, so I heard.

crackkhaus:

Trust issues and suspicions of infidelity aside, every woman should also insist on having DNA tests on their children for their own sake as well..

Switching babies is also common, so I heard.

I see what you did here...

You're throwing a similar comment I made sometime ago back at me. Clever you.

crackkhaus:
8years is too long to be this foolish.

Every man is supposed to do DNA tests within the first two years, and if he don't match...then he ought to tell his whorë of a wife to take the child to the father or better still, move in with the man responsible.

There's no sensible reason for any woman to remain married to a man whom she gave the product of her infidelity to raise as his own, none at all.

It's an abomination.

Immediately the child is born before signing on that child's birth certificate. Nothing like within the first two years... In the western world, once pended signature on the birth certificate before checking DNA and it turns out its not your child, you will pay alimony once divorced.

chatinent:
"At that moment, you mean if I later know that.. I mean, if I notices that I am not the one that born.. I mean, my wife born but born later notices that I am not my father?
It'll be hard for me to handle the situation."

Lol! I remember that guy on the video. The question confuse am no be small

elektra:


Lol! I remember that guy on the video. The question confuse am no be small

That video made my month the era I watched it first.

Omar09:

Immediately the child is born before signing on that child's birth certificate. Nothing like within the first two years... In the western world, once pended signature on the birth certificate before checking DNA and it turns out its not your child, you will pay alimony once divorced.

Lol... Splendid.

Sixfeetbelle:

I see what you did here...

You're throwing a similar comment I made sometime ago back at me. Clever you.

I learn quickly

Obviously send her out with her kid. The fund stops immediately.

Sixfeetbelle:


The 'Every man is supposed to do DNA' test is where there is trust issue. If there's no reason to suspect the spouse, there's no reason to doubt the paternity of the child.

But I get what you're saying. No one deserves to be lied to and used like that. Even if it was done to save face and hide the man's impotency, still, he has to know immediately the child is born.


The type of marriage issues we have today makes it worrisome for the singles. God help us ooh.

As long as a woman is involved, there will always be trust issues. No woman is 100% trustworthy. So forget about your guilt tripping men into not doing a DNA test.

That is why you should be present during your kids delivery.
Claiming wise when you clearly lack it. You leave a half conscious woman at the mercy of the nurses who may have ulterior motives for your newborn or your aged mother whose eyes may be weak to spot the diff in newborns.

Swapping and mistakes happen especially in crowded hospitals which means you shld be present. Examine your child very well before they dress him/her up.
My husband doesn't stay in the labor room because of fear but is always the person to rec eive all my children.

If you are the type that deliberately disappears when ur wife's Edd is close or form travel, I have no pity for you if such happens to you.

ALOT of women have been labeled cheats cos of it.

For women that clearly cheated, I have no word to say.

RisenPhoenix:


As long as a woman is involved, there will always be trust issues. No woman is 100% trustworthy. So forget about your guilt tripping men into not doing a DNA test.

As long as a man is involved, there will always be trust issues. No man is 100% trustworthy. Every woman should ensure a monthly Std/HIV/AIDS tests. You never know where your spouse is sticking his dick.

Sixfeetbelle:


As long as a man is involved, there will always be trust issues. No man is 100% trustworthy. Every woman should ensure a monthly Std/HIV/AIDS tests. You never know where your spouse is sticking his dick.

I have no issue with that if the woman wishes it. It could even be a good precaution on her part. But apart from disease, a man's being unfaithful should not concern the wife in any way; unlike the converse where the man is unknowingly forced to pay for the upkeep of progeny sired by another; and maybe still exposed to infections as well.

RisenPhoenix:


I have no issue with that if the woman wishes it. It could even be a good precaution on her part. But apart from disease, a man's being unfaithful should not concern the wife in any way; unlike the converse where the man is unknowingly forced to pay for the upkeep of progeny sired by another; and maybe still exposed to infections as well.

I don't understand some people's reasoning sometimes.

Why should a man's unfaithfulness not concern the wife? Is she a painting in his house? When karma comes knocking, will it spare her? Asides that, whatever happened to marital vows to make the marriage bed undefiled?

