Gravatar:


I know say you no get talk again, because you no expect say person go that attack you like this, it was so unexpected., e shock you.

E don tey when you dey post nonsense upandan nairaland, people dey free you because you shouldn't interrupt a fool when he's making a mistake, but like I said, I have time this Evening

See who feel say e get mouth

skywalker240:

Gravatar and dadabashua1

I believe we're adults with wives and kids

What the hell brought the punches

dadabashua1:
his fighting himself.... I be person way he fit fight... No na

skywalker240:

Probably you edited your posts

But honestly, let's be prudent in our approach, this is not romance segment

One love

skywalker240:

Gravatar and dadabashua1

I believe we're adults with wives and kids

What the hell brought the punches

Gravatar:


I quoted your post where you suggested a comparison between two vehicles, to point out an obvious flaw.

As for that clown that claims to have owned every Marque under the sun, every now and then it's important to put empty headed noisemakers like that in their place.

His wings have been clipped, his madness go reduce small for now.

dadabashua1:
don't start what you can't finish kid,its just an advice any way.

chronos00:


Lol the guy is thrashing you, you're busy shouting

"Hold me o! Hold me o!"

This thread just went from 0 to 100 in 5 seconds.

skywalker240:

Gravatar and dadabashua1

I believe we're adults with wives and kids

What the hell brought the punches

Gravatar:


As for you, these your online copy and paste tactics, don't you ever get tired of th.em? Eh Weyreypey?

adanny01:


Your assumptions are shallow.

678/60=11.3km/l=26.58mpg

First off, a 2004 Honda Civic has better fuel economy so will do this trip with less fuel. Will it be king if it does?

26.5mpg on a highway on a Corolla is poor, I was expecting like 30mpg considering it is rated 34-36mpg highway. With our bad fuel, bad roads and loading, 30mpg is more appropriate.

The worst I get on my 2003 Honda accord is 24mpg.

24mpg=10.2km/l
678/10.2=66.5l

That means at worst case I will use 6.5l more which translates to N929.50k.

The average cost of buying a 2004 Corolla is 300k more. If say we both go to PH and back once a month that will be 2k times 12=24k/year
300k/24=12½yrs

What I lost in fuel economy is gained in cost price. I also gained in performance. On reliability, that is another subject for another thread.

It still boils down to preference.

dicksonadams:
I have Honda civic and corolla base matrix, these are my experiences

Toyota is more durable though Honda is close too...

Honda have more sensors and electrical failures than corolla, but if you have a scanner and you understand how to use it, then you are good to go with less wasteful trial and error from mechanic

Transmission of corolla is more rugged and less sensitive, if you use any how gear oil on civic it can parkup.

Civic power steering system develop leak and fault more than corolla

Corolla have better ride height,

Civic is cheaper to maintain

Civic is faster not sluggish at all

Civic is more balance in drive

Both engine are rugged, but please don't let your civic overheat too much once.. Sensitive to overheat

Praxtech:

Contradictory phrase. Corolla is cheaper than civic in maintenance

Dozieson:


I believe civil should be cheaper because Toyota corrola 2003-2007 engine is about 320k. Gear box 180k etc.

Honda civil engine is about 150k, gear box 120k

Other parts could follow suit

Dozieson:


I believe civil should be cheaper because Toyota corrola 2003-2007 en.gine is about 320k. Gear box 180k etc.

Honda civil engine is about 150k, gear box 120k

Other parts could follow suit

Dozieson:


I believe civil should be cheaper because Toyota corrola 2003-2007 engine is about 320k. Gear box 180k etc.

Honda civil engine is about 150k, gear box 120k80k

Other parts could follow suit

Adejuwonhis:
Toyota Corolla is a very good ride if u are not going to travel with it...if it is within a city..
Traveling with a Toyota Corolla is risking ur life
Very very useless the breaking system is nothing to write home about..
The car no balance if U use am enter better speed na hin u go know say na ke.ke napep u Dey use

Adejuwonhis:
Toyota Corolla is a very good ride if u are not going to travel with it...if it is within a city..
Traveling with a Toyota Corolla is risking ur life
Very very useless the breaking system is nothing to write home about..
The car no balance if U use am enter better speed na hin u go know say na keke napep u Dey use

adanny01:


Your assumptions are shallow.

678/60=11.3km/l=26.58mpg

First off, a 2004 Honda Civic has better fuel economy so will do this trip with less fuel. Will it be king if it does?

26.5mpg on a highway on a Corolla is poor, I was expecting like 30mpg considering it is rated 34-36mpg highway. With our bad fuel, bad roads and loading, 30mpg is more appropriate.

The worst I get on my 2003 Honda accord is 24mpg.

24mpg=10.2km/l
678/10.2=66.5l

That means at worst case I will use 6.5l more which translates to N929.50k.

The average cost of buying a 2004 Corolla is 300k more. If say we both go to PH and back once a month that will be 2k times 12=24k/year
300k/24=12½yrs

What I lost in fuel economy is gained in cost price. I also gained in performance. On reliability, that is another subject for another thread.

It still boils down to preference.

chillex8:

I will quote you next when I hit 200,000km...

R18 ivtec is one of the best motors produced by Honda.