Ifugurl:


You claim you want to help, yet you have said nothing and proved nothing that can help the situation.

If this was a white mans case, will he be given this same sentence?

Everyone here is trying to understand the situation, and the OP is showing true concern with evidence that he was wrongfully accused, and all you keep doing, is to debunk and kill the effort.

Whoever you are, please look into the facts and contribute positively. This is a mans whole life we are talking about, and all evidence displayed here has proven that he wasn’t given a fair hearing.

3 life sentences + 76years, OMG �

1stGenAmerican:


Ignoring all of those who resort to name-calling and insults because their lack of intelligence bars them from discourse, I want to touch upon a question you asked me.

The prints were lifted directly from the keypad within an hour of the crime being committed, before they even had leads on the suspect.

So what you stated was that it is possible that the convicted man shook hands with someone and that person did not sweat, wash their hands, or touch anything else but instead went to the police with the handprint to frame him, allowing them to lift a perfect print?

Yet the print lifted from the KEY PAD was a fingerprint from the pointer finger, one that a person uses to type in a code. The print lifted from the doorknob is a partial HAND print.

Have you use the tip of your pointer finger to shake hands with a friend who doesn’t wash or touch anything else afterwards?

Ifugurl:


You claim you want to help, yet you have said nothing and proved nothing that can help the situation.

If this was a white mans case, will he be given this same sentence?

Everyone here is trying to understand the situation, and the OP is showing true concern with evidence that he was wrongfully accused, and all you keep doing, is to debunk and kill the effort.

Whoever you are, please look into the facts and contribute positively. This is a mans whole life we are talking about, and all evidence displayed here has proven that he wasn’t given a fair hearing.

3 life sentences + 76years, OMG �

dollynnn:
I have been following this thread keenly and all I can say is that, Justice will not be done if an innocent man is convicted of an offence he knows nothing of.

1stGenAmerican:


I do. In order to avoid being verbally abused, insulted, and bullied, I shall wait until the convicted man provides you with each and every piece of evidence that he claims to have and answer all questions publicly.

Powerhouse5050:
The United states supreme court help that under due process clause of the federal constitution fourteenth amendment, the suppression of evidence favorable to an accused upon request by the accused violate due process where the evidence is material either to the guilt or to punishment irrespective of the prosecution good faith or bad faith.

See: Bank v Dretke 540 U.S 668 (2004)

Under Georgia constition :

O.C.G.A 24-14-8 : The testimony of a single with ness is generally sufficient to establish a fact.

See : Srhramm v State 286 Ga. App 156,648 S.E. 2d 392 (2007)

" the court ruled that sufficient evidence existed to support a finding that the arresting officer had a clear and unobstructed view of defendants not wearing seat belt based solely on that officer testimony,as the testimony of a single witness is sufficient to establish a fact"

The detective Jay Hayes testified that he watched the video footage of the man in khaki, the same man the lady reported....this is sufficient fact to prove the prosecution maliciously withheld this evidence from the defense,because it is an exculpatory evidence.

Under Title 24-10-1007 : The content of writing,recording or photograph may be proved by the testimony or deposition of a party against whom offered or by that party written admission without accounting for the production of the original.

The police officer Adam Kicker did admit that he wrote the investigative report and admitted to the content of that report at the trial.

That is the video that showed the perpetrator of this crime and it is an exculpatory evidence for me.

So back to my question :

1stGenAmerican : Could you please explain to the general public why the prosecution is withholding a video footage that showed the man this lady reported?

Thank you

Elporo:


Prison. He's now in prison.

Powerhouse5050:
@1stGenAmerican you haven't shared the documents that talk about the print?

Where are you getting your facts from?

You want to talk about the constitution of the state of Georgia and United States constitution....be my guest

Powerhouse5050:
1stGenAmerican : Could you please explain to the general public why the prosecution is withholding a video footage that showed the man this lady reported?

Thank you

onlyforchrist:

I will advice you engage those that can help you, this woman is hell bent on seeing you go down. Chatinent raised some counter arguments, yet all she could say to counter that was questioning.

Also, answer all questions thrown at you as clear as you can. We can never say your help might just be few comments aways.

Will keep praying for you.

Ola17:


So in essence, you are hinging your innocence on the inability of the prosecutors to prove that you are the one on tan colored khaki shorts? Is that correct?

Powerhouse5050:
@1stGenAmerican you haven't shared the documents that talk about the print?

Where are you getting your facts from?

You want to talk about the constitution of the state of Georgia and United States constitution....be my guest

You called me a condemned man, you must know I was once a free person like you....you actually do not know what may befall you in little or no time

I wanted to ignore you but Chatinent wanted me to answer some of the question you posed.....so far so good you have never added any documents to buttress your claim.

Your argue about the evidences I shared here but you couldn't shared a contradictory evidences to refute my claim

You talk but in my experience your talk can not hold any water.....

1stGenAmerican:


With all due respect, before you attempt to insult me or anyone else, please learn the difference between ADVICE and ADVISE as well as when the use of either is appropriate. Doing so may cause sane people to look beyond your attempted insults and take you seriously.

