prekumohtim:
Come enter heaven make I see

Magnoliaa:
Hmm. In a secular sense, I'd absolutely absolutely consent to my partner having a sexual partner. I don't own people and don't like to see what I do with them as me 'allowing' me. I'm a Christian, but I'd really give them that freedom and option and if they choose not to use it for whatever reasons... okay. We can negotiate other terms of the marriage... And then there's pre-intimacy and other forms of sex...

Magnoliaa:


You made so many assumptions. Things can swing any way and I don't automatically assume the worst. If that happens, I'll face it. Demanding faithfulness ≠ Entitled to faithfulness ≠ literally caging people. This is not about me not knowing my worth or not commanding respect if I 'allow' my man go poking someone else. All I'm saying is I'm not in the place to dictate others' faithfulness to me. He's happy because she's been very free and open and happy and accepting of her condition. She doesn't blackmail him with it, she doesn't gaslight him with it or hold it over his head like a trigger card.* I'm sure he was attracted to something in her. White or black, not all men are shallow.

I'll find someone who shares the same sexual values as me if I was the woman, but I'm just saying I'll have it at the back of my mind that that freedom is available as well. And if you think I'm just saying this, because words, well I have nothing to say to that. Plus the idea of cheating is doing something behind someone's back, going back on an agreement. What I consented to and have knowledge of, that we've discussed won't hurt me as much as when he does it behind my back.

This is literally only penetration and a marriage goes beyond that. Are there not things to occupy ourselves with?

Then there's men's psyche. Like biologically. Don't y'all separate sex from emotions? I mean to some extent.

SonofGod231:
I lost my Libido after reading.
So they are living a life of lasting celibacy.
Mind you they can both have healthy kids if no underlying reproductive health condition.

advanceDNA:




Have you heard a woman that can’t children say to her husband, honey it’s okay to fvck other women to have your own kids??
Lai lai...she will say.. we can adopt...

Vagina or no vagina, a woman’s jealousy is always on beast mode...

Ficient:


Thank God for Jesus, no be you be Angel Michael sef

GeneralPula:


That cuz naija girl has nothing to offer a man except vagina and once the vagina isn’t there, wetin remain?

Also, naija girl won’t stay with a man that has no dick..

hybrid11:

For the husband,that is a real man there

advanceDNA:
Have you heard a woman that can’t children say to her husband, honey it’s okay to fvck other women to have your own kids??
Lai lai...she will say.. we can adopt...

Vagina or no vagina, a woman’s jealousy is always on beast mode...

Fiscus105:



And you think the man not getting it outside?
What of millions of house wife with functioning VJ, how many husbands fathful? (Bill Clinton, Bill Gate, Benny Hinn, etc)

I think the woman deliberately not mentioned that aspect from her story, yet I still salute the man, to stay with her til now.

Kondomatic:
Because he married a woman that doesn't have a vagina?

hybrid11:
because he sticked with her despite her condition
Some men go jakpa, especially you

Kondomatic:
And that automatically makes her a real man?

hybrid11:

Define attributes of real man

Kondomatic:
You should be the one to help us with that.


What I see here is a supportive husband, that's all. He would still be a man alright if he had left.

Mykelslim:
Usain bolt run am
If she no get puna leave am

DoingBetter:

They can’t have their own biological kids. Hysterectomy means the removal of the female reproductive organs.

hybrid11:
add real to it bro

Kondomatic:
A man is an adult male bro.

He is neither real nor unreal.

The real tag is usually a blackmail tool used by people who want you to do what they wouldn't try if they were in your position.

When you see a woman say "he's a real man" just know that he's either being trapped, deceived or manipulated.

Same thing for a real woman, when a man points at a real woman, just look and you will likely see a woman who is tolerating several overflowing baskets of rubbish.


Like I said. The word is a manipulative tool.


This man here is a supportive husband, nothing else and believe you me that if the woman wakes up tomorrow with a vagina and the man's penis disappears, they will be separated before Sunday.

Magnoliaa:


Lmao. This was going good and I was nodding my head like an agama lizard to the 'objective' submission until the final part where you had to to go and let your own bias show as well. Like the person's belief you were disagreeing with. They'll be separated before Sunday if the reverse was the case?? Like, seeeeeriously? The man can be a supportive husband but the wife can't? Because? Gender? Proclivity for promiscuity?

There is no 'real' anybody anywhere, the same way there is no selfish/selfless gender anywhere. Can that be agreed on? Abi no be woman marry the ugliest man for Uganda abi where??

prekumohtim:

Remain there , I don lock gate since

Kondomatic:
Haba mana, that's not my point.

We have supportive women, and if you ask me(outside nairaland of course) I would admit that women are more supportive but that's down here not over there.

Don't compare that Uganda man oo, it's a different case. He has a penis. That thing is very important. We dey see how much wahala two minutes experience dey cause talk more of when it's not there at all.


But my point is that women over there divorce easily. I think about 70-80% of the divorces over there were filed by women.

They divorce when they get higher paying job or when they're promoted.

They divorce when they lose weight etc.
Ordinary weight..

Now imagine say husband penis disappeared