sassysure:

That guy just dug his own grave. See as the lady set a trap for him and he fall inside.

Not only grave. He dug his own basement. If they were both drunk, then there's no case here. Else, both of them will get the same prison sentence

wisdomiskey:


Coming from a sexually frustrated rapist like you. I'm not surprised

You have nothing else to say.
.. ignorant false rape apologist. A big simp

VEXT:
Honestly most women are ingrate... In my own house,you still accuse me of rape!! Did he force her for sex? "No"
Check out the pic below and imagine a man carry this same act with his daughter and post it on social media... All the stupid feminists and simp will have call him names and want him to be jail....

She is manipulating the boy ahead before he grows up

wisdomiskey:


Coming from a sexually frustrated rapist like you. I'm not surprised

Did your mom say I raped her?

J111333:
..."According to him, they had consensual sex, twice. The 1st being after they were both drunk, only for her to tell him the next day she didn’t give her consent to the sex they had"...






The above statement alone will get him in serious trouble. When she is drunk, you ain't suppose to sleep with her especially when not in an established relationship.
Guys be careful and know when to abort mission. Control your prick, don't let it control you. Yea it can be hard and strong but e no go break for sure.

. They were both drunk. And in her drunken state, manipulated the man into having sex

See how some people are gloating here. They even know it wasn't rape, but that they can bend the law to convict this guy. Generation of potiphar's wife everywhere! Some of these ladies don't even give a toss about the crime of rape, all they want is revenge and bring someone down.
Guys stop having sex in whatever form with these girls. Stop cohabiting with them. No more dates. Don't work so hard only to crumble because of woman matter.

Has it occurred to the lawyers here that the law works both ways. If you think she can't give consent because she's drunk, A good lawyer can posit also that the girl premeditated the whole drunk sex escapade to entangle the guy in a blackmail. The lawyer can posit that;
1. She put the idea of drinking wine together to the guy
2. She willing decides to take a bottle of red wine to a bedroom to share with a guy.
3. Decided to get the guy drunk in order to execute her plan.
4. She had consensual sex with him a second time and kept sexually harassing the guy in order to hoodwink him.
5. When all that failed, she finally came to social media instead of the police in order to tarnish the image of the guy and sway public opinion.


I'm just saying some of what a defense lawyer may say. Know this, in the court, it is not about the truth but what can be proven.

oyatz:
So how was the man supposed to know that she didn't give consent when both went out to socialize and got drunk?


For a lady who traveled all the way from Nigeria to UK to meet and stayed with a man, what does this suggest?

Rozz:
From comments here, most of these men are rapist,they have one time or the other rape innocent girls because they are ignorant of what consent really entails.Most of you should be ready ooo if any of those ladies you rape decided to speak out,dont come and be telling us we were both drunk.

How many times have you been raped by the men in your life.

legionISproteus:


THEY WERE BOTH DRUNK.

THEY, in this context, is the pronoun for two people. So she wouldn't get into trouble for having sex with a drunk guy, but the guy should get into trouble for having sex with a drunk girl, abi?

I'm happy you're not a judge

Update: You too Dobson43, I had to include you here

Unfortunately, the court does not care. People are sympathetic towards women nowadays to prevent those mad feminists.

wisdomiskey:


See this one.

Are you aware that the idiot-doctor you are defending would automatically take the lady's side and call for your arrest if it was you in this situation? Do you know how many potentially innocent men he has prosecuted on Twitter over one-sided rape allegations?

Dr Olufunmilayo is a twaat and so is anyone who defends him

I know that the man is a hypocritical posturing asshole, but my point was rather generic, I was actually putting up a defense for the male gender as a whole in a situation like that.

pocohantas:


Nawa o, but this no balance at all na. They were both drunk. Why one person go come suffer the effect?

That is the law in developed countries.
Read the link I posted.

Two k pop celebrities were sent to jail last yr cos of this. They admitted to being drunk yet they shared the video.