I Bid You Goodnight, Sir.

1stGenAmerican:


So, in order to “contribute positively”, I must ignore the facts, any false evidence presented, and everything that I have studied about and practiced within the American Justice system, particularly the criminal justice system?

If these people take all of “these evidences” the condemned man is presenting and approaches ANY reputable entity with “these evidences”, they will be either insulted, ignored, or both. On the same token, this is one of the very reasons why the Nigerian consulate and others who have the power to help have abandoned the convicted man.

If you feel that I have in no way contributed positively to this discussion then may God Bless you with the wisdom and discernment that a few people in this discussion actually have. Please place me on ignore if that is possible on this type of forum

onlyforchrist:
Thank you for that correction, I'm sure your cellphone has autocomplete. Kindly provide proves to refute what the op is posing to you. It will do you good to be open minded, take your mind game elsewhere manipulator.

chatinent:


We want the Nigerian government to be involved. If momentum from the FG can be drawn, and these evidences scrutinized, this is the target. Until it goes viral, they are hellbent on imprisoning him.

chatinent:

Permit me play the role of a detective.
Who lifted them? Bring him for questioning on national TV. We have to see them extract it again from the keypad.

Or simply allow my expert go there and extract what is there. Also allow my expert present it in the law court.


Does it occur to you, ma, that if I want to implicate you to a crime, I could take a whole year studying you? I would be successful in extracting all your prints and cloning them. I could wear them to perpetrate a crime and they'll come for you. How would you prove yourself innocent?


Please illustratively answer my last question and explain how you'll defend yourself ma in court.


Thanks for the time.

In another examination, what if this is a mistaken eyewitness identification?

I am sure, ma, you know the case of Ronald Cotton who spent eleven years for a case he didn't commit even when the “facts” said so..or that of Kirk Bloodsworth who was serving a jail term before being exonerated.

What happens to those who insisted on the “facts” they felt were facts when they realised the facts were still facts but other facts proved him innocent of the old facts?

1stGenAmerican:


Proper usage has nothing to do with autocomplete.

You have used your substandard grammar to demand that I “shut up” on more than one occasion. You have also attempted to insult me by referring to me as a bitter woman rather than treating me like a human being.

Move along. I will see any further attempts to engage me personally as harassment of me as a member of this forum.

1stGenAmerican:


Here in the US, I have the credentials necessary to help those in need.. When I first replied to the original thread, I had all intentions of helping however that ended when the deceptive nature of the party soliciting help became clear.

I am not here to convince but instead provide missing pieces to the puzzle as well as withheld information. The documents I uploaded pertain to the information supplied in the OP.

While laymen may not derive meaning, any good Law Professional, Physician, or perhaps even STEM professional will be able to discern the truth of the matter after examining the documents I have provided.

Please note the date of the order I provided as well as the date of the conviction.

Good luck and God Bless

Ola17:


Chief, I doubt if detective and law enforcement work that way o. Those evidences can’t be lifted from the keypad again as it must have been contaminated by subsequent users. It’s a pity that this JD lady doesn’t want to come clean; show us the documents she’s privy to.

Talking about frame up, yes it may be possible even in American judicial system even as advanced as it is, but come to think of it; whoever committed that crime must be a lowlife, who will go this elaborate extent to frame Mr Bah to protect a lowlife? When the perpetrator isn’t Obama’s son. I don’t know if you get my drift.

Another pointer, seems Mr Bah wants to hinge his innocence on the inability of the prosecution to prove that he’s the one on tan colored khaki shorts( probably his face didn’t show? Other forensic evidence might have tied him to the crime), you may deduce this from his recent posts.

What are your thoughts please.

chatinent:


That was rather harsh and punchline-like..but I understand you are a mother. I understand. No mother can even want their enemy's child raped.

Permit me to send a mail later in the day to gain access to the evidence in your possession. Thank you.

Ola17:


Talking about frame up, yes it may be possible even in American judicial system even as advanced as it is, but come to think of it; whoever committed that crime must be a lowlife, who will go this elaborate extent to frame Mr Bah to protect a lowlife? When the perpetrator isn’t Obama’s son, I don’t know if you get my drift.

chatinent:


Nice one baba.

What about the DNA results?

Ola17:


Concerning the DNA result, a DNA result is declared inconclusive when the probability of the match is less than 99%. So in a nutshell, DNA evidence alone might not have tied him to the crime but other evidences like plate number tag, fingerprints lifted from the door keypad, cell tower triangulation might have.

It’s quite frustrating that Mr Bah isn’t presenting the whole facts but snippets.

Ola17:


Concerning the DNA result, a DNA result is declared inconclusive when the probability of the match is less than 99%. So in a nutshell, DNA evidence alone might not have tied him to the crime but other evidences like plate number tag, fingerprints lifted from the door keypad, cell tower triangulation might have.

It’s quite frustrating that Mr Bah isn’t presenting the whole facts but snippets.