LordReed:


How can you prove what you cannot define? My question remains unanswered, how do you know what an uncaused cause is?

How does evolution DEFY (i assume you mean defy cos defile means something else entirely) simple logical explanation?

I don't believe in scientific findings, I either accept them or don't accept them. They do not require belief. I accept the big bang theory. I accept evolution. I accept general relativity and special relativity. I accept quantum mechanics. And many more the list won't be exhaustive enough if I tried to list them.

reigncalif1:


OH MY GOD ARE U FOR REAL ,OK LET GO LIKE THIS

QUES; how do u know what an UNCAUSED CAUSED is?
ANS: NO ONE CAN ASCERTAIN OR KNOW WHAT AN UNCAUSED CAUSED IS ,IS ONLY LET FOR U YO EITHER BELIEVE OR ACCEPT BY FAITH ,EVEN ME CAN'T TELL I JUST BELIEVE, HOPE U GET ME NOW

THANKS FOR THE CORRECTION ANYWAY

WELL SEEMS U DON'T BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION U JUST ACCEPT ,I THINK THERE IS NO NEED TO GO ON BUT FOR BENEFIT OF DOUBT
EVOLUTION WHATEVER LOST IT TO COMMON SENSE BY SAYING WE ALL COME FROM SAME PARENT.
ITS DISPUTE THE LAW OF BIOLOGY OF PRE- EXISTING LIFE GO ON TO FORM ANOTHER LIFE THEN HOW COME THE CHEMICAL REACTION THAT IS IS NOT LIVING ENDED UP FORMING A LIVING COMPLEX ORGANISM

THEN IN MATHEMATICS THE PROBABILITY OF A SINGLE CELL COMING INTO EXISTENCE BY
CHANCE OR ACCIDENT IS VERY LOW ,FOR ME I DONT THINK ITS POSSIBLE

WHY DO ACCEPT BIG BANG SEEMS IT DIDN'T DEFINE THE UNCAUSED CAUSE

reigncalif1:


OH MY GOD ARE U FOR REAL ,OK LET GO LIKE THIS

QUES; how do u know what an UNCAUSED CAUSED is?
ANS: NO ONE CAN ASCERTAIN OR KNOW WHAT AN UNCAUSED CAUSED IS ,IS ONLY LET FOR U YO EITHER BELIEVE OR ACCEPT BY FAITH ,EVEN ME CAN'T TELL I JUST BELIEVE, HOPE U GET ME NOW

YES HUMAN CAN CAN ASCERTAIN WHAT THEY CANT DEFINE THAT IS Y THERE IS PROBABILITY ITS TERM DOWN WHETHER IS POSSIBILITY DEPENDING ON HOW HIGH THE PROBABILITY MIGHT BE . IS LIKE 0 NO ONE CAN DEFINE IT ,U CAN SAY ITS SELF EXISTING OR U CAN ASCERTAIN IT COMES OUT FROM NOWHERE BUT THE PROBLEM IS THAT U CANT DEFINE IT.


THANKS FOR THE CORRECTION ANYWAY

WELL SEEMS U DON'T BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION U JUST ACCEPT ,I THINK THERE IS NO NEED TO GO ON BUT FOR BENEFIT OF DOUBT
EVOLUTION WHATEVER LOST IT TO COMMON SENSE BY SAYING WE ALL COME FROM SAME PARENT.
ITS DISPUTE THE LAW OF BIOLOGY OF PRE- EXISTING LIFE GO ON TO FORM ANOTHER LIFE THEN HOW COME THE CHEMICAL REACTION THAT IS IS NOT LIVING ENDED UP FORMING A LIVING COMPLEX ORGANISM

THEN IN MATHEMATICS THE PROBABILITY OF A SINGLE CELL COMING INTO EXISTENCE BY
CHANCE OR ACCIDENT IS VERY LOW ,FOR ME I DONT THINK ITS POSSIBLE

WHY DO ACCEPT BIG BANG SEEMS IT DIDN'T DEFINE THE UNCAUSED CAUSE

LordReed:


Evolution has nothing to do with chemical reaction that is not living ending up forming a living organism. Maybe you should look at evolution properly before you form an objection to it.