The problem is not being both drunk. If the woman told you she did it while drunk, the guy should use all in his arsenal to bury the case. Although in most cases, what the lawyers are after is the level of toxity which is very hard to get. But our bros hand is too sharp to type and post. He cleared that doubt and complexity by admitting both were indeed drunk.

Assuming the lady took him to court, he could argue she gave her consent before they became drunk and this is a good case or that they were not really drunk.

maynia:


You are the ignorant and proud layman here bro.

Did you also read the part in the thread where she came to his room wearing just pant and bra, seducing him?
Read the part where she came with contraception pills?
If they want to play dirty, the man has more tricks in his sleeve, but you can't understand that ignorant layman.
The other housemates can testify to it

Bro, I have read the thread.

But the thread is not the truth yet. It is just the man's side of the story.

Everyone has a story and everyone always tries to make their case stronger should they have to go to court.

Stop relying on one person's testimony.

Moreover, I am not against the doctor. My point is that he should not be quick to talk because whatever he says can be used against him in the court of law.

phemmyfour:
"They were both drunk"

Being drunk is not a consent sir

Do remember implied consent

Rap is a very sensitive issue.sometimes it could be a little lie, sometimes it could be the truth

Rap is a very sensitive issue.sometimes it could be a little lie, sometimes it could be the truth.

BluntTheApostle:


Bro, I have read the thread.

But the thread is not the truth yet. It is just the man's side of the story.

Everyone has a story and everyone always tries to make their case stronger should they have to go to court.

Stop relying on one person's testimony.

Moreover, I am not against the doctor. My point is that he should not be quick to talk because whatever he says can be used against him in the court of law.

Try to read before commenting, not commenting then reading afterwards.

It's irritating.
Shalom

sisisioge:
For once, I'm with the guy here! She went to stay with a dude with whom she was romantically connected for 4months rent free, chopping his food, using his electricity, WiFi, etc and cried wolf at getting down with him! How long after this sex did she leave? Fear God o aunty! A raped victim who was going to report anyways would have reported as it happened...not several months after while living voluntarily with her abuser. She wasn't held against her wish, she had internet, police was working...whew!

Technically she was madam.

Do you know anyone in the UK? They've all been under covid house arrest since March.

She was inevitably stuck in that house and so are many others who are currently in the UK on visiting visas.

They've only eased the lockdown in the past week!

No mind that stupid woman, she is wat they call lair lair , pants on fire

maynia:

.they can both twist it, why you sounding like the it's only the woman that can twist it.

On top of this , the man has witnesses.

Now you are talking, the question is was the witness in the room when she came with the bottle? Was the witness in the room when they were drinking it. Was the witness in the room when they had sex. If the answer to this questions are no then trust me the witness is absolutely useless. Its completely a he says and she says something.

Yes both can twist it. But the problem here is, he has already stated his version of events here. He has limited himself to how far he can twist it. Thats the point. The girl on the other haven't given her version of events. So she's free to stretch the truth to however far she likes. Thats the advantage he has given her. And its a very substantial advantage at that especially when it is a he said she said something. With no evidence and no witnesses.

If he comes and changes his story too much he would be labelled a lier and an unreliable witness. So with this statement he has released however true it might be. He has effectively limited the ability of his legal to twist facts in his favour.

She on the other hand have so much room to maneuver. That she can actually sink him, if she has a good lawyer that will bring up a more believable circle of events.

This guy na fool.Why did you allow her come to your house if you were not serious with her.You were even speaking with her mum.You shouldn't have entertained her in the first place.You were definitely interested in her but because of the attitude she put up in your house you had a re think.

J111333:
That's his word against the law, sir.

Lol, what Law is that, Sir? Tell me, I am curious.
I am a Lawyer, so I believe we learn everyday.

What law?

Rape rape and rape everywhere. Can sex be banned at all?

Iamsane:


How many times have you been raped by the men in your life.

one spotted lol

sassysure:
Seems like you guys don't get it.
Let me screenshot it.