Talking about progeny, how would he be infected by taking care of another man's child?

Sixfeetbelle:

I don't understand some people's reasoning sometimes.

Why should a man's unfaithfulness not concern the wife? Is she a painting in his house? When karma comes knocking, will it spare her? Asides that, whatever happened to marital vows to make the marriage bed undefiled?

Talking about progeny, how would he be infected by taking care of another man's child?

See question...

Brothers, DNA is a must ...abeg

I can't shout

crackkhaus:

See question...

Brothers, DNA is a must ...abeg

I can't shout

The post wasn't meant for you, though. I wanted the original commentator to answer my question about the man's unfaithfulness not being his wife's concern.

If DNA is a must, women should also do testing on every child the man is friendly with, no matter the connection.

Sixfeetbelle:

The post wasn't meant for you, though. I wanted the original commentator to answer my question about the man's unfaithfulness not being his wife's concern.

If DNA is a must, women should also do testing on every child the man is friendly with, no matter the connection.

No problem...

Sixfeetbelle:



I don't understand some people's reasoning sometimes.

Why should a man's unfaithfulness not concern the wife? Is she a painting in his house? When karma comes knocking, will it spare her? Asides that, whatever happened to marital vows to make the marriage bed undefiled?

Talking about progeny, how would he be infected by taking care of another man's child?

It doesn't concern her because she loses nothing by his having extra marital sex, there is nothing like karma and marital vows are only emotional ploys to keep men subservient and keep their concentration unnaturally focused on a specific woman. Let's try to stay logical here.

He would not be infected by taking care of another man's progeny, but he would be cheated of his hard earned wealth; thinking that he is working to support his family when he is actually supporting; financially and time-wise; another man's.

He can also be infected by stds, which I have already admitted, can also happen to the woman; which is why I support your idea of monthly std tests for both if the man has extra marital affairs. However, a woman should never cheat because of the possibility of the progeny not being the real provider's.

RisenPhoenix:


It doesn't concern her because she loses nothing by his having extra marital sex, there is nothing like karma and marital vows are only emotional ploys to keep men subservient and keep their concentration unnaturally focused on a specific woman. Let's try to stay logical here.

He would not be infected by taking care of another man's progeny, but he would be cheated of his hard earned wealth; thinking that he is working to support his family when he is actually supporting; financially and time-wise; another man's.

He can also be infected by stds, which I have already admitted, can also happen to the woman; which is why I support your idea of monthly std tests for both if the man has extra marital affairs. However, a woman should never cheat because of the possibility of the progeny not being the real provider's.

Please, never get married if your definition of being married means a man would not be naturally focused on one woman. What's the essence of making it legal and all that bullshit if he can't stay committed to his wife? Why get married when baby mama is more profitable for him?

Must a man cheat to prove his masculinity?

If we are being logical, a woman can and should cheat if:
a) the man cheats,
b) she can handle not getting pregnant or handle the pregnancy discreetly if one arises. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.


If the generation of men jumping into marriages today believe cheating is their right, even after knacking everything knackable before marriage, it is safe to say that the generation of women too should take up the mantle of cheating, as well. Anybody that comes with that divorce nonsense is only being a fool cause if you divorce her, likelihood of him getting to this particular junction with the next wife is very high.


Radarada. Shebi we are mad, ni.

Sixfeetbelle:



Please, never get married if your definition of being married means a man would not be naturally focused on one woman. What's the essence of making it legal and all that bullshit if he can't stay committed to his wife? Why get married when baby mama is more profitable for him?

Must a man cheat to prove his masculinity?

If we are being logical, a woman can and should cheat if:
a) the man cheats,
b) she can handle not getting pregnant or handle the pregnancy discreetly if one arises. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.


If the generation of men jumping into marriages today believe cheating is their right, even after knacking everything knackable before marriage, it is safe to say that the generation of women too should take up the mantle of cheating, as well. Anybody that comes with that divorce nonsense is only being a fool cause if you divorce her, likelihood of him getting to this particular junction with the next wife is very high.