I don't know anything about uncaused cause which is why I asked you to define it. You just happen to believe in a thing you can't define.

The big bang theory has nothing to do with uncaused cause.

reigncalif1:


OK SO HOW DOES EVOLUTION STARTED SEEMS ITS NOT CHEMICAL REACTION I WILL BE GLAD TO LEARN

AND BIG BANG TOO HOW DOES THE EXPANSION AND EXPLOSION STARTED

ITS CALLED FAITH WE ALL BELIEVE IN WHAT WE CANT DEFINE THATS FAITH

reigncalif1:


OK SO HOW DOES EVOLUTION STARTED SEEMS ITS NOT CHEMICAL REACTION I WILL BE GLAD TO LEARN

AND BIG BANG TOO HOW DOES THE EXPANSION AND EXPLOSION STARTED

ITS CALLED FAITH WE ALL BELIEVE IN WHAT WE CANT DEFINE THATS FAITH

LordReed:


Evolution in simple terms began when the first living cells started to replicate.

Big bang was an expansion there was no explosion. What triggered the expansion is unknown.

Well good for you.

LordReed:


That's your problem.

reigncalif1:


lol THE FIRST LIVING CELL WHICH NO ONE CAN ASCERTAIN

ARE U SURE THERE WAS NO EXPLOSION IN IN BIG BANG

LordReed:


Which is irrelevant, evolution is observed fact.

Yes I am sure.

GRIMMJOE:
Science isn't human being, what is your point.

reigncalif1:



WELL SEEMS U DON'T BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION U JUST ACCEPT ,I THINK THERE IS NO NEED TO GO ON BUT FOR BENEFIT OF DOUBT
EVOLUTION WHATEVER LOST IT TO COMMON SENSE BY SAYING WE ALL COME FROM SAME PARENT.
ITS DISPUTE THE LAW OF BIOLOGY OF PRE- EXISTING LIFE GO ON TO FORM ANOTHER LIFE THEN HOW COME THE CHEMICAL REACTION THAT IS IS NOT LIVING ENDED UP FORMING A LIVING COMPLEX ORGANISM

THEN IN MATHEMATICS THE PROBABILITY OF A SINGLE CELL COMING INTO EXISTENCE BY
CHANCE OR ACCIDENT IS VERY LOW ,FOR ME I DONT THINK ITS POSSIBLE

LordReed:


Evolution in simple terms began when the first living cells started to replicate.

Big bang was an expansion there was no explosion. What triggered the expansion is unknown.

Well good for you.

GRIMMJOE:
See, believe what you want to believe, if want to believe a God created Light before the sun believe.

But one thing is true, this God knows nothing science, nothing about logic, and lacks common sense.

liked I've always said if this God want us to take him serious he should come and die on the cross himself.

elated177:



What were these first living cells? How did they come to be?

How did such replication get to the point that two individuals, male and female, are now required to form or create an entirely new individual?

reigncalif1:


HMM TO COMPLETE THE LOGICALITY OF SCIENCE
THE MECHANISM OF THE FIRST LIVING CELL MUST BE EXPLAINED .SAYING ITS IRRELEVANT MEANS ITS ILLOGICAL OR IT DOESN'T MATER or MAYBE NOT CONNECTED ,HWW IS IT NOT CONNECTED

CHECK THIS
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang

elated177:



What were these first living cells? How did they come to be?

How did such replication get to the point that two individuals, male and female, are now required to form or create an entirely new individual?

BoncoBoy:


So your answer to all this questions is that everything was created by yahweh, and that everything has to be creates except yahweh also this yahweh craves worship so bad that he is ready to burn all of his creation if they don't worship him right?

