justtoodark:


you sure about that....??
na so you south easterners tut atiku cant loose....

when it happened,you went to court for nathing....

South south won't vote their own son ?

mrvitalis:

South south won't vote their own son ?

dont listen to me....

motivate him to try....
we nigerians dont give a shi shi....

justtoodark:


dont listen to me....

motivate him to try....
we nigerians dont give a shi shi....

By Nigerians u mean Yoruba's ?

mrvitalis:

By Nigerians u mean Yoruba's ?

motivate him to try....
we dont care....

Agboriotejoye:

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying Jonathan did well. But it's a fact that recession occurred under buhari.
I remember the few months result into Buhari's tenure. Some good things happened and were attributed to his body language. Immediately things went south, Jonathan's name cropped up on the lips of govt supporters. Why didn't they also attribute the good things at the beginning of the admin to Jonathan?

Fact is, buhari has to take the blame for the recession. He had all the time in the world to be proactive before things went south but his do-nothing attitude which has been a bane of his govt is what has led us to where we are

Immediately Buhari got into power, it seemed the power situation improved and it seemed that public officials became conscious of not collecting bribe etc.

But you need to see that it was ephemeral.

It was something that couldn't be sustained.

Jonathan's government had eaten deep into the fabric of the nation.

His reckless spending of Forex led to the Forex shortage that hit Nigeria after his tenure.

If Jonathan had made the economy stronger like people claim, one year of Buhari wouldn't have made the economy plunge into recession.

With the amount of stealing that went on in Jonathan's era, it is a wonder that Nigeria didn't slide from recession to full blown depression.

Yes, Buhari has his blame. He took too long to form his cabinet.

But the truth is that, Jonathan didn't bequeath to Nigerians an economy that could run itself.

He gave Nigerians a rotten apple, fresh on the outside but already eaten by maggots on the inside.

FrLukas:


Immediately Buhari got into power, it seemed the power situation improved and it seemed that public officials became conscious of not collecting bribe etc.

But you need to see that it was ephemeral.

It was something that couldn't be sustained.

Jonathan's government had eaten deep into the fabric of the nation.

His reckless spending of Forex led to the Forex shortage that hit Nigeria after his tenure.

If Jonathan had made the economy stronger like people claim, one year of Buhari wouldn't have made the economy plunge into recession.

With the amount of stealing that went on in Jonathan's era, it is a wonder that Nigeria didn't slide from recession to full blown depression.

Yes, Buhari has his blame. He took too long to form his cabinet.

But the truth is that, Jonathan didn't bequeath to Nigerians an economy that could run itself.

He gave Nigerians a rotten apple, fresh on the outside but already eaten by maggots on the inside.

You're still doing the same thing. How do you attribute the stable power to buhari only a few weeks into his tenure but attribute a recession one year later to Jonathan.
Why could the power improvement not be sustained? It's because no one wanted to be at the receiving end of buhari's perceived venom initially. But immediately everyone saw it was just spittle, business as usual resumed.

The economy is like weather, it responds to stimulus. It also responds to nothing. OBJ met Nigeria in crippling debt and deficit, he left us with a reserve over $60bn and less than $5bn debt.

Let me tell you, I hope you're aware just $70m is remaining in the ECA now. Buhari met over $2bn there. What about inflation, forex rates, interest rates and commodity prices? Are you going to blame all those being on the wrong side to Jonathan.

No economy runs itself. An economy on autopilot is destined to crash. That's exactly what buhari did wrong. He left all the economic indicators crashing and did nothing. Absolutely nothing about it. Do you realise dollar rates hit almost N500 under him? Only for it to fall back to about N300 when Osinbajo took over for a few months in 2017. There were plans to cut interest rates then before buhari came back unfortunately. Osinbajo improved it cause he knew what to do and he did it. Unlike the do-nothing Buhari.

Go on we support you

Don't let them deceive you Baba. You are already a legend

GEJ is better off keeping his mouth shut.
He should emulate late shehu shagari

[s]

FrLukas:


Immediately Buhari got into power, it seemed the power situation improved and it seemed that public officials became conscious of not collecting bribe etc.

But you need to see that it was ephemeral.

It was something that couldn't be sustained.

Jonathan's government had eaten deep into the fabric of the nation.

His reckless spending of Forex led to the Forex shortage that hit Nigeria after his tenure.

If Jonathan had made the economy stronger like people claim, one year of Buhari wouldn't have made the economy plunge into recession.

With the amount of stealing that went on in Jonathan's era, it is a wonder that Nigeria didn't slide from recession to full blown depression.

Yes, Buhari has his blame. He took too long to form his cabinet.

But the truth is that, Jonathan didn't bequeath to Nigerians an economy that could run itself.

He gave Nigerians a rotten apple, fresh on the outside but already eaten by maggots on the inside.

[/s]