Around 2018/19 a man and his wife were kidnapped while coming back from church. They were taken into a bush and the man was assassinated. They shot the man at the head and shot the wife on the leg. While the case was been discussed in a radio programme, a man called in and said the wife should be interrogated. He questioned why the man should be shot on the head and the woman on the leg. I found that absurd. For God's sakes something might have transpired between the husband and those killers which she was not privy to.Does he wish death upon the woman so as to prove her innocence? I believe this is one of the rationale behind torturing of widows once their husbands die.

Jewel1515:
Around 2018/19 a man and his wife were kidnapped while coming back from church. They were taken into a bush and the man was assassinated. They shot the man at the head and shot the wife on the leg. While the case was been discussed in a radio programme, a man called in and said the wife should be interrogated. He questioned why the man should be shot on the head and the woman on the leg. I found that absurd. For God's sakes something might have transpired between the husband and those killers which she was not privy to.Does he wish death upon the woman so as to prove her innocence? I believe this is one of the rationale behind torturing of widows once their husbands die.

One sided opinion is all I see here
The man who called made a lot of sense.
The wife should be suspected of foul play though she will not be judged till proven guilty
Stop looking into matters with emotions and use your logic next time