LordReed:


Evolution is not concerned with how the first cells came about that is why it is irrelevant. Even if it was aliens that brought life to earth it will not change evolution as observed fact.

https://www.britannica.com/story/was-the-big-bang-actually-an-explosion
The “big bang” wasn’t a “bang” at all, at least not in the common definition. It didn’t explode in a scene of shrapnel and fire, and there was definitely no mushroom cloud. The big-bang theory of the universe is derived from Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity and the idea that the universe expanded from a miniscule dense collection of energy called a singularity. There was no bang, just a vast expansion of extremely condensed material.

IamMichael:


In Logical Reasoning, what you are doing is referred to as "God of the gap fallacy".

The term God-of-the-gaps fallacy can refer to a position that assumes an act of God as the explanation for an unknown phenomenon, which is a variant of an argument from ignorance fallacy.

Honestly, your ignorance level must be competing with that of slowpoke's. Why don't you just use your rational sense instead into finding out if actually your belief system passes the simple tests of logic instead of consistently making a fôol of yourself.

Religious arguments are senseless because if you believe 'God' exists, it also brings the next question, who/what created 'God'... and what/who created this thing/being that created "God"... It's an unending circus that will not end and which we will never know. It's something that will drive you mad if you think it more, which is one of the reasons why religious founders had to come up with something to fill the gap.

Please, I advise you again, quit being silly!!!

elated177:



Eziokwu bu ndu. You have answered your question with your own question...lol That, right there, boncoboy, is the unadulterated eziokwu.


Just in case, eziokwu = truth.

BoncoBoy:

So he is ready to kill off all his creation if they don't worship him well shows how loving he truly his.
Why does yahweh want worship so bad does he feed on it on is that what fuels his heaven or just to massage his ego??

GRIMMJOE:
That guy loves going in circles

elated177:



Do you have a father?

BoncoBoy:


Yes I do

LordReed:


Evolution is not concerned with how the first cells came about that is why it is irrelevant. Even if it was aliens that brought life to earth it will not change evolution as observed fact.

https://www.britannica.com/story/was-the-big-bang-actually-an-explosion
The “big bang” wasn’t a “bang” at all, at least not in the common definition. It didn’t explode in a scene of shrapnel and fire, and there was definitely no mushroom cloud. The big-bang theory of the universe is derived from Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity and the idea that the universe expanded from a miniscule dense collection of energy called a singularity. There was no bang, just a vast expansion of extremely condensed material.

LordReed:


Evolution is not concerned with how the first cells came about that is why it is irrelevant. Even if it was aliens that brought life to earth it will not change evolution as observed fact.

https://www.britannica.com/story/was-the-big-bang-actually-an-explosion
The “big bang” wasn’t a “bang” at all, at least not in the common definition. It didn’t explode in a scene of shrapnel and fire, and there was definitely no mushroom cloud. The big-bang theory of the universe is derived from Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity and the idea that the universe expanded from a miniscule dense collection of energy called a singularity. There was no bang, just a vast expansion of extremely condensed material.

elated177:



The big bang is the most ridiculous theory ever. That is my opinion. And I am a scientist.

LordReed:


Evolution is not concerned with how the first cells came about that is why it is irrelevant. Even if it was aliens that brought life to earth it will not change evolution as observed fact.

https://www.britannica.com/story/was-the-big-bang-actually-an-explosion
The “big bang” wasn’t a “bang” at all, at least not in the common definition. It didn’t explode in a scene of shrapnel and fire, and there was definitely no mushroom cloud. The big-bang theory of the universe is derived from Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity and the idea that the universe expanded from a miniscule dense collection of energy called a singularity. There was no bang, just a vast expansion of extremely condensed material.

LordReed:


When you win a Nobel prize for your opinion come and tell us.

LordReed:


When you win a Nobel prize for your opinion come and tell us.