Radarada. Shebi we are mad, ni.

Read the nonesense you are typing over and over again.
I pity the simp that will eventually marry you, ladies like you should be laid 6 feets below!
Brethren, DNA has come to stay!

Sixfeetbelle:



Please, never get married if your definition of being married means a man would not be naturally focused on one woman. What's the essence of making it legal and all that bullshit if he can't stay committed to his wife? Why get married when baby mama is more profitable for him?

Must a man cheat to prove his masculinity?

If we are being logical, a woman can and should cheat if:
a) the man cheats,
b) she can handle not getting pregnant or handle the pregnancy discreetly if one arises. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.


If the generation of men jumping into marriages today believe cheating is their right, even after knacking everything knackable before marriage, it is safe to say that the generation of women too should take up the mantle of cheating, as well. Anybody that comes with that divorce nonsense is only being a fool cause if you divorce her, likelihood of him getting to this particular junction with the next wife is very high.


Radarada. Shebi we are mad, ni.

Read the nonesense you are typing over and over again.
I pity the simp that will eventually marry you, ladies like you should be sued !
Brethren, DNA has come to stay!

Yeecar:

Read the nonesense you are typing over and over again.
I pity the simp that will eventually marry you, ladies like you should be laid 6 feets below!
Brethren, DNA has come to stay!

I've noticed this trend here. Once you people have nothing meaning to say, you result to insults. Defend what you wrote, Sir.

Yesterday, I argued with @crackkhauss here about women proposing to men and he defended the post to the very end without a modicum of insult attached.

If you read through well, you'd see my subsequent comments had nothing to do with DNA testing but with the cheating you previously mentioned. Defend that statement. Is it okay for a married men to cheat? Are you supporting that ideology?

And I countered it that any man who supports that idealogy should not expect complete loyalty from the woman. It doesn't matter how long we'll argue this but my stance won't change.

Have a good day since you can't debate without acting ghetto

I can never muster up much sympathy for my country men whenever I hear of cases like this for some reason

Sixfeetbelle:



Please, never get married if your definition of being married means a man would not be naturally focused on one woman.

I am already married, and I never defined marriage as a ploy to keep a man unnaturally focused on one woman, I defined marital vows as a ploy to keep a man unnaturally focused on one woman. Marriage could and did once inherently permit a man to focus on as many women as he wants as long as he did this legally with the blessing of society, but modern day marital vows have been engineered specially to restrict this.

Sixfeetbelle:


What's the essence of making it legal and all that bullshit if he can't stay committed to his wife? Why get married when baby mama is more profitable for him?

I did not say that a baby mama is more profitable. It is not. Nor do I think that you can present any logical reason as to why a man should stay committed to one woman if he is able to financially support more.

Sixfeetbelle:


Must a man cheat to prove his masculinity?

Of course not. Masculinity by its nature has no need to be proven. Furthermore, my reference to a man having a natural propensity to commit to more than one woman does not necessarily mean cheating. It would also include legally sanctioned polygamy

Sixfeetbelle:


If we are being logical, a woman can and should cheat if:
a) the man cheats,
b) she can handle not getting pregnant or handle the pregnancy discreetly if one arises. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

There you go again with your false equivalence. This is not logic; it is vengefulness and a woman's idea of emotional blackmail. As I painstakingly explained earlier, it is not the same when a man cheats and when a woman cheats. Women do this often but they are completely wrong in comparing the logical outcome of their cheating as being the same as the logical outcome of a man cheating. A woman cheating has more serious repercussion on societal stability.

Sixfeetbelle:

If the generation of men jumping into marriages today believe cheating is their right, even after knacking everything knackable before marriage, it is safe to say that the generation of women too should take up the mantle of cheating, as well. Anybody that comes with that divorce nonsense is only being a fool cause if you divorce her, likelihood of him getting to this particular junction with the next wife is very high.

Radarada. Shebi we are mad, ni.

You are beginning to sound like a broken record stuck in one place. The problem is that women always think emotionally rather than with their brains. Men and women are not equal. Never were. Until you properly understand this, you will keep confusing yourself unnecessarily.