Getty Images/iStockphoto
MEN SHOULD AVOID HAVING SEX WITH WOMEN WHO HAVE DRUNK ANY AMOUNT OF ALCOHOL, SAYS BARRISTER
‘Drunken sex rarely ends well’

Olivia Petter
@oliviapetter1
Thursday 5 October 2017 15:33
38 comments
A criminal barrister says men should not sleep with women who've drank any alcohol - because consent laws are misunderstood by some men.

Cathy McCulloch, who has 34 years of legal experience in sexual assault, advises men not to have sex with women if they’ve had a single drink in a Mail Online article, as this may compromise their capacity to consent.


She wrote: "The law is simple. If a woman has had a drink, and says after sex she did not have the choice, freedom and capacity to consent, the man can be accused of rape. A man being drunk is no defence in law......"


Bros said they they were drunk. And the law said u shouldn't make love to a woman who is drunk cos she might gave you her consent while inebriated.

Case closed. Oga, go and beg. U dug your own grave.

I think this applies to a situation where the guy is sober enough. But since the two of them were drunk can this point also stand

tony9k:



Oga the case happened in the uk. The fact that both of you were drunk does not exonerate rape. The important issue is if she gave consent which she couldn't have given when drunk, Also all the statements that she came from Nigeria. lived in her house and didn't report early are no excuses in the UK

You are still emotional. Reason logically bro. UK is not another galaxy. How do you define rape when both parties are drunk? Who initiated the sex and who is sane enough to determine who did what? Is there a CCTV in the house to judge this?

Even if the first case is rape(according to you), the second nko? Or the multitude of witnesses(his friends and brother) who knew of her BS? Be clear cut in your responses and approach.

I heard the guy is a hard core unbalanced nigga who outrightly condemns accused rapists without caring,listening or judging their own n part of the story. That,and the mere fact that he couldn't chase away a leech for four months and being subjected to abuse in his own house gives me no sympathy for him.

He is a simp,who thinks being a very nice guy and women defender on SM, makes him invulnerable to women wiles and gets him premium pussy. HE IS SO WRONG!!

No wound is as serious as wounded love.
No troubles are as serious as the troubles that women cause
No poison is deadlier than the poison of a snake, and no anger is deadlier than the anger of a woman

I would rather live in the same house with a lion or a dragon than with a bad woman

compared to the troubles caused by a woman, any other troubles look small. May such women never come near us

cococandy:
But I agree that if the man is drunk too like the woman, then he has the same case against her that she has on him.

Shikena. Although I don’t know how they will prosecute it over there.

The law said a drunk man is no defence in court.

Surprising, isn't it?

jikins:


Now you are talking, the question is was the witness in the room when she came with the bottle? Was the witness in the room when they were drinking it. Was the witness in the room when they had sex. If the answer to this questions are no then trust me the witness is absolutely useless. Its completely a he says and she says something.

Yes both can twist it. But the problem here is, he has already stated his version of events here. He has limited himself to how far he can twist it. Thats the point. The girl on the other haven't given her version of events. So she's free to stretch the truth to however far she likes. Thats the advantage he has given her. And its a very substantial advantage at that especially when it is a he said she said something. With no evidence and no witnesses.

If he comes and changes his story too much he would be labelled a lier and an unreliable witness. So with this statement he has released however true it might be. He has effectively limited the ability of his legal to twist facts in his favour.

She on the other hand have so much room to maneuver. That she can actually sink him, if she has a good lawyer that will bring up a more believable circle of events.

A waste of time.

Shalom

DaddyRochie1642:
Never Trust A BITCH!!!, ... It Never Ends Well.

Never be too hasty to leap. Look before you leap lest you fall on shaky grounds.

Rgade:

I know that the man is a hypocritical posturing asshole, but my point was rather generic, I was actually putting up a defense for the male gender as a whole in a situation like that.

Dr Olufunmilayo is a sociopath whom I know very well... dating back to our Mayflower sch days.

Be careful how you defend the male folk on his matter.. he would read your post (which has garnered a few likes on the front page) and feel justified in his stupidity, manipulation and folly.

Just